OrangeSoul Posted March 28, 2004 Share Posted March 28, 2004 In terms of sound quality.... check it out urself and opinions here http://www.iki.fi/hy/apollo/Apollo37ze.exe (645 kb) compare in terms of sound quality output Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 morkuma Posted March 28, 2004 Share Posted March 28, 2004 shift+ num+ and num- ? didn't do nothing for me. OS X maybe? i have the exact same ones set up :p go to preferences - keyboard shortcuts and add them set to shift+ and shift- (make sure to click global) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Pink Floyd Veteran Posted March 28, 2004 Veteran Share Posted March 28, 2004 apollo was the audio player I've used years ago... before foobar now foobar kicks his ass easy as hell and I wont talk about winamp because this one is way behind Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 manroweb Posted March 29, 2004 Share Posted March 29, 2004 Foobar still gets my vote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 OrangeSoul Posted March 29, 2004 Author Share Posted March 29, 2004 in terms of audio quality specially since last 4 months the audio quality has been improved even more than before , this software stopped developing for 4 years until someone put it on fileforum and the developer started to update it every 3-4 weeks since then. i think for audio wise its better than foobar or winamp but not in terms of features, but im not somone who goes for a gazillion options, al i want to do is listen to music and thats what this software does, output great music Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Shannon Posted March 29, 2004 Share Posted March 29, 2004 in terms of audio quality specially since last 4 months the audio quality has been improved even more than before , this software stopped developing for 4 years until someone put it on fileforum and the developer started to update it every 3-4 weeks since then. i think for audio wise its better than foobar or winamp but not in terms of features, but im not somone who goes for a gazillion options, al i want to do is listen to music and thats what this software does, output great music Like I said, if it had native Ogg Vorbis support I'd use it. It says its compatible with Winamp general purpose plugins, but when I tried to use the Audioscrobbler plugin with it, it wouldn't work. Maybe because the Ogg Vorbis plug-ins are out of date, I don't know. I also have another nit pick with it - I couldn't find out how to edit the metadata of some of my tracks. It's sad as I really like it's simplicity. :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 kci Posted March 29, 2004 Share Posted March 29, 2004 pwned totally pwned!! :D sound quailty > winamp > foobar memory usage 2.6mb ~ 1.2 when minimized :D pwned ur guys computer must really suc* :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 yudi_lks Posted March 29, 2004 Share Posted March 29, 2004 How many music do you have? 4? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 iwod Posted March 29, 2004 Share Posted March 29, 2004 screenshot i am using foo tunes as well, but i asked wa y back for icon pack. Where could i get some different icons like yours? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 morkuma Posted March 29, 2004 Share Posted March 29, 2004 How many music do you have? 4? that is what i was thinking take a look at my screeny then dump over 9000 songs into apollo and give her a try then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 tonicx Posted March 30, 2004 Share Posted March 30, 2004 why you guys arguing about some music players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Question
OrangeSoul
In terms of sound quality....
check it out urself and opinions here
http://www.iki.fi/hy/apollo/Apollo37ze.exe (645 kb)
compare in terms of sound quality output
Link to comment
Share on other sites
60 answers to this question
Recommended Posts