dmp3 Posted January 9, 2006 Share Posted January 9, 2006 I have a Casio (Exilm) EX-Z57 digital camera, and love it! I need to get a bigger SD card for it. Right now, temporarlily, I'm using my SanDisk TransFlash card (with the SD adaptor) until I get a regular SD card for the camera. I don't need much space, since I always take pictures off the camera the day I take them. I was thinkin 256-512 is plentiful. I was first lookin at the SanDisk Standard SD? Card 256MB. It wasn't too pricey. Then I saw this awesome SanDisk Ultra? II SD? Plus USB 512MB I liked it, cause of the built-in USB thing, but it was twice as much as the other card. I don't know which to get, is there much benefit between the two, besides the USB thing and the size? Do I need a faster card, then the Standard one? Basically, I performance wise, can the camera perform better (noticeably), with the Ultra card? Thanks for anyones' h:)p. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Syphonic Posted January 9, 2006 Share Posted January 9, 2006 I don't think the performance increase would be noticeable in your camera... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lan88 Posted January 9, 2006 Share Posted January 9, 2006 the only additional feature is that usb thang, which is used to directly connect to your pc. also, unless u wish to take fast pictures with the burst mode etc, sticking to a standard card will be sufficient. as for me i'm now using a kingston elite pro sd 1gb, the model im using is 50x speed, which is roughly close to the write speed for my camera. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pink Floyd Veteran Posted January 11, 2006 Veteran Share Posted January 11, 2006 sandisk isnt the only good memory card maker and dont waste your money to buy a highspeed memory card as your camera wont need it it's a waste of $ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts