jerry Posted February 14, 2005 Author Share Posted February 14, 2005 impossible.. you should be slapped?;)) lol its not even worth spending money on.in the end you want the best anyways>.. and of course thats this beast im using the MX1000 585471112[/snapback] I'll quote a fellow Neowinian: For those who think cordless mice have no lag, and are as good at corded mice... obviously suck at FPS games:))Ask any ranked player in the CPL what mouse they use... you won't find cordless there -- there's a reason for that. 585326845[/snapback] So yeah the MX1000 isnot> the best:pp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackwanders Posted February 14, 2005 Share Posted February 14, 2005 impossible.. you should be slapped ;) lol its not even worth spending money on. in the end you want the best anyways.. and of course thats this beast im using the MX1000 585471112[/snapback] Yeah, but the MX1000 is not a gaming mouse, as there's a delay if you pick up the mouse and put it back down again. Not a good thing when you're playing a big multiplayer shooter... now a corded MX1000 would be the ultimate solution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zip Posted February 14, 2005 Share Posted February 14, 2005 why would you want to turn down the sensitivity?! surely you'd want it at the highest setting all the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
masterren Posted February 14, 2005 Share Posted February 14, 2005 why would you want to turn down the sensitivity?! surely you'd want it at the highest setting all the time. 585471406[/snapback] I guess just so you don't have to go into the mouse options for each game you play. Or maybe you use different sens. for desktop? I'm not sure myself. :unsure: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blaxez Posted February 14, 2005 Share Posted February 14, 2005 sometimes it may not be a good thing to have the highest sensitivity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PyX Posted February 14, 2005 Share Posted February 14, 2005 LOL why do people prefer corded versions of mice? Do we still need to say that THERE IS A STAND TO COMPLETELY RECHARGE THE BATTERY OF THE MX1000 WITHIN TWO HOURS and that FIFTEEN MINUTES ON THE CHARGE IS EQUAL TO ONE DAY OF USE and that A BREAK LASTS ABOUT FIFTEEN MINUTES? I think their concept is not well understood by people, or maybe people don't know about new technology... but yeah, Logitech includes a stand to recharge the batteries nowadays! WOW! Edit : Oh sorry... I just read the topic and realized it is because of the huge 2 milliseconds lag cordless mice have. :pinch: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Veteran Posted February 14, 2005 Veteran Share Posted February 14, 2005 Edit : Oh sorry... I just read the topic and realized it is because of the huge 2 milliseconds lag cordless mice have. :pinch: 585471607[/snapback] It does actually count. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
biorK Posted February 14, 2005 Share Posted February 14, 2005 Ew, it's wired :xSorry, I love wireless mouses now :) 585471131[/snapback] I'm with you! :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kainashi Posted February 14, 2005 Share Posted February 14, 2005 Yeah, but the MX1000 is not a gaming mouse, as there's a delay if you pick up the mouse and put it back down again. Not a good thing when you're playing a big multiplayer shooter...now a corded MX1000 would be the ultimate solution. 585471403[/snapback] i never noticed any lag doing that... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
m0digital Posted February 14, 2005 Share Posted February 14, 2005 i never noticed any lag doing that... 585471731[/snapback] I've never noticed the lag either. I play FPS games like CS:Source, HL2, Doom3. The MX1000 is by far the best mouse I have ever owned! I do have some friends who don't like it cuz they got small hands and the mouse is a little bigger. To each his own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeroX Posted February 14, 2005 Share Posted February 14, 2005 The pics are just ripped of this article here: ComputerBase.de He cut out the watermark of the pics and put it on here. :x Shame on you. :angry: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riahc3 Posted February 14, 2005 Share Posted February 14, 2005 I'll quote a fellow Neowinian:So yeah the MX1000 is not the best :p 585471389[/snapback] OK I have the MX700 and i have NEVER i repeat NEVER i trepeat NEVER noticed any lag from my mouse playing a FPS. I just moved it accross the screen fast and i didnt lag. This is the best (optical) wireless mouse ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerry Posted February 14, 2005 Author Share Posted February 14, 2005 The pics are just ripped of this article here:ComputerBase.de He cut out the watermark of the pics and put it on here. :x Shame on you. :angry: 585472165[/snapback] uh no. sorry :blush: I got it off a very "cheeky" website. I'll add it to the first post anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MurrayF1 Posted February 14, 2005 Share Posted February 14, 2005 OK I have the MX700 and i have NEVER i repeat NEVER i trepeat NEVER noticed any lag from my mouse playing a FPS. I just moved it accross the screen fast and i didnt lag. This is the best (optical) wireless mouse ever. 585472196[/snapback] Got the same mouse the 1st one broke but logitech shipped me a new on hte same day called at 9am and it was here by 5pm thats good service and i have noticed NO lag whatso ever, maby a milisec when it wakes up from its true sleep mode but the semi sleep respose is compeltley instant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerry Posted February 14, 2005 Author Share Posted February 14, 2005 OK I have the MX700 and i have NEVER i repeat NEVER i trepeat NEVER noticed any lag from my mouse playing a FPS. I just moved it accross the screen fast and i didnt lag. This is the best (optical) wireless mouse ever. 585472196[/snapback] I have used MX700 and I found almost zero lag. I still prefer a corded mouse though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boogiman Posted February 14, 2005 Share Posted February 14, 2005 LOL why do people prefer corded versions of mice?Do we still need to say that THERE IS A STAND TO COMPLETELY RECHARGE THE BATTERY OF THE MX1000 WITHIN TWO HOURS and that FIFTEEN MINUTES ON THE CHARGE IS EQUAL TO ONE DAY OF USE and that A BREAK LASTS ABOUT FIFTEEN MINUTES? I think their concept is not well understood by people, or maybe people don't know about new technology... but yeah, Logitech includes a stand to recharge the batteries nowadays! WOW! Edit : Oh sorry... I just read the topic and realized it is because of the huge 2 milliseconds lag cordless mice have. :pinch: 585471607[/snapback] It's not that, it's the weight dude. You always have more weight with coreless ones becaus of the battery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mx Posted February 14, 2005 Share Posted February 14, 2005 Cool! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argote Posted February 14, 2005 Share Posted February 14, 2005 niice, good to see jerry is back to unbiased, correct and interesting news again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesse Carlton Posted February 14, 2005 Share Posted February 14, 2005 I have a just plain cordless ball wheel mouse from logitech, never seen any sort of lag...it looses it's signals occasionally and I need to leave it a few days then try to reconnect it...it's buggy...but lag no. I'd take a cordless over corded because the cord gets in the way and restricts movement more than anything...lag on a mouse is not an issue Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Detroit Posted February 15, 2005 Share Posted February 15, 2005 Viva the mx500! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g-n-t Posted February 15, 2005 Share Posted February 15, 2005 It's not that, it's the weight dude. You always have more weight with coreless ones becaus of the battery. 585472246[/snapback] my wireless microsoft optical mouse 2.0 is lighter than my corded mx310. but thats only caue microsoft makes ****ty mice. :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE BAT Posted February 15, 2005 Share Posted February 15, 2005 :D coool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marduk Posted February 15, 2005 Share Posted February 15, 2005 Looks the same, I guess all they've changed is the rez, I'm still loving my 510mx :) . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tran Posted February 15, 2005 Share Posted February 15, 2005 Sweetness. I was planning on getting an MX510 but I'll hold for these. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Posted February 15, 2005 Share Posted February 15, 2005 Lol, "For Expert Gamers." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts