Jump to content
Posted 11 February 2011 - 13:05
Posted 11 February 2011 - 13:19
and not everyone wants a large phone with all the bells and whistles, some people just like small devices. Thats why not the 3GS
Im wondering as the poster said above, why not just use the 3G?
Posted 11 February 2011 - 13:22
Posted 11 February 2011 - 13:23
Posted 11 February 2011 - 13:24
Posted 11 February 2011 - 13:26
Posted 11 February 2011 - 13:31
What they could do is have the 3Gs free with a contract, iPhone 4 for $99 (just like the 3Gs right now) and the new phone coming out at $199
Posted 11 February 2011 - 13:35
Posted 11 February 2011 - 13:46
Posted 11 February 2011 - 13:55
Posted 11 February 2011 - 13:57
YES the iPhone Shuffle!!
You can still loads apps on to it but it doesn't have a screen, and when you want to make a phone call you shake it and it randomly selects a number from your phone book to dial.
It could however have a lot of potential benefits in a voice operation interface. "Open Angry Birds" "Fire 40 Degree Angle full power" *You have hit a wooden wall and knocked down several others injuring one Pig and Killing three more* **There are three Pigs remaining, you currently have loaded a blue Angry Bird**
YES YES!!!!!!!!!! Apple could release a voice operated text based phone adventure game for this kind of thing, they could call it an iMUD and since this has never been done before it will be the greatest invention since sliced bread (until apple invents the sliced iBread anyway)
So much untapped potential
Posted 11 February 2011 - 14:02
A cheap iPhone isn't happening. It is against Apple's philosophy. If they were to create a smaller phone, it would still have a great quality and be relatively expensive.