Welcome Guest! To access all forums & features, please register an account or sign-in. → Why register?



Star Trek Into Darkness


1032 replies to this topic * * * * - 7 votes

#1 Rappy

    Mudblood

  • 98,394 posts
  • Joined: 20-July 02
  • Location: England
  • OS: Windows 7 Enterprise
  • Phone: Blackberry Bold 9900

Posted 31 March 2009 - 14:32

First Showing said:

In advance of its May 8th release, Paramount has already preemptively greenlit a sequel to J.J. Abrams' Star Trek, and has confirmed that screenwriters Alex Kurtzman and Roberto Orci will be back. Joining those two, however, will be Damon Lindelof, a Paramount producer and writer for "Lost" who helped get this Star Trek reboot off the ground with J.J. Abrams to begin with. No decision has been made on whether Abrams will return to direct the sequel. Although we can expect to hear a lot more about this in May, soon after it hits theaters. It looks like Abrams has indeed already successfully rebooted this franchise!

While Paramount is hoping to get this made for a summer 2011 release, no ideas for a story have been solidified just yet. Kurtzman, Orci, and Lindelof will wait to hear from the fans before deciding which way to go next. "Obviously we discussed ideas, but we are waiting to see how audiences respond next month," Kurtzman said. "With a franchise rebirth, the first movie has to be about origin. But with a second, you have the opportunity to explore incredibly exciting things. We'll be ambitious about what we'll do." For someone who is truly excited for this reboot this summer, I can say this makes me even more excited.

Source


#2 MasterC

    ♫ d(-_-)b ♫

  • 6,019 posts
  • Joined: 14-September 05
  • Location: Lake Forest, California

Posted 31 March 2009 - 14:42

I'm going to laugh if this thing bombs out and nobody will want to see the sequal. :laugh:

#3 Anaron

  • 20,343 posts
  • Joined: 25-May 04
  • Location: Toronto, ON
  • OS: Windows 8
  • Phone: HTC 8S

Posted 31 March 2009 - 14:43

I guess they want the movie to be canon.

#4 OP Rappy

    Mudblood

  • 98,394 posts
  • Joined: 20-July 02
  • Location: England
  • OS: Windows 7 Enterprise
  • Phone: Blackberry Bold 9900

Posted 31 March 2009 - 14:46

View PostMasterC, on Mar 31 2009, 15:42, said:

I'm going to laugh if this thing bombs out and nobody will want to see the sequal. :laugh:

I don't think it will bomb but there could be some bad reviews but that's to be expected.

#5 Richard Hammond

    Neowinian UNSTOPPABLE

  • 6,575 posts
  • Joined: 26-May 08
  • Location: United Kingdom

Posted 31 March 2009 - 14:46

I think this was a given seen as the actors are contracted for another 2 sequels.

Lets hope it doesnt suck and we get the other 2 sequels.

I think it will get lots of bad reviews because its a casual film not made for trekkies, but i have an open mind.

#6 vetCorris

    Hobnob King

  • 8,591 posts
  • Joined: 15-October 05
  • Location: Wales

Posted 31 March 2009 - 14:51

They better not make a sequel to J.J. Abrams' Star Trek, with out J.J. Abrams.

Nothing worse than making a good movie (if it is going to be good that is) and then having a sequel made by someone else that could ruin it.
Like if someone else carried on the new batman franchise without Christopher Nolan, it would be really stupid.

Just my opinion though.

#7 mad_onion

    In varietate concordia

  • 3,428 posts
  • Joined: 08-July 04
  • Location: London, UK

Posted 31 March 2009 - 14:52

View PostAnaron, on Mar 31 2009, 15:43, said:

I guess they want the movie to be canon.

no, the new film and this one too (i would think) are a reimagining of the original story. it is a separate continuity.

#8 OP Rappy

    Mudblood

  • 98,394 posts
  • Joined: 20-July 02
  • Location: England
  • OS: Windows 7 Enterprise
  • Phone: Blackberry Bold 9900

Posted 31 March 2009 - 15:01

View PostCorris, on Mar 31 2009, 15:51, said:

They better not make a sequel to J.J. Abrams' Star Trek, with out J.J. Abrams.

Nothing worse than making a good movie (if it is going to be good that is) and then having a sequel made by someone else that could ruin it.
Like if someone else carried on the new batman franchise without Christopher Nolan, it would be really stupid.

Just my opinion though.

JJ will stay on in some form even as adviser.

#9 Anaron

  • 20,343 posts
  • Joined: 25-May 04
  • Location: Toronto, ON
  • OS: Windows 8
  • Phone: HTC 8S

Posted 31 March 2009 - 15:06

View Postmad_onion, on Mar 31 2009, 10:52, said:

no, the new film and this one too (i would think) are a reimagining of the original story. it is a separate continuity.
It could still be canon. The same way those alternate timeline episodes of DS9 and Enterprise are canon. :p

#10 OP Rappy

    Mudblood

  • 98,394 posts
  • Joined: 20-July 02
  • Location: England
  • OS: Windows 7 Enterprise
  • Phone: Blackberry Bold 9900

Posted 08 May 2009 - 23:19

Now the film is out and doing well...good time to dig this thread up from the graves!

/discuss!

#11 ~WinGz~

    Monster Kill!

  • 1,818 posts
  • Joined: 31-January 05
  • Location: Blair County, PA

Posted 08 May 2009 - 23:24

I haven't seen the new movie yet, However all my friends have said it was an awesome ride.
So I guess a sequel would be pretty awesome. Now only for me to see the first that will be my goal.

#12 Hupp

    Neowinian Senior

  • 3,810 posts
  • Joined: 25-May 04
  • Location: Omaha

Posted 09 May 2009 - 00:20

after already seeing the movie twice, i can say I can't wait :D

#13 qdave

    Neowinian Super Cool

  • 16,124 posts
  • Joined: 02-October 02
  • Location: Vilnius, Lithuania | Toronto,On

Posted 09 May 2009 - 04:29

View PostHupp, on May 8 2009, 20:20, said:

after already seeing the movie twice, i can say I can't wait :D
any chance for a third time? i will go to see it again next week. same movie twice in 2 days is a bit too much for me.
i wonder if the new movie, st 12 will continue with the 'alternate timeline' or will get back to the 'normal one'.

#14 Hupp

    Neowinian Senior

  • 3,810 posts
  • Joined: 25-May 04
  • Location: Omaha

Posted 09 May 2009 - 04:43

View Postqdave, on May 8 2009, 22:29, said:

any chance for a third time? i will go to see it again next week. same movie twice in 2 days is a bit too much for me.
i wonder if the new movie, st 12 will continue with the 'alternate timeline' or will get back to the 'normal one'.

actually yeah; sunday ill probably see it again with a different group of friends at the imax. I'm pretty sure the alternative timeline is the new timeline. Otherwise whats the point of the reboot? You would just undue everything you did in this film.

#15 gazebee_

    Neowinian Senior

  • 2,990 posts
  • Joined: 17-May 04

Posted 09 May 2009 - 04:55

Just came back from the movie and I enjoyed every minute of it! I haven't seen any Star Trek shows before, and a sequel sounds great!