vajlent Posted June 22, 2010 Share Posted June 22, 2010 btw doorhanger has landed in firefox 4 trunk hourly :D firefox 4? mine still says 3.7 ;) doorhanger? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bogas04 Posted June 22, 2010 Author Share Posted June 22, 2010 firefox 4? mine still says 3.7 ;) doorhanger? 3.7=4.0 Doorhanger : https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/Projects/Doorhanger_notifications Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sulphy Posted June 22, 2010 Share Posted June 22, 2010 was a FF fan for a long time.... then discovered Chrome.... it would have to be really impressive to make me move back... but does look good tho! :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bogas04 Posted June 22, 2010 Author Share Posted June 22, 2010 14 Blockers for beta 1 ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Heartripper Subscriber¹ Posted June 22, 2010 Subscriber¹ Share Posted June 22, 2010 196 Score in beta.html5test.com Test (Chrome 6 - 220 ,Safari 5 - 170 , tests on Win7) Mine only scores 186 in beta.html5tests.com (today's build) :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inklin Posted June 23, 2010 Share Posted June 23, 2010 I am not sure but I think the lines and broken (transparent) context menus have been fixed in the latest nightly... I have restarted minefield a few times and Direct write is still enable, but it's not giving me any trouble! :cool: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Decryptor Veteran Posted June 23, 2010 Veteran Share Posted June 23, 2010 I was trying to test out the WebSocket support that landed in Firefox a few days ago, and every single site I tried failed, they either did browser sniffing and told me to get Chrome (missing the point of having standards), or used the old protocol and (as such) required old versions of the browsers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Frank B. Subscriber² Posted June 23, 2010 Subscriber² Share Posted June 23, 2010 New toolbar icons and address bar for OS X landed. Screenshots: Big icons: Small icons: Also: mephisto:~ fpbecker$ lipo -i /Applications/Minefield.app/Contents/MacOS/firefox-bin Non-fat file: /Applications/Minefield.app/Contents/MacOS/firefox-bin is architecture: x86_64 Minefield is now available as 64-bit app on OS X. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rudy Posted June 23, 2010 Share Posted June 23, 2010 New toolbar icons and address bar for OS X landed. Screenshots: Big icons: Small icons: Also: mephisto:~ fpbecker$ lipo -i /Applications/Minefield.app/Contents/MacOS/firefox-bin Non-fat file: /Applications/Minefield.app/Contents/MacOS/firefox-bin is architecture: x86_64 Minefield is now available as 64-bit app on OS X. Does the OOPP still generate a new icon in the dock? I was using minefield until that started :crazy: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattking Posted June 23, 2010 Share Posted June 23, 2010 New toolbar icons and address bar for OS X landed. Screenshots: Big icons: Small icons: Also: mephisto:~ fpbecker$ lipo -i /Applications/Minefield.app/Contents/MacOS/firefox-bin Non-fat file: /Applications/Minefield.app/Contents/MacOS/firefox-bin is architecture: x86_64 Minefield is now available as 64-bit app on OS X. What build is that in? I'm using firefox-3.7a6pre.en-US.mac.dmg Link please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Frank B. Subscriber² Posted June 23, 2010 Subscriber² Share Posted June 23, 2010 What build is that in? I'm using firefox-3.7a6pre.en-US.mac.dmg Link please. This one: http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/latest-trunk/firefox-3.7a6pre.en-US.mac64.dmg Note: There is no 32-bit build of today available yet. The 64-bit build doesn't work with 32-bit plug-ins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inklin Posted June 23, 2010 Share Posted June 23, 2010 I am sure the mac 64-bit builds were out a while before the win64 builds were out... http://ftp.mozilla.o...en-US.mac64.dmg EDIT* beaten to it :blush: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Decryptor Veteran Posted June 23, 2010 Veteran Share Posted June 23, 2010 There are 64bit builds available for Linux, OS X and Windows. And I wouldn't use any of them (there are still optimisations disabled probably, crash reporter doesn't work, etc.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattking Posted June 23, 2010 Share Posted June 23, 2010 Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Frank B. Subscriber² Posted June 23, 2010 Subscriber² Share Posted June 23, 2010 Does the OOPP still generate a new icon in the dock? I was using minefield until that started :crazy: Having tried with the 32-bit version and YouTube just now I can confirm that yes, OOP still generate a second dock icon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cck_my Posted June 23, 2010 Share Posted June 23, 2010 My Latest Browsers Benchmark results: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rudy Posted June 23, 2010 Share Posted June 23, 2010 Having tried with the 32-bit version and YouTube just now I can confirm that yes, OOP still generate a second dock icon. The final version better NOT do that :angry: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bogas04 Posted June 23, 2010 Author Share Posted June 23, 2010 My Latest Browsers Benchmark results: According to that , Fastest Firefox is roughly 2 times slower than fastest browser. And JM + Optimizations are yet to land! Chester0 1 Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Decryptor Veteran Posted June 23, 2010 Veteran Share Posted June 23, 2010 The final version better NOT do that :angry: Of course it won't, why would they do something like that? By default apps that have a GUI show in the dock unless you explicitly state otherwise, that haven't done that yet (or packaged the plugin process properly yet, they're working on more important things) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
th3rEsa Posted June 24, 2010 Share Posted June 24, 2010 The most disgusting thing is the new "design" with the tabs over the toolbar. WTF are the toolbars related to the current tab? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stetson Posted June 24, 2010 Share Posted June 24, 2010 The most disgusting thing is the new "design" with the tabs over the toolbar. WTF are the toolbars related to the current tab? Hm? If you're referring to Back, Forward, Stop, Reload, the Favicon and the Address bar, they have everything to do with the current tab. Brandon H 1 Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
th3rEsa Posted June 24, 2010 Share Posted June 24, 2010 The toolbar is usually filled with more than these four buttons. Or are they about to separate the "standard" toolbar and provide a separate one below the tab bar then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stetson Posted June 24, 2010 Share Posted June 24, 2010 The toolbar is usually filled with more than these four buttons. Or are they about to separate the "standard" toolbar and provide a separate one below the tab bar then? That's about all that's in mine. I guess you have a bunch of add-ons or something? Most tools/options/configuration stuff is supposed to be moving to the "Firefox Menu" above the tabs. This is pretty much the way that Chrome and Opera do it and nobody seems to complain that they don't make sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
th3rEsa Posted June 24, 2010 Share Posted June 24, 2010 The Firefox menu above the tabs? Hmm, why do they actually put it above the tabs while claiming that putting the tabs on top is "saving screen space"? (One of the major reasons why I don't like Chromium-based browsers is the ugly, inflexible UI btw.) I have a bunch of add-ons indeed, like Smiley Xtra (which is, in fact, a toolbar button) or the Download Helper (which is only useful when displayed in the toolbar, too)... so I really wonder what is "logical" here. And yeeep, other browsers do the same. But they don't have a programmable user interface like Firefox has always had, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
torrentthief Posted June 24, 2010 Share Posted June 24, 2010 firefox 4.0 beta 1 was due today, now it's status is "TBD", hopefully it might come by the end of the month. cck_my, you should re-run those benchmarks with IE9 Platform Preview 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts