Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

Widescreen Notebooks To Become Standard By 2008

32 posts in this topic

Posted

Notebook PCs are rapidly moving toward a future filled with more pixels and more screen real estate, thanks to the unexpectedly rapid proliferation of widescreen displays.

Once fairly rare beasts, widescreen notebooks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

(Y) Watching movies

(N) Watching Tv

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I would have guessed they were almost already as standard, I was hunting around to buy a laptop a few months back and almost every one I looked at was widescreen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

There are non-widescreen notebooks out there still?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

There are non-widescreen notebooks out there still?

my point exactly. Preferably I would have gotten a non-wide screen notebook because well, it's a notebook, I want the height not the width. But I couldent find any normal screens so I had to settle with a widescreen too...This whole widescreen craze is just too overblown. Like seriously, they're just taking the top off and adding it to the side...whats the use of that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Like seriously, they're just taking the top off and adding it to the side...whats the use of that.

More screen space. WXGA is larger than XGA. You can't comfortably fit two documents side by side on a standard aspect ratio screen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

While widescreen may be standard in 2008, I think OEMs really need to increase the resolutions that they put in laptops, particularly the most common size, 15.4".

Widescreen in a quick fix to the screen space problem. The real solution would be increasing the native resolutions on most widescreens from 1280x800 to something like 1440x900. Only reason why the don't do it is because Windows XP isn't resolution independent at all. People would be squinting too much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I believe the standard resolution on my E1405 (widescreen) is 1440

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Only reason why the don't do it is because Windows XP isn't resolution independent at all. People would be squinting too much.

BULL. That's what the DPI setting is for.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

(Y) Watching movies

(N) Watching Tv

I take it you've never watched a downloaded Xvid of a TV show before on a widescreen monitor :yes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I take it you've never watched a downloaded Xvid of a TV show before on a widescreen monitor :yes:
Either way 4:3 is better on 4:3 monitors and 16:9 is better on 16:9 monitors. A lot of shows are swtiching to 16:9 which is nice. :yes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

BULL. That's what the DPI setting is for.

Ever used the DPI setting? It's not too bad, but a lot of programs look out of proportion. Don't believe me? Jack up the DPI to 150% and open media player. The only thing that's resized is the text. And it's like this on a number of programs, not just WMP. But hey, it's not as bad as OSX. OSX resizes everything in proportion, but only quartz apps look decent (safari looks pretty good). Quickdraw apps look like complete crap (everything is pixelated). But I digress.

Either way 4:3 is better on 4:3 monitors and 16:9 is better on 16:9 monitors. A lot of shows are swtiching to 16:9 which is nice. :yes:

What I've wondered for a while is why are there so few 4:3 and no 16:9 LCD montors? Most are either 5:4 or 16:10.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Wider screens = better laptop keyboards (Y)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Standard for Apple in 2006. :laugh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Standard for 08 just like HDTV was standard in 06? HA!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I hope this widescreen trend doesnt take off with tablets also. Having the extra height is critical for a tablet, I can see how it not neccesary for a notebook, but writing on a widescreen tablet lacking the extra width of the page(when in portrait mode) makes the transition from paper to screen difficult.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Jmoney: 90 Horizontal flip will fix that on XP :) Then your widescreen should be perfect for viewing pages.

16:10

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

What I've wondered for a while is why are there so few 4:3 and no 16:9 LCD montors? Most are either 5:4 or 16:10.

Now there's a real question. What's the point of so many different aspect ratio's? There's 4:3, 5:4, 16:9, 16:10, 1.85:1, 2.35:1 and so on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Wider screens = better laptop keyboards (Y)

including number pads... :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I don't really care weather my laptop is wide screen or not. Dose make some sense when you think about it because you can see more with your eyes horizontal then you can vertical, at least I can anyways.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Wider screens = better laptop keyboards (Y)
:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

What I've wondered for a while is why are there so few 4:3 and no 16:9 LCD montors? Most are either 5:4 or 16:10.

16:10 was chosen, I believe, to give a bit more vertical height for general computer usage, vs the 16:9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Honestley, having two windows open at once doesen't appeal to me that much. I hate widescreens. I did so much hunting til I found a normal one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

You mean they still make laptops with 4:3 screens? :p

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.