lardiop Veteran Posted April 13, 2004 Veteran Share Posted April 13, 2004 (edited) I've always ripped my CD's to high bit rate, VBR WMA 9 files using WMP 9. What is the difference between using the "Professional" WMA 9 codec to encode my music and using the one that comes with WMP by default? I saw a tutorial posted somewhere a few days ago that dealt with WMA 9 Professional, but I still dont get the diff between the regular and the Professional codec. :huh: EDIT: :laugh: "Prodessional...." Could a mod change the thread title pleaz? I'm still half-asleep Edited April 16, 2004 by AgEnTsMiTh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultra Frosty Posted April 16, 2004 Share Posted April 16, 2004 I looked into this and the "Professional" codec does not exsist. MS doesn't have a Professional codec, they tech person I spoke with said that some people may refer to the high bitrate setting to be a professional codec, but it's not a real codec. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icecaveman Posted April 16, 2004 Share Posted April 16, 2004 WMA9 Professional (lossless) has for example to be licenced specially for use on MP3 players and other devices. It's also not selected the same way as default WMA9 in Windows Media Encoder so they aren't just refering to anything, Microsoft set those borders them selves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultra Frosty Posted April 16, 2004 Share Posted April 16, 2004 MS techs don't tell you much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordHatrus Posted April 16, 2004 Share Posted April 16, 2004 Urrghhh... I don't suggest using WMA... I mean, what does it do for you? It adds copyright encryption, and DCMA stuffs, AND It's a proprietary closed-source format. Ogg is much nicer in these (And many other) regards... Even Mp3 with a high bitrate is better than wma; at least you can be nearly assured that mp3s will play on handhelds and such. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AgEnTsMiTh Posted April 16, 2004 Share Posted April 16, 2004 Topic Title Edited per request Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icecaveman Posted April 16, 2004 Share Posted April 16, 2004 Urrghhh... I don't suggest using WMA... I mean, what does it do for you?It adds copyright encryption, and DCMA stuffs, AND It's a proprietary closed-source format. Ogg is much nicer in these (And many other) regards... Even Mp3 with a high bitrate is better than wma; at least you can be nearly assured that mp3s will play on handhelds and such. The WMAs you seem to be talking about are most likely WM7 series. WMA does not add copyright encryption unless you ask it to do so! It's a much higher quality than MP3 + it's much more advanced, allows multiple channels. It's much cheaper to licence than MP3. It has much greater hardware support than any other audio codec right after MP3. Windows Mobile devices out-sold Palms last year so you can play it many PDAs and some phone models. blalbalblabla. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Explicative Posted April 16, 2004 Share Posted April 16, 2004 There are basically 4 variations of the WMA9 codec: Standard (WMA9STD) Professional (WMA9PRO) Voice (WMSP9) Lossless (WMA9LSL) A song encoded with WMA9PRO sounds significantly better than the same song encoded with WMA9STD, and generally the file sizes are the same. However, so far as I know there aren't any portable MP3 players that support WMA9PRO decoding yet, so you'd have to use WMA9STD for that purpose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McoreD Posted June 7, 2004 Share Posted June 7, 2004 I saw a tutorial posted somewhere a few days ago that dealt with WMA 9 Professional, but I still dont get the diff between the regular and the Professional codec. :huh: According public listening tests done by rjamorim, WMA9 PRO (introduced in Windows Media 9) has better quality, but is not backwards compatible with WMA standard, that is the codec that is actually supported by portable players, DVD players, etc. It's expected that devices supporting WMA Pro start being manufactured soon. WMA 9 Professional tied with AAC in this test: http://www.rjamorim.com/test/128extension/results.html You will find a relevant guide here: CD Audio to Windows Media Audio 9 Professional Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ishizu Posted October 23, 2005 Share Posted October 23, 2005 I looked into this and the "Professional" codec does not exsist. MS doesn't have a Professional codec, they tech person I spoke with said that some people may refer to the high bitrate setting to be a professional codec, but it's not a real codec. 1976217[/snapback] False, there is a "Professional" codec. It is a real codec. You can download windows media encoder 9 and convert your wma to wma professionaljavascript:emoticon(':)') smilie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ishizu Posted October 23, 2005 Share Posted October 23, 2005 I've always ripped my CD's to high bit rate, VBR WMA 9 files using WMP 9. What is the difference between using the "Professional" WMA 9 codec to encode my music and using the one that comes with WMP by default? I saw a tutorial posted somewhere a few days ago that dealt with WMA 9 Professional, but I still dont get the diff between the regular and the Professional codec. :huh:EDIT: :laugh: "Prodessional...." Could a mod change the thread title pleaz? I'm still half-asleep 1967002[/snapback] The difference between WMA 9 and WMA 9 PRO is in WMA 9 Pro, you can have a multi-channel codec that WMA 9 doesn't have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan V Posted October 23, 2005 Share Posted October 23, 2005 According public listening tests done by rjamorim, WMA9 PRO (introduced in Windows Media 9) has better quality, but is not backwards compatible with WMA standard, that is the codec that is actually supported by portable players, DVD players, etc. It's expected that devices supporting WMA Pro start being manufactured soon.WMA 9 Professional tied with AAC in this test: http://www.rjamorim.com/test/128extension/results.html You will find a relevant guide here: CD Audio to Windows Media Audio 9 Professional 2231438[/snapback] Now my question is - Are there any devices out there now that support WMA9 Professional? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icecaveman Posted October 23, 2005 Share Posted October 23, 2005 Now my question is - Are there any devices out there now that support WMA9 Professional? 586712479[/snapback] There were some expensive Pioneer HI-FIs that supported it, guess there are plenty by now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gaekwad2 Posted October 24, 2005 Share Posted October 24, 2005 I don't think so. At least I never saw it mentioned for any hardware player. Looks more like Microsoft concentrated on PlaysForSure and let WMA pro die. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts