gamers

Microsoft eyeing Duke Nukem and Max Payne?

Marcel Klum   on 09 December 2001 - 11:28 · 14 comments & 1450 views

Advertisement (Why?)
A recent report claims that Take-Two Interactive's versatile lineup of products may be enough for Microsoft to consider a buyout of the company.

Following the release of its Xbox console, Microsoft may be aggressively pursuing a variety of acqusitions in bringing more exclusive content to its console. According to a report in Business Week, which cites analysts' observations, Microsoft may be particularly interested in acquiring New York-based publisher Take-Two Interactive. Officially, Take-Two Interactive could not comment, saying that the merger talks are only rumors at this point. When asked about a possible buyout, Paul Eibeler, president of Take-Two Interactive, declined to discuss any specific mergers, but did say that consolidation in the industry remains a possibility.
Analysts feel that Take-Two Interactive's strong lineup of products, including Max Payne, the upcoming Duke Nukem Forever, and Grand Theft Auto III for the Sony PlayStation 2, makes the company particularly attractive to Microsoft--especially given its stock is undervalued and trading at about $14.

News source: Gamespot



Volume licensees will still be able to buy extra NT Server 4.0 licenses, by "downgrading" from Windows 2000. To do this, companies have to buy a Windows 2000 license for every NT 4.0 licence they want; Microsoft says they can later upgrade to Windows 2000 at no extra cost.

But some companies are loathe to lose their Windows Server NT 4.0 operating system, having invested a great deal of time and effort building operations around it. Even though the product is now five years old, its retirement is not universally popular.

Chris Ogg, President of Canadian consultancy Wireless Island, said a lot of companies he deals with seem to be refusing to retire Windows NT 4.0. "I did so with much regret around August, but so many companies have invested years in getting it just right," he said. "We have one client who is running software which requires Windows NT 4.0.Wwe had to buy Windows 2000 licences then install NT 4.0." Ogg said that the situation is less than ideal.

As sales of Windows NT Server 4.0 are restricted, support will also be gradually downgraded. From 1 January 2003, Microsoft will start charging for hot fixes. Hot fixes will be discontinued altogether 12 months later on 1 January 2004, at which time pay-per-incident and Premier support will also be axed. Online support is due to be stopped on 1 January 2005.

Microsoft caused something of a storm among certified engineers when it originally announced the retirement of Windows NT Server 4.0: the company said engineers would lose their MCSE titles gained under the Windows NT 4.0 track. Following intense lobbying from customers, Microsoft said it would change the certification title to include versions, so that engineers will now be designated as MCSE on Windows NT 4.0, or MCSE on Windows 2000.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 14 additional comments
#1 Skyfrog on 09 Dec 2001 - 12:21
Why doesn't Microsoft just buy every gaming company in the world? "We're rich, we can have anything we want!". Just makes me sick...
#2 bigboy292000 on 09 Dec 2001 - 14:52
It's just business.. Microsoft is by far not the only one doing it.
#3 Spectre on 09 Dec 2001 - 14:57
microsoft bought bungie a long time ago, and halo turned out 100% kickass. i don't see what the problem is ...
#4 mortensen on 09 Dec 2001 - 15:16
[quote]Just makes me sick...[/quote] LOL, yeah... we CAN'T have businesses doing well and buying smaller companies. What has the world come to... LMFAO! [quote]halo turned out 100% kickass[/quote] Halo was already kickass! It was the most talked about game on the web and so M$ bought Bungie... later it turned out it was for M$'s console plan. If I owned M$ I wouldn't just sit there twiddling my thumbs... I'd buy promising companies and try to make as much money as possible!
#5 Berzum on 09 Dec 2001 - 17:19
These were not hostile takeovers. MS made a proposal, and the said companies agreed/disagreed/renegotiated. If you're going to blame MS for being greedy, you might as well give half the "blame" to the companies for "selling out" by simply trying to get a better deal. Gotta love blind speculation.
#6 SHoTTa35 on 09 Dec 2001 - 18:09
some people are too anti-ms. No matter what they do they are wrong. They could save the world oneday and people would still hate them. I guess they were the not so popular ones in school that sit back and start sh*t with the other kids just to get attention... LOL.. Windows isn't popular because it's from MS, it's popular because it works and does that job that it's supposed to do. Granted us powerusers would liek more but they are human too and they make mistakes sometimes, whether in judgement or programming (man made computers too so they still f*ck up sometime too) Corel Office was the best back in the days and the Office became the standard. Why.... well cuz they listened to what people wanted instead of bloating on the sucess and shove what the think we want down our throats... like what Corel did.. so quit the Anti MS and just enjoy the competition they bring. If it wasn't for MS then there wouldn't be any Linux because it was formed to combat MS. So all you people who hate MS so much should think of all the things that MS made posible in your lives and then shut up about it.....
#7 msn- on 09 Dec 2001 - 18:35
#8 msn- on 09 Dec 2001 - 18:35
all other companys are DEAD
#9 Zelpus on 09 Dec 2001 - 21:35
hasnt duke nukem forever been in production for like 5 years? WTF is taking them so long jeebus
#10 radixvir on 09 Dec 2001 - 23:04
cant wait until 30 years from now when a few companies own everything. america becomes a corpocracy.
#11 burnsflipper on 10 Dec 2001 - 01:54
I don't think that Linux was created to battle against m$, it was a project from a student that wanted to develop a system that would be easy to share and improve, with the collaboration of the whole world, it was more of an inspirational work instead of a business, but it is true, you can't blame M$ for everything, but neither can blame Linux or other companies, they just compete with each other [b]This comment was last edited by burnsflipper at 21:33 EST on 10 Dec 2001 - 02:33 GMT[/b]
#12 shaark on 10 Dec 2001 - 23:05
hey zelphus, commenting on your post #9 I wonder why the game was called Duke Nukem: "Forever"
#13 Killa-b on 11 Dec 2001 - 03:45
its called forever because its the 4th game ie: duke nukem 3d (three)
#14 Zelpus on 11 Dec 2001 - 06:20
yeah but i mean they have said they were gonna have it out numerious times and then nothing they have been draging it on forever its like there never gonna release it

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)