Bing launches Encyclopedia Britannica answers

Microsoft has updated its Bing search engine to include an improved feature: answers from Encyclopedia Britannica.

Bing has long had an answers feature, but yesterday it began integrating Encyclopedia Britannica answers to the feature. The answers feature gives users a quick glance of information about the search query they've submitted while giving them the option to learn more about their query. With the new partnership, brief summaries of Encyclopedia Britannica articles will be shown in search results; pertinent information, such as dates of birth and death for historical figures, will also be included in the results.

The basic results featuring Encyclopedia Britannica answers will include a thumbnail of the article, a quick overview and pertinent facts about the search query. An example of an Encyclopedia Britannica answer from Bing for "agence france-presse" can be seen below. The updated answer feature will also still include links to other relevant online sources, including Wikipedia, Freebase and Qwiki.

This is the second significant update Microsoft's made to Bing over the past few days. On Wednesday, the company updated its Bing Webmaster Tools service to include new features and enhancements to previous services. The new features allow users to better understand where linked traffic  is originating from and scan for best practices in link compliance (ensuring links aren't broken), among other features. Microsoft also updated the service to include an improved design.

Source: Bing

Report a problem with article
Previous Story

Mac app supporting Retina displays appears ahead of WWDC

Next Story

Author: 50 years from now, we'll remember Gates, not Jobs

4 Comments

Not really useful for not-english search. Why not Wikipedia and for all languages? Sometimes I don't understand Microsofts act.

thekim said,
Not really useful for not-english search. Why not Wikipedia and for all languages? Sometimes I don't understand Microsofts act.

Bing already returns Wikipedia hits.

thekim said,
Not really useful for not-english search. Why not Wikipedia and for all languages? Sometimes I don't understand Microsofts act.

Because Wikipedia is unreliable, maybe?

Not to say it can't be a useful tool, but further research is generally required to ensure the validity of information on Wikipedia.

Hello,

EB is considered to be a much higher-quality source of information by academics, with peer-reviewed articles by experts in each field, much like how scientific journals compare with open-access research web sites. It's also not prone to vandalism. Of course, in reality, there might not be much of a difference, quality-wise, between some Wikipedia articles and their EB counterparts.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky

thekim said,
Not really useful for not-english search. Why not Wikipedia and for all languages? Sometimes I don't understand Microsofts act.

Commenting is disabled on this article.