EFF online privacy report names Snapchat and Amazon amongst worst offenders

The Electronic Frontier Foundation has concluded its analysis for 2014 of the privacy policies utilized by all manner of service providers operating online. Their findings show how several of the 26 well-known companies assessed had serious shortcomings in their privacy protection policies and the report, freely available on the Electronic Frontier Foundation's website, names Snapchat in particular as having severe failings. It earned just one star in the 'publishes law enforcement guidelines' category, out of a possible six. Amazon only achieved in 'requires a warrant for content' and 'fights for users privacy rights in courts'. AT&T were the only other company to gain just two stars, with merit given in the 'publishes transparency reports' and 'publishes law enforcement guidelines' categories.

Apple, Credo Mobile, Dropbox, Facebook, Sonic.net, Twitter, Yahoo all gained six stars. Apple was particularly praised, as in the past three reports undertaken by the foundation they were only rewarded with one star. Microsoft also gained six stars despite the foundation slamming the company earlier this year over allegations that it viewed the email inbox of a company employee who was suspected of leaking Windows code.

The foundation aims to bring more transparency to consumers by informing them of how their data is used by the companies that hold them. Their annual 'Who Watches Your Back' report highlights areas where companies are failing to protect their consumers' data protection rights.

Snapchat responded to their mediocre one-star rating by explaining how it had made 'mistakes' during its early days, but was now working to fix the issues. Now that the company's failings - and those of the two-star rated AT&T and Amazon - have been made public, perhaps we will notice a bigger push in the near future by the named companies to make their privacy policies more transparent and understandable. Or in other words, that they are no longer failing customers on the complex subject of how user data should be stored, maintained and protected.

Source: The Electronic Frontier Foundation

Report a problem with article
Previous Story

Options being moved to tab by default in Firefox 32

Next Story

New report claims Twitch will choose Google buyout offer over Microsoft


Commenting is disabled on this article.

Looking at their website, they have Google with all 6 stars. What a joke. Google is the king of spyware, literally. Microsoft used to hold that title.

They also gave Facebook all 6 stars. Another complete joke, and everyone knows it.

Yahoo has 6 stars, and they have a history of helping law enforcement entrap their customers.

I like the EFF, but someone is drunk whoever made up this list. I've lost respect for them now.

I don't agree with their ratings. I know I would trust Amazon far more than I would Apple or Microsoft in terms of protecting privacy.

So they get a star for lobbying.... Can you see that EFF is a political organization now with more interest in that than what they used to be... Well they always where a bunch of hairy unix lobbyists that wanted everything to be "free" :p

HAHA Dropbox... what after its I've lost count on 1 hand Security blunders(last one being what last week, exposing private info to Google?) and Hiring a War criminal/ NSA spy advocate and torture proponent directly onto their board

Apparently these EFF lists are a bad joke

How about asking who is protecting your data in general. Cant see any of the award winners here protecting your data in general. Encrypted Data could be the key for ending those stupid requests by governments but hey!.. keep the control in your own hands, right