apple
Report a problem

New Apple ads target Microsoft ads

Horrocks   on 20 October 2008 - 16:43 · 213 comments & 29091 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Now taking a different approach, Apple has released 2 new ads not only targeting Microsoft's OS, but their advertising methods as well. Microsoft's first line of ads featuring Jerry Seinfeld was much hyped, but proved to deliver more confusion than a solid advertisement. These ads by Apple however, seem to be more of a direct attack rather than showing what a Mac has to offer.

In the first ad, "V Word", Apple pokes fun at Microsoft for not saying "Vista" in any of their advertisements but using more well known terms such as "Microsoft". Coincidentally or maybe not, Microsoft was recently awarded a patent for blocking out swear words.

The second ad, "Bean Counter", mainly focuses on the $350 million amount that Microsoft spent on their advertisement campaign, instead of spending money to improve Vista as an OS.

These ads bring up the dying question, is this just a friendly competition, or are they taking it too far? Do you feel the novelty of these advertisements is starting to wear off? Apple and Microsoft seem to be in a heated battle of advertising and not achieving what the consumers want to see.

Apple ad - V Word:



Apple ad - Bean Counter:


Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 213 additional comments
#1 saiya on 20 Oct 2008 - 15:30
lame

how about you all get together and help me make a new OS i'm designing =)

all i need is programmers and some type of security anylist
(2 replies) #2 devHead on 20 Oct 2008 - 15:33
all i need is programmers and some type of security anylist

and a spell checker...
#2.1 Imran Hussain on 20 Oct 2008 - 16:10
devHead said,
and a spell checker...

Owned!!
#2.2 Lare2 on 20 Oct 2008 - 22:03
LOL @ Spell checker
(5 replies) #3 devHead on 20 Oct 2008 - 15:35
It's kind of sad that the only thought those folks at Apple have is how to bash Microsoft for what they're doing. Why do they feel the need to make fun of Microsoft to make themselves look better?
#3.1 LTD on 20 Oct 2008 - 16:05
devHead said,
It's kind of sad that the only thought those folks at Apple have is how to bash Microsoft for what they're doing. Why do they feel the need to make fun of Microsoft to make themselves look better?



Works like charm, though.

MS is a brutally easy target.
#3.2 GreyWolfSC on 20 Oct 2008 - 16:39
LTD said,
Works like charm, though.

MS is a brutally easy target.


Not as easy a target as Apple...
#3.3 Glassed Silver on 20 Oct 2008 - 18:48
GreyWolfSC said,
LTD said,
Works like charm, though.

MS is a brutally easy target.


Not as easy a target as Apple...

ah yea, right.
I guess that's because you base that on surveys that clearly show that microsoft is more popular than apple... wait...

Glassed Silver:win
#3.4 Neoauld on 21 Oct 2008 - 15:00
Glassed Silver said,
GreyWolfSC said,

LTD said,
Works like charm, though.

MS is a brutally easy target.


Not as easy a target as Apple...

ah yea, right.
I guess that's because you base that on surveys that clearly show that microsoft is more popular than apple... wait...

Glassed Silver:win


apple isnt popular for their pcs
just ipods itunes and whatnot

but really..the reason apple doesnt do anythin but bash MS is cause they dont have any unique features that make apples worth their overpricing when it comes to their computers

im quite happy with my PC..ive used macs and wow..nothing special
#3.5 Smethead on 21 Oct 2008 - 15:14
Neoauld said,
Glassed Silver said,

GreyWolfSC said,

LTD said,
Works like charm, though.

MS is a brutally easy target.


Not as easy a target as Apple...

ah yea, right.
I guess that's because you base that on surveys that clearly show that microsoft is more popular than apple... wait...

Glassed Silver:win


apple isnt popular for their pcs
just ipods itunes and whatnot

but really..the reason apple doesnt do anythin but bash MS is cause they dont have any unique features that make apples worth their overpricing when it comes to their computers

im quite happy with my PC..ive used macs and wow..nothing special

Oh come on... nothing unique?
(15 replies) #4 d3nuo on 20 Oct 2008 - 15:37
i love how retarded apple is. they've nothing better to do than make fun of the big guy? oh wait that's what the underdog always does. they can't stand being in a far distant second so they immaturely try to belittle them. maybe they should use their time and money to produce better software. and get their fanboys some counseling for thinking they're superior.
#4.1 LTD on 20 Oct 2008 - 16:06
d3nuo said,
Maybe they should use their time and money to produce better software.


They are, and a good case can be made that they do.

But that would involve actually *using* their software, so you might never find out for yourself. Oh well.
#4.2 +Chrono951 on 20 Oct 2008 - 16:32
LTD said,
They are, and a good case can be made that they do.

But that would involve actually *using* their software, so you might never find out for yourself. Oh well.


From the various disasters that seems to be following all their latest software launches (Mobile Me, iPhone upgrade software, etc) maybe they should be working on fixing bugs before releasing the next big thing. "Oh, sorry we lost all your important email, but don't worry, Vista sucks!"

Also, I hate ads that just bash and don't even bother to tell why your product is better. Hence why I am getting so sick of the current campaign ads in the US.
#4.3 LTD on 20 Oct 2008 - 16:45
Chrono951 said,
LTD said,
They are, and a good case can be made that they do.

But that would involve actually *using* their software, so you might never find out for yourself. Oh well.


From the various disasters that seems to be following all their latest software launches (Mobile Me, iPhone upgrade software, etc) maybe they should be working on fixing bugs before releasing the next big thing. "Oh, sorry we lost all your important email, but don't worry, Vista sucks!"

Also, I hate ads that just bash and don't even bother to tell why your product is better. Hence why I am getting so sick of the current campaign ads in the US.


Good thing you're not in marketing. You need to disassociate your personal feelings from products and focus on how to get them to actually sell.
#4.4 39 Thieves on 20 Oct 2008 - 17:04
LTD said,
Chrono951 said,

LTD said,
They are, and a good case can be made that they do.

But that would involve actually *using* their software, so you might never find out for yourself. Oh well.


From the various disasters that seems to be following all their latest software launches (Mobile Me, iPhone upgrade software, etc) maybe they should be working on fixing bugs before releasing the next big thing. "Oh, sorry we lost all your important email, but don't worry, Vista sucks!"

Also, I hate ads that just bash and don't even bother to tell why your product is better. Hence why I am getting so sick of the current campaign ads in the US.


Good thing you're not in marketing. You need to disassociate your personal feelings from products and focus on how to get them to actually sell.


I'll make sure to remind you of this when the entire Apple fanbase is laid low when Jobs finally succumbs to whatever ailment is eating away at him. I'll be the first to remind all you fanatical freaks to dissassociate yourselves from mere products.

Wonder how well Apple products will sell when the tech industries greatest used car salesman is out of the picture...
#4.5 Shadrack on 20 Oct 2008 - 17:28
LTD said,
They are, and a good case can be made that they do.

But that would involve actually *using* their software, so you might never find out for yourself. Oh well.



I've used their software. There is nothing special about it other than the shinny packaging and over-marketing (which is kinda ironic considering the ad). Oh well.
#4.6 FrozenEclipse on 20 Oct 2008 - 17:56
LTD said,
You need to disassociate your personal feelings from products and focus on how to get them to actually sell.


LOL! Try taking your own advice. You'd probably curl up into a ball and cry like a bitch if Apple just folded. You have nothing BUT personal feelings for Apple, and that's pretty sad.
#4.7 RAID 0 on 20 Oct 2008 - 19:38
FrozenEclipse said,
LOL! Try taking your own advice. You'd probably curl up into a ball and cry like a bitch if Apple just folded. You have nothing BUT personal feelings for Apple, and that's pretty sad.


SNAP!
#4.8 d3nuo on 20 Oct 2008 - 19:52
LTD said,
They are, and a good case can be made that they do.

But that would involve actually *using* their software, so you might never find out for yourself. Oh well.

i love your presumptuous attitude. you think apple is your god and that you are a professional at everything regarding marketing and how to sell products. You're presumptuous in that i have 2 macs on my desk at work, which i never use for anything but chat cuz adium's 'pretty' which means i in fact have used macos a LOT.. nice try tho fanboy. my laptop and desktop pc's are far more useful. Learn a few things before you assume i haven't used their products. I like my ipod. I dont like companies who can only get an image by 'making fun' of others. If they had products that could be competent enough to seriously threaten the market share of a Windows, their ad campaigns would obviously focus on actually touting such things. I can't recommend this enough: get a clue.

i dont have anything against apple's os.. if you like it so what.. if you like windows, fine. linux, whatevs. my issue is the company. i own an ipod touch 2g which i really like.
#4.9 Glendi on 20 Oct 2008 - 20:11
FrozenEclipse said,
LOL! Try taking your own advice. You'd probably curl up into a ball and cry like a bitch if Apple just folded. You have nothing BUT personal feelings for Apple, and that's pretty sad.


True... check out all Mac News. He's fanboying all over them. He's not worth debating on Apple's defense.
#4.10 +trag3dy on 20 Oct 2008 - 20:58
LTD said,
They are, and a good case can be made that they do.

But that would involve actually *using* their software, so you might never find out for yourself. Oh well.


I've used their software and I can honestly say it's not any better or worse than XP or Vista. In -my- opinon, that's not fact.
#4.11 ScottKin on 21 Oct 2008 - 06:15
LTD said,
They are, and a good case can be made that they do.

But that would involve actually *using* their software, so you might never find out for yourself. Oh well.


Let's see:

Mac OS X Kernel: MACH fork of BSD - real software innovation there!
Windows OS Kernel: In-house, didn't rely on work that goes back 20 years.

Apple's Operating Systems are basically regurgitated crap from failed OS attempts (NextSTEP?) and UNIX ports, put in a nice & shiney box with shiney, cute GUI. Their systems work so well ("Bomb" & "Kernel Panic") because they also control the hardware being used. Apple systems appeal to a certain part of society that thinks that their computers should be consider as "High-Art", and who hold their pinkie-finger out when they drink tea.

For the rest of the world, those of us who are not snobs, we have a better solution - a solution defined by market-share. It's called "Windows"

P.S. I have a G4 Mac running OS X "Tiger" sitting right next to me. I also have a NetApp Server and two Sun Ultra boxes...so don't even *THINK* about calling me an "OS Biggot"
#4.12 ichi on 21 Oct 2008 - 11:52
ScottKin said,
Windows OS Kernel: In-house, didn't rely on work that goes back 20 years.


Didn't they take stuff from bsd and base part of the design on vms?
#4.13 ScottKin on 21 Oct 2008 - 15:41
ichi said,
Didn't they take stuff from bsd and base part of the design on vms?


Actually, some of the architectural design of NT (of which I was on the Kernel, API & Test Group in the NT DevTeam back in '91) was based on DEC's VaxVMS through Dave Cutler (former DEC Software Developer and pretty much the father of VaxVMS) - no code was "lifted" out of either VMS or BSD, with the notable exception of the TCP/IP Stack (which actually still contained the BSD Copyright info inside the code).
#4.14 MioTheGreat on 21 Oct 2008 - 19:32
ScottKin said,
Actually, some of the architectural design of NT (of which I was on the Kernel, API & Test Group in the NT DevTeam back in '91) was based on DEC's VaxVMS through Dave Cutler (former DEC Software Developer and pretty much the father of VaxVMS) - no code was "lifted" out of either VMS or BSD, with the notable exception of the TCP/IP Stack (which actually still contained the BSD Copyright info inside the code).



And, of course, the TCP/IP stack has been rewritten from scratch with Vista.
#4.15 undu on 22 Oct 2008 - 20:41
Chrono951 said,
Also, I hate ads that just bash and don't even bother to tell why your product is better. Hence why I am getting so sick of the current campaign ads in the US.
Luckily these tpe of ads are banned in my country
#5 Relativity_17 on 20 Oct 2008 - 15:49
Woo, Apple FTL.
(6 replies) #6 GreyWolfSC on 20 Oct 2008 - 16:05
This from the company that only runs ads saying "Windows sucks" without explaining the virtues of their own products... Whatever...
#6.1 theyarecomingforyou on 20 Oct 2008 - 16:55
It's easier to bash the opposition than to trying to explain to people why Macs cost more and do less than PCs.
#6.2 Shadrack on 20 Oct 2008 - 18:45
theyarecomingforyou said,
It's easier to bash the opposition than to trying to explain to people why Macs cost more and do less than PCs.


Ahhh... now these ads make sense. Good point.
#6.3 simon360 on 20 Oct 2008 - 22:08
theyarecomingforyou said,
It's easier to bash the opposition than to trying to explain to people why Macs cost more and do less than PCs.

Yeah, agreed. They do waaay less than PC's. I hear you can't even send e-mail's on them.

I can do far more on a Mac than a PC simply because it has accessibility features I can really use. Most people would be able to do the same amount. I fail to see where this perception that Macs are useless came from, especially considering how much more useful they are for media. I will admit that Windows is probably more useful than OS X for office things, and OSX X better than Windows for media things (professional movie making, etc. with Final Cut Pro), but for the average user it shouldn't make a difference (unless, like me, you need screen zooming )
#6.4 Shadrack on 21 Oct 2008 - 05:13
simon360 said,
Yeah, agreed. They do waaay less than PC's. I hear you can't even send e-mail's on them.

I can do far more on a Mac than a PC simply because it has accessibility features I can really use. Most people would be able to do the same amount. I fail to see where this perception that Macs are useless came from, especially considering how much more useful they are for media. I will admit that Windows is probably more useful than OS X for office things, and OSX X better than Windows for media things (professional movie making, etc. with Final Cut Pro), but for the average user it shouldn't make a difference (unless, like me, you need screen zooming )


Windows has had accessibility options (such as magnifier) for a long time now .
#6.5 ScottKin on 21 Oct 2008 - 06:32
simon360 said,
Yeah, agreed. They do waaay less than PC's. I hear you can't even send e-mail's on them.

I can do far more on a Mac than a PC simply because it has accessibility features I can really use. Most people would be able to do the same amount. I fail to see where this perception that Macs are useless came from, especially considering how much more useful they are for media. I will admit that Windows is probably more useful than OS X for office things, and OSX X better than Windows for media things (professional movie making, etc. with Final Cut Pro), but for the average user it shouldn't make a difference (unless, like me, you need screen zooming )


Let me get this straight; how do these "accessability features" help you do what you do? Be specific on which "accessability features" you use in OS X that are better than Windows. The Mouse? The Keyboard? How containers & object windows are manipulated? One Click versus Double-Clicking? The Option Key, The Apple Key? Do you even know what "accessabilty features" are defined as being, or are you just grabbing at parrot-speak that you've heard?

I can do *anything* that you can do in Mac OS X in Vista, or even XP. Adobe Premier, or even AVID Xpress are *significantly* better than Final Cut Pro. I don't know where you get-off saying that OS X is better, and decide that on an APPLICATION! Separate the two - oh, wait; you can't really DO THAT with OS X! I do video & audio editing on Windows (ACID Pro 6, SoundForge 8, Reason 4, AVID Xpress) and my results are equal to any similar APPLICATION on OS X. You sound like nothng more than an Apple-Parrot.
#6.6 EJocys on 23 Oct 2008 - 13:10
simon360 said,
I will admit that Windows is probably more useful than OS X for office things, and OSX X better than Windows for media things


Windows for media, entertainment and creativity is much better than mac.
Today, most of the games need DirectX (or OpenGL) - Windows is clear winner here.

Many of Hollywood special effects are done with SoftImage or 3DS MAX. Windows can run this software no problem. 3D choice on Mac is much more limited.

So if you want MP3 or 2D design then overpriced MAC will be fine. But if demand for entertainment, creativity and 3D is high then Windows is the only right choice.
(2 replies) #7 +Vykranth on 20 Oct 2008 - 16:07
Someone is going to have to explain how these ads are going to demonstrate the inner quailties of Apple products.
#7.1 Darran on 20 Oct 2008 - 22:56
They don't have to.
#7.2 Solidstinch on 03 Jan 2009 - 14:24
Darran said,
They don't have to.

Your right because it would be futile anyway
#8 +littleneutrino on 20 Oct 2008 - 16:09
i rather liked the ads lol
(2 replies) #9 Imran Hussain on 20 Oct 2008 - 16:09
It wasn't $350 million, but $300 million.
#9.1 creamhackered on 20 Oct 2008 - 21:14
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...8102000767.html

Washington post says $350 million. I'd be inclined to believe them.
#9.2 Imran Hussain on 21 Oct 2008 - 02:48
oh, I guess they increased the budget. Coz even MJ posted about it, saying it's a $300 million campaign.
http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1066
(1 reply) #10 Bri- on 20 Oct 2008 - 16:12
The "advertising" ad was a good one. Didn't care for the "V-word" ad, though. I can't really blame Apple for taking MS down a peg or two this time since they pretty much hung themselves after that horrible Seinfeld/Gates fiasco.
#10.1 Solidstinch on 03 Jan 2009 - 14:26
Bri- said,
The "advertising" ad was a good one. Didn't care for the "V-word" ad, though. I can't really blame Apple for taking MS down a peg or two this time since they pretty much hung themselves after that horrible Seinfeld/Gates fiasco.

Ya your right, people stopped buying windows PC's because of this. get a clue.
(11 replies) #11 LTD on 20 Oct 2008 - 16:12
LOL @ the sales and marketing noobs in this thread. Seriously. Another "Apple is so mean" whine thread.

You're taking it all very personally. The ads work like a charm. Why should they stop?? Because they're hurting the feelings and soft sensibilities of Windows-using Neowinians??

Apparently, the sales/growth figures disagree with you. In fact, the competition should be copying Apple, if anything. Apple is a company that is clearly in touch with the average user and produces things people want. What they've been doing has proven to be extremely effective. Is this not apparent??

#11.1 GreyWolfSC on 20 Oct 2008 - 16:41
LTD said,
LOL @ the sales and marketing noobs in this thread. Seriously. Another "Apple is so mean" whine thread.

You're taking it all very personally. The ads work like a charm. Why should they stop?? Because they're hurting the feelings and soft sensibilities of Windows-using Neowinians??

Apparently, the sales/growth figures disagree with you. In fact, the competition should be copying Apple, if anything. Apple is a company that is clearly in touch with the average user and produces things people want. What they've been doing has proven to be extremely effective. Is this not apparent??


Hurting? No. Irritating us with their smugness and stupidity? You betcha.
#11.2 Titoist on 20 Oct 2008 - 16:42
you have a typo in your post, let me fix it for you;

"Apple is a company that is clearly in touch with the average idiot and produces things idiot's want."
#11.3 KavazovAngel on 20 Oct 2008 - 16:43
Yup, they surely produce things that people want. And EVEN give you a choice, buy it or don't.
#11.4 Shadrack on 20 Oct 2008 - 17:31
Apple is a company that is clearly in touch with the average user


I guess most people on Neowin strive to be more than just average users. Unfortunately, Apple makes products that are for average users, not power users.
#11.5 Glendi on 20 Oct 2008 - 20:12
Shadrack said,
I guess most people on Neowin strive to be more than just average users. Unfortunately, Apple makes products that are for average users, not power users.


Average users don't even know Macs exist :p
#11.6 simon360 on 20 Oct 2008 - 22:12
Shadrack said,
I guess most people on Neowin strive to be more than just average users. Unfortunately, Apple makes products that are for average users, not power users.

The Neowin developer team would tend to disagree with you, as would much of the staff. It doesn't get much more "power user" than actually programming the stuff, and a majority of the developer team here uses Macs.
#11.7 39 Thieves on 20 Oct 2008 - 23:25
simon360 said,
The Neowin developer team would tend to disagree with you, as would much of the staff. It doesn't get much more "power user" than actually programming the stuff, and a majority of the developer team here uses Macs.


Is that why it takes you guys so long to get anything done..?

=P
#11.8 Shadrack on 21 Oct 2008 - 05:24
simon360 said,
It doesn't get much more "power user" than actually programming the stuff, and a majority of the developer team here uses Macs.


Oh gee whiz, do you really need more than a fancy dancy color coded text editor for some web design? Take your pick of any number of these programming tools for any system and any competent programmer shouldn't have any problems. A shell account accessable through a terminal running Vim should be sufficient. If it isn't, i dunno what to tell you, except I guess I'm glad you are using a Mac.

I was referring more to the development of a flow simulation in something like solidworks that utilizes a mathcad document to make calculations by communicating across applications via OLE/ActiveX.

For the record, I have a Mac and have developed PHP web sites on it before (nothing as large as Neowin, if you want to have a who's got a bigger ding-dong contest). It did the job just fine, no doubt. But certainly not any better than Windows or Linux would be capable of.

Anyway, Mac OS has shell scripting, that apple language that tries to be like ActiveX (can't think of the name right now, but automater made it idiot proof), and of course copy-n-paste. So I digress. Mac can be for Power Users, just the lack of software choices (especially in Engineering) makes it difficult. Not exactly Apple's fault. Doesn't change the fact that these ads are nothing but FUD against MS.

Last edited by Shadrack on 21 Oct 2008 - 05:30
#11.9 Baked on 21 Oct 2008 - 05:45
simon360 said,
The Neowin developer team would tend to disagree with you, as would much of the staff. It doesn't get much more "power user" than actually programming the stuff, and a majority of the developer team here uses Macs.


Umm coding isn;t what id call power usage!
#11.10 ichi on 21 Oct 2008 - 12:16
Baked said,
Umm coding isn;t what id call power usage!


Indeed... it's all about posting on tech forums
#11.11 Solidstinch on 03 Jan 2009 - 14:27
Titoist said,
you have a typo in your post, let me fix it for you;

"Apple is a company that is clearly in touch with the average idiot and produces things idiot's want."


Exactly, They target the non professional neo-hippie and alienate the everyone else with their "more form the function" computing device
(3 replies) #12 waldenasta on 20 Oct 2008 - 16:14
well, all I can say is that I switched to Ubuntu 64 bit and burned my microsoft dvd THAT I PAID good money for. Vista was such a disappointment (paid extra for ultimate). I then turned to opensource and low and behold they are offering a more superior product. For one thing I don't have to load up on virus protection, spyware protection, firewall, malware protection. I use (firestarter, free) and the peace of mind of not been a frigging target of every creton looking to exploit my machine. I am done with the racket of having to pay for stuff that should be provided with my OS. I am done making the spyware, malware, virus companies rich. What sealed it for me was the fact that I wanted the Compiz effects. I have a dual core, dual video cards(SLI), raid0 system, and instead of my OS providing me with something comparable, I would have to go out buy Deskspace. Hell no, no more...NO MORE!!!
#12.1 +trag3dy on 20 Oct 2008 - 21:08
waldenasta said,
well, all I can say is that I switched to Ubuntu 64 bit and burned my microsoft dvd THAT I PAID good money for. Vista was such a disappointment (paid extra for ultimate). I then turned to opensource and low and behold they are offering a more superior product. For one thing I don't have to load up on virus protection, spyware protection, firewall, malware protection. I use (firestarter, free) and the peace of mind of not been a frigging target of every creton looking to exploit my machine. I am done with the racket of having to pay for stuff that should be provided with my OS. I am done making the spyware, malware, virus companies rich. What sealed it for me was the fact that I wanted the Compiz effects. I have a dual core, dual video cards(SLI), raid0 system, and instead of my OS providing me with something comparable, I would have to go out buy Deskspace. Hell no, no more...NO MORE!!!


And all that hardware is wasted because you can't play any games on it. Maybe I'm just a noob here but what is the point of having SLI in linux? That seems overkill. SLI is for gaming, and linux is not really intended as a gaming platform..maybe I'm wrong.

To be fair I know there is ways to play games in linux so you don't need to tell me I'm wrong as far as that goes.
#12.2 ScottKin on 21 Oct 2008 - 06:43
Waldenasta - you're in for a rude awakening when you get hit with a Kernel exploit. Whomever told you that Ubuntu is secure enough without having to use some kind of protections is as high as a kite. Also, just because you now have pretty, melting and fire-eaten windows should NOT be a criteria for what you use a computer for.

If I didn't know better, I would being to think that you're sounding like a shill for /. and OSDN.
#12.3 ichi on 21 Oct 2008 - 12:03
trag3dy said,
And all that hardware is wasted because you can't play any games on it. Maybe I'm just a noob here but what is the point of having SLI in linux? That seems overkill. SLI is for gaming, and linux is not really intended as a gaming platform..maybe I'm wrong.

To be fair I know there is ways to play games in linux so you don't need to tell me I'm wrong as far as that goes.


I'd say SLI is overkill on any OS, but anyway... there are indeed ways to play games on linux, and there are also games that just run on linux.
If you are an avid hardcore gamer that plays every game out there then linux is certainly not the best option, but if you'll be just playing games like WoW, quake wars or ut, linux is perfectly ok.
(4 replies) #13 Shadow Dragon on 20 Oct 2008 - 16:15
And here I was thinking to myself that the presidential campaign was ignorant and dirty.

I kinda find the ads a bit ironic though: your want to make the point that your opponent is advertising too much instead of focusing on their OS, and you do that by making your own ad? Talk about strange logic.

At least MS have the dignity to not make such stupid attacks at Apple.
#13.1 Ricmacas on 20 Oct 2008 - 19:34
+1
#13.2 Slugbait on 21 Oct 2008 - 05:27
Shadow Dragon said,
At least MS have the dignity to not make such stupid attacks at Apple.


That depends on your definitions of "dignity" and "stupid". In February of 2007, Newsweek published an interview with Bill Gates (which is no longer available at msnbc.com). The entire second page was basically dedicated to Apple's commercials and their claims to be a superior and safer computing experience compared to Windows. One of my favorite BillG quotes:
Does honesty matter in these things, or if you're really cool, that means you get to be a lying person whenever you feel like it?


My guess is that Bill has resisted the urge to add Steve Jobs to his myFaves plan...
#13.3 ichi on 21 Oct 2008 - 17:31
Shadow Dragon said,
At least MS have the dignity to not make such stupid attacks at Apple.


But they see no problem in saying that "linux is a cancer" and launching veiled threats involving patents.

So much for dignity.
#13.4 Shadow Dragon on 22 Oct 2008 - 11:35
ichi said,
But they see no problem in saying that "linux is a cancer" and launching veiled threats involving patents.

So much for dignity.

The argument isn't about how many chairs Ballmer throws around og how many people MS sue (because Apple sue a lot of people as well for equally strange and paranoid reasons), it's about appearances and respect for the general consumer; with these ads Apple is effectively showcasing their stupidity and smugness, MS try to hide theirs (and I appreciate that ).
(10 replies) #14 LTD on 20 Oct 2008 - 16:21
Maybe you should all call the highly successful marketing team at Apple and tell them they've been doing it wrong all this time.

Unbelievable.

#14.1 squarepants on 20 Oct 2008 - 16:38
Highly successful? Last time I checked, success in advertising translates into increased market share. Mac OS market share has been stuck at around 5% for decades. If it wasn't for the iPod, Apple would be bankrupt. And, to hear them say it, their main (only?) competitor (MS) is virtually incompetent. Imagine what Apple market share would be if MS knew what they were doing?

Truth is that these ads resonate mostly with their existing 5% base and with advertising industry critics. Neither group will gain them any market share. Sometimes I think that their marketing campaigns are merely intended to give Apple zealots the ammunition needed to maintain their smuggness and not switch to a competing OS.

But, hey, whatever rocks Apple's boat, keep doing it.
#14.2 Skynetfuture on 20 Oct 2008 - 16:38
LTD said,
Maybe you should all call the highly successful marketing team at Apple and tell them they've been doing it wrong all this time.

Unbelievable.


successful at bushing to no end
#14.3 LTD on 20 Oct 2008 - 16:44
squarepants said,
Highly successful? Last time I checked, success in advertising translates into increased market share. Mac OS market share has been stuck at around 5% for decades. If it wasn't for the iPod, Apple would be bankrupt. And, to hear them say it, their main (only?) competitor (MS) is virtually incompetent. Imagine what Apple market share would be if MS knew what they were doing?

Truth is that these ads resonate mostly with their existing 5% base and with advertising industry critics. Neither group will gain them any market share. Sometimes I think that their marketing campaigns are merely intended to give Apple zealots the ammunition needed to maintain their smuggness and not switch to a competing OS.

But, hey, whatever rocks Apple's boat, keep doing it.


Oh. So you don't read/watch the news.

It's about REVENUE. Not market share. And your info is out of date.
#14.4 Shadrack on 20 Oct 2008 - 17:34
Apple may be highly successful at convincing idiot users who don't know how to use Windows that they might have a better chance with Apple computers. Sure, their marketing campaign has helped that. Hasn't touched the corporate market though. Not even a dent. Corporations know better.
#14.5 Ricmacas on 20 Oct 2008 - 19:36
They are growing very much compared to the current market ... But you know, its easy to grow when you're little!
#14.6 squarepants on 20 Oct 2008 - 19:49
"It's about REVENUE. Not market share. And your info is out of date."

2008 annual figures

Revenue: Apple - $24 Billion | MS - $60 Billion
Net Income: Apple - $3.5 Billion | MS - $17.7 Billion
Net Profit Margin: Apple - 14.5% | MS - 29.6%

But ... whatever

Source: Google Finance.

2008
#14.7 RAID 0 on 21 Oct 2008 - 06:35
LTD said,
It's about REVENUE. Not market share. And your info is out of date.



I think Microsoft makes more money per year than Apple... so, what's your argument about? Oh yeah... REVENUE... the thing that Microsoft has more of... got it.
#14.8 devHead on 21 Oct 2008 - 11:55
That's exactly it; they can't be directing these ads at Windows users-that would be like telling them "Look what a nerdy dweeb moron you are for using Windows. If you were cool, you'd be using a Mac." That's basically the message they send. So, if you're trying to motivate people to leave Microsoft Windows and come over to Apple, is that how you do it? By showing someone what a goon they are because they're using Windows? That type of advertising repels me and makes me not want to leave Windows. The ads are for the Mac zealots who, and made by Mac zealots who are just as smug and proud as Steve Jobs is.
#14.9 devHead on 21 Oct 2008 - 12:06
squarepants said,
Highly successful? Last time I checked, success in advertising translates into increased market share. Mac OS market share has been stuck at around 5% for decades. If it wasn't for the iPod, Apple would be bankrupt. And, to hear them say it, their main (only?) competitor (MS) is virtually incompetent. Imagine what Apple market share would be if MS knew what they were doing?

Truth is that these ads resonate mostly with their existing 5% base and with advertising industry critics. Neither group will gain them any market share. Sometimes I think that their marketing campaigns are merely intended to give Apple zealots the ammunition needed to maintain their smuggness and not switch to a competing OS.

But, hey, whatever rocks Apple's boat, keep doing it.


That's just it; the folks at Apple can't really be thinking that their ads in which they portray PC users and dweeby nerds and fat losers is what will motivate them to leave Windows and come over the Mac. What, so they can be cool? So they must actually be targeting Mac users who want to be reassured that everything Microsoft does is stupid and nerdy, and Apple is cool and artsy. I'm sorry, if anything, those ads make me never want to take sides with a company that thinks the best way to sell its product is simply to bash the competition. But I think that kind of reflects Steve Jobs self-absorbed wacked-out view of himself.
#14.10 Solidstinch on 03 Jan 2009 - 14:39
LTD said,
squarepants said,
Highly successful? Last time I checked, success in advertising translates into increased market share. Mac OS market share has been stuck at around 5% for decades. If it wasn't for the iPod, Apple would be bankrupt. And, to hear them say it, their main (only?) competitor (MS) is virtually incompetent. Imagine what Apple market share would be if MS knew what they were doing?

Truth is that these ads resonate mostly with their existing 5% base and with advertising industry critics. Neither group will gain them any market share. Sometimes I think that their marketing campaigns are merely intended to give Apple zealots the ammunition needed to maintain their smuggness and not switch to a competing OS.

But, hey, whatever rocks Apple's boat, keep doing it.


Oh. So you don't read/watch the news.

It's about REVENUE. Not market share. And your info is out of date.


Arent those both related?? LOLZ
(3 replies) #15 Soldiers33 on 20 Oct 2008 - 16:25
i hate apple for this, why do they think they are so much better than anyone else?
#15.1 LTD on 20 Oct 2008 - 16:42
Soldiers33 said,
i hate apple for this, why do they think they are so much better than anyone else?


That's their job!!

How old are you??
#15.2 +Kirkburn on 20 Oct 2008 - 17:43
LTD said,
That's their job!!

How old are you??

And the appropriateness of that second sentence was...?
#15.3 rm20010 on 20 Oct 2008 - 18:00
LTD said,
That's their job!!

How old are you??


Says the one condoning these CHILDISH attacks from a so-called group of professionals in tech...
(2 replies) #16 Gabureiru on 20 Oct 2008 - 16:37
it's lame from Apple side, the Bean Counter ad speaks for itself, instead of Apple trying to show how the Mac is better they're wasting money looking Microsoft look bad. =-\, lame, simply lame
#16.1 Ricmacas on 20 Oct 2008 - 19:40
They're actually doing the mistake they pointed in the ad. They're spending money in advertising instead of speding money in Snow Leopard. I'm not saying that they aren't producing good software... They should point Microsoft's software problems that have a fix in Apple's software. They shouldn't advertise for a mistake they are doing
#16.2 Ricmacas on 20 Oct 2008 - 19:41
P.s.: Interesting, they dont mention Leopard in almost any recent ad... They are really advertising theyre own mistakes!
(3 replies) #17 Neobond on 20 Oct 2008 - 16:39
When will they go back to actually showcasing and advertising their product?
#17.1 39 Thieves on 20 Oct 2008 - 17:07
Neobond said,
When will they go back to actually showcasing and advertising their product?


They aren't trying to get new customers, merely fuel the elitist attitude of their current owners. That way, their existing customers will be that guy that chirps in at every computer issue, droning on about how perfect a Mac is.

Lets face it, when you have obsessed freaks selling your product at every possible moment, how much do you really have to advertise? Hell, you see what LTD is doing in this very thread? Point proven.
#17.2 Ricmacas on 20 Oct 2008 - 19:43
As i said before, they arent mentioning the L-word in their most recent ads (leopard)
#17.3 Shadrack on 21 Oct 2008 - 07:35
Ricmacas said,
As i said before, they arent mentioning the L-word in their most recent ads (leopard)


Lol...no doubt . I've never seen an advert for Leopard. Lets see, umm who has spent the most on advertisements? Who can't seem to advertise the name of their latest OS? Pretty hypocritical.
(2 replies) #18 Esmandau on 20 Oct 2008 - 16:40
all i have to say is..... jajajajajajajaa kujajajajajajajajajaja jajajajjaaj microsuck =mocosuck =fusuck
#18.1 squarepants on 20 Oct 2008 - 16:41
I bet that is all you CAN say.
#18.2 -Hiroshi- on 20 Oct 2008 - 16:49
squarepants said,
I bet that is all you CAN say.


Probably, that and "ZOMG ROFLCOPTOR LOLZ" -.-'
#19 Sevan on 20 Oct 2008 - 16:41
Here we go again.. *sigh*
(1 reply) #20 -Hiroshi- on 20 Oct 2008 - 16:48
o_O Vista's already fixed.. Stupid Apple.
#20.1 Ricmacas on 20 Oct 2008 - 19:45
By fixed, you mean matured... People take time to get used to the product, and Microsoft takes time to help companies fix their faulty drivers and produce good ones. Apple does not have that problem, since they produce their own drivers.
#21 smooth_criminal1990 on 20 Oct 2008 - 16:55
This advert had better be set in a barn somewhere near Apple Towers and filmed in black and white, or its a bit hyppocritical to moan about MS spending money on advertising.

IMHO the novelty wore off after the first set of "I'm a mac, I'm a pc" ads, they jus b*****n' now.

Hell, the only Microsoft ads I ever even SAW were the Vista ones
(1 reply) #22 James123 on 20 Oct 2008 - 17:00
Yawn... Just when you think Apple advertising couldn't get any more pathetic (and inaccurate) they release these.
#22.1 Ricmacas on 20 Oct 2008 - 19:46
Apple's attitude is so predictable...
(8 replies) #23 LTD on 20 Oct 2008 - 17:04
I can't believe that people are complaining about Apple's "smugness." Or some other nebulous, abstract side of their "attitude." As if that has ever, or ever will have any bearing on my purchases!! ROFL!

You've got to be kidding me.

They make a damn good product. They've been at the absolute forefront of the tech industry for a few years now, they set the bar in terms of hardware/OS design . . . and you all cry about their attitude toward the the competition???? It's their job.

Most of the responses in this thread are not only completely illogical, but its as if none of you have any concept of what it means to market a product. It's basic business understanding.

Stupid Apple? Seems they're the only smart ones in the industry. They're making an absolute killing. We should all study Apple and their extremely successful business model. And did I mention they make some really, really solid products? Can't deny that.

Wow. LOL.



#23.1 Titoist on 20 Oct 2008 - 17:29
LTD said,
I can't believe that people are complaining about Apple's "smugness." Or some other nebulous, abstract side of their "attitude." As if that has ever, or ever will have any bearing on my purchases!! ROFL!

You've got to be kidding me.

They make a damn good product. They've been at the absolute forefront of the tech industry for a few years now, they set the bar in terms of hardware/OS design . . . and you all cry about their attitude toward the the competition???? It's their job.

Most of the responses in this thread are not only completely illogical, but its as if none of you have any concept of what it means to market a product. It's basic business understanding.

Stupid Apple? Seems they're the only smart ones in the industry. They're making an absolute killing. We should all study Apple and their extremely successful business model. And did I mention they make some really, really solid products? Can't deny that.

Wow. LOL.


Do you work for Apple? Didn't think so. Yes, you bought their products...and now Apple won't give a **** if you insulted them or defended them. They still made the money off you and thats all that matters.
#23.2 Shadrack on 20 Oct 2008 - 17:35
LTD said,
I can't believe that people are complaining about Apple's "smugness." Or some other nebulous, abstract side of their "attitude." As if that has ever, or ever will have any bearing on my purchases!! ROFL!

You've got to be kidding me.

They make a damn good product. They've been at the absolute forefront of the tech industry for a few years now, they set the bar in terms of hardware/OS design . . . and you all cry about their attitude toward the the competition???? It's their job.

Most of the responses in this thread are not only completely illogical, but its as if none of you have any concept of what it means to market a product. It's basic business understanding.

Stupid Apple? Seems they're the only smart ones in the industry. They're making an absolute killing. We should all study Apple and their extremely successful business model. And did I mention they make some really, really solid products? Can't deny that.

Wow. LOL.


I can't believe how many top-level posts you've made to this one article. Are you done commenting yet?
#23.3 +Kirkburn on 20 Oct 2008 - 17:46
LTD, if it was working so well, we wouldn't be getting ****ed off, now, would we?

"We should all study Apple and their extremely successful business model."

Or, we could look at the iPod, say it was an extremely good decision, and realise that's pretty much it.
#23.4 FrozenEclipse on 20 Oct 2008 - 17:52
LTD said,
I can't believe that people are complaining about Apple's "smugness." Or some other nebulous, abstract side of their "attitude." As if that has ever, or ever will have any bearing on my purchases!! ROFL!

You've got to be kidding me.

They make a damn good product. They've been at the absolute forefront of the tech industry for a few years now, they set the bar in terms of hardware/OS design . . . and you all cry about their attitude toward the the competition???? It's their job.

Most of the responses in this thread are not only completely illogical, but its as if none of you have any concept of what it means to market a product. It's basic business understanding.

Stupid Apple? Seems they're the only smart ones in the industry. They're making an absolute killing. We should all study Apple and their extremely successful business model. And did I mention they make some really, really solid products? Can't deny that.

Wow. LOL.


I wonder how many circle jerks you've attended at Cupertino to have such an erroneous and obviously flawed opinion. I don't think there's a bigger fanboy around here than you. I also love the personal shots you're taking at everybody. "Oh none of you know how to market a product, only Apple does because they do everything right". Does Apple send you a free overrated gift with every swooning comment you make about their overrated products?
#23.5 +stifler6478 on 20 Oct 2008 - 18:06
FrozenEclipse said,
I wonder how many circle jerks you've attended at Cupertino to have such an erroneous and obviously flawed opinion. I don't think there's a bigger fanboy around here than you. I also love the personal shots you're taking at everybody. "Oh none of you know how to market a product, only Apple does because they do everything right". Does Apple send you a free overrated gift with every swooning comment you make about their overrated products?


You just made my day, haha. Thanks for that.

-Spenser
#23.6 theyarecomingforyou on 20 Oct 2008 - 20:12
The point is Apple uses negative advertising to make their point. That is something I personally hate and I boycott products with such campaigns. You might not have a problem with it but I most certainly do. I find it unbelievable that people don't take the attitude/sentiment of an advert into consideration.
#23.7 GreyWolfSC on 20 Oct 2008 - 20:19
LTD, dude, you really gotta stop eating the green M&Ms...
#23.8 Richteralan on 21 Oct 2008 - 01:53
Hey LTD,
How much you are earning per comment?
Can I get an interview for this?
#24 +majortom1981 on 20 Oct 2008 - 17:50
Apple should talk instead of spending money on their ad campaign they should use the money to get more games for osx.
#25 Doli on 20 Oct 2008 - 17:59
Ok both ads were bad. Just make ads showing off your computers and OS Apple and stop this silly game.
(1 reply) #26 jordanthegreat on 20 Oct 2008 - 18:03
Now say I never heard of apple. And I watched this commercial. What kind of business could I conclude apple is? A community for people who enjoy bashing on windows? That is all the ad portrays. I could never conclude that apple is a computer company and that they are actually trying to sell me a product. Not from these commercials.
#26.1 Ricmacas on 20 Oct 2008 - 19:52
That's true, Apple is not even selling computers with that ad. That ad is targeting Microsoft, not us, thats what makes it silly. Its more 30 secs of advertising on TV that's not even targetted to us. Of course the idea is to make everyone hate Vista. But nowdays PC's are fast enough * to run Vista and they dont have a point anymore. So, you can't make people hate something that they know its working. You had your chance Apple.

* (and they have better drivers)
(2 replies) #27 2Cold Scorpio on 20 Oct 2008 - 18:04
More substanceless propaganda ads from Apple. Boo! Next time, actually try to convince me to use your wares instead of pointing fingers at what others are doing 'wrong'. Fail.
#27.1 39 Thieves on 20 Oct 2008 - 18:10
2Cold Scorpio said,
More substanceless propaganda ads from Apple. Boo! Next time, actually try to convince me to use your wares instead of pointing fingers at what others are doing 'wrong'. Fail.


They don't even effectively point out what "others" are doing wrong. They just perpetuate the same ignorant BS.
#27.2 Ricmacas on 20 Oct 2008 - 19:55
I agree. This is pointing other's mistakes, and Microsoft is actually learning from this ads. And Apple is now commiting the mistakes they advertise. Like spending money advertising against the competition and never saying Leopard in the latest Ads (third time i comment this)
(2 replies) #28 guruparan on 20 Oct 2008 - 18:18
Microsoft is getting ready with Windows 7...still Apple is far behind with Vista!!...Ask Apple to charge less for there not-worthy-laptop for that amount.. I can load OSX in Dell inspiron too (hahem if Apple sells the OS to load it on a dell)
#28.1 Ricmacas on 20 Oct 2008 - 19:58
Yeah, the restrictive policy is what makes Apple software so stable. If you tested Vista vs Mac OS X in a lot of different PC's, you would understand what i'm saying.
#28.2 offroadaaron on 20 Oct 2008 - 22:29
Ricmacas said,
Yeah, the restrictive policy is what makes Apple software so stable. If you tested Vista vs Mac OS X in a lot of different PC's, you would understand what i'm saying.


they probably want to support their own product instead of some random company, I mean if you owned a business and has some other random company use their policies that were substandard to yours you probably wouldn't be happy.

I like DELL but I don't think that apple want to use their hardware for the fact of more problems, as apple can keep as much or as little control over how good the hardware is being used with Mac OS X.
(1 reply) #29 craybox on 20 Oct 2008 - 19:00
The Bean Counter is so Funny LOL
#29.1 Shadow Dragon on 22 Oct 2008 - 12:21
Hey you forgot these [sarcasm] [/sarcasm]
(1 reply) #30 BrainDedd on 20 Oct 2008 - 19:00
Makes me glad competitive advertising is illegal in my country.
#30.1 Ricmacas on 20 Oct 2008 - 19:58
What country are you in? South Africa?
(2 replies) #31 ambiance on 20 Oct 2008 - 19:02
I don't see what wrong with Apple calling a spade a spade.
#31.1 Doli on 20 Oct 2008 - 19:10
When was the last Apple ad about their OS on TV? They need to fight Microsoft with what there OS can do for people then these silly ads.
#31.2 Ricmacas on 20 Oct 2008 - 20:00
They say Vista is not mentioned in M$' ads, but they didn't mention Leopard in their latest ads.. (4th time i mention this)
(2 replies) #32 Recon415 on 20 Oct 2008 - 19:20
Its really sad how Apple resorts to negative ads to actually get people to buy their crappy product.. Microsoft's ads didn't make one negative comment about anything to do with Apple, besides the fact they were sort of poking fun at Mac's ads with the "I'm a PC" thing. Apple's the one being hostile here. Microsoft is ALWAYS improving Vista, with every update it gets better, and faster. People still think of Vista as the bloated OS that it originally was when it was launched, and Apple is taking advantage of that. Dirty tricks.

You see, Apple has to use negative ads because they just can't think of anything that's better about their OS that's boast-worthy.
#32.1 39 Thieves on 20 Oct 2008 - 19:23
Recon415 said,
Its really sad how Apple resorts to negative ads to actually get people to buy their crappy product.. Microsoft's ads didn't make one negative comment about anything to do with Apple, besides the fact they were sort of poking fun at Mac's ads with the "I'm a PC" thing. Apple's the one being hostile here. Microsoft is ALWAYS improving Vista, with every update it gets better, and faster. People still think of Vista as the bloated OS that it originally was when it was launched, and Apple is taking advantage of that. Dirty tricks.


No, actually Apple make excellent products. You'd never know that strictly going by their ads. No, they do what most people with dramatically low self-esteem do, or people with various types of mental disorders; they insult the short-comings of others in order to elevate themselves, rather than emphasizing their own merits.

Sad, really. But I guess that goes to show whom they have targeted for these ads.
#32.2 Ricmacas on 20 Oct 2008 - 20:05
39 Thieves said,
No, actually Apple make excellent products. You'd never know that strictly going by their ads. No, they do what most people with dramatically low self-esteem do, or people with various types of mental disorders; they insult the short-comings of others in order to elevate themselves, rather than emphasizing their own merits.

Sad, really. But I guess that goes to show whom they have targeted for these ads.


Yeah, but this ads are making Micro$oft look better. People are getting sick of I'm a Mac/PC ads always telling people that Windows is worse. They have no better arguments? They are actually doing the mistakes that they point in the ads, and they're losing reputation. The fact is, Microsoft has learned from Apple's ads, but Apple hasn't.
(3 replies) #33 RangerLG on 20 Oct 2008 - 20:11
Apple needs to decide if they are a hardware company or a software company. I've always heard they were a hardware company so they should not even care what MS is doing.
#33.1 Esmandau on 20 Oct 2008 - 20:16
RangerLG said,
Apple needs to decide if they are a hardware company or a software company. I've always heard they were a hardware company so they should not even care what MS is doing.


You are so wrong, in the past steve always has say that they are Software. But they decide who manufacturate their hardwares. but they are software and if you dont trust watch Bill Vs. Steve @ D5 in 2007 and watch the Keynote of the 2.0 Software For iPhone

The Are Software
#33.2 RAID 0 on 21 Oct 2008 - 06:40
Esmandau said,
You are so wrong, in the past steve always has say that they are Software. But they decide who manufacturate their hardwares. but they are software and if you dont trust watch Bill Vs. Steve @ D5 in 2007 and watch the Keynote of the 2.0 Software For iPhone

The Are Software


Oh great, so there's really nothing special about their hardware, is there?
#33.3 RangerLG on 22 Oct 2008 - 02:50
Esmandau said,
You are so wrong, in the past steve always has say that they are Software. But they decide who manufacturate their hardwares. but they are software and if you dont trust watch Bill Vs. Steve @ D5 in 2007 and watch the Keynote of the 2.0 Software For iPhone

The Are Software


I will disagree based on this fact, you can install Windows on Apple hardware, but I cannot build a machine and install OSX on it. OSX is directly tied to the hardware so they can almost be thought of as one all inclusive piece. I cannot buy an Apple with no OS and install my own, it will come with OSX rather I want it to or not. There is no such thing as a Microsoft brand PC. MS just provides the software to allow the PC to function.
#34 HalcyonX12 on 20 Oct 2008 - 20:31
Attack ads, they're not just for politics!
(2 replies) #35 MightyJordan on 20 Oct 2008 - 20:43
Looks like Apple can't think of any more praises for Mac now. Attacking the competition is just childish and a sign of weakness.

Apple, do us a favour and just focus on improving iPods, and most of all, iTunes.
#35.1 offroadaaron on 20 Oct 2008 - 22:20
MightyJordan said,
Looks like Apple can't think of any more praises for Mac now. Attacking the competition is just childish and a sign of weakness.

Apple, do us a favour and just focus on improving iPods, and most of all, iTunes.


In sport if your doing well do you start defending or do you still attack (that doesn't mean better than MS), apple have been doing the attacking the whole time why change its game now.
#35.2 Glendi on 21 Oct 2008 - 12:04
offroadaaron said,
In sport if your doing well do you start defending or do you still attack (that doesn't mean better than MS), apple have been doing the attacking the whole time why change its game now.


Worst comparison ever. In sports there IS ALWAYS someone who attacks and someone who defends. MS isn't defending because it doesn't need to. Apple is just wasting time. They could focus on other stuff rather then spend money on ridiculous ads. None of them should bash at each other.
#36 ajua on 20 Oct 2008 - 20:48
The problem is that as long as Apple continues to be so tight in their software/hardware, the competition (MS, music players, phones, etc) will continue to produce better products than theirs.

The iPod was what brought them back. The iPod's software is really good, but that's it.

Besides that, their OS is as good as any other OS out there.
(3 replies) #37 bob_c_b on 20 Oct 2008 - 21:21
Too bad they have to spend all their ad dollars bashing other products instead of touting there own, makes you wonder if maybe they don't have anything all that special really? Weak, condescending and getting more than a little old.

Overpriced hardware, waiting longer for Mac versions of mainstream software (PhotoShop Elements, Quicken and Office are always lagging in releases and features), charging for firmware. I'd probably try to keep the eye on my competitor too if I had these issues.

Last edited by bob_c_b on 20 Oct 2008 - 21:29
#37.1 offroadaaron on 20 Oct 2008 - 22:16
bob_c_b said,
Too bad they have to spend all their ad dollars bashing other products instead of touting there own, makes you wonder if maybe they don't have anything all that special really? Weak, condescending and getting more than a little old.

Overpriced hardware, waiting longer for Mac versions of mainstream software (PhotoShop Elements, Quicken and Office are always lagging in releases and features), charging for firmware. I'd probably try to keep the eye on my competitor too if I had these issues.


better than spending 10 mill on a comedian that's not funny anymore (was funny back in his time though) and is pretty much retired. Plus the MS ads are boring.
#37.2 simon360 on 20 Oct 2008 - 22:23
Photoshop Elements and Quicken I don't know a whole lot about, but MS Office isn't "delayed", rather Microsoft has a practical release schedule. They add new features in each Windows release, take the features people liked from that, and put it in the Mac release, but add a few more features which could end up in the Windows release.

But very few people use Office on a Mac anymore anyway. Far too overpriced when iWork is $99 and Office is useless (on a Mac).
#37.3 bob_c_b on 21 Oct 2008 - 02:14
simon360 said,
Photoshop Elements and Quicken I don't know a whole lot about, but MS Office isn't "delayed", rather Microsoft has a practical release schedule. They add new features in each Windows release, take the features people liked from that, and put it in the Mac release, but add a few more features which could end up in the Windows release.

But very few people use Office on a Mac anymore anyway. Far too overpriced when iWork is $99 and Office is useless (on a Mac).


I own several Macs, Office is always delayed, don't feed me MS sping. And iWork is not a replacement for Office if you need to get actual work done. This is why as much as I like some things about OS X, I do most of my work and play on Windows. Apple can spin all they want, Vista is just fine.
(4 replies) #38 Pink Waters on 20 Oct 2008 - 21:48
I don't know whats wrong with people who are talking about what they dont know!
the apple mac campigns are some kind of episodes, the talked about their products upsides in some, and vista downsides on otherones, and bashed microsoft in another ones too

the thing about those last 2 ads is that:
microsoft has played a little mean game in their ads "iam a pc", which is: changing apple true intentions (which is making some ads about how pcs do less a hassle compaered to macs with this guy playing the role of the PC) and twisted it to the concept that apple is making fun of PC users themselves (as if that pc guy represents pc users, which is wrong)

this was a trick microsoft was trying to trun people against apple morally! and thats so twisted!
SO APPLE IS NOT BLAMED TO RESPOND TO THEIR LITTLE DIRY MEAN TRICK WITH THOSE LAST ADS, SAYING: NICE TRY!

edit:
and by the way, when apple tells in the mac ads that the bigger market share os, has that hassles and their products does not!, that means that they are telling whats their products good about, but in a different way!

Last edited by Pink Waters on 20 Oct 2008 - 21:58
#38.1 39 Thieves on 20 Oct 2008 - 22:04
Pink Waters said,
I don't know whats wrong with people who are talking about what they dont know!
the apple mac campigns are some kind of episodes, the talked about their products upsides in some, and vista downsides on otherones, and bashed microsoft in another ones too

the thing about those last 2 ads is that:
microsoft has played a little mean game in their ads "iam a pc", which is: changing apple true intentions (which is making some ads about how pcs do less a hassle compaered to macs with this guy playing the role of the PC) and twisted it to the concept that apple is making fun of PC users themselves (as if that pc guy represents pc users, which is wrong)

this was a trick microsoft was trying to trun people against apple morally! and thats so twisted!
SO APPLE IS NOT BLAMED TO RESPOND TO THEIR LITTLE DIRY MEAN TRICK WITH THOSE LAST ADS, SAYING: NICE TRY!

edit:
and by the way, when apple tells in the mac ads that the bigger market share os, has that hassles and their products does not!, that means that they are telling whats their products good about, but in a different way!


Pink Waters...is that like...Kool Aid?
#38.2 nmesisca on 21 Oct 2008 - 08:26
39 Thieves said,
Pink Waters said,
I don't know whats wrong with people who are talking about what they dont know!
the apple mac campigns are some kind of episodes, the talked about their products upsides in some, and vista downsides on otherones, and bashed microsoft in another ones too

the thing about those last 2 ads is that:
microsoft has played a little mean game in their ads "iam a pc", which is: changing apple true intentions (which is making some ads about how pcs do less a hassle compaered to macs with this guy playing the role of the PC) and twisted it to the concept that apple is making fun of PC users themselves (as if that pc guy represents pc users, which is wrong)

this was a trick microsoft was trying to trun people against apple morally! and thats so twisted!
SO APPLE IS NOT BLAMED TO RESPOND TO THEIR LITTLE DIRY MEAN TRICK WITH THOSE LAST ADS, SAYING: NICE TRY!

edit:
and by the way, when apple tells in the mac ads that the bigger market share os, has that hassles and their products does not!, that means that they are telling whats their products good about, but in a different way!


Pink Waters...is that like...Kool Aid?


mate.. just ... die.. will you?
#38.3 39 Thieves on 21 Oct 2008 - 14:22
nmesisca said,
mate.. just ... die.. will you?


I'm not your mate, and is that the best you can come up with? Someone doesn't agree with some ads, so you tell them to die?

Grow up.
#38.4 rm20010 on 21 Oct 2008 - 18:52
Pink Waters said,
the thing about those last 2 ads is that:
microsoft has played a little mean game in their ads "iam a pc", which is: changing apple true intentions (which is making some ads about how pcs do less a hassle compaered to macs with this guy playing the role of the PC) and twisted it to the concept that apple is making fun of PC users themselves (as if that pc guy represents pc users, which is wrong)

this was a trick microsoft was trying to trun people against apple morally! and thats so twisted!
SO APPLE IS NOT BLAMED TO RESPOND TO THEIR LITTLE DIRY MEAN TRICK WITH THOSE LAST ADS, SAYING: NICE TRY!


Ooooohh I see. So Apple's intention of making almost completely offtopic ads to "convert" users and painting PC users as dumb is somehow all innocent, then MS responds WITHOUT MENTIONING APPLE EVEN ONCE OR INSULTING ITS USERS... and it's somehow a 'dirty trick'?

Nice try.
#39 +chaosblade on 20 Oct 2008 - 21:48
Like the ever-losing type of politician, Apple (and their army of RDF'd idiots) can do nothing better than to bash their competition. And even then, They don't get ahead in terms of market share or sales, Compared to Microsoft.

This is just sad.

Edit: Oh, and to certain furious fanboys posting in this thread.. Seriously, I do think you need help. Defending a brand you have no relation to what so ever is just plain worrying. Seek help. Now.
#40 offroadaaron on 20 Oct 2008 - 22:13
oh this was way better than the MS ads, and funny too... guess what they didn't even have to get someone like Seinfeld or another comedian to try and make it funny (which makes it completely lame of MS).

Watch the MS fanboys jealousy in the truth come out.

(1 reply) #41 Aahz on 20 Oct 2008 - 22:19
So...are any of these companies ever going to make ads which actually show what using the OS is like?

It's kinda funny how I know about all of the amazing things that ShamWow can do but OSX and Vista are still nebulous concepts to me as an average commercial viewer.
#41.1 LTD on 21 Oct 2008 - 12:26
Aahz said,
So...are any of these companies ever going to make ads which actually show what using the OS is like?


They don't need to. That isn't the point.
(1 reply) #42 perochan on 20 Oct 2008 - 22:22
at least these ads made me laugh, seinfeld doesnt.
#42.1 offroadaaron on 20 Oct 2008 - 22:33
perochan said,
at least these ads made me laugh, seinfeld doesnt.


+1 he is passed his used by date unfortunately.
(3 replies) #43 Pygmy_Hippo on 20 Oct 2008 - 22:32
Anyone want to place a bet that Apple will accuse Microsoft of "pallin' around with terrorists" in their next ad?
#43.1 offroadaaron on 20 Oct 2008 - 22:37
Pygmy_Hippo said,
Anyone want to place a bet that Apple will accuse Microsoft of "pallin' around with terrorists" in their next ad?


anyone wanna bet that MS bring out Windows 7 next year because Vista is doing badly?
#43.2 FrozenEclipse on 20 Oct 2008 - 22:44
offroadaaron said,
anyone wanna bet that MS bring out Windows 7 next year because Vista is doing badly?


I'll bet that Windows 7 will be out by next year, but not because Vista is doing badly, but because it's going back to how Microsoft used to release operating systems. The near 6 year gap between XP and Vista was a one-time thing.
#43.3 Pygmy_Hippo on 21 Oct 2008 - 07:34
offroadaaron said,
anyone wanna bet that MS bring out Windows 7 next year because Vista is doing badly?


So using the same rationale OSX must be doing appallingly because it's had updates nearly every 2 years (sometimes more frequently) since its release in 2001.

It's not doing that badly though is it?

Last edited by Pygmy_Hippo on 21 Oct 2008 - 09:29
(2 replies) #44 Aahz on 20 Oct 2008 - 22:42
The big pile of cash is the PC guy's Mac hardware savings fund and the little one is for building a new PC with similar specs.
#44.1 offroadaaron on 20 Oct 2008 - 23:09
Aahz said,
The big pile of cash is the PC guy's Mac hardware savings fund and the little one is for building a new PC with similar specs.


where did you come up with that, I didn't see that stated anywhere lol
#44.2 mrmckeb on 21 Oct 2008 - 06:57
Hahaha you're right on the mark
#45 AnthoWin on 20 Oct 2008 - 22:43
Thank goodness Apple has responded, and responded it has well.
#46 ambiance on 20 Oct 2008 - 22:57
Why must so many people take these ads so personally?

There is far too much hostility, name calling and assumptions being made in here. It's almost as if you can't say anything bad about Vista, warranted or not, without starting a flame war. I also find it hypocritical that someone above me mentions Apple's users RDF, because lately I've noticed a strong one resonating around Vista users as well.

For the record, I have used Vista since the day it was released and have went through all of it's growing pains. I'm still going through some and I am tired of waiting for vendors (Creative) and Microsoft to do something about it. The waiting and frustration has convinced me to switch to Apple in the near future and I don't consider myself any better than the next user.

A lot of you need to geek down and to stop taking these ads so seriously. Ignore them if you have to and know that all is fair when it comes to competition.
#47 Darran on 20 Oct 2008 - 22:58
I think they worked, and it's funny how many fangirls in this thread are offended by that.
#48 MulletRobZ on 20 Oct 2008 - 22:59
As much as I love Apple's products, those kinds of ads are getting old and are now simply stupid.
#49 Mayhem on 20 Oct 2008 - 23:24
is this the reason i dislike Apple and don't want to buy a Mac, their Ads are totally childish

is this the way that a company express themselves ? for me don't look any different from a bunch of kids and treating everyone as such making me not trust on any product of them

if i wanted to see kids promoting their products simply can go to a university and see their projects

and no, i'm not a anti mac, not a microsoft/vista fanboy or whatever, i will say the same of any company doing ads like this and such making me not buy anything from them
#50 Tech Star on 20 Oct 2008 - 23:25
These are my favorite ads from Apple!
#51 Aahz on 20 Oct 2008 - 23:33
Macs vs. PCs*thumbsup*
#52 JamesWeb on 20 Oct 2008 - 23:39
OH MY GOD why does everyone get so ANGRY about these things?

Can't the Mac fanboys just concede Windows is more useful and Windows users concede MacOS is prettier and be done with it?
#53 Tikitiki on 21 Oct 2008 - 00:08
that made me lol
(2 replies) #54 rm20010 on 21 Oct 2008 - 01:14
I seem to have forgotten the day 'advertising' was no longer talking about yourselves or your products, but talking trash about your competition and nothing else. That's the same thing as the election campaigns on both sides of the border. :/

Like honestly, an average consumer couldn't give a ****ing damn that Microsoft spent X amount of dollars in ad campaigns. How is that beneficial in anyway to the average Joe?
#54.1 offroadaaron on 21 Oct 2008 - 01:40
rm20010 said,
I seem to have forgotten the day 'advertising' was no longer talking about yourselves or your products, but talking trash about your competition and nothing else. That's the same thing as the election campaigns on both sides of the border. :/

Like honestly, an average consumer couldn't give a ****ing damn that Microsoft spent X amount of dollars in ad campaigns. How is that beneficial in anyway to the average Joe?


they probably do actually, especially with vista, you speak to any non geekish person about vista and they usually don't like it (well most of the people i've spoken to anyways).
#54.2 Recon415 on 21 Oct 2008 - 01:54
offroadaaron said,
they probably do actually, especially with vista, you speak to any non geekish person about vista and they usually don't like it (well most of the people i've spoken to anyways).


That's mainly because it is considered bloated to alot of people (which it isn't, but people still think of it that way). But really, Windows XP recieved the very same treatment back in the day. Slow, bloated, too much eye candy.

Windows Vista was made to make full use of today's and tomorrows hardware.
(5 replies) #55 hybridr6 on 21 Oct 2008 - 02:05
After spending millions of dollars on advertising the two OS giants fall to operating systems created for free by the OSS community.
#55.1 39 Thieves on 21 Oct 2008 - 03:06
hybridr6 said,
After spending millions of dollars on advertising the two OS giants fall to operating systems created for free by the OSS community.


I'd say wake me up when that happens, but I don't want to spend the rest of my life in a coma...
#55.2 hybridr6 on 21 Oct 2008 - 04:29
39 Thieves said,
I'd say wake me up when that happens, but I don't want to spend the rest of my life in a coma...


Well may not be that long. Netbooks are becoming more and more popular and these things can't run OSX) much less Vista and XP is slowly being phased out.
http://www.dailytech.com/Netbooks+Saving+P...rticle13206.htm
http://www.dailytech.com/Netbooks+Assault+...rticle13058.htm
#55.3 39 Thieves on 21 Oct 2008 - 14:19
hybridr6 said,
Well may not be that long. Netbooks are becoming more and more popular and these things can't run OSX) much less Vista and XP is slowly being phased out.
http://www.dailytech.com/Netbooks+Saving+P...rticle13206.htm
http://www.dailytech.com/Netbooks+Assault+...rticle13058.htm


Oh ho ho...Netbooks you say? Too bad the Linux versions are being returned 4x as frequently as the Windows versions.

http://gizmodo.com/5058953/linux-netbooks-...rsions-says-msi

Lest you think I've somehow chopped this figure and embedded it out of context, here's what MSI's US sales director Andy Tung told our friend Joanna at Laptop when she asked about high return rates:

"We have done a lot of studies on the return rates and haven’t really talked about it much until now. Our internal research has shown that the return of netbooks is higher than regular notebooks, but the main cause of that is Linux."


Guess I'll get my pajamas on...
#55.4 hybridr6 on 21 Oct 2008 - 15:40
39 Thieves said,
hybridr6 said,
Well may not be that long. Netbooks are becoming more and more popular and these things can't run OSX) much less Vista and XP is slowly being phased out.
http://www.dailytech.com/Netbooks+Saving+P...rticle13206.htm
http://www.dailytech.com/Netbooks+Assault+...rticle13058.htm


Oh ho ho...Netbooks you say? Too bad the Linux versions are being returned 4x as frequently as the Windows versions.

http://gizmodo.com/5058953/linux-netbooks-...rsions-says-msi

Lest you think I've somehow chopped this figure and embedded it out of context, here's what MSI's US sales director Andy Tung told our friend Joanna at Laptop when she asked about high return rates:

"We have done a lot of studies on the return rates and haven’t really talked about it much until now. Our internal research has shown that the return of netbooks is higher than regular notebooks,
but the main cause of that is Linux."


Guess I'll get my pajamas on...


Arrogance on the internet knows no bounds. If you read my response you would have understood my point. Which is that XP is being phased out and the netbooks cannot run Vista or OSX so unless MS or Apple creates a new OS which can run on these machines that role will quickly be taken up by the FOSS community and people will have no choice but to use another OS. BTW I never said it has to be a *nix OS...
#55.5 hybridr6 on 21 Oct 2008 - 16:47
new developments have made my point null. At least for Asus netbooks.

http://www.dailytech.com/ASUS+CEO+Jerry+Sh...rticle13251.htm
#56 virtorio on 21 Oct 2008 - 03:51
On one hand I found them kind of funny (mostly because I think the actors do a pretty good job), on the other I found them highly annoying because of full of bull****.
#57 AchromiciA on 21 Oct 2008 - 05:38
I have to say I'm getting sick of these ads, all that Apple can seem to do is hack on Windows... Tout your own bloody software like a normal company and yes for you out there I am a Windows user and yes I don't like Apple, but seriously is it that hard to make an ad that isn't bashing the competition. As far as I am aware Windows have never created an ad to directly attack Mac (but I could have easily missed all of those).
(3 replies) #58 M_Lyons10 on 21 Oct 2008 - 06:53
Well, in all honesty I would like to see Apple release an OS that targets the sheer variety of hardware (Including driver and component support) that Microsoft works to target. I really am impartial here as I like both companies really, but these adds are really unfair to Microsoft (Though funny). Apple doesn't take on anywhere near the challenges Microsoft does and instead locks down their OS so that it can't run on anything BUT Apple hardware. So, come on Apple? If it's so easy, realease Snow Leopard for PC... I dare ya'... :p
#58.1 RAID 0 on 21 Oct 2008 - 09:52
Yeah. Like that would EVER happen. It would take Apple 10 years to catch up to MS (oh my bad, I meant M$) on that front. I don't think that's $teve Job$' plan. Besides, what would Apple users know about upgrades and various computer parts that don't come standard with a iMac/iBook/iFarted?
#58.2 LTD on 21 Oct 2008 - 12:29
RAID 0 said,
Yeah. Like that would EVER happen. It would take Apple 10 years to catch up to MS (oh my bad, I meant M$) on that front. I don't think that's $teve Job$' plan. Besides, what would Apple users know about upgrades and various computer parts that don't come standard with a iMac/iBook/iFarted?


Apple's intention is definitely NOT to support all the hardware out there. That's always been part of their plan.
#58.3 M_Lyons10 on 21 Oct 2008 - 12:50
Yes. Apple doesn't support anything other than a select few components, then makes fun of Microsoft for having difficulty supporting everything. It's quite ludicrous. My point I feel is valid. No one has any business making fun of someone for something that THEY can't do...
#59 Fusion3k on 21 Oct 2008 - 08:26
I think its just plain Sad, I do like the look and everthing else about OS X but still no decent hardware or game support. Maybe they should look at spending there advertisment cash on supporting games rather then having a dig at microsoft!
#60 kizzaaa on 21 Oct 2008 - 09:21
Haha I thought the ads had a lot of humour.

My company would love to have a marketing dept. like Apple.
#61 pax13 on 21 Oct 2008 - 09:49
Well, to settle matters, the problem with the recent ad bashing galore seems to be that apple contracted creatives haven't been able to find an easy target to steal a good idea for a new have of advertising, as such they just keep on repeating the same ideas with variations on the latest trends.

Louis Psihoyos - Photo wall apple TV ad - stolen after negotiations with apple failed
Christian Marclay - iphone telephones - stolen after negotiations with apple were declined
Lugz - Apple copied the shoes commercial - apple ended up having to pull the ad
The Postal Service - music video almost cloned shot by shot - apple feigned ignorance it existed
Jobs admitting the ripping off - http://youtube.com/watch?v=J0UjU0rtavE

Here's a little more detail - http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/05/apples-...ng-off-artists/

Apple's "think different", and the Picasso appropried frase "Good artists copy, Great artists steal" is starting to get thinner by the ad.

Last edited by pax13 on 21 Oct 2008 - 10:36
#62 vetneufuse on 21 Oct 2008 - 11:14
These ads just seem childish... not calling Windows by its name... "Vista".. vista isn't its "name" it's the name of the version... so that ad just feels really dumb... MS can't call Windows, Windows? what happens when Windows 7 comes out... Apple going to run ads saying don't but "7"? no they will say dont get windows... I just don't know, these ads turn me off from Apple more then make me want to buy a mac, sure they are nicely designed, but these just make me look at apple as the bully in the market while MS tries to keep their ads more friendly....
(1 reply) #63 +chaosblade on 21 Oct 2008 - 11:22
#63.1 +techbeck on 21 Oct 2008 - 15:57
chaosblade said,


Good sum up. I am sure if MS bad mouthed Leopard, then people would have a negative feeling towards leopard.
#64 acies on 21 Oct 2008 - 12:09
lol... I really don't see how the average person can really care about the ads this much. Fair enough if you find them annoying. Plenty of ads are annoying... But they're just ads.

Last edited by acies on 21 Oct 2008 - 12:55
#65 hotdog963al on 21 Oct 2008 - 12:19
LOL that last one was brilliant
(2 replies) #66 LTD on 21 Oct 2008 - 13:05
Ads don't need to showcase anything about the product being sold. It can be done indirectly. Effective ads don't even need to include any kind of speech or text!

There is a place for both negative and positive advertising. Negative ads may seem distasteful to certain individuals, but they can be incredibly effective. It is not a sign of weakness, it is not a sign of imaginative bankruptcy - it's an attempt to put your product in the best possible light by turning the tables and emphasizing your opponent's shortcomings. This has been practiced for years, not just in advertising, but in politics, business, all walks of life. it isn't just about selling a product, it's about finding a weakness (or one that your target/audience is able to perceive) and then exploiting it. YOU have likely engaged in this kind of behaviour as well! In relationships, business dealings, etc. It's about taking your opponents image, and then substituting with your own. If he goal was not to sell anything, we can play this nicely all the time. But in such a fast-changing industry as tech, you have to be deliberate and even aggressive at times. It's not dirty, it's all part of the process.

Advertising's goal is to ultimately influence the audience - to get them to believe something, to behave a certain way, to view a thing, object, person, etc. in a different light that will result in sales. You don't need to showcase or demo your product at all! It can be direct or indirect. it can be an implied message, or a direct message, or a mixture of both.

Mac vs. PC ads have been on for a while now. It's only recently that Apple has decided to target Microsoft a bit differently than before - they've perceived a weakness, a chink in their armour and are now exploiting it. Simple as that. It isn't bad or good. It just *is*. It's amoral.

I'm not being paid by Apple. I don't fly out to Cupertino in order to participate in any kind of "consumer appreciation event." I just like to defend effective, ballsy advertising. Apple is a company that spent its time in the shadows during the 90's. And out of nowhere it strode out and asserted itself among big, established players such as Dell and HP. That's impressive. Their products are now the most sought-after in the tech industry. Top sellers on Amazon.com. The darling of tech reviewers. You can hate them. You can find their methods offensive. But don't begrudge them their success despite huge odds. They don't sell junk. Everyone knows that. You can't deny that they do indeed have a commitment to quality that is uncommon in this industry, which has resulted in not only a large population of switchers, but repeat business. Satisfied customers.

Apple's success doesn't excuse them from any wrongdoing, however. Same as MS' success doesn't excuse them from any wrongdoing as well (a la antitrust.) But we need to also understand that all's fair in love and war. If you were reaping the benefits of negative advertising, you would certainly not complain. It's really all a matter of perception, all a matter of where you happen to be sitting. If I had the opportunity to capitalize on my opponent's weakness, to exploit their fumble of the ball, I'll do it. It's an opportunity, that's all it is. If it works, it'll leave my image, my product, as the alternative - and hopefully consumers will have a far better experience with my products. That's the goal. At the end of the day, the only reason to be in business is to make money. This isn't for everyone. There are plenty of non-profit, charitable organizations that operate differently. But if you have stakeholders, if you have an available target market, if there are expectations in terms of revenue and profit, then you really can't be worried about hurting the competition's feelings.

So the next time you see a negative ad, just remember that the only one yelling "dirty tricks" . . . is the other side.

Until they do it too.

Playing nice works only some of the time.

Cheers.
#66.1 pax13 on 21 Oct 2008 - 14:15
Nice well put, even still, they do portray a negative image of the company in the eyes of a substatial amount of consumers, though in the end I'm not sure that impacts sales negatively.
I get much more upset, especially since working on a creative medium how they blatantly rip off artists on their marketing campaigns, with several cases of using the media/concept they tried to acquire and were denied, opting for a "if not by word, then by sword! approach, and have not had bigger setback in this because said artists usually don't have the money to defend their intellectual property.
I do like apple products (except the pod), but because of price have never aquired any, but I am developing a growing dislikeness of jobs and the image he portrays of the company by the marketing techniques he employs.
#66.2 Shadrack on 21 Oct 2008 - 14:59
There is nothing wrong with negative advertisements (although I think positive ones are more effective). But there is also nothing wrong with people attacking the attacker and dismissing blatant FUD.

BTW: How many more top-level posts do you got in you for this news article? It could be a record. You may win a copy of Vista Ultimate.
#67 Airlink on 21 Oct 2008 - 13:30
Ok, those two ads made me laugh. Good job, apple.
V-word: Ok, lame premise but it's executed well.
Been-counter: Now that's funny. I don't care if you're a mac-fan or a MS Fanboy, or if you are a weenie and can't find the any button on the keyboard; this is pure comedy gold. Very well done, good job Apple.
#68 Impact on 21 Oct 2008 - 14:16
I thought these were hillarious! I can always count on an Apple ad to make me laugh because of how much they hit home being a former Windows user.
(4 replies) #69 +techbeck on 21 Oct 2008 - 15:01
Oh please. Another bad advertisement from Apple. Please Apple, instead of only bad mouthing MS, try and promote your product. If this is the only way Apple can promote itself by bad mouthing MS...then they are in big trouble. If you cannot make your stuff sell without these lame ads, then you pretty much suck and dont know how to advertise. MS never had to do this.

And yes MS is putting a lot of $$$ towards advertising...because the can and they CAN AFFORD IT! There is nothing wrong with Vista ( i have it installed on 4 systems no issues), just people bitching and moaning because for the first time EVER, they need a decent system to run a Windows OS. Apple has ALWAYS had better hardware in their systems because their OS has required that for A LONG TIME. Yea, MS paid 300mil for advertising...thats just chump change for MS. Apple is just moaning and complaining because all they can do is hire nobodies and create a commercial with 2 morons on a white background chatting. You know what Apple, stop your crying and advertise your PRODUCTS. Maybe if you do this and stop trying to bad mouth MS, your company will do better. This kind of bad mouthing tactics are not working in the Presidential election and will fail here. Its been proven that people dont want to hear bad mouthing but information on what the company/person is selling. Apple doesnt want to battle MS in advertising. MS has MUCH more money to promote their products and create new products. MS could buy Apple and make them their bitch if they wanted...haha...but hey, no one wants that.

Last edited by techbeck on 21 Oct 2008 - 15:12
#69.1 LTD on 21 Oct 2008 - 15:59
techbeck said,
Oh please. Another bad advertisement from Apple. Please Apple, instead of only bad mouthing MS, try and promote your product. If this is the only way Apple can promote itself by bad mouthing MS...then they are in big trouble. If you cannot make your stuff sell without these lame ads, then you pretty much suck and dont know how to advertise. MS never had to do this.

And yes MS is putting a lot of $$$ towards advertising...because the can and they CAN AFFORD IT! There is nothing wrong with Vista ( i have it installed on 4 systems no issues), just people bitching and moaning because for the first time EVER, they need a decent system to run a Windows OS. Apple has ALWAYS had better hardware in their systems because their OS has required that for A LONG TIME. Yea, MS paid 300mil for advertising...thats just chump change for MS. Apple is just moaning and complaining because all they can do is hire nobodies and create a commercial with 2 morons on a white background chatting. You know what Apple, stop your crying and advertise your PRODUCTS. Maybe if you do this and stop trying to bad mouth MS, your company will do better. This kind of bad mouthing tactics are not working in the Presidential election and will fail here. Its been proven that people dont want to hear bad mouthing but information on what the company/person is selling. Apple doesnt want to battle MS in advertising. MS has MUCH more money to promote their products and create new products. MS could buy Apple and make them their bitch if they wanted...haha...but hey, no one wants that.



Apple has been bad-mouthing MS for years now. And it's worked quite well. It's just marketing, don't get offended by it.

And as to the value of MS and Apple, listed 2008 at http://www.sync-blog.com/sync/2008/10/the-worlds-top.html

3. Microsoft: $21.2 billion
4. Apple: $20.7 billion

Ms isn't making Apple "their bitch" anytime soon.


**Maybe if you do this and stop trying to bad mouth MS, your company will do better.**

Were you on another planet the last 3 years? Apple is setting new records in the tech industry. They've been enjoying ridiculous revenue. It's on e of the healthiest companies in the entire industry.

Presidential election adverts and product adverts have nothing to do with each other and the kind of "negative" campaigning that goes on in them is completely and utterly different from a typical product ad campaign. The two are incomparable and unrelated.

Sorry you're personally hurt by the ads.
#69.2 +techbeck on 21 Oct 2008 - 16:30
LTD said,
Apple has been bad-mouthing MS for years now. And it's worked quite well. It's just marketing, don't get offended by it.

And as to the value of MS and Apple, listed 2008 at http://www.sync-blog.com/sync/2008/10/the-worlds-top.html

3. Microsoft: $21.2 billion
4. Apple: $20.7 billion

Ms isn't making Apple "their bitch" anytime soon.


**Maybe if you do this and stop trying to bad mouth MS, your company will do better.**

Were you on another planet the last 3 years? Apple is setting new records in the tech industry. They've been enjoying ridiculous revenue. It's on e of the healthiest companies in the entire industry.

Presidential election adverts and product adverts have nothing to do with each other and the kind of "negative" campaigning that goes on in them is completely and utterly different from a typical product ad campaign. The two are incomparable and unrelated.

Sorry you're personally hurt by the ads.


I am not offended by anything. I am just sick of questionable marketing tactics in order to make a quick buck. I dont care if it is MS doing it or Apple or Cisco...whoever. And apples has been doing this for years, I never said this was a new tactic by Apple. I said it was another bad mouthing advert from Apple.

The the whole election that I wasnt trying to compare it to Apple/MS. My point was that they use the "bad mouthing" tactics in the elections and it doesnt impress the people at all. They ARE comparable in the fact that negative advertising has been proven to hurt more than help.

And I am not impressed by Apples products. They bad mouth MS all the time but they have the same issues, if not more, that MS.

And Apple setting new records? Maybe so...but as long as they remain proprietary and expensive...they will never surpase MS. They need to make their OS more versitle as well. More hardware/software support. It kinda blows that you have to buy an EXPENSIVE Apple only card in order to update a Mac. Not to mention that 1gb of memory for a new Apple system costs you about $250. I can get the same speed memory and 4gb for a PC for under $200.

Last edited by techbeck on 21 Oct 2008 - 17:06
#69.3 offroadaaron on 21 Oct 2008 - 22:38
techbeck said,
LTD said,
Apple has been bad-mouthing MS for years now. And it's worked quite well. It's just marketing, don't get offended by it.

And as to the value of MS and Apple, listed 2008 at http://www.sync-blog.com/sync/2008/10/the-worlds-top.html

3. Microsoft: $21.2 billion
4. Apple: $20.7 billion

Ms isn't making Apple "their bitch" anytime soon.


**Maybe if you do this and stop trying to bad mouth MS, your company will do better.**

Were you on another planet the last 3 years? Apple is setting new records in the tech industry. They've been enjoying ridiculous revenue. It's on e of the healthiest companies in the entire industry.

Presidential election adverts and product adverts have nothing to do with each other and the kind of "negative" campaigning that goes on in them is completely and utterly different from a typical product ad campaign. The two are incomparable and unrelated.

Sorry you're personally hurt by the ads.


I am not offended by anything. I am just sick of questionable marketing tactics in order to make a quick buck. I dont care if it is MS doing it or Apple or Cisco...whoever. And apples has been doing this for years, I never said this was a new tactic by Apple. I said it was another bad mouthing advert from Apple.

The the whole election that I wasnt trying to compare it to Apple/MS. My point was that they use the "bad mouthing" tactics in the elections and it doesnt impress the people at all. They ARE comparable in the fact that negative advertising has been proven to hurt more than help.

And I am not impressed by Apples products. They bad mouth MS all the time but they have the same issues, if not more, that MS.

And Apple setting new records? Maybe so...but as long as they remain proprietary and expensive...they will never surpase MS. They need to make their OS more versitle as well. More hardware/software support. It kinda blows that you have to buy an EXPENSIVE Apple only card in order to update a Mac. Not to mention that 1gb of memory for a new Apple system costs you about $250. I can get the same speed memory and 4gb for a PC for under $200.


whinge whinge whinge.

and yes you can get a crappy looking computer with high specs and say its just as good if you like.

why buy a 3.8lt Ferrari when a Ford XR6 has a 3.8lt engine aswell. Because one is built better than the other!

The new systmes are DDR3 BTW
#69.4 +techbeck on 22 Oct 2008 - 02:48
offroadaaron said,
whinge whinge whinge.

and yes you can get a crappy looking computer with high specs and say its just as good if you like.

why buy a 3.8lt Ferrari when a Ford XR6 has a 3.8lt engine aswell. Because one is built better than the other!

The new systmes are DDR3 BTW


Wow, big time Apple fanboy if I ever did see one. Apple has you sooo brain washed in to buying they over priced crap. Go out and buy all the shiny stuff now!!

You dont know crap about computers obviously. You can build a better PC for cheaper than a Mac. Yea, it may not be all nice and shiny like a Mac, but who the **** cares. its a piece of equipment. If you are vain, go buy a shiny Mac.

Macs have their purpose since competition is a good thing. Hell, I even have an iPod because I like that it has a ton of accessories to choose from. But to say something is better because it is more expensive (your ferrari/ford comment) is just plain asinine. Mac and PC both use Intel chips, ATI Cards, NVIDIA cards, do I need to go on? The only differance is the Mac cards are proprietary and only work in certain systems thus being more expensive.

Ok, I got better things to do now...so hope you pop out of dream land soon and join the rest of us in reality...theres plenty of room.

bye,
#70 jporter on 21 Oct 2008 - 16:27
Really sad ad by Apple This makes me not want to buy a Mac even more.
#71 devHead on 21 Oct 2008 - 18:28
Maybe they should change their company name from Apple to Rotten Tomato. That's what it seems they want to be remembered for hurling

Last edited by devHead on 21 Oct 2008 - 18:41
(4 replies) #72 mayamaniac on 21 Oct 2008 - 21:03
When you are the underdog or trying to compete with the big dog, you have to resort to negative advertising. Instead of telling people about the greatness of your product, you bash the product from the competitor instead. Microsoft still dominates the Apple in terms of PC sales, its not even close. And it will stay that way for many years. Microsoft being the big dog, they don't need to resort to negative advertising because they are dominating. And in terms of MP3 players and iPhones, notice Apple never resort to negative ads because they dominate those markets.
#72.1 offroadaaron on 21 Oct 2008 - 22:43
mayamaniac said,
When you are the underdog or trying to compete with the big dog, you have to resort to negative advertising. Instead of telling people about the greatness of your product, you bash the product from the competitor instead. Microsoft still dominates the Apple in terms of PC sales, its not even close. And it will stay that way for many years. Microsoft being the big dog, they don't need to resort to negative advertising because they are dominating. And in terms of MP3 players and iPhones, notice Apple never resort to negative ads because they dominate those markets.


about a month ago people were like omg Windows ads are freaking bad! they spend 60 billion on it (whatever large amount) and they were meant to be funny. Apple isn't allow to pay them out as well? I mean they made fun of a really bad ad campaign and windows ads are still shocking... These ads are never boring and you guys all watched it.

IF YOU DON"T LIKE APPLE ADS YOU DIDN"T HAVE TO CLICK THE LINK, but you did which show you something, deep down you actually want to see these ads, and apple have then won because they got you to watch them.
#72.2 +techbeck on 22 Oct 2008 - 02:54
offroadaaron said,
about a month ago people were like omg Windows ads are freaking bad! they spend 60 billion on it (whatever large amount) and they were meant to be funny. Apple isn't allow to pay them out as well? I mean they made fun of a really bad ad campaign and windows ads are still shocking... These ads are never boring and you guys all watched it.

IF YOU DON"T LIKE APPLE ADS YOU DIDN"T HAVE TO CLICK THE LINK, but you did which show you something, deep down you actually want to see these ads, and apple have then won because they got you to watch them.


Granted, I didnt care for the seinfeld ads to much but I like the new MS ads. It was their slam back towards Apple about their ads. The only difference is that MS did a better job. They showed the wide variety of people and the professions that work in that use PCs. All the Mac ads have been is bashing MS. If Mac claims to be so much better that PC, then why not explain why? We want to hear!
#72.3 LTD on 22 Oct 2008 - 04:49
techbeck said,
offroadaaron said,
about a month ago people were like omg Windows ads are freaking bad! they spend 60 billion on it (whatever large amount) and they were meant to be funny. Apple isn't allow to pay them out as well? I mean they made fun of a really bad ad campaign and windows ads are still shocking... These ads are never boring and you guys all watched it.

IF YOU DON"T LIKE APPLE ADS YOU DIDN"T HAVE TO CLICK THE LINK, but you did which show you something, deep down you actually want to see these ads, and apple have then won because they got you to watch them.


Granted, I didnt care for the seinfeld ads to much but I like the new MS ads. It was their slam back towards Apple about their ads. The only difference is that MS did a better job. They showed the wide variety of people and the professions that work in that use PCs. All the Mac ads have been is bashing MS. If Mac claims to be so much better that PC, then why not explain why? We want to hear!


The MS ads are unoriginal, derivative, and meaningless. I think I only saw one of them on TV and then never saw one again.

They show that a lot of different people use PCs. No ****. It's like a ****in airline commercial. It's a very weak attempt to answer the Apple ads, which are actually warm, amusing, and by now very familiar.

Redmond really isn't the home of creative professionals. It's home to accountants who happen to have programming ability.

And Apple needs to keep bashing, and even turn the heat up a bit more. It's paying off.
#72.4 +techbeck on 22 Oct 2008 - 15:09
LTD said,
The MS ads are unoriginal, derivative, and meaningless. I think I only saw one of them on TV and then never saw one again.

They show that a lot of different people use PCs. No ****. It's like a ****in airline commercial. It's a very weak attempt to answer the Apple ads, which are actually warm, amusing, and by now very familiar.

Redmond really isn't the home of creative professionals. It's home to accountants who happen to have programming ability.

And Apple needs to keep bashing, and even turn the heat up a bit more. It's paying off.


Wow, another Mac fanboy that Apple brainwashed. You need to learn to be open with your views like the rest of us. I have an iPod and I think that OSX has a purpose in the market. I just dont agree with their ad tactics.

And Redmond has no creative professionals and just accountants with programming ability? Yea, think again. They didnt get to be the biggest software maker for sitting around crunching numbers. There is a reason why people use MS products, but cause they work and you have a WIDER variety to choose from. You can argue that they dont work, but I never had any serious issues with Microsoft PCs and the thousands of PCs I support. If you are not smart enough to use a PC, then go to a Mac since, according to Apple, they are easier to use and pretty.

Apple ads warm? that made me laugh. MS ads are tactful and friendly while Apple ads are just hostile. Apple saying that MS doesnt care about the customers..hmmm, i guess them putting out patches and updates faster than anyone else means they dont care. And I guess since pretty much the majority of the computer users use MS products...well, I guess there are a lot of people that hate them huh?

The Apple bashing MS may be working a little..for now. But there is going to come a time soon when people are going to get sick of it all. Your product should sell its own and you shouldnt have to resort to adverts like Apple is doing.

Besides, Apple will never be as big as MS...so I am not worried. Enjoy your flashy shiny equipment.
#73 ghos on 21 Oct 2008 - 23:55
I liked the I'm a Mac/PC ads at first but they are just annoying now. They are only making fun of Microsoft instead of telling me why Apple is better. Negative campaigning only can take you so far (to take a line from politics).
Not that Microsoft's ads have been any better. Neither of them get into the core reason why you might choose one OS over another.
#74 offroadaaron on 22 Oct 2008 - 01:48
I think the second one probably isn't really an ads, I think its more to help microsoft with its budgets
(1 reply) #75 Smethead on 22 Oct 2008 - 09:19
Why so serious? In my opinion, the ads are not to break down MS or people who use Windows. They're just made to laugh. That's why in the ads, the mac is a funny guy and the pc is boring. They want you to know you have to laugh with things. I'm sick of these kind of comments EVERY SINGLE TIME. If you can't stand the ads, don't look at them. And if you take that back at me for saying "if you can't stand these comments, don't come to neowin" than that's ok. I'll never read anything here again. What the hell is wrong with you people? It's like you have to hate each other.
#75.1 Shadow Dragon on 22 Oct 2008 - 11:57
Smethead said,
Why so serious? In my opinion, the ads are not to break down MS or people who use Windows. They're just made to laugh. That's why in the ads, the mac is a funny guy and the pc is boring. They want you to know you have to laugh with things. I'm sick of these kind of comments EVERY SINGLE TIME. If you can't stand the ads, don't look at them. And if you take that back at me for saying "if you can't stand these comments, don't come to neowin" than that's ok. I'll never read anything here again. What the hell is wrong with you people? It's like you have to hate each other.

Why are you so serious and irritated yourself when you ask others the same question?

As as response to your argument, let make a fictional "funny" Apple < MS ad:

Imagine this: white background, ten people standing. One is a fat old midget in a cat costume, the others are casual young "hip" people.
One of the youngsters asks "Why are you in that costume?" catman responds "I'm the king of the jungle and I'm better than all of you!" Youngster responds "Oh, okay, but, if you are the king, where are all your followers?" catman thinks and responds "Most people don't know I'm the king, only smart people follow me" younster responds "Okay, well you have fun then, I'm gonna go back now" (youngster returns to the 8 other people who were just talking while he was gone).

See what I did there? I made fun of the fact that Apple try to look "elite" while their market share is only a tenth of Microsoft's. As a Windows user I would find that ad slightly offensive because we shouldn't engage in the same stupid activities as Apple, and MS agree, which is why with their "I'm a Windows" ads focus on the message that Windows is for everyone and thy even manage to not insult their competition in the process, maybe Apple could learn something from that?
(2 replies) #76 C_Guy on 22 Oct 2008 - 15:28
Heh. And despite the "problems" with Vista, it has still out-sold Mac OS X by leaps and bounds. How embarrassing for Apple. No wonder their ads scream desperation.
#76.1 offroadaaron on 22 Oct 2008 - 22:17
C_Guy said,
Heh. And despite the "problems" with Vista, it has still out-sold Mac OS X by leaps and bounds. How embarrassing for Apple. No wonder their ads scream desperation.


How embarrassing for the humans in general that people buy Vista, I know I shouldn't have.
#76.2 RAID 0 on 23 Oct 2008 - 00:58
C_Guy said,
Heh. And despite the "problems" with Vista, it has still out-sold Mac OS X by leaps and bounds. How embarrassing for Apple. No wonder their ads scream desperation.


Shhhhhhhh! You better not be spreading facts around here.
#77 RebelSean on 23 Oct 2008 - 12:58
Instead of these companies attacking each other with ads, they need to spend more time working on software and fixing what's wrong with both OS's. Just my two cents.
#78 liang852 on 24 Oct 2008 - 05:07
Actually, these ads are effective with two types of people: 1. mac fanboys 2. insecure clueless young people

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)