Neowin.net

Mobile Forces delivers explosive vehicle combat combined with traditional FPS action.

Built on top of Epic's latest Unreal Engine technology - graphics hardware is pushed to the limit by the use of static meshes to deliver complex believable environments, and poly counts go through the roof to give you smooth rolling terrain.

Mobile Forces offers the complete FPS offline/online multiplayer only experience with full AI bot support. The single focus of Mobile Forces is to create a gaming experience that any fan of the multiplayer-FPS genre will be at home playing.

A total of 8 different game modes are available. Along with traditional Deathmatch, Capture The Flag and Domination game types you’ll also find other modes such as Trailer, Captains, Detonation (and more!) game modes to quench your FPS thirst!

Play any of the game modes offline against the highly skilled AI bot opponents or take your skillz online against the Mobile Forces community!

You’ll play across eleven environments including docks, shopping malls, Mexican desert, ice bases, airports , storm drains, rail yards and warehouses. All eleven environments are playable in all 8 game modes.

News source: 3D Gamers
Download: Mobile Forces Demo (42Mb)
View: Official website

"We have strong relationships with many of the state attorneys general," said Microsoft spokesman Jim Desler. "We work with them on various activities and initiatives. On this issue, we agree to disagree. While the states do have a role in antitrust enforcement, the non-settling states stepped outside the boundaries of that role when they chose to pursue a different course from the Justice Department, resulting in conflicting national competition policy."

In making the filing, the states are trying to protect their sovereignty over antitrust matters, something a dismissal could potentially undermine, said legal experts.

"There are a lot of us who, having done antitrust defense, would like to see this whole dual-sovereignty issue resolved," said Emmett Stanton, an antitrust lawyer with Fenwick & West in Palo Alto, Calif. "If there was a case to challenge this, this would be the one."

The "friends of court" briefs filed by the 25 states were not expected, but a third brief from the litigating states came as no surprise. The states rebutted Microsoft's request more in the context of the overall antitrust case than in regard to the sovereignty issue.

They argued that Microsoft's request is "effectively, a motion to set aside the Court of Appeals' mandate."

In June 2000, seven judges unanimously upheld eight separate antitrust violations against Microsoft.

The filings could give the litigating states important air cover as they return to court next week for what could be as much as eight weeks of testimony. They are looking for stiffer sanctions than those proposed by the Justice Department and the settling states. The settlement largely puts restrictions on Microsoft's business practices. The litigating states also want restrictions on how Microsoft develops and deploys software.

While overseeing the settlement proceeding, Kollar-Kotelly must weigh whether the settlement meets the standard demanded by the Nixon-era Tunney Act. That law requires that a settlement be in the public interest and that no backroom dealmaking influence the process. Kollar-Kotelly could reject or approve the proposed deal at any time.