Jump to content



Photo

[Poll] Kde VS Gnome


  • Please log in to reply
187 replies to this topic

Poll: Kde Vs Gnome (878 member(s) have cast votes)

Kde Vs Gnome

You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Vote Guests cannot vote

#31 g-n-t

g-n-t

    Neowinian Senior

  • Joined: 17-January 05

Posted 15 February 2005 - 04:26

cool. i never even knew i had umbrello on my computer. its a cool litle app, although i dont think ill ever really use it. its great to know i have it though.


#32 JonathanVP

JonathanVP

    Neowinian Senior

  • Joined: 08-October 03
  • Location: Hicktown Hell Hole

Posted 15 February 2005 - 04:47

KDE...been using with Gentoo ever since and love it, man!

#33 Lechio

Lechio

    Neowinian Senior

  • Joined: 07-April 04

Posted 15 February 2005 - 11:10

Voted KDE

simple comparisons between both and the programs supplied:

File manager:
Konqueror - robust file manager, the most complete one i've ever seen. Untuitive
file browsing, with access to all the services available in yor system. Still lacks a bit of
polishing when it comes to image previews (the default setting can be customized here). It
can also be a very powerfull web-browser with tabs and usefull options.
Nautilus - spatial file manager a complete joke (who loves to have to close 20 windows after
a min of browsing...?); u do a temporary samba mount (not editing fstab) and u go to computer:
nothing to see there... ; wanna use nautilus on other DE/WM? be sure to pass the option --no-desktop
to nautilus or the whole GNOME desktop will be loaded with it :blink: , also you will not have icons on the file manager;
"open with" options... ever tryed to open a .wmv file? :laugh:

Media Player:
KDE: has about 5 of them kaffeine favourite for movies, amaroK for audio.
GNOME: gxine no comparison possible with kaffeine, it doesn't even integrate on systemtray.
rhythmbox :x

Panel:
kicker: plain perfect with a complete set of usefull applets and external panels, transparency
very well handled, taskbar applet very well built.
gnome-panel: the most anoying little thing on GNOME. They don't evolute this thing for so much
time that it feels like 1999 when u use it. Taskbar applet :x if you have only one window openned
it takes all the taskbar space (you can change this), ever tryed to use a program like amsn with it? :pinch:
systemtray protocol is one of the buggiest things in it and regret everytime of running some program
that uses it. The menu launcher only shows gnome tasks and programs, if you want to launch another
program that isn't from GNOME u have to go to the system menu (...)

Control:
KDE Control Center: U have all the options here to configure yor Desktop aswell as yor system,
all very well distribuited and with tree view as default to save time.
GNOME preferences: very incomplete based on icons only.

Desktop
KDE: U can customize it all :cool: Have transparent window decorations, transparent menus
rendered with hardware accell, different wallpapers for every desktop, move to another desktop with a simple scroll, tell the windowmanager to remember the window settings for a specific app (eg. have no window decs on a console)
with a simple right-click on the windowdec.
GNOME: no option to have independent wallpapers on each desktop, no move to another desktop
on scroll (they should learn this little trick from XFCE), (...) Not a good window manager, it's based
on pixmaps only.

IM client
kopete: Very complete in all the protocols. U can customize it to look like ichat, have the
conversation window transparent. How cool is that? :cool:
gaim: Looks horrible, and those annoying litlle bell sounds erm... Buddy icons aren't displayed
right on every protocol...


(...)

#34 n3wt

n3wt

    Thank your god that I'm not aware.

  • Joined: 19-August 04
  • Location: Lindsay, Ontario, Canada

Posted 15 February 2005 - 15:07

spatial file manager

You can turn that off.

ever tryed to open a .wmv file

...yes.

KDE Control Center:

One of the reasons I dislike KDE, very poorly implemented.

The menu launcher only shows gnome tasks and programs, if you want to launch another
program that isn't from GNOME u have to go to the system menu

I'm not sure what you are talking about, but you can edit the menus.

#35 Lechio

Lechio

    Neowinian Senior

  • Joined: 07-April 04

Posted 15 February 2005 - 15:57

You can turn that off.

The problem is that this is defaulted for GNOME, in version 2.6
it didn't even had an option on nautilus. First thing to get it usable
was to run :
gconftool-2 --type bool --set /apps/nautilus/preferences/always_use_browser true

...yes.

No application to run that NIME type by default.

I'm not sure what you are talking about, but you can edit the menus.

this: Gnome menu
Not all people use tweaked versions of GNOME made by Fedora.

#36 vetgigapixels

gigapixels

    Neowinian Senior

  • Joined: 08-December 02
  • Location: California, USA
  • OS: Windows 7 64-bit

Posted 15 February 2005 - 16:04

I've used both, and I liked Gnome a lot better. KDE just felt too much like a toy. It didn't feel like it was letting me do everything I could in Linux (I was using Gentoo)... I just liked the feel of Gnome better and the way it worked. Perhaps when I tried KDE I was too used to the way Gnome worked, but it just didn't feel right to me.

#37 hornett

hornett

    Cult-leader

  • Joined: 11-September 03
  • Location: Blighty

Posted 16 February 2005 - 01:19

Nautilus - spatial file manager a complete joke (who loves to have to close 20 windows after
a min of browsing...?); u do a temporary samba mount (not editing fstab) and u go to computer:
nothing to see there... ; wanna use nautilus on other DE/WM? be sure to pass the option --no-desktop
to nautilus or the whole GNOME desktop will be loaded with it blink.gif , also you will not have icons on the file manager;
"open with" options... ever tryed to open a .wmv file? laugh.gif


Nautilus does have some flaws, but personally I love spatial browsing. I've even set up my install of XP to mimic this behaviour - ps you can hold shift when double clicking to close the parent window.

In Nautilus supplied with Fedora (maybe it is not in mainline Nautilus yet), I can go to Computer then Network, I am able to see and access the files over Samba without mounting the folder at all! So much faster...

I like Gnome, XFCE and Fluxbox - in that order :)

#38 JorgeIvan

JorgeIvan

    Neowinian Senior

  • Joined: 06-April 03
  • Location: Puerto Rico Location:Silent Hill

Posted 16 February 2005 - 01:22

Kde :)

#39 Lechio

Lechio

    Neowinian Senior

  • Joined: 07-April 04

Posted 16 February 2005 - 12:27

In Nautilus supplied with Fedora (maybe it is not in mainline Nautilus yet), I can go to Computer then Network, I am able to see and access the files over Samba without mounting the folder at all! So much faster...

Yes you can acces yor "Network neighborhood" with that GNOME feature, also
present in KDE. But try to add that folder to let's say a XMMS playlist, or work
in that directory, edit files, write to that directory. It's not a real mount, just a way to browse
a network.
What i'm saying Nautilus doesn't recognize temporary mounts.


Don't get me wrong here people, i'd wish GNOME was better then it is now. The GNOME
project has come a long way and the community supporting it is one of the best in the open-source,
but they should really get there act togheter, and make it more usable. Not saying i'm against the
easy look of it, they can perfectly keep that and still have a powerfull DE for people who want to
do more with it than just take pretty screenshots (option present on main menu toolbar, as it was
fundamental....).

#40 vetFred Derf

Fred Derf

    Klaatu barada nikto

  • Joined: 30-December 02
  • Location: ɐpɐuɐɔ 'oʇuoɹoʇ

Posted 16 February 2005 - 12:54

Even though I use Knoppix that defaulted to KDE, I found that I much prefer Gnome.

What I am surprised about is the poll results. Granted it's not scientific but the other times that we have done this (prior to Gnome 2.8?), the polls were always 50-50. Has KDE fallen that far, that fast?

#41 vetmarkjensen

markjensen

    Linux noob since Red Hat 5.1

  • Joined: 02-October 03
  • Location: Middle Tennessee
  • OS: GNU/Linux
  • Phone: Android and iPhone

Posted 16 February 2005 - 13:25

What I am surprised about is the poll results.  Granted it's not scientific but the other times that we have done this (prior to Gnome 2.8?), the polls were always 50-50.

View Post

I was thinking the same thing. This poll has been almost exactly 50/50 every other time it has been done.

I was thinking it may be due to the recent huge uptake on Ubuntu. BUt, I haven't looked at either KDE or Gnome in quite a while, so it is also possible that one has made some nice advances while the other has not...

#42 vetPink Floyd

Pink Floyd

    Neowinian Senior

  • Joined: 06-January 03

Posted 16 February 2005 - 13:28

I like kde more

#43 g-n-t

g-n-t

    Neowinian Senior

  • Joined: 17-January 05

Posted 16 February 2005 - 23:48

Even though I use Knoppix that defaulted to KDE, I found that I much prefer Gnome.

What I am surprised about is the poll results.  Granted it's not scientific but the other times that we have done this (prior to Gnome 2.8?), the polls were always 50-50.  Has KDE fallen that far, that fast?

View Post


ubuntu fanboyism :laugh:

kde is greater than ever and getting greater. i really dont think it has anything to do with which one is better, but which is used more on neowin. take the linuxquestions.org poll for example, and both ubuntu and gnome get their ass handed to them. :p

http://www.linuxques...threadid=272100
http://www.linuxques...threadid=272090

#44 uniacid

uniacid

    R.I.P. <3

  • Joined: 10-August 01
  • Location: Boca Raton , FL

Posted 16 February 2005 - 23:51

I think both are nice but I'll have to say KDE rocks.

#45 Evolution

Evolution

    Neowinian Senior

  • Joined: 06-April 02

Posted 17 February 2005 - 00:25

I think the poll should indicate if it was the person's only option :/ Some distros only include kde, while others only include gnome (i.e. unbuntu). I suspect a lot of people are using the wm that came with their distro.