Windows 7 Build 7077 Due Today/Tonight


Recommended Posts

Just picked this up from another forum;

"The woman who leaked the 7068 build now has her hands on 7077 in both flavors, and is planning on leaking them tonight. Apparently right now she is just deciding on which version to release first."

Looks like it might be time for an upgrade from 7068.. :D

Please remember no warez talk is allowed in this thread. All members who discuses warez will get a warning.

In the case of windows 7 you can talk about your experience with it, just not the methods of obtaining it.

It would be a wise to take the words Seeds and torrents out of your vocabulary.

-Warwagon

Edited by warwagon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully she'll leak (x64) first. Any ideas what r the changes in Build 7077 ? The screenshots should be posted before the leak. In my opinion, i don't think there's a significant changes in this build and not worth for a new re-installation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7077.0.090404-1255_x86fre_client_en-us_Retail_Ultimate-GRC1CULFRER_EN_DVD was indeed posted on the above mentioned russian site about half an hour ago

edit:: it was removed about 5 minutes ago, but i am still getting about 700 kb/s on it

Edited by timster
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Crap, I missed the initial leak by several seconds. The plan (as stated on the russian site) is the following: First, this gal leaks the thingy to those who managed to grab the torrent while it was still there, because she has a really slow connection, then when the selected community is able to provide enough speed, the torrent file will reappear again

Link to comment
Share on other sites

any chance build 7777 will be the final one? :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not this crap again!

At least this one seems to have hit the torrent sites.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not watching that 7077 thread on that russian site for a torrent download link :shiftyninja: :bounce:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7077 = 7105 if you didn't know.

Okay you lost me there. I must have not read about that. So why do the 2 different build numbers mean the same build? And is there somewhere I can read about this more?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay you lost me there. I must have not read about that. So why do the 2 different build numbers mean the same build? And is there somewhere I can read about this more?

7077 and 7105 are build on the same day.

7077 = from the RC (escrow) branch (escrow is only to see if there are bugs in the build, and the final RC will be renamed to 7100)

7105 = the first build from the RTM branch.

so if there are no bugs found in 7077, it will be the final RC (release in may, 7077 will be then renamed to 7100)

Edited by edgarf28
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How so?
Okay you lost me there. I must have not read about that. So why do the 2 different build numbers mean the same build? And is there somewhere I can read about this more?

Anyway ill try to explain what wzor was saying (so people dont need to decode that weird google translation). Build 7073 was first build branched twice, once as 7073.winmain and once as 7073.win7rc. Build 7077 was also branched twice, once as 7077.win7rc and once as 7105.winmain. And its expected that sometimes in next 2 days, MS will decide what build will become RC-escrow build.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7077 and 7105 are build on the same day.

7077 = from the RC (escrow) branch

7105 = the first build from the RTM branch.

Okay so its basically 2 different branches working separately toward different things but on the same build?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How so?

development builds branch in to different sections so 7077 is part of the RC branch and 7105 is the start of the RTM branch. the build number is artificially increased so that the RC branch can end at 7100.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what the heck at this thread :huh:

Is that even a sentence? :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.