ATI Claim 9700 More Bandwidth Than FX


Recommended Posts

ATI have counter - attacked nVidia's claims of bandwidth supremacy for the upcoming GF FX, by giving astonishing figures, which they claim prove that the Radeon 9700 PRO is a better card altogether.

It all started when nVidia announced the FX chip and hinted at 48GB/s, ATI have now come back with 174.6 GB/s!!!!

The whole debate, as is usually the case, is based purely on theory but nonetheless, is interesting to follow and the essence of the bandwidth argument is simple, the more bandwidth the faster the card. But, much like in the AMD/Intel battle, the hard part is deciphering the numbers.

The magic word is compression, according to nVidia their compression, 3 to 1, manages to coax 48 GB/s out of the 16 GB/s the chip should actually be able to produce.

In come ATI to claim that their magnificent Z compression, delivers 8.8 to 1 compression and combined with their colour compression methods yields the amazing 174.6 GB/s.

As most of you can guess, these numbers, both nVidia's and ATI's cannot be taken at face value since they represent theoretical limits rather than practical ones. In practice the effective bandwidth of each card will depend on the data tranferred and on various other factors. The real values are probably a lot lower than that.

It is still useful to know the theoretical limits from both manufacturers however, so that we can better appreciate the probable limits of each chip.

Source: Tech-Critic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Without compression, the 9700 Pro has a higher bandwidth...

256 bits / 8 * 310 MHz * 2 DDR = 19.8GB/s

128 bits / 8 * 500 MHz * 2 DDR2 = 16GB/s

They both claim different compression techniques so who can measure it. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually nVidia claims 4-1 lossless compression. The 48GBps figure was only an estimate before its launch. Although, I suspect that it is also a rough estimate of the actual performence achieved by the compression.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like both companies, they each have their highs and lows, but I will always buy the faster card. I'm already starting to save up for an FX 5800 Ultra.

Also, anyone notice how similar the fight between AMD and Intel is to the fight between ATI and Nvidia? Here's my analogy...AMD is to Intel as ATI is to Nvidia, while AMD offers better performance, Intel is the more popular company.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if these two giants merged.......we would just have better cards coming out?? Don't you think......it would stop all this crap of ATI and Nvidia. I would rather Nvidia buy out ATI....I don't know why they didn't years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if these two giants merged.......we would just have better cards coming out?? Don't you think......it would stop all this crap of ATI and Nvidia. I would rather Nvidia buy out ATI....I don't know why they didn't years ago.

Competition drives innovation, and lower prices....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.