Now taking a different approach, Apple has released 2 new ads not only targeting Microsoft's OS, but their advertising methods as well. Microsoft's first line of ads featuring Jerry Seinfeld was much hyped, but proved to deliver more confusion than a solid advertisement. These ads by Apple however, seem to be more of a direct attack rather than showing what a Mac has to offer.In the first ad, "V Word", Apple pokes fun at Microsoft for not saying "Vista" in any of their advertisements but using more well known terms such as "Microsoft". Coincidentally or maybe not, Microsoft was recently awarded a patent for blocking out swear words.
The second ad, "Bean Counter", mainly focuses on the $350 million amount that Microsoft spent on their advertisement campaign, instead of spending money to improve Vista as an OS.
These ads bring up the dying question, is this just a friendly competition, or are they taking it too far? Do you feel the novelty of these advertisements is starting to wear off? Apple and Microsoft seem to be in a heated battle of advertising and not achieving what the consumers want to see.
Apple ad - V Word:
Apple ad - Bean Counter:
















how about you all get together and help me make a new OS i'm designing =)
all i need is programmers and some type of security anylist
and a spell checker...
Owned!!
Works like charm, though.
MS is a brutally easy target.
MS is a brutally easy target.
Not as easy a target as Apple...
MS is a brutally easy target.
Not as easy a target as Apple...
ah yea, right.
I guess that's because you base that on surveys that clearly show that microsoft is more popular than apple... wait...
Glassed Silver:win
MS is a brutally easy target.
Not as easy a target as Apple...
ah yea, right.
I guess that's because you base that on surveys that clearly show that microsoft is more popular than apple... wait...
Glassed Silver:win
apple isnt popular for their pcs
just ipods itunes and whatnot
but really..the reason apple doesnt do anythin but bash MS is cause they dont have any unique features that make apples worth their overpricing when it comes to their computers
im quite happy with my PC..ive used macs and wow..nothing special
MS is a brutally easy target.
Not as easy a target as Apple...
ah yea, right.
I guess that's because you base that on surveys that clearly show that microsoft is more popular than apple... wait...
Glassed Silver:win
apple isnt popular for their pcs
just ipods itunes and whatnot
but really..the reason apple doesnt do anythin but bash MS is cause they dont have any unique features that make apples worth their overpricing when it comes to their computers
im quite happy with my PC..ive used macs and wow..nothing special
Oh come on... nothing unique?
They are, and a good case can be made that they do.
But that would involve actually *using* their software, so you might never find out for yourself. Oh well.
But that would involve actually *using* their software, so you might never find out for yourself. Oh well.
From the various disasters that seems to be following all their latest software launches (Mobile Me, iPhone upgrade software, etc) maybe they should be working on fixing bugs before releasing the next big thing. "Oh, sorry we lost all your important email, but don't worry, Vista sucks!"
Also, I hate ads that just bash and don't even bother to tell why your product is better. Hence why I am getting so sick of the current campaign ads in the US.
But that would involve actually *using* their software, so you might never find out for yourself. Oh well.
From the various disasters that seems to be following all their latest software launches (Mobile Me, iPhone upgrade software, etc) maybe they should be working on fixing bugs before releasing the next big thing. "Oh, sorry we lost all your important email, but don't worry, Vista sucks!"
Also, I hate ads that just bash and don't even bother to tell why your product is better. Hence why I am getting so sick of the current campaign ads in the US.
Good thing you're not in marketing. You need to disassociate your personal feelings from products and focus on how to get them to actually sell.
But that would involve actually *using* their software, so you might never find out for yourself. Oh well.
From the various disasters that seems to be following all their latest software launches (Mobile Me, iPhone upgrade software, etc) maybe they should be working on fixing bugs before releasing the next big thing. "Oh, sorry we lost all your important email, but don't worry, Vista sucks!"
Also, I hate ads that just bash and don't even bother to tell why your product is better. Hence why I am getting so sick of the current campaign ads in the US.
Good thing you're not in marketing. You need to disassociate your personal feelings from products and focus on how to get them to actually sell.
I'll make sure to remind you of this when the entire Apple fanbase is laid low when Jobs finally succumbs to whatever ailment is eating away at him. I'll be the first to remind all you fanatical freaks to dissassociate yourselves from mere products.
Wonder how well Apple products will sell when the tech industries greatest used car salesman is out of the picture...
But that would involve actually *using* their software, so you might never find out for yourself. Oh well.
I've used their software. There is nothing special about it other than the shinny packaging and over-marketing (which is kinda ironic considering the ad). Oh well.
LOL! Try taking your own advice. You'd probably curl up into a ball and cry like a bitch if Apple just folded. You have nothing BUT personal feelings for Apple, and that's pretty sad.
SNAP!
But that would involve actually *using* their software, so you might never find out for yourself. Oh well.
i love your presumptuous attitude. you think apple is your god and that you are a professional at everything regarding marketing and how to sell products. You're presumptuous in that i have 2 macs on my desk at work, which i never use for anything but chat cuz adium's 'pretty' which means i in fact have used macos a LOT.. nice try tho fanboy. my laptop and desktop pc's are far more useful. Learn a few things before you assume i haven't used their products. I like my ipod. I dont like companies who can only get an image by 'making fun' of others. If they had products that could be competent enough to seriously threaten the market share of a Windows, their ad campaigns would obviously focus on actually touting such things. I can't recommend this enough: get a clue.
i dont have anything against apple's os.. if you like it so what.. if you like windows, fine. linux, whatevs. my issue is the company. i own an ipod touch 2g which i really like.
True... check out all Mac News. He's fanboying all over them. He's not worth debating on Apple's defense.
But that would involve actually *using* their software, so you might never find out for yourself. Oh well.
I've used their software and I can honestly say it's not any better or worse than XP or Vista. In -my- opinon, that's not fact.
But that would involve actually *using* their software, so you might never find out for yourself. Oh well.
Let's see:
Mac OS X Kernel: MACH fork of BSD - real software innovation there!
Windows OS Kernel: In-house, didn't rely on work that goes back 20 years.
Apple's Operating Systems are basically regurgitated crap from failed OS attempts (NextSTEP?) and UNIX ports, put in a nice & shiney box with shiney, cute GUI. Their systems work so well ("Bomb" & "Kernel Panic") because they also control the hardware being used. Apple systems appeal to a certain part of society that thinks that their computers should be consider as "High-Art", and who hold their pinkie-finger out when they drink tea.
For the rest of the world, those of us who are not snobs, we have a better solution - a solution defined by market-share. It's called "Windows"
P.S. I have a G4 Mac running OS X "Tiger" sitting right next to me. I also have a NetApp Server and two Sun Ultra boxes...so don't even *THINK* about calling me an "OS Biggot"
Didn't they take stuff from bsd and base part of the design on vms?
Actually, some of the architectural design of NT (of which I was on the Kernel, API & Test Group in the NT DevTeam back in '91) was based on DEC's VaxVMS through Dave Cutler (former DEC Software Developer and pretty much the father of VaxVMS) - no code was "lifted" out of either VMS or BSD, with the notable exception of the TCP/IP Stack (which actually still contained the BSD Copyright info inside the code).
And, of course, the TCP/IP stack has been rewritten from scratch with Vista.
Ahhh... now these ads make sense. Good point.
Yeah, agreed. They do waaay less than PC's. I hear you can't even send e-mail's on them.
I can do far more on a Mac than a PC simply because it has accessibility features I can really use. Most people would be able to do the same amount. I fail to see where this perception that Macs are useless came from, especially considering how much more useful they are for media. I will admit that Windows is probably more useful than OS X for office things, and OSX X better than Windows for media things (professional movie making, etc. with Final Cut Pro), but for the average user it shouldn't make a difference (unless, like me, you need screen zooming
I can do far more on a Mac than a PC simply because it has accessibility features I can really use. Most people would be able to do the same amount. I fail to see where this perception that Macs are useless came from, especially considering how much more useful they are for media. I will admit that Windows is probably more useful than OS X for office things, and OSX X better than Windows for media things (professional movie making, etc. with Final Cut Pro), but for the average user it shouldn't make a difference (unless, like me, you need screen zooming
Windows has had accessibility options (such as magnifier) for a long time now
I can do far more on a Mac than a PC simply because it has accessibility features I can really use. Most people would be able to do the same amount. I fail to see where this perception that Macs are useless came from, especially considering how much more useful they are for media. I will admit that Windows is probably more useful than OS X for office things, and OSX X better than Windows for media things (professional movie making, etc. with Final Cut Pro), but for the average user it shouldn't make a difference (unless, like me, you need screen zooming
Let me get this straight; how do these "accessability features" help you do what you do? Be specific on which "accessability features" you use in OS X that are better than Windows. The Mouse? The Keyboard? How containers & object windows are manipulated? One Click versus Double-Clicking? The Option Key, The Apple Key? Do you even know what "accessabilty features" are defined as being, or are you just grabbing at parrot-speak that you've heard?
I can do *anything* that you can do in Mac OS X in Vista, or even XP. Adobe Premier, or even AVID Xpress are *significantly* better than Final Cut Pro. I don't know where you get-off saying that OS X is better, and decide that on an APPLICATION! Separate the two - oh, wait; you can't really DO THAT with OS X! I do video & audio editing on Windows (ACID Pro 6, SoundForge 8, Reason 4, AVID Xpress) and my results are equal to any similar APPLICATION on OS X. You sound like nothng more than an Apple-Parrot.
Windows for media, entertainment and creativity is much better than mac.
Today, most of the games need DirectX (or OpenGL) - Windows is clear winner here.
Many of Hollywood special effects are done with SoftImage or 3DS MAX. Windows can run this software no problem. 3D choice on Mac is much more limited.
So if you want MP3 or 2D design then overpriced MAC will be fine. But if demand for entertainment, creativity and 3D is high then Windows is the only right choice.
Your right because it would be futile anyway
Washington post says $350 million. I'd be inclined to believe them.
http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1066
Ya your right, people stopped buying windows PC's because of this. get a clue.
You're taking it all very personally. The ads work like a charm. Why should they stop?? Because they're hurting the feelings and soft sensibilities of Windows-using Neowinians??
Apparently, the sales/growth figures disagree with you. In fact, the competition should be copying Apple, if anything. Apple is a company that is clearly in touch with the average user and produces things people want. What they've been doing has proven to be extremely effective. Is this not apparent??
You're taking it all very personally. The ads work like a charm. Why should they stop?? Because they're hurting the feelings and soft sensibilities of Windows-using Neowinians??
Apparently, the sales/growth figures disagree with you. In fact, the competition should be copying Apple, if anything. Apple is a company that is clearly in touch with the average user and produces things people want. What they've been doing has proven to be extremely effective. Is this not apparent??
Hurting? No. Irritating us with their smugness and stupidity? You betcha.
"Apple is a company that is clearly in touch with the average idiot and produces things idiot's want."
I guess most people on Neowin strive to be more than just average users. Unfortunately, Apple makes products that are for average users, not power users.
Average users don't even know Macs exist :p
The Neowin developer team would tend to disagree with you, as would much of the staff. It doesn't get much more "power user" than actually programming the stuff, and a majority of the developer team here uses Macs.
Is that why it takes you guys so long to get anything done..?
=P
Oh gee whiz, do you really need more than a fancy dancy color coded text editor for some web design? Take your pick of any number of these programming tools for any system and any competent programmer shouldn't have any problems. A shell account accessable through a terminal running Vim should be sufficient. If it isn't, i dunno what to tell you, except I guess I'm glad you are using a Mac.
I was referring more to the development of a flow simulation in something like solidworks that utilizes a mathcad document to make calculations by communicating across applications via OLE/ActiveX.
For the record, I have a Mac and have developed PHP web sites on it before (nothing as large as Neowin, if you want to have a who's got a bigger ding-dong contest). It did the job just fine, no doubt. But certainly not any better than Windows or Linux would be capable of.
Anyway, Mac OS has shell scripting, that apple language that tries to be like ActiveX (can't think of the name right now, but automater made it idiot proof), and of course copy-n-paste. So I digress. Mac can be for Power Users, just the lack of software choices (especially in Engineering) makes it difficult. Not exactly Apple's fault. Doesn't change the fact that these ads are nothing but FUD against MS.
Last edited by Shadrack on 21 Oct 2008 - 05:30
Umm coding isn;t what id call power usage!
Indeed... it's all about posting on tech forums
"Apple is a company that is clearly in touch with the average idiot and produces things idiot's want."
Exactly, They target the non professional neo-hippie and alienate the everyone else with their "more form the function" computing device
And all that hardware is wasted because you can't play any games on it. Maybe I'm just a noob here but what is the point of having SLI in linux? That seems overkill. SLI is for gaming, and linux is not really intended as a gaming platform..maybe I'm wrong.
To be fair I know there is ways to play games in linux so you don't need to tell me I'm wrong as far as that goes.
If I didn't know better, I would being to think that you're sounding like a shill for /. and OSDN.
To be fair I know there is ways to play games in linux so you don't need to tell me I'm wrong as far as that goes.
I'd say SLI is overkill on any OS, but anyway... there are indeed ways to play games on linux, and there are also games that just run on linux.
If you are an avid hardcore gamer that plays every game out there then linux is certainly not the best option, but if you'll be just playing games like WoW, quake wars or ut, linux is perfectly ok.
I kinda find the ads a bit ironic though: your want to make the point that your opponent is advertising too much instead of focusing on their OS, and you do that by making your own ad? Talk about strange logic.
At least MS have the dignity to not make such stupid attacks at Apple.
That depends on your definitions of "dignity" and "stupid". In February of 2007, Newsweek published an interview with Bill Gates (which is no longer available at msnbc.com). The entire second page was basically dedicated to Apple's commercials and their claims to be a superior and safer computing experience compared to Windows. One of my favorite BillG quotes:
My guess is that Bill has resisted the urge to add Steve Jobs to his myFaves plan...
But they see no problem in saying that "linux is a cancer" and launching veiled threats involving patents.
So much for dignity.
So much for dignity.
The argument isn't about how many chairs Ballmer throws around og how many people MS sue (because Apple sue a lot of people as well for equally strange and paranoid reasons), it's about appearances and respect for the general consumer; with these ads Apple is effectively showcasing their stupidity and smugness, MS try to hide theirs (and I appreciate that
Unbelievable.
Truth is that these ads resonate mostly with their existing 5% base and with advertising industry critics. Neither group will gain them any market share. Sometimes I think that their marketing campaigns are merely intended to give Apple zealots the ammunition needed to maintain their smuggness and not switch to a competing OS.
But, hey, whatever rocks Apple's boat, keep doing it.
Unbelievable.
successful at bushing to no end
Truth is that these ads resonate mostly with their existing 5% base and with advertising industry critics. Neither group will gain them any market share. Sometimes I think that their marketing campaigns are merely intended to give Apple zealots the ammunition needed to maintain their smuggness and not switch to a competing OS.
But, hey, whatever rocks Apple's boat, keep doing it.
Oh. So you don't read/watch the news.
It's about REVENUE. Not market share. And your info is out of date.
2008 annual figures
Revenue: Apple - $24 Billion | MS - $60 Billion
Net Income: Apple - $3.5 Billion | MS - $17.7 Billion
Net Profit Margin: Apple - 14.5% | MS - 29.6%
But ... whatever
Source: Google Finance.
2008
I think Microsoft makes more money per year than Apple... so, what's your argument about? Oh yeah... REVENUE... the thing that Microsoft has more of... got it.
Truth is that these ads resonate mostly with their existing 5% base and with advertising industry critics. Neither group will gain them any market share. Sometimes I think that their marketing campaigns are merely intended to give Apple zealots the ammunition needed to maintain their smuggness and not switch to a competing OS.
But, hey, whatever rocks Apple's boat, keep doing it.
That's just it; the folks at Apple can't really be thinking that their ads in which they portray PC users and dweeby nerds and fat losers is what will motivate them to leave Windows and come over the Mac. What, so they can be cool? So they must actually be targeting Mac users who want to be reassured that everything Microsoft does is stupid and nerdy, and Apple is cool and artsy. I'm sorry, if anything, those ads make me never want to take sides with a company that thinks the best way to sell its product is simply to bash the competition. But I think that kind of reflects Steve Jobs self-absorbed wacked-out view of himself.
Truth is that these ads resonate mostly with their existing 5% base and with advertising industry critics. Neither group will gain them any market share. Sometimes I think that their marketing campaigns are merely intended to give Apple zealots the ammunition needed to maintain their smuggness and not switch to a competing OS.
But, hey, whatever rocks Apple's boat, keep doing it.
Oh. So you don't read/watch the news.
It's about REVENUE. Not market share. And your info is out of date.
Arent those both related?? LOLZ
That's their job!!
How old are you??
How old are you??
And the appropriateness of that second sentence was...?
How old are you??
Says the one condoning these CHILDISH attacks from a so-called group of professionals in tech...
They aren't trying to get new customers, merely fuel the elitist attitude of their current owners. That way, their existing customers will be that guy that chirps in at every computer issue, droning on about how perfect a Mac is.
Lets face it, when you have obsessed freaks selling your product at every possible moment, how much do you really have to advertise? Hell, you see what LTD is doing in this very thread? Point proven.
Lol...no doubt
Probably, that and "ZOMG ROFLCOPTOR LOLZ" -.-'
IMHO the novelty wore off after the first set of "I'm a mac, I'm a pc" ads, they jus b*****n' now.
Hell, the only Microsoft ads I ever even SAW were the Vista ones
You've got to be kidding me.
They make a damn good product. They've been at the absolute forefront of the tech industry for a few years now, they set the bar in terms of hardware/OS design . . . and you all cry about their attitude toward the the competition???? It's their job.
Most of the responses in this thread are not only completely illogical, but its as if none of you have any concept of what it means to market a product. It's basic business understanding.
Stupid Apple? Seems they're the only smart ones in the industry. They're making an absolute killing. We should all study Apple and their extremely successful business model. And did I mention they make some really, really solid products? Can't deny that.
Wow. LOL.
You've got to be kidding me.
They make a damn good product. They've been at the absolute forefront of the tech industry for a few years now, they set the bar in terms of hardware/OS design . . . and you all cry about their attitude toward the the competition???? It's their job.
Most of the responses in this thread are not only completely illogical, but its as if none of you have any concept of what it means to market a product. It's basic business understanding.
Stupid Apple? Seems they're the only smart ones in the industry. They're making an absolute killing. We should all study Apple and their extremely successful business model. And did I mention they make some really, really solid products? Can't deny that.
Wow. LOL.
Do you work for Apple? Didn't think so. Yes, you bought their products...and now Apple won't give a **** if you insulted them or defended them. They still made the money off you and thats all that matters.
You've got to be kidding me.
They make a damn good product. They've been at the absolute forefront of the tech industry for a few years now, they set the bar in terms of hardware/OS design . . . and you all cry about their attitude toward the the competition???? It's their job.
Most of the responses in this thread are not only completely illogical, but its as if none of you have any concept of what it means to market a product. It's basic business understanding.
Stupid Apple? Seems they're the only smart ones in the industry. They're making an absolute killing. We should all study Apple and their extremely successful business model. And did I mention they make some really, really solid products? Can't deny that.
Wow. LOL.
I can't believe how many top-level posts you've made to this one article. Are you done commenting yet?
"We should all study Apple and their extremely successful business model."
Or, we could look at the iPod, say it was an extremely good decision, and realise that's pretty much it.
You've got to be kidding me.
They make a damn good product. They've been at the absolute forefront of the tech industry for a few years now, they set the bar in terms of hardware/OS design . . . and you all cry about their attitude toward the the competition???? It's their job.
Most of the responses in this thread are not only completely illogical, but its as if none of you have any concept of what it means to market a product. It's basic business understanding.
Stupid Apple? Seems they're the only smart ones in the industry. They're making an absolute killing. We should all study Apple and their extremely successful business model. And did I mention they make some really, really solid products? Can't deny that.
Wow. LOL.
I wonder how many circle jerks you've attended at Cupertino to have such an erroneous and obviously flawed opinion. I don't think there's a bigger fanboy around here than you. I also love the personal shots you're taking at everybody. "Oh none of you know how to market a product, only Apple does because they do everything right". Does Apple send you a free overrated gift with every swooning comment you make about their overrated products?
You just made my day, haha. Thanks for that.
-Spenser
How much you are earning per comment?
Can I get an interview for this?
* (and they have better drivers)
They don't even effectively point out what "others" are doing wrong. They just perpetuate the same ignorant BS.
they probably want to support their own product instead of some random company, I mean if you owned a business and has some other random company use their policies that were substandard to yours you probably wouldn't be happy.
I like DELL but I don't think that apple want to use their hardware for the fact of more problems, as apple can keep as much or as little control over how good the hardware is being used with Mac OS X.
You see, Apple has to use negative ads because they just can't think of anything that's better about their OS that's boast-worthy.
No, actually Apple make excellent products. You'd never know that strictly going by their ads. No, they do what most people with dramatically low self-esteem do, or people with various types of mental disorders; they insult the short-comings of others in order to elevate themselves, rather than emphasizing their own merits.
Sad, really. But I guess that goes to show whom they have targeted for these ads.
Sad, really. But I guess that goes to show whom they have targeted for these ads.
Yeah, but this ads are making Micro$oft look better. People are getting sick of I'm a Mac/PC ads always telling people that Windows is worse. They have no better arguments? They are actually doing the mistakes that they point in the ads, and they're losing reputation. The fact is, Microsoft has learned from Apple's ads, but Apple hasn't.
You are so wrong, in the past steve always has say that they are Software. But they decide who manufacturate their hardwares. but they are software and if you dont trust watch Bill Vs. Steve @ D5 in 2007 and watch the Keynote of the 2.0 Software For iPhone
The Are Software
The Are Software
Oh great, so there's really nothing special about their hardware, is there?
The Are Software
I will disagree based on this fact, you can install Windows on Apple hardware, but I cannot build a machine and install OSX on it. OSX is directly tied to the hardware so they can almost be thought of as one all inclusive piece. I cannot buy an Apple with no OS and install my own, it will come with OSX rather I want it to or not. There is no such thing as a Microsoft brand PC. MS just provides the software to allow the PC to function.
Apple, do us a favour and just focus on improving iPods, and most of all, iTunes.
Apple, do us a favour and just focus on improving iPods, and most of all, iTunes.
In sport if your doing well do you start defending or do you still attack (that doesn't mean better than MS), apple have been doing the attacking the whole time why change its game now.
Worst comparison ever. In sports there IS ALWAYS someone who attacks and someone who defends. MS isn't defending because it doesn't need to. Apple is just wasting time. They could focus on other stuff rather then spend money on ridiculous ads. None of them should bash at each other.
The iPod was what brought them back. The iPod's software is really good, but that's it.
Besides that, their OS is as good as any other OS out there.
Overpriced hardware, waiting longer for Mac versions of mainstream software (PhotoShop Elements, Quicken and Office are always lagging in releases and features), charging for firmware. I'd probably try to keep the eye on my competitor too if I had these issues.
Last edited by bob_c_b on 20 Oct 2008 - 21:29
Overpriced hardware, waiting longer for Mac versions of mainstream software (PhotoShop Elements, Quicken and Office are always lagging in releases and features), charging for firmware. I'd probably try to keep the eye on my competitor too if I had these issues.
better than spending 10 mill on a comedian that's not funny anymore (was funny back in his time though) and is pretty much retired. Plus the MS ads are boring.
But very few people use Office on a Mac anymore anyway. Far too overpriced when iWork is $99 and Office is useless (on a Mac).
But very few people use Office on a Mac anymore anyway. Far too overpriced when iWork is $99 and Office is useless (on a Mac).
I own several Macs, Office is always delayed, don't feed me MS sping. And iWork is not a replacement for Office if you need to get actual work done. This is why as much as I like some things about OS X, I do most of my work and play on Windows. Apple can spin all they want, Vista is just fine.
the apple mac campigns are some kind of episodes, the talked about their products upsides in some, and vista downsides on otherones, and bashed microsoft in another ones too
the thing about those last 2 ads is that:
microsoft has played a little mean game in their ads "iam a pc", which is: changing apple true intentions (which is making some ads about how pcs do less a hassle compaered to macs with this guy playing the role of the PC) and twisted it to the concept that apple is making fun of PC users themselves (as if that pc guy represents pc users, which is wrong)
this was a trick microsoft was trying to trun people against apple morally! and thats so twisted!
SO APPLE IS NOT BLAMED TO RESPOND TO THEIR LITTLE DIRY MEAN TRICK WITH THOSE LAST ADS, SAYING: NICE TRY!
edit:
and by the way, when apple tells in the mac ads that the bigger market share os, has that hassles and their products does not!, that means that they are telling whats their products good about, but in a different way!
Last edited by Pink Waters on 20 Oct 2008 - 21:58
the apple mac campigns are some kind of episodes, the talked about their products upsides in some, and vista downsides on otherones, and bashed microsoft in another ones too
the thing about those last 2 ads is that:
microsoft has played a little mean game in their ads "iam a pc", which is: changing apple true intentions (which is making some ads about how pcs do less a hassle compaered to macs with this guy playing the role of the PC) and twisted it to the concept that apple is making fun of PC users themselves (as if that pc guy represents pc users, which is wrong)
this was a trick microsoft was trying to trun people against apple morally! and thats so twisted!
SO APPLE IS NOT BLAMED TO RESPOND TO THEIR LITTLE DIRY MEAN TRICK WITH THOSE LAST ADS, SAYING: NICE TRY!
edit:
and by the way, when apple tells in the mac ads that the bigger market share os, has that hassles and their products does not!, that means that they are telling whats their products good about, but in a different way!
Pink Waters...is that like...Kool Aid?
the apple mac campigns are some kind of episodes, the talked about their products upsides in some, and vista downsides on otherones, and bashed microsoft in another ones too
the thing about those last 2 ads is that:
microsoft has played a little mean game in their ads "iam a pc", which is: changing apple true intentions (which is making some ads about how pcs do less a hassle compaered to macs with this guy playing the role of the PC) and twisted it to the concept that apple is making fun of PC users themselves (as if that pc guy represents pc users, which is wrong)
this was a trick microsoft was trying to trun people against apple morally! and thats so twisted!
SO APPLE IS NOT BLAMED TO RESPOND TO THEIR LITTLE DIRY MEAN TRICK WITH THOSE LAST ADS, SAYING: NICE TRY!
edit:
and by the way, when apple tells in the mac ads that the bigger market share os, has that hassles and their products does not!, that means that they are telling whats their products good about, but in a different way!
Pink Waters...is that like...Kool Aid?
mate.. just ... die.. will you?
I'm not your mate, and is that the best you can come up with? Someone doesn't agree with some ads, so you tell them to die?
Grow up.
microsoft has played a little mean game in their ads "iam a pc", which is: changing apple true intentions (which is making some ads about how pcs do less a hassle compaered to macs with this guy playing the role of the PC) and twisted it to the concept that apple is making fun of PC users themselves (as if that pc guy represents pc users, which is wrong)
this was a trick microsoft was trying to trun people against apple morally! and thats so twisted!
SO APPLE IS NOT BLAMED TO RESPOND TO THEIR LITTLE DIRY MEAN TRICK WITH THOSE LAST ADS, SAYING: NICE TRY!
Ooooohh I see. So Apple's intention of making almost completely offtopic ads to "convert" users and painting PC users as dumb is somehow all innocent, then MS responds WITHOUT MENTIONING APPLE EVEN ONCE OR INSULTING ITS USERS... and it's somehow a 'dirty trick'?
Nice try.
This is just sad.
Edit: Oh, and to certain furious fanboys posting in this thread.. Seriously, I do think you need help. Defending a brand you have no relation to what so ever is just plain worrying. Seek help. Now.
Watch the MS fanboys jealousy in the truth come out.
It's kinda funny how I know about all of the amazing things that ShamWow can do but OSX and Vista are still nebulous concepts to me as an average commercial viewer.
They don't need to. That isn't the point.
+1 he is passed his used by date unfortunately.
anyone wanna bet that MS bring out Windows 7 next year because Vista is doing badly?
I'll bet that Windows 7 will be out by next year, but not because Vista is doing badly, but because it's going back to how Microsoft used to release operating systems. The near 6 year gap between XP and Vista was a one-time thing.
So using the same rationale OSX must be doing appallingly because it's had updates nearly every 2 years (sometimes more frequently) since its release in 2001.
It's not doing that badly though is it?
Last edited by Pygmy_Hippo on 21 Oct 2008 - 09:29
where did you come up with that, I didn't see that stated anywhere lol
There is far too much hostility, name calling and assumptions being made in here. It's almost as if you can't say anything bad about Vista, warranted or not, without starting a flame war. I also find it hypocritical that someone above me mentions Apple's users RDF, because lately I've noticed a strong one resonating around Vista users as well.
For the record, I have used Vista since the day it was released and have went through all of it's growing pains. I'm still going through some and I am tired of waiting for vendors (Creative) and Microsoft to do something about it. The waiting and frustration has convinced me to switch to Apple in the near future and I don't consider myself any better than the next user.
A lot of you need to geek down and to stop taking these ads so seriously. Ignore them if you have to and know that all is fair when it comes to competition.
is this the way that a company express themselves ? for me don't look any different from a bunch of kids and treating everyone as such making me not trust on any product of them
if i wanted to see kids promoting their products simply can go to a university and see their projects
and no, i'm not a anti mac, not a microsoft/vista fanboy or whatever, i will say the same of any company doing ads like this and such making me not buy anything from them
Can't the Mac fanboys just concede Windows is more useful and Windows users concede MacOS is prettier and be done with it?
Like honestly, an average consumer couldn't give a ****ing damn that Microsoft spent X amount of dollars in ad campaigns. How is that beneficial in anyway to the average Joe?
Like honestly, an average consumer couldn't give a ****ing damn that Microsoft spent X amount of dollars in ad campaigns. How is that beneficial in anyway to the average Joe?
they probably do actually, especially with vista, you speak to any non geekish person about vista and they usually don't like it (well most of the people i've spoken to anyways).
That's mainly because it is considered bloated to alot of people (which it isn't, but people still think of it that way). But really, Windows XP recieved the very same treatment back in the day. Slow, bloated, too much eye candy.
Windows Vista was made to make full use of today's and tomorrows hardware.
I'd say wake me up when that happens, but I don't want to spend the rest of my life in a coma...
Well may not be that long. Netbooks are becoming more and more popular and these things can't run OSX) much less Vista and XP is slowly being phased out.
http://www.dailytech.com/Netbooks+Saving+P...rticle13206.htm
http://www.dailytech.com/Netbooks+Assault+...rticle13058.htm
http://www.dailytech.com/Netbooks+Saving+P...rticle13206.htm
http://www.dailytech.com/Netbooks+Assault+...rticle13058.htm
Oh ho ho...Netbooks you say? Too bad the Linux versions are being returned 4x as frequently as the Windows versions.
http://gizmodo.com/5058953/linux-netbooks-...rsions-says-msi
"We have done a lot of studies on the return rates and haven’t really talked about it much until now. Our internal research has shown that the return of netbooks is higher than regular notebooks, but the main cause of that is Linux."
Guess I'll get my pajamas on...
http://www.dailytech.com/Netbooks+Saving+P...rticle13206.htm
http://www.dailytech.com/Netbooks+Assault+...rticle13058.htm
Oh ho ho...Netbooks you say? Too bad the Linux versions are being returned 4x as frequently as the Windows versions.
http://gizmodo.com/5058953/linux-netbooks-...rsions-says-msi
"We have done a lot of studies on the return rates and haven’t really talked about it much until now. Our internal research has shown that the return of netbooks is higher than regular notebooks,
but the main cause of that is Linux."
Guess I'll get my pajamas on...
Arrogance on the internet knows no bounds. If you read my response you would have understood my point. Which is that XP is being phased out and the netbooks cannot run Vista or OSX so unless MS or Apple creates a new OS which can run on these machines that role will quickly be taken up by the FOSS community and people will have no choice but to use another OS. BTW I never said it has to be a *nix OS...
http://www.dailytech.com/ASUS+CEO+Jerry+Sh...rticle13251.htm
Apple's intention is definitely NOT to support all the hardware out there. That's always been part of their plan.
My company would love to have a marketing dept. like Apple.
Louis Psihoyos - Photo wall apple TV ad - stolen after negotiations with apple failed
Christian Marclay - iphone telephones - stolen after negotiations with apple were declined
Lugz - Apple copied the shoes commercial - apple ended up having to pull the ad
The Postal Service - music video almost cloned shot by shot - apple feigned ignorance it existed
Jobs admitting the ripping off - http://youtube.com/watch?v=J0UjU0rtavE
Here's a little more detail - http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/05/apples-...ng-off-artists/
Apple's "think different", and the Picasso appropried frase "Good artists copy, Great artists steal" is starting to get thinner by the ad.
Last edited by pax13 on 21 Oct 2008 - 10:36
Somewhat offensive, But sums it up.
Somewhat offensive, But sums it up.
Good sum up. I am sure if MS bad mouthed Leopard, then people would have a negative feeling towards leopard.
Last edited by acies on 21 Oct 2008 - 12:55
There is a place for both negative and positive advertising. Negative ads may seem distasteful to certain individuals, but they can be incredibly effective. It is not a sign of weakness, it is not a sign of imaginative bankruptcy - it's an attempt to put your product in the best possible light by turning the tables and emphasizing your opponent's shortcomings. This has been practiced for years, not just in advertising, but in politics, business, all walks of life. it isn't just about selling a product, it's about finding a weakness (or one that your target/audience is able to perceive) and then exploiting it. YOU have likely engaged in this kind of behaviour as well! In relationships, business dealings, etc. It's about taking your opponents image, and then substituting with your own. If he goal was not to sell anything, we can play this nicely all the time. But in such a fast-changing industry as tech, you have to be deliberate and even aggressive at times. It's not dirty, it's all part of the process.
Advertising's goal is to ultimately influence the audience - to get them to believe something, to behave a certain way, to view a thing, object, person, etc. in a different light that will result in sales. You don't need to showcase or demo your product at all! It can be direct or indirect. it can be an implied message, or a direct message, or a mixture of both.
Mac vs. PC ads have been on for a while now. It's only recently that Apple has decided to target Microsoft a bit differently than before - they've perceived a weakness, a chink in their armour and are now exploiting it. Simple as that. It isn't bad or good. It just *is*. It's amoral.
I'm not being paid by Apple. I don't fly out to Cupertino in order to participate in any kind of "consumer appreciation event." I just like to defend effective, ballsy advertising. Apple is a company that spent its time in the shadows during the 90's. And out of nowhere it strode out and asserted itself among big, established players such as Dell and HP. That's impressive. Their products are now the most sought-after in the tech industry. Top sellers on Amazon.com. The darling of tech reviewers. You can hate them. You can find their methods offensive. But don't begrudge them their success despite huge odds. They don't sell junk. Everyone knows that. You can't deny that they do indeed have a commitment to quality that is uncommon in this industry, which has resulted in not only a large population of switchers, but repeat business. Satisfied customers.
Apple's success doesn't excuse them from any wrongdoing, however. Same as MS' success doesn't excuse them from any wrongdoing as well (a la antitrust.) But we need to also understand that all's fair in love and war. If you were reaping the benefits of negative advertising, you would certainly not complain. It's really all a matter of perception, all a matter of where you happen to be sitting. If I had the opportunity to capitalize on my opponent's weakness, to exploit their fumble of the ball, I'll do it. It's an opportunity, that's all it is. If it works, it'll leave my image, my product, as the alternative - and hopefully consumers will have a far better experience with my products. That's the goal. At the end of the day, the only reason to be in business is to make money. This isn't for everyone. There are plenty of non-profit, charitable organizations that operate differently. But if you have stakeholders, if you have an available target market, if there are expectations in terms of revenue and profit, then you really can't be worried about hurting the competition's feelings.
So the next time you see a negative ad, just remember that the only one yelling "dirty tricks" . . . is the other side.
Until they do it too.
Playing nice works only some of the time.
Cheers.
I get much more upset, especially since working on a creative medium how they blatantly rip off artists on their marketing campaigns, with several cases of using the media/concept they tried to acquire and were denied, opting for a "if not by word, then by sword! approach, and have not had bigger setback in this because said artists usually don't have the money to defend their intellectual property.
I do like apple products (except the pod), but because of price have never aquired any, but I am developing a growing dislikeness of jobs and the image he portrays of the company by the marketing techniques he employs.
BTW: How many more top-level posts do you got in you for this news article? It could be a record. You may win a copy of Vista Ultimate.
V-word: Ok, lame premise but it's executed well.
Been-counter: Now that's funny. I don't care if you're a mac-fan or a MS Fanboy, or if you are a weenie and can't find the any button on the keyboard; this is pure comedy gold. Very well done, good job Apple.
And yes MS is putting a lot of $$$ towards advertising...because the can and they CAN AFFORD IT! There is nothing wrong with Vista ( i have it installed on 4 systems no issues), just people bitching and moaning because for the first time EVER, they need a decent system to run a Windows OS. Apple has ALWAYS had better hardware in their systems because their OS has required that for A LONG TIME. Yea, MS paid 300mil for advertising...thats just chump change for MS. Apple is just moaning and complaining because all they can do is hire nobodies and create a commercial with 2 morons on a white background chatting. You know what Apple, stop your crying and advertise your PRODUCTS. Maybe if you do this and stop trying to bad mouth MS, your company will do better. This kind of bad mouthing tactics are not working in the Presidential election and will fail here. Its been proven that people dont want to hear bad mouthing but information on what the company/person is selling. Apple doesnt want to battle MS in advertising. MS has MUCH more money to promote their products and create new products. MS could buy Apple and make them their bitch if they wanted...haha...but hey, no one wants that.
Last edited by techbeck on 21 Oct 2008 - 15:12
And yes MS is putting a lot of $$$ towards advertising...because the can and they CAN AFFORD IT! There is nothing wrong with Vista ( i have it installed on 4 systems no issues), just people bitching and moaning because for the first time EVER, they need a decent system to run a Windows OS. Apple has ALWAYS had better hardware in their systems because their OS has required that for A LONG TIME. Yea, MS paid 300mil for advertising...thats just chump change for MS. Apple is just moaning and complaining because all they can do is hire nobodies and create a commercial with 2 morons on a white background chatting. You know what Apple, stop your crying and advertise your PRODUCTS. Maybe if you do this and stop trying to bad mouth MS, your company will do better. This kind of bad mouthing tactics are not working in the Presidential election and will fail here. Its been proven that people dont want to hear bad mouthing but information on what the company/person is selling. Apple doesnt want to battle MS in advertising. MS has MUCH more money to promote their products and create new products. MS could buy Apple and make them their bitch if they wanted...haha...but hey, no one wants that.
Apple has been bad-mouthing MS for years now. And it's worked quite well. It's just marketing, don't get offended by it.
And as to the value of MS and Apple, listed 2008 at http://www.sync-blog.com/sync/2008/10/the-worlds-top.html
3. Microsoft: $21.2 billion
4. Apple: $20.7 billion
Ms isn't making Apple "their bitch" anytime soon.
**Maybe if you do this and stop trying to bad mouth MS, your company will do better.**
Were you on another planet the last 3 years? Apple is setting new records in the tech industry. They've been enjoying ridiculous revenue. It's on e of the healthiest companies in the entire industry.
Presidential election adverts and product adverts have nothing to do with each other and the kind of "negative" campaigning that goes on in them is completely and utterly different from a typical product ad campaign. The two are incomparable and unrelated.
Sorry you're personally hurt by the ads.
And as to the value of MS and Apple, listed 2008 at http://www.sync-blog.com/sync/2008/10/the-worlds-top.html
3. Microsoft: $21.2 billion
4. Apple: $20.7 billion
Ms isn't making Apple "their bitch" anytime soon.
**Maybe if you do this and stop trying to bad mouth MS, your company will do better.**
Were you on another planet the last 3 years? Apple is setting new records in the tech industry. They've been enjoying ridiculous revenue. It's on e of the healthiest companies in the entire industry.
Presidential election adverts and product adverts have nothing to do with each other and the kind of "negative" campaigning that goes on in them is completely and utterly different from a typical product ad campaign. The two are incomparable and unrelated.
Sorry you're personally hurt by the ads.
I am not offended by anything. I am just sick of questionable marketing tactics in order to make a quick buck. I dont care if it is MS doing it or Apple or Cisco...whoever. And apples has been doing this for years, I never said this was a new tactic by Apple. I said it was another bad mouthing advert from Apple.
The the whole election that I wasnt trying to compare it to Apple/MS. My point was that they use the "bad mouthing" tactics in the elections and it doesnt impress the people at all. They ARE comparable in the fact that negative advertising has been proven to hurt more than help.
And I am not impressed by Apples products. They bad mouth MS all the time but they have the same issues, if not more, that MS.
And Apple setting new records? Maybe so...but as long as they remain proprietary and expensive...they will never surpase MS. They need to make their OS more versitle as well. More hardware/software support. It kinda blows that you have to buy an EXPENSIVE Apple only card in order to update a Mac. Not to mention that 1gb of memory for a new Apple system costs you about $250. I can get the same speed memory and 4gb for a PC for under $200.
Last edited by techbeck on 21 Oct 2008 - 17:06
And as to the value of MS and Apple, listed 2008 at http://www.sync-blog.com/sync/2008/10/the-worlds-top.html
3. Microsoft: $21.2 billion
4. Apple: $20.7 billion
Ms isn't making Apple "their bitch" anytime soon.
**Maybe if you do this and stop trying to bad mouth MS, your company will do better.**
Were you on another planet the last 3 years? Apple is setting new records in the tech industry. They've been enjoying ridiculous revenue. It's on e of the healthiest companies in the entire industry.
Presidential election adverts and product adverts have nothing to do with each other and the kind of "negative" campaigning that goes on in them is completely and utterly different from a typical product ad campaign. The two are incomparable and unrelated.
Sorry you're personally hurt by the ads.
I am not offended by anything. I am just sick of questionable marketing tactics in order to make a quick buck. I dont care if it is MS doing it or Apple or Cisco...whoever. And apples has been doing this for years, I never said this was a new tactic by Apple. I said it was another bad mouthing advert from Apple.
The the whole election that I wasnt trying to compare it to Apple/MS. My point was that they use the "bad mouthing" tactics in the elections and it doesnt impress the people at all. They ARE comparable in the fact that negative advertising has been proven to hurt more than help.
And I am not impressed by Apples products. They bad mouth MS all the time but they have the same issues, if not more, that MS.
And Apple setting new records? Maybe so...but as long as they remain proprietary and expensive...they will never surpase MS. They need to make their OS more versitle as well. More hardware/software support. It kinda blows that you have to buy an EXPENSIVE Apple only card in order to update a Mac. Not to mention that 1gb of memory for a new Apple system costs you about $250. I can get the same speed memory and 4gb for a PC for under $200.
whinge whinge whinge.
and yes you can get a crappy looking computer with high specs and say its just as good if you like.
why buy a 3.8lt Ferrari when a Ford XR6 has a 3.8lt engine aswell. Because one is built better than the other!
The new systmes are DDR3 BTW
and yes you can get a crappy looking computer with high specs and say its just as good if you like.
why buy a 3.8lt Ferrari when a Ford XR6 has a 3.8lt engine aswell. Because one is built better than the other!
The new systmes are DDR3 BTW
Wow, big time Apple fanboy if I ever did see one. Apple has you sooo brain washed in to buying they over priced crap. Go out and buy all the shiny stuff now!!
You dont know crap about computers obviously. You can build a better PC for cheaper than a Mac. Yea, it may not be all nice and shiny like a Mac, but who the **** cares. its a piece of equipment. If you are vain, go buy a shiny Mac.
Macs have their purpose since competition is a good thing. Hell, I even have an iPod because I like that it has a ton of accessories to choose from. But to say something is better because it is more expensive (your ferrari/ford comment) is just plain asinine. Mac and PC both use Intel chips, ATI Cards, NVIDIA cards, do I need to go on? The only differance is the Mac cards are proprietary and only work in certain systems thus being more expensive.
Ok, I got better things to do now...so hope you pop out of dream land soon and join the rest of us in reality...theres plenty of room.
bye,
Last edited by devHead on 21 Oct 2008 - 18:41
about a month ago people were like omg Windows ads are freaking bad! they spend 60 billion on it (whatever large amount) and they were meant to be funny. Apple isn't allow to pay them out as well? I mean they made fun of a really bad ad campaign and windows ads are still shocking... These ads are never boring and you guys all watched it.
IF YOU DON"T LIKE APPLE ADS YOU DIDN"T HAVE TO CLICK THE LINK, but you did which show you something, deep down you actually want to see these ads, and apple have then won because they got you to watch them.
IF YOU DON"T LIKE APPLE ADS YOU DIDN"T HAVE TO CLICK THE LINK, but you did which show you something, deep down you actually want to see these ads, and apple have then won because they got you to watch them.
Granted, I didnt care for the seinfeld ads to much but I like the new MS ads. It was their slam back towards Apple about their ads. The only difference is that MS did a better job. They showed the wide variety of people and the professions that work in that use PCs. All the Mac ads have been is bashing MS. If Mac claims to be so much better that PC, then why not explain why? We want to hear!
IF YOU DON"T LIKE APPLE ADS YOU DIDN"T HAVE TO CLICK THE LINK, but you did which show you something, deep down you actually want to see these ads, and apple have then won because they got you to watch them.
Granted, I didnt care for the seinfeld ads to much but I like the new MS ads. It was their slam back towards Apple about their ads. The only difference is that MS did a better job. They showed the wide variety of people and the professions that work in that use PCs. All the Mac ads have been is bashing MS. If Mac claims to be so much better that PC, then why not explain why? We want to hear!
The MS ads are unoriginal, derivative, and meaningless. I think I only saw one of them on TV and then never saw one again.
They show that a lot of different people use PCs. No ****. It's like a ****in airline commercial. It's a very weak attempt to answer the Apple ads, which are actually warm, amusing, and by now very familiar.
Redmond really isn't the home of creative professionals. It's home to accountants who happen to have programming ability.
And Apple needs to keep bashing, and even turn the heat up a bit more. It's paying off.
They show that a lot of different people use PCs. No ****. It's like a ****in airline commercial. It's a very weak attempt to answer the Apple ads, which are actually warm, amusing, and by now very familiar.
Redmond really isn't the home of creative professionals. It's home to accountants who happen to have programming ability.
And Apple needs to keep bashing, and even turn the heat up a bit more. It's paying off.
Wow, another Mac fanboy that Apple brainwashed. You need to learn to be open with your views like the rest of us. I have an iPod and I think that OSX has a purpose in the market. I just dont agree with their ad tactics.
And Redmond has no creative professionals and just accountants with programming ability? Yea, think again. They didnt get to be the biggest software maker for sitting around crunching numbers. There is a reason why people use MS products, but cause they work and you have a WIDER variety to choose from. You can argue that they dont work, but I never had any serious issues with Microsoft PCs and the thousands of PCs I support. If you are not smart enough to use a PC, then go to a Mac since, according to Apple, they are easier to use and pretty.
Apple ads warm? that made me laugh. MS ads are tactful and friendly while Apple ads are just hostile. Apple saying that MS doesnt care about the customers..hmmm, i guess them putting out patches and updates faster than anyone else means they dont care. And I guess since pretty much the majority of the computer users use MS products...well, I guess there are a lot of people that hate them huh?
The Apple bashing MS may be working a little..for now. But there is going to come a time soon when people are going to get sick of it all. Your product should sell its own and you shouldnt have to resort to adverts like Apple is doing.
Besides, Apple will never be as big as MS...so I am not worried. Enjoy your flashy shiny equipment.
Not that Microsoft's ads have been any better. Neither of them get into the core reason why you might choose one OS over another.
Why are you so serious and irritated yourself when you ask others the same question?
As as response to your argument, let make a fictional "funny" Apple < MS ad:
Imagine this: white background, ten people standing. One is a fat old midget in a cat costume, the others are casual young "hip" people.
One of the youngsters asks "Why are you in that costume?" catman responds "I'm the king of the jungle and I'm better than all of you!" Youngster responds "Oh, okay, but, if you are the king, where are all your followers?" catman thinks and responds "Most people don't know I'm the king, only smart people follow me" younster responds "Okay, well you have fun then, I'm gonna go back now" (youngster returns to the 8 other people who were just talking while he was gone).
See what I did there? I made fun of the fact that Apple try to look "elite" while their market share is only a tenth of Microsoft's. As a Windows user I would find that ad slightly offensive because we shouldn't engage in the same stupid activities as Apple, and MS agree, which is why with their "I'm a Windows" ads focus on the message that Windows is for everyone and thy even manage to not insult their competition in the process, maybe Apple could learn something from that?
How embarrassing for the humans in general that people buy Vista, I know I shouldn't have.
Shhhhhhhh! You better not be spreading facts around here.
Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!
Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.