California politician: Hands off the Internet!

Remember when SOPA, ACTA, PIPA and the other four letter acronyms for bills that were created to stifle the Internet were all the rage last year? Many politicians seemed to believe that the Internet needed to be controlled more than it already was, so they tried to push laws in place to help with that, only to face a major backlash that resulted in the bills being defeated.

Well, a couple of days ago, California Republican Darrell Issa drafted a new bill called the “Internet American Moratorium Act,” or IAMA. While the name of the bill is a bit goofy, the idea behind it is very sound. Issa has drafted a bill that, if passed, will prevent the United States government from passing any laws that change the Internet at all. Specifically the bill states:

…no Department or Agency of the United States shall publish new rules or regulations, or finalize or otherwise enforce or give lawful effect to draft rules or regulations affecting the Internet until a period of at least 2 years from the enactment of this legislation has elapsed.

On the surface, this bill sounds wonderful for people who want the Internet to remain an open platform. However it’s unclear what the real purpose of the bill would is. While it would definitely stop attacks like SOPA and PIPA, would it also block states from legalizing things like online poker? How would it impact states trying to impose sales tax on Amazon and other large Internet stores? Or is the intent simply to gain popularity? Not surprisingly, members of Reddit appear very suspicious of Issa’s true motives although there’s no confirmation that there's anything sinister going on.

Source: KeepTheWebOpen | Stop Acta image courtesy of Shutterstock

Report a problem with article
Previous Story

BlackBerry announces new prototype device, opens $10K commitment program

Next Story

Free Xbox LIVE Gold weekend starts today


Commenting is disabled on this article.

This sound suspicious, cuz its too good to be true, and seems like the lawyers work...if they dont have what they want...they change the question and they can have a different response but getting a favorable result.

so this has to be checked carefully, cuz maybe there are other ways to pull the laws to control the internet.

I think that the bill should allow any regulation that would directly benefit private people and non-profit or educational organizations.
(one way road - if you move, you can only move towards more rights, not reverse them or take away rights)

And hell, if worded well, this would be a bill I'd like to see passed everywhere.


SharpGreen said,
It remains to be seen what effect this bill will have. But it sounds good.

For one thing, it would prevent any legislation to regulate how wireless carriers control the use of data services. Wait and see if Verizon shows signs of supporting this, and there you go.

This is testing the waters of the internet community. There's a LOT of knee-jerk anti-government regulation in any and all regards, and that sort of zero tolerance is never a good policy. Some people will short-sightedly cheer a bill like this on, because they refuse to believe that regulation can be good for the internet.