Just wanted to wish everyone Happy Holidays! We have an X-BoX in the house now, but it belongs to my 12 year old brother, and we all know how long they let the big brothers play! I got to set up the time before he started crying so I guess thats good.
Hope you all have a wonderful Christmas!
However, "Ford has failed to allege facts sufficient to prevail on its dilution, infringement, and unfair competition claims. Thus faced with no chance of succeeding on the merits, Ford may not be granted injunctive relief," the court ruled.
Ford's allegations won't fly because, as the court notes, "to succeed on an infringement claim, a plaintiff must show that the defendant has used the mark in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distribution, or advertising of any goods or services. An essentially identical showing of use in connection with any goods or services is required on an unfair competition claim."
The court decided that Corley is not using the Ford trademark for any commercial purpose, and therefore that there are no grounds for granting a preliminary injunction.
And of course if there's insufficient merit in Ford's claims to grant an injunction, there's hardly going to be enough to proceed at trial.
The court therefore dismissed the suit in a separate ruling issued the same day; and that, one hopes, will be that.
Hope you all have a wonderful Christmas!
However, "Ford has failed to allege facts sufficient to prevail on its dilution, infringement, and unfair competition claims. Thus faced with no chance of succeeding on the merits, Ford may not be granted injunctive relief," the court ruled.
Ford's allegations won't fly because, as the court notes, "to succeed on an infringement claim, a plaintiff must show that the defendant has used the mark in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distribution, or advertising of any goods or services. An essentially identical showing of use in connection with any goods or services is required on an unfair competition claim."
The court decided that Corley is not using the Ford trademark for any commercial purpose, and therefore that there are no grounds for granting a preliminary injunction.
And of course if there's insufficient merit in Ford's claims to grant an injunction, there's hardly going to be enough to proceed at trial.
The court therefore dismissed the suit in a separate ruling issued the same day; and that, one hopes, will be that.