GaZ Posted September 5, 2005 Share Posted September 5, 2005 its not terrorists, what has indonesia done? nothing.. if you ask me its the airline/boeing fault another 737 in a short space of time. Notice also how they havent grounded all of them? when concord had its accident in france all flights were suspended. you gotta love monopolies Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Kompressor Posted September 5, 2005 Share Posted September 5, 2005 its not terrorists, what has indonesia done? nothing.. if you ask me its the airline/boeing fault another 737 in a short space of time. Notice also how they havent grounded all of them? when concord had its accident in france all flights were suspended. you gotta love monopolies 586480855[/snapback] umm indonesia is known to have spawned Al Queida recruits. Also and not to sound like I'm profiling but they are predominantly Muslim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
golazo Posted September 5, 2005 Share Posted September 5, 2005 I think the media is doing this to scare us. the media shot down the planes?!! may god have mercy on us all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
golazo Posted September 5, 2005 Share Posted September 5, 2005 its not terrorists, what has indonesia done? they sold me counterfeit rolex watches and ferrari steering wheels lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jexel Posted September 5, 2005 Share Posted September 5, 2005 don't let these accidents scare you into not flying...flying is the safest method of transportation compared to other methods. However, when accidents do happen, the chances of your survival is pretty low... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boffa Jones Veteran Posted September 5, 2005 Veteran Share Posted September 5, 2005 Not to dispute what your saying, but why would they want to do that? Just wondering. 586480330[/snapback] sound suspicious if you ask me. Terrorists? 586480823[/snapback] That is why. The whole keeping the populace on the edge, keep em scared and they will be easier to control kind of thing. Also it brings in more ratings, more than anything they will want to keep you afraid for ratings. For example all hurricaine coverage. They play it up sooo much as being cat 4 or 5, when they know that chances are when it hits land it will be a CAT 3 at most. Of course omitting katrina, but even with Katrina they almost sounded dissapointed when it got downgraded. "It has dropped down to a cat 4. But this is almost as bad! And the winds will still be destructive. Stay Tuned." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferret Posted September 5, 2005 Share Posted September 5, 2005 I haven't read the full report, but BBC news is saying that it happened up at the front of the plane ? Apart from electronic wiring, there's nothing to blow up... Unless it was a bomb, so I would love to see the full outcome of this tradidy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LOC Veteran Posted September 5, 2005 Veteran Share Posted September 5, 2005 Sigh, just more and more death and destruction. Condolences to the families :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mx Posted September 5, 2005 Share Posted September 5, 2005 I haven't read the full report, but BBC news is saying that it happened up at the front of the plane ?Apart from electronic wiring, there's nothing to blow up... Unless it was a bomb, so I would love to see the full outcome of this tradidy. 586483319[/snapback] Nothing to blow up? You know how packed with fuel they are. Electrical fault, ignite it, bang. Or engine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
idoia Posted September 6, 2005 Author Share Posted September 6, 2005 wow, 12 people survived!!!! apparently they were in the back of the plane, it felt apart, so they escaped the explosion !! :o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daviesbad04 Posted September 6, 2005 Share Posted September 6, 2005 And I ask myself........Why keep flying 737-200's from the 70's. These are aircraft as old, if not older, than 727-100's. I know that airliners have some budgets to work with, but does it mean you have to jeopardize safety to save a buck? :no: Edit: The 737-100 made its first flight on April 9 1967 and entered service in February 1968 with Lufthansa, while the last of 30 built was delivered to Malaysia-Singapore Airlines in October 1969. P.S. Idoia, you stole my last name :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts