FreeBSD 5 Released


Recommended Posts

What's so special about Linux?*

(*=...that everyone praises it to sky)

I meant it as what incentive is there to install this as opposed to a linux distro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, it's not release yet. It's just being work on such as create image, upload and etc. There's no announce in the maillist, which meaning it's not release yet too. Check in the past.. -> http://bsd.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/...=thread&tid=122

it's been on the sever for a day now. they just don't announce it right away because they need to let the other servers mirror it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[never used bsd]i'm on 56k so can i download 5.0-RELEASE-i386-miniinst.iso instead of the other two iso images??[/never used bsd] :huh:

yeah, that should give the absolute minimum for an install. if you want other packages, you'll have to download them separately. (i think, i've never done it :happy: )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's been on the sever for a day now. they just don't announce it right away because they need to let the other servers mirror it.

That's what I said, they are being work on it. However, now FreeBSD 5.0 is offical release, which I got an email in my box from FreeBSD maillist.

http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fet...reebsd-announce

http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.0R/early...ly-adopter.html

http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.0R/relnotes.html

http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.0R/errata.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what I said, they are being work on it. However, now FreeBSD 5.0 is offical release, which I got an email in my box from FreeBSD maillist.

http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fet...reebsd-announce

http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.0R/early...ly-adopter.html

http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.0R/relnotes.html

http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.0R/errata.html

heh, whoops, i musta misread your post. :happy:

has anyone burned the isos yet? for some reason, when i burn CD1, it gets the title miniinst (or whatever it is, the mini installation). it's the same title that CD3 is supposed to have. is this normal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i have run other linux distro's and somewhat liked them, here is my question about freebsd 5.0, (this may sound dumb)... Does it run Xwindows? If so, what version of Kde/Gnome, etc does it run?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i have run other linux distro's and somewhat liked them, here is my question about freebsd 5.0, (this may sound dumb)... Does it run Xwindows? If so, what version of Kde/Gnome, etc does it run?

Yes, FreeBSD can run near any of Linux's apps. But, Linux can't run FreeBSD's apps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, FreeBSD can run near any of Linux's apps. But, Linux can't run FreeBSD's apps.

cool i will download it then, what are the best only freebsd apps? Also any idea what version of kde/Gnome Free BSD 5 runs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cool i will download it then, what are the best only freebsd apps? Also any idea what version of kde/Gnome Free BSD 5 runs?

KDE 2.xx and 3.xx, Gnome 1.xx, 2.0 and 2.2rc1.. I am using Gnome 2.2rc1..

http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/

http://freebsd.kde.org

Search for KDE and Gnome in http://www.freshports.org .. Freshports is what show you everything are in the FreeBSD ports already. Yes, it's over 8k apps..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

don't install 5.0.. it's really buggy. if you're new to freebsd.. use 4.7 it's stable. 5.x won't be good until 5.1 to 5.2 supposedly

I think Mezz will probably care to comment on this one soon. He's been using it for months now as he's said in a previous post. Besides, the developers themselves have probably been running pre-5.0 on their desktops for some time now as other have been. I don't think there's any red flags going up saying *don't use this*.

FreeBSD developers only suggest you not use it if you're running an ISP or datacenter. I'm guessing that the SMP and other new goodies haven't been tested yet ( which will NOT affect desktop users ).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Mezz will probably care to comment on this one soon. He's been using it for months now as he's said in a previous post. Besides, the developers themselves have probably been running pre-5.0 on their desktops for some time now as other have been. I don't think there's any red flags going up saying *don't use this*.

FreeBSD developers only suggest you not use it if you're running an ISP or datacenter. I'm guessing that the SMP and other new goodies haven't been tested yet ( which will NOT affect desktop users ).

Yup, I have been using 5.0-CURRENT for long time by now with Gnome CVS version (now 2.2rc1).. I must say, it's pretty very stable to use as desktop. Sure, there have very very small issues, but those problems are always got away quick. Such as newer drivers, change something and etc. If you are following -RELEASE branch, then it shouldn't be problem. Because, it only will be update when there's security or some serious bug fixed.

As for newbie, very first time to touch *nix.. I probably recommend to use 4.x, because the handbook for 5.x isn't finish. Well, it's not that huge change thought, just small edit and add some more stuff. Once, it's finished then I would recommend newbie to try 5.0 as for desktop or small hobby (no business) personal server. If you are ex-Linux user, then go ahead for FreeBSD 5.0 and should have the common sense to follow the unfinish handbook such as few files are moved to different place and etc.

it's really buggy.

Where did you get that kind of idea? It's not really buggy.. But, some stuff aren't finishing yet such as SMP and etc for servers. As for desktop, there's really no issue for it, which it's kind of ready (very stable) to use everyday as main desktop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.