British Twitter users' details revealed in landmark court case

The council of South Tyneside has successfully obtained the details of multiple Twitter accounts, which the council claims were used to post libellous messages. Officials were pushed to take the company to court in its native California, where a judge ruled that the perpetrators (who were based in Britain) had no protection from Twitter. The company was forced to hand over its data on five different accounts.

The news comes during a storm of controversy in the celebrity world, where the holders of "super-injunctions" are being outed through the social networking site. Speaking to The Telegraph, Amber Melville-Brown, a media law specialist consultant, said:

This case concerning serious allegations about South Tyneside councillors could have significant repercussions across the blogosphere. With Twitter quietly assisting in the process, the case could have an equally significant impact on future applications by those seeking to protect their privacy and reputation anywhere in the world, as a result of activity on Twitter.

The council are hoping to track down a "Mr Monkey", who has been blogging about the council since 2008. Accusations are far-reaching and include drug misuse, ballott rigging, and even a story of a councillor making a public bus turn around and pick him up from the pub. The allegations made their jump to Twitter in 2009.

Ahmed Khan is one of the Twitter account owners. An independent councillor, Khan denies links to the "Mr Monkey" account but also questions the impact the ruling has on free speech. "If a council can take this kind of action against one of its own councillors simply because they don’t like what I say, what hope is there for freedom of speech or privacy?", he said.

Twitter users will now be kept on their toes, according to Charles Glasser. The global media counsel for Bloomberg said the ruling "puts Twitter and social media users on notice that they may be held accountable for what they publish." Twitter's privacy policy says that it will release information about users to comply with a law, regulation or legal request, but now a successful ruling has been made it seems the floodgates are about to open. Before, Ryan Giggs' lawyers attempted to retrieve similar information, but the British ruling had no legal status in Twitter's own country, so the deadline passed without consequence.

Previous Story
Samsung lawyers demand to see Apple's iPhone 5 and iPad 3
Next Story
Popular game-based emulators taken off Android Market