AT&T raises data prices, kicks kittens

AT&T is going to make it more expensive to have a data plan for its new smartphone customers, including people who buy a new iPhone 4S, but the company is also raising its wireless data caps at the same time. In a press release today, AT&T said that starting on Sunday, January 22 it will cost $20 a month for a 300 MB data plan versus the old $15 a month for a 200 MB plan.

The new plans include $30 a month for a 3 GB data cap versus the previous $25 per month fee for 2 GB. Finally, AT&T will have a $50 a month data plan with a 5 GB cap compared to the current $45 a month for a 4 GB cap.

If you buy a tablet with AT&T service, you will also have new wireless data plans starting on Sunday. The new tablet plans include $30 a month for a 3 GB data cap versus the previous $25 per month fee for 2 GB and a $50 a month data plan with a 5 GB cap compared to the current $45 a month for a 4 GB cap. AT&T says the current $14.99 a month plan for tablets for 250 MB of data will remain unchanged.

Current AT&T smartphone and tablet customers can choose to stick with their current data plan or move to one of the new ones if they wish.

These new plans will certainly be in effect when AT&T launches the highly anticipated Nokia 900 smartphone sometime later this year.

Report a problem with article
Previous Story

ioSafe hard drive struck by lightning, still works

Next Story

Study: The Internet had 2.1 billion users in 2011

64 Comments

Commenting is disabled on this article.

Seen once they clued in the new smartphones where data pigs this was coming .. I have a friend that bought iPhone 4S and his bill skyrocketed.. and as a Canadian we never had those lovely unlimited plan like our Brothers to the South have had for so long. Hello to the Cloud.. data goes right up there if your not paying attention.. take a pic and BAMM two megs plus gone from your 500 MB a month plan.. so keep those kinky pictures off the phone and keep it on the cam

From the press release:

Smartphone customers needing additional data can pay $10 per additional gigabyte on the AT&T Data Pro 3GB and Data Pro 5GB plans; AT&T Data Plus users will receive an extra 300MB for $20.

They REALLY don't want you on their 300MB plan...ouch $20 more bucks for 300MB more? It should come in 100MB increments.

Also, why even have a $50 5GB plan? Only a fool would go for that plan. Get the $30 3GB plan and if you go over and use up to 5GB you get charged the same! I don't see the incentive of having $50 for 5GB. They should have set that at $45 to give some incentive to folks to go for that plan. Its currently nonsensical.

EDIT: Ohhhhhh... the $50 5GB plan comes with tethering. NEVERMIND!

Meh. Article title is wrong because their data prices actually went down but their data plans are more expensive now. On the low end of the scale:
Previous plan @ $15 for 200MB or $7.5/100MB.
New plan @ $20 for 300MB or $6.67/100MB.

On the GB plans:
Previous plan @ $25 for 2GB or $12.5/GB
New plan @ $30 for 3GB or $10/GB
Previous plan @ $45 for 4GB or $11.25/GB
New plan @ $50 for 5GB or $10/GB

Still, as for me and my wallet I'll be sticking to the 200MB for $15 a month simply because I do not use more than 200MB a month. Paying a little more for an extra 100MB that I won't use does not make sense to me.

Too bad people get locked into contracts. Which I feel is BS. Then people could leave AT&T just like they did with Netflix. If we did not have locked contracts then people would move quickly to the better carrier and force competition. Most people do not switch carriers even when a contract is up because of costs and simplicity.

One thing is for sure. The costs are ridiculous. The price is half or the same price as internet service which the majority do not have a cap or at least a cap that people are ever aware of.

One thing I never understand is that we are paying for the amount of data and if it is never used then we are paying for nothing. Once we pay for data it should be rolled over with no catch 22 so since we paid for it already.

In fact that would be nice. Pay for a large chunk of data and then forget about it until you need more. Once you have used your data then do not provide data to you until you buy more. Rather than charging crazy fees for going over.

Instead we are forced to pay for high prices and locked into it as well.

Here is a million dollar idea. Make an antenna that you can put on your roof and use your internet bandwidth. (The device has to be cheap) Then promote it so that neighborhoods, businesses, and individuals buy and provide it to anyone. Then no matter where you are at within distance of residents you have cellular voice and data access. Imagine that if so many of these are around that the power and costs is minimal. Reducing costs and power to operate and for phones as well. Hell, if a business did this they could even offer an incentive to the host. If the people do this and share what they are already paying for then everyone would have service on the go and it would all balance out. After all we are not using our bandwidth when we are not home anyway.

Title is a bit misleading. AT&T raised the prices of the data PLANS but lowered the price of the data itself.

Low Plan
Before: 200mb for $15 which came out to be 13.33mb per dollar.
Now: 300mb for $20 which is 15mb per dollar.

Mid Plan
Before: 2GB(2048mb) for $25 which came out to be 81.92mb per dollar
Now: 3GB(3072mb) for $30 which is 102.4mb per dollar

High Plan
Before: 4GB(4096mb) for $45 which came out to be 91.02mb per dollar
Now: 5GB(5120mb) for $50 which is 102.4mb per dollar

I will probably voluntarily switch to the 3GB plan. I have been sitting around 1.5GB with heavy use when I am 2/3 through the billing cycle. 3GB would allow me to use it throughout the month however I see fit.

ILikeTobacco said,
Title is a bit misleading. AT&T raised the prices of the data PLANS but lowered the price of the data itself..

how do you explain the cats? is that the factual part of the headline?

dotf said,

how do you explain the cats? is that the factual part of the headline?

An AT&T representative came in my house and kicked my kitten after they did this so that part is true.

Is anyone really surprised by them increasing rates to their customers after the 4 BILLION they had to pay out for the failed T-Mobile merger? Did anyone really thing that they would take the hit on that without raising our rates?

Fredrik Wallentin said,
This is really expansive !!

I live in Sweden and i pay around $29 for a UNLIMITED data plan

I don't think the USA has any true unlimited plans. Even the ones that market as unlimited and unrestricted throttle your speeds at some point. I don't even think our hardlines are truly unlimited. In the past though the speeds were slow enough that the chances of hitting the limit was rare enough they could make that claim.

Fredrik Wallentin said,
This is really expansive !!

I live in Sweden and i pay around $29 for a UNLIMITED data plan


It is not unlimited. At some point, your date rate speed is lowered.

In the UK I'm on truely unlimited texts and data and 250 mina for £10 a month, something is seriously wrong with the US telecoms market.

Whoa. You guys do get screwed for mobile and home data. In the uk here andfor £10/mo i get free same-network minutes, 250 mins other-network, unlimited txt and truly unlimited data. Last month i tried to hit a limit, 25gb and no warning our slowdown.

dancedar said,
Whoa. You guys do get screwed for mobile and home data. In the uk here andfor £10/mo i get free same-network minutes, 250 mins other-network, unlimited txt and truly unlimited data. Last month i tried to hit a limit, 25gb and no warning our slowdown.

The UK screws you in other ways. In net terms of living, Americans are better off.

KingCrimson said,

The UK screws you in other ways. In net terms of living, Americans are better off.

True, we Brits are raped over almost every other single cost, but that said, net living being cheaper doesn't necessarily correspond to better.

wow!! How can data be so costly? Amazing how AT&T gets away with this.

Here with MTNL Mumbai, I pay $90 for 6 month 3G unlimited plan without any FUP and that too on Prepaid.

Call cost for prepaid is $0.005 per min for local and $0.010 for roaming.

Draconian Guppy said,
Wow, in Honduras, central America if you go past your cap it simply slows down to 256kpbs and 3G speeds suck too, but you don't charged extra.

+1 for me on my plan here in Germany, but there do exist plans with Vodafone that I know of that have such a rule...

I quite had a ride with that once, it was unintentionally used data (well, data was used intentionally, but during being off the actual plan and on a simple 50¢/MB tarif, it got deactivated by accident on Vodafone's behalf. Called them, told them that there must be something wrong, didn't get billed for the 120 Euros... *phew* )

GS:mac

I thought that mobile phones are expensive in Australia, but USA is much much worse. I don't know how Americans in the lower class can afford mobile phones at all.
The advertising of the plans on offer is deceptive, they say that the phone is "$199" or whatever by fail to disclose the total minimum cost of the service plan, which is very expensive, and doesn't even fully subsidise the phone at that price!

Simon- said,
I thought that mobile phones are expensive in Australia, but USA is much much worse. I don't know how Americans in the lower class can afford mobile phones at all.
The advertising of the plans on offer is deceptive, they say that the phone is "$199" or whatever by fail to disclose the total minimum cost of the service plan, which is very expensive, and doesn't even fully subsidise the phone at that price!

They don't, it now comes out of tax payers pockets...(if you're on government assistance of any sort you qualify).

This whole thing is crap, AT&T is just using it to increase profit margins on all of their services.

The article is a good read and I agree with Steve B.
Guys, while I agree that the stuff with caps is horrendous, I want to say this though:

The headline, whilst catchy, true and factual leaves out one important fact: you get more bang for buck with the new options and you may stay on your current plan. Of cause this affect new costumers definitely on that particular day, but I personally think it'd be better to make the headline go more with what's ALSO being said in the article, cause for some this might be good news. (pay a little more, get more bang for the buck or go down one plan as you picked your current plan as the one under that wouldn't suit you by a bit / at least some day (not sure whether you're eligible to tier down to new plans from old plans before you're in for a renewal))

That being said, the prices are still absolutely laughable and butt rape to say the least.
Now of cause caps must go for good, but for what it is, I guess I'm quite well served with my plan:
T-Mobile (Germany that is, best carrier around (IMHO, at least second to Vodafone))
5GB data for an extra 10€ a month (upgrade from 1GB/month that's included in my Complete Mobile L tarif)

I quite like my plan!

GS:mac

I disagree that you're getting more for your money with the lower-tier plan. $5 more per month for 1 GB extra per month may not seem so bad, but $5 for 100 MB more per month ($60 per year, if you like)? What's that?

I wish AT&T had kept that plan. I have their 2 GB plan, but the honest truth is that I have a hard time breaking 200 MB per month at the moment. It seems that I'm either on wi-fi networks most of the time, or I overestimated how much data my plan would take up. My wife has the 200 MB plan, and she never comes close to it. Clearly there are a lot of people who are consuming tons of data, but 200 MB is surprisingly a good limit... and AT&T was one of the few (only?) carriers to offer something like that.

Ledgem said,
I disagree that you're getting more for your money with the lower-tier plan. $5 more per month for 1 GB extra per month may not seem so bad, but $5 for 100 MB more per month ($60 per year, if you like)? What's that?

I wish AT&T had kept that plan. I have their 2 GB plan, but the honest truth is that I have a hard time breaking 200 MB per month at the moment. It seems that I'm either on wi-fi networks most of the time, or I overestimated how much data my plan would take up. My wife has the 200 MB plan, and she never comes close to it. Clearly there are a lot of people who are consuming tons of data, but 200 MB is surprisingly a good limit... and AT&T was one of the few (only?) carriers to offer something like that.

Well, of cause as with many changes on offers, some will not like it and the extra money they spent will not be needed.
Actually, we should scrap caps all together, but here is what I think:

You say: "it will cost $20 a month for a 300 MB data plan versus the old $15 a month for a 200 MB plan"
1.5x data with just 1.25 the price.
Seems like a better bang/buck ratio for sure!

As I said, many won't like it, in that case, consider staying on your current plan or adopting the old plan that's being phased out asap.

I know there will still be people left out who don't like it, but factually it's a better deal just looking at the numbers, not taking into account everyone's usage pattern.

GS:mac

Ledgem said,
I disagree that you're getting more for your money with the lower-tier plan. $5 more per month for 1 GB extra per month may not seem so bad, but $5 for 100 MB more per month ($60 per year, if you like)? What's that?


I wish AT&T had kept that plan. I have their 2 GB plan, but the honest truth is that I have a hard time breaking 200 MB per month at the moment. It seems that I'm either on wi-fi networks most of the time, or I overestimated how much data my plan would take up. My wife has the 200 MB plan, and she never comes close to it. Clearly there are a lot of people who are consuming tons of data, but 200 MB is surprisingly a good limit... and AT&T was one of the few (only?) carriers to offer something like that.

Well factually it's a price cut if you look at it per MB, but of course your forced to spend more regardless of need and that extra bandwidth costs them next to nothing additional. Just more squeezing of the customer really.

I seem to recall a report that found windows phone 7 uses less data, by default, than other smartphones.

Another reason to get the highly anticipated Lumia 900 mentioned.

dotf said,
I seem to recall a report that found windows phone 7 uses less data, by default, than other smartphones.

Another reason to get the highly anticipated Lumia 900 mentioned.

Or to buy instead a phone that allows you to sync directly with the desktop without the need to upload and download all your mails and Office docs..............

dotf said,
I seem to recall a report that found windows phone 7 uses less data, by default, than other smartphones.

Another reason to get the highly anticipated Lumia 900 mentioned.

Umm.. DATA is DATA regardless of the phone. windows doesn't manufacture their own applications, they STILL use Netflix and other apps, they are just made to work on that phone.

More rhetoric trying to incite an argument.. that isn't true, That's like saying AMD uses more data than Intel.. that's completely bogus.

eilegz said,
carriers in the US its even worse than here in so many aspects.... the pricing and the policy its just bad

I take it you're Canadian? I don't mean any insult, I just heard it was bad over there, especially with 3 year contracts.

(Spork) said,
im on the 2 gig plan ( never have went over ) and i stream pandora and netflix all day plus my normal surfing.

I seriously doubt that. A single netflix movie is around 500mb or so.

Brandon said,

I seriously doubt that. A single netflix movie is around 500mb or so.


shrug thats fine i look at my data each month and never once have i broke my 2 gig cap

(Spork) said,
im on the 2 gig plan ( never have went over ) and i stream pandora and netflix all day plus my normal surfing.

You'd go over your limit streaming Netflix for 10 hours or less, let alone all day.

(Spork) said,


shrug thats fine i look at my data each month and never once have i broke my 2 gig cap

Sounds like there's a wireless network or two involved here. You know that if you're setup for wireless that your phone will pick the wireless connection for data over the 3G connection, right? Being on wireless all day would explain how you're able to stay under 2GB per mo. on your cell plan.

Brandon said,

I seriously doubt that. A single netflix movie is around 500mb or so.

Maybe he only watches one movie, besides it's STREAMING not downloading, it's not 500mb, that's a CD worth, I SERIOUSLY doubt it's that much for ONE movie.

I'm not surprised here. I hope everyone else sees what is happening. When tiered data was "being talked about", myself and countless others who knew what would really be happening said that what AT&T and alike are trying to do is to get you to pay the same price as you did with unlimited plans but, you get less. The pure ripoff plan of 300MB for $20 where you got an additional 50MB for $5 is obviously to get people off that plan and onto the $30 for 3GB plan. Wait...see it? The unlimited plans were $30 also. Again, you see it? Lol. You are now paying the same price for 3GB as you did with unlimited. The carriers want $30 to be the new minimum again but want to give you less in return. This also proves that the $30 unlimited model was more then sufficient for them and that the tiered data plans were nothing more then a greedy cash grab.

Let's not even forget how AT&T's data network comes to a crawl in spots...if it works at all.

Steve B said,
I'm not surprised here. I hope everyone else sees what is happening. When tiered data was "being talked about", myself and countless others who knew what would really be happening said that what AT&T and alike are trying to do is to get you to pay the same price as you did with unlimited plans but, you get less. The pure ripoff plan of 300MB for $20 where you got an additional 50MB for $5 is obviously to get people off that plan and onto the $30 for 3GB plan. Wait...see it? The unlimited plans were $30 also. Again, you see it? Lol. You are now paying the same price for 3GB as you did with unlimited. The carriers want $30 to be the new minimum again but want to give you less in return. This also proves that the $30 unlimited model was more then sufficient for them and that the tiered data plans were nothing more then a greedy cash grab.

Let's not even forget how AT&T's data network comes to a crawl in spots...if it works at all.


funny samething can be said for sprint Verizon and t-mobile


i was with sprint for 12 years and the last 4 was brutal im with att now and im happy


(Spork) said,


funny samething can be said for sprint Verizon and t-mobile


i was with sprint for 12 years and the last 4 was brutal im with att now and im happy


Perhaps where you live you're getting better AT&T coverage resulting in better connectivity but generally speaking, the majority of people get better coverage and connectivity with VZW or Sprint. There are tons of people out there testifying to this fact (many more than people voting the other way) and countless reviews, articles, and tests that verify that AT&T's coverage is questionable.

But I'm sure those higher cost data packages are just so AT&T can invest in their infrastructure and make it better for everybody, right??

(Spork) said,


funny samething can be said for sprint Verizon and t-mobile


i was with sprint for 12 years and the last 4 was brutal im with att now and im happy

Same here.

Tim Dawg said,
Perhaps where you live you're getting better AT&T coverage resulting in better connectivity but generally speaking, the majority of people get better coverage and connectivity with VZW or Sprint. There are tons of people out there testifying to this fact (many more than people voting the other way) and countless reviews, articles, and tests that verify that AT&T's coverage is questionable.

But I'm sure those higher cost data packages are just so AT&T can invest in their infrastructure and make it better for everybody, right??

umm.. I worked at a call center during the initial porting period (late 90's) and I can tell YOU that statement is bogus. NOT true AT ALL.

It wasn't true then, even less true now, Verizon ISN'T the most reliable network, but it does depend on WHERE you live.. Verizon has JUST as many issues as do other carriers. AT&T is the MOST reliable NOW, so that is old outdated and blatantly wrong information.

First of all what I find rather interesting the LARGEST complaints on AT&T came from iPhone users (2G,3G) around 30%. Compared with OTHER phones (of which I had a Windows mobile phone at the time) had only a 10% complaint rate. SAME Network, SAME company.. so those Apple whiners were the ones that complained the loudest.. so what does that say?

It's the PHONE not the network. I will guarantee you that we can be in the same spot (you can pick it) you bring your crappy handset connected to your loser carrier and I will bring my LTE phone and we can conduct our own reliability ratings.. I can PROMISE you will lose.. Let's travel to Las Vegas, where there are more diverse crowds and traffic and a MUCH higher saturation and test there as well, that is a TRUE test not some lame comment or whining statement that isn't true.

Let's walk into a large department store or mall.. I BET you drop calls, while I can surf the net AND TALK at the same time.. you can't even do THAT on other networks..

So you get your stupid facts straight and stop the AT&T bashing because it's absolutely NOT true.

Wow... as a T-Mobile customer (but a not fan), I am shocked! I pay $10.00 for 2GB data plan. I have HTC Radar 4G and I pay $39.99 for 500 min. talk, unlimited text, and unlimited data (2GB cap).

I am glad that AT&T and T-Mobile did not merge.

Aletheia said,
Wow... as a T-Mobile customer (but a not fan), I am shocked! I pay $10.00 for 2GB data plan. I have HTC Radar 4G and I pay $39.99 for 500 min. talk, unlimited text, and unlimited data (2GB cap).

I am glad that AT&T and T-Mobile did not merge.

I'm not a T-Mobile user, and I'm glad they didn't merge too... It would have led to some bad things...

Aletheia said,
Wow... as a T-Mobile customer (but a not fan), I am shocked! I pay $10.00 for 2GB data plan. I have HTC Radar 4G and I pay $39.99 for 500 min. talk, unlimited text, and unlimited data (2GB cap).

I am glad that AT&T and T-Mobile did not merge.


How did you get that deal for your HTC Radar? I can't find it for that cheap on tmobile.com???

KevinN206 said,

How did you get that deal for your HTC Radar? I can't find it for that cheap on tmobile.com???

My wife and I both have Radar, and we are under Value Plan. For both of us:
1000 shared minutes = $50.00
Unlimited text = $10.00
Unlimited data (up to 2GB) = $20.00

Total $80.00 Plus tax.

BUT this value plan is for those who purchase a smartphone (not free ones). Because my wife purchased Radar ($99 down and $15.00/per month for 20 months). This plan works. I have my Radar for free (someone gave me as a gift).

Aletheia said,
UT this value plan is for those who purchase a smartphone (not free ones). Because my wife purchased Radar ($99 down and $15.00/per month for 20 months). This plan works. I have my Radar for free (someone gave me as a gift).

You buy smartphone on a monthly payment plan? No wonder Americans are in knee-deep dung.

Aletheia said,

My wife and I both have Radar, and we are under Value Plan. For both of us:
1000 shared minutes = $50.00
Unlimited text = $10.00
Unlimited data (up to 2GB) = $20.00

Total $80.00 Plus tax.

BUT this value plan is for those who purchase a smartphone (not free ones). Because my wife purchased Radar ($99 down and $15.00/per month for 20 months). This plan works. I have my Radar for free (someone gave me as a gift).

Wow! My monthly Sprint bill for me and my girlfriend comes out to abotu $170! Damn!

Aletheia said,
Wow... as a T-Mobile customer (but a not fan), I am shocked! I pay $10.00 for 2GB data plan. I have HTC Radar 4G and I pay $39.99 for 500 min. talk, unlimited text, and unlimited data (2GB cap).

I am glad that AT&T and T-Mobile did not merge.

Umm.. I am glad you didn't get included with AT&T either, since that would dilute the IQ level.. apparently you don't know the difference between cell phone plans, they aren't across the BOARD. CERTAIN phones (such as the newer LTE phones) have higher rate plans because the DATA is much faster.. you probably have an older smartphone, and t-mobile is a LOUSY service provider, so it's not surprising your plan would be lower.. t-mobile is desperate for customers, so raising rates would not be wise.

At any rate.. compare the data you get (speed) to what I get.. I BET your speed is only 3G, which is not anything CLOSE to what I get with a newer phone. I will GLADLY pay for 30 bucks for my data plan to get the speeds *I* want.

So you are glad they didn't merge.. that is a moot point, I left t-mobile long ago, because they SUCK! Lousy coverage, poor support, and (at that time) not the speed I could get on AT&T. so *I* Am glad I left.. you use your phone to make a couple of calls and maybe check your twitter, and that's it. Not good enough for me.

este said,

Wow! My monthly Sprint bill for me and my girlfriend comes out to abotu $170! Damn!

Yeah I pay $250.00 for 3 devices.. but let's compare shall we? Look up who has the fastest network, AT&T is first, Sprint is second.. T-mobile is a VERY distant 4th or maybe 5th even..

You couldn't PAY me to go back to T-mobile, I had a HORRIBLE experience (2 years of hell) couldn't WAIT to move off.. AT&T is the BEST provider I have had (and I had Sprint before t-mobile), so apparently we have very different observations.

Are my plans expensive? What is the alternative, a plan for 100 bucks less (I can call and roam voice and data in other countries --included--), I get LTE speed (unlimited) AND I can tether. so is it REALLY cheaper for t-mobile? Don't think so.. considering I dropped calls left and right and t-mobile doesn't even work at my house, but EVERY other network does (verizon, AT&T, and sprint).. so tell me, if I get lousy service, no coverage at my house which is in the metro area not rural, I get perfect LTE coverage everywhere I go, I travel, with ZERO problems no roaming calls or data fees... and it has been great..

...OR.. t-mobile. I will pay what I am paying to get GOOD service rather than 50 bucks with t-mobile ANY day of the week! You couldn't GIVE (free service and phone) me a t-mobile account, its worth it to me to PAY for something that is ACTUALLY usable.

rijp said,

Umm.. I am glad you didn't get included with AT&T either, since that would dilute the IQ level.. apparently you don't know the difference between cell phone plans, they aren't across the BOARD. CERTAIN phones (such as the newer LTE phones) have higher rate plans because the DATA is much faster.. you probably have an older smartphone, and t-mobile is a LOUSY service provider, so it's not surprising your plan would be lower.. t-mobile is desperate for customers, so raising rates would not be wise.

At any rate.. compare the data you get (speed) to what I get.. I BET your speed is only 3G, which is not anything CLOSE to what I get with a newer phone. I will GLADLY pay for 30 bucks for my data plan to get the speeds *I* want.

So you are glad they didn't merge.. that is a moot point, I left t-mobile long ago, because they SUCK! Lousy coverage, poor support, and (at that time) not the speed I could get on AT&T. so *I* Am glad I left.. you use your phone to make a couple of calls and maybe check your twitter, and that's it. Not good enough for me.

1. My phone is actually pretty new. Radar 4G came out only 2 months ago. BUT as you said, it is not LTE speed - T-Mobile does not support that. However, their 4G is better than 3G, but slower than LTE. I do get 4G, in my speed test, it is same as my WiFi connection at home (which is pretty fast). HTC Radar 4G, being Windows Phone 7 (mango) helps quite a bit as well. Very easy and smooth.

2. For me and my wife, T-Mobile offers the best value/quality ratio. We are not power-users. We are every day working people who need quick access to web, email, text, and calls. And I think, for our NEED, T-Mobile delivers. But you are quite right, AT&T and Verizon are better than T-Mobile. BUT it is the cheapest. This we cannot ignore. We simply cannot afford to pay $170-250 per month for our smartphones. Others who can afford, more power to them.

3. In short, we chose T-Mobile, because of its price with decent coverage (not the best, but not the worst). We are very happy.

Xilo said,
Still on AT&T grandfathered unlimited data.

Same here, one of the big reasons I have stuck with AT&T. The instant they kill the grandfathered unlimited plans is when I leave AT&T for Sprint

ncoday said,

Same here, one of the big reasons I have stuck with AT&T. The instant they kill the grandfathered unlimited plans is when I leave AT&T for Sprint

You think they would do that eventually?

este said,

You think they would do that eventually?

Doubtful since that would be against the law... they cannot FORCE you to stop your plan since at some point you DID sign a contract..