Windows 7 M1 is here...


Recommended Posts

Sorry if that gets you really excited! Unfortunately I don't have access to the build, but from what I see the build number seems to be 6519! See if someone confirms!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry if that gets you really excited! Unfortunately I don't have access to the build, but from what I see the build number seems to be 6519! See if someone confirms!

And you know this how?.. unless you can provide credentials no one will believe you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And you know this how?.. unless you can provide credentials no one will believe you

+1

And I was VERY EXCITED when i saw your topic...Bummer....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys are playing it way too much man. It's fine if you don't believe until a valid source confirms. But if you are more observant then you'd remember my previous posts on Vista betas were hardly fake news.

I have seen the files, just don't have access to grab them yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

source people!

Not that we don't believe you but we wanna read it and digest it for ourselves and make up our mind and then have someone else........

ok nevermind, we don't believe you. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

source people!

Not that we don't believe you but we wanna read it and digest it for ourselves and make up our mind and then have someone else........

ok nevermind, we don't believe you. :)

fair enough. but what if you see it yourself (as in my case), how can you say source? I think I brought this point up before (when I posted Vista beta info and no one believed me). Are you saying it's better not to post then post then? Everyone wants to know more about the next release of Windows, and share what you know helps. I'm just sharing what I see and what I know.... you can use your own discretion on its validity, but saying stupid things (not you KoDeXeRo, you have a good point here) just ruin the Neowin spirit.

If you guys think it's better not to post if it's not verifiable by a third party, I will stop posting Win 7 news then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

fair enough. but what if you see it yourself (as in my case), how can you say source? I think I brought this point up before (when I posted Vista beta info and no one believed me). Are you saying it's better not to post then post then? Everyone wants to know more about the next release of Windows, and share what you know helps. I'm just sharing what I see and what I know.... you can use your own discretion on its validity, but saying stupid things (not you KoDeXeRo, you have a good point here) just ruin the Neowin spirit.

If you guys think it's better not to post if it's not verifiable by a third party, I will stop posting Win 7 news then.

Nah, don't stop posting about it please ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this reminds me of the longhorn alpha days in 2003 / 2004 .. oh how those builds suck :p

well they were innovative but slow and unstable... suits the name alpha then

can't wait to get my hands on a new alpha build :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well i was only messing... even if i don't have a valid source we like speculation too. Hey, isn't that how Neowin got started? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.