16.8 days of music @ 48kbps = x Mb?


Recommended Posts

Bit of a difference there :laugh:

changed my mind... :laugh:

anyway, the way i would work it out is...

48kbps is roughly 4.8kb/s, well more around 5.2kb/s ish but it depends on the acutal throughput..

so to get the size of 16.8 days its..

((4.8 x 3600) x 24) x 16.8

if 4.8 is right then that should prove right to give the answer in Kb.

EDIT - OK i forgot to divide by 8. *slaps wrist*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48kbits into bytes is 6 as its divided by 8, there are 1,451,520 in 16.8 days according to google, times that by 6 to get the amount of kilobytes, times that by 1000 as there are 1000 kilobytes in a megabyte and you get 8709Mb or 8.7Gb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48kbits into bytes is 6 as its divided by 8, there are 1,451,520 in 16.8 days according to google, times that by 6 to get the amount of kilobytes, times that by 1000 as there are 1000 kilobytes in a megabyte and you get 8709Mb or 8.7Gb.

Isnt there 1024kb in a mb?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you know that a MP3 at 48Kbps is very poor like quality? :blink:

I'm encoding using OGG, ~16khz low pass using the optimized codecs. :yes: I'm trying to fit ~6000 songs onto my ipod mini 6gb with rockbox. :yes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm encoding using OGG, ~16khz low pass using the optimized codecs. :yes: I'm trying to fit ~6000 songs onto my ipod mini 6gb with rockbox. :yes:

48kbps no matter what encoding is still very poor quality. I weep for your ears. Why not just use updating playlists?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48kbps no matter what encoding is still very poor quality. I weep for your ears. Why not just use updating playlists?

Well, I already have an iPod Video 30GB, iPod Photo 40GB and Shure E3C and Etymotic ER6i earphones, so yes, I am fully aware that 48kbps ogg will not sound the best.

I've been doing some listening tests and analysing the frequency spectrum graphs in Adobe Audition and 48kbps OGG > 48kbps mp3 :yes: The sound quality is reasonable for the bit rate. I do hear audible artifacts, but they are not irritating. I'm not aiming for the best sound quality in this situation...

I might as well just experiment with my spare iPod Mini 6GB and try to fill it up with as much music as I can. Allow me to reiterate, I'm not aiming for the best sound quality in this situation... :whistle:

Anyway, my original question is how much space it would take up. I did not ask "does 48kbps sound good?". Obviously it won't, so please can some of the people here stop replying that "48kbps will sound crap or whatever", I already know that. It's so blas? to keep hearing this over and over again...

Edited by digitalnemesis
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I already have an iPod Video 30GB, iPod Photo 40GB and Shure E3C and Etymotic ER6i earphones, so yes, I am fully aware that 48kbps ogg will not sound the best.

I've been doing some listening tests and analysing the frequency spectrum graphs in Adobe Audition and 48kbps OGG > 48kbps mp3 :yes: The sound quality is reasonable for the bit rate. I do hear audible artifacts, but they are not irritating. I'm not aiming for the best sound quality in this situation...

I might as well just experiment with my spare iPod Mini 6GB and try to fill it up with as much music as I can. Allow me to reiterate, I'm not aiming for the best sound quality in this situation... :whistle:

Anyway, my original question is how much space it would take up. I did not ask "does 48kbps sound good?". Obviously it won't, so please can some of the people here stop replying that "48kbps will sound crap or whatever", I already know that. It's so blas? to keep hearing this over and over again...

16.8D*24H*60M*60S = 16.8*24*60*60 = 1451520 seconds

48kbps /1024 = 48152bps /1024 = 6144Bps

6144Bps*1451520sec= 8918138880B /1024 = 8709120KiB /1024 = 8505MiB / 1024 = 8.3056640625GiB of music

6GB = 6000000000B = 5859375KiB = 5722.0458984375MiB = 5.58793544769287109375GiB of ipod space

2.71772861480712890625GiB more music than ipod space.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why putting all this in an ipod? 16Days will take you 4 days non stop encoding to get sucking quality music playback on a device that will be unable to play the 1 / 20 in a single charge. So you are wasting your time in order to waste your quality to fit 6000 songs in your iPod that, if you don't listing when on the charge, will give you 1 month non-stop (except charge time) of music playback without getting the same file played 2 times. But after few days of listing crappy quality song you will get bored to death of crappy sound and you will try to do like anyone like you and cutting your 6000 songs in few playlist and sync them when you sleep to not loose time.

This is the maths that I think it's logic :p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.