gamers

PlayStation Can Be 'Chipped' in Australia-Court

Sleeper   on 29 July 2002 - 09:14 · 8 comments & 1643 views

Advertisement (Why?)
An Australian court has given Sony PlayStation owners the right to "chip" their consoles to play imported and copied games, prompting cheers from the competition watchdog but sharp criticism from the Japanese firm.

The judgement by the Federal Court, handed down on Friday, contrasts with recent rulings in Britain and Canada, where Sony won copyright infringement cases against people using so-called mod chips to bypass regional coding.

Sony Computer Entertainment Australia, a unit of Sony Corp, said on Monday it was considering an appeal.

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), however, hailed the ruling as a victory for consumers because regional coding of games -- and by extension DVDs -- limited consumer choice and access to competitively priced goods.

"Australian consumers can now enjoy games legitimately bought overseas, as well as authorized back-up copies, by legally having their games consoles chipped," ACCC chairman Allan Fels said in a statement titled "Game Over for Sony PlayStation."

News source: Yahoo! News


The ACCC had intervened to support Sydney PlayStation retailer Eddy Stevens after he was sued by Sony for installing code-breaking chips in consoles and selling them.

In a separate case that has yet to be judged, Sony has also accused Stevens of selling pirated PlayStation games.

PIRACY

The electronics giant argues that regional coding, under which it sells different consoles to three geographically exclusive zones, prevents piracy.

But Justice Ronald Sackville of the Federal Court said Sony failed to prove that the regional coding was simply aimed at copyright protection, and that mod chips were therefore in breach of copyright legislation.

Sony Computer Entertainment Australia said it had the right to appeal and was in discussions with its parent company.

"We're obviously very disappointed," managing director Michael Ephraim told Reuters.

Ephraim lashed out at the ACCC for what he said were "misleading" and "distorted" comments to Australian consumers about competition and regional coding.

He said PlayStation 2 games sold in Australia at the same price as in the United States and at up to 20 percent less than in Britain.

The court case was purely about piracy, he said.

"Piracy is a major problem," Ephraim said.

Citing independent surveys, he said the cost of piracy to Australia's A$680 million (US$367 million) a year computer games industry amounted to A$50 million per annum.

Pirated PlayStation 1 games sell on the black market for as little as A$5 compared to a retail price of up to A$49 while PlayStation 2 games can be bought for around A$30, against the normal retail price of around A$100.

The Sony executive said that rather than being designed for commercial motives, regional coding came about because of different television formats in Australia and the United States.

Furthermore, he said there was nothing in the court ruling that allowed consumers to legally play back-up copies, as suggested by ACCC chairman Fels.

"There is no such thing as an authorized back-up copy," Ephraim said. "The copyright act makes it clear that making back-up copies of games is illegal."

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 8 additional comments
#1 DJ^TuRKiYe on 29 Jul 2002 - 11:25
[quote]Pirated PlayStation 1 games sell on the black market for as little as A$5 compared to a retail price of up to A$49 while PlayStation 2 games can be bought for around A$30, against the normal retail price of around A$100. [/quote] lower prices of PS2 Games = More Sales = Less Piracy = More Money for Sony They brought it on them Selves, i wonder how long it will take for big stores like K-Mart and Big-W etc. to start selling modded PS2's and Mod Chips?

Last edited by 3830 on 29 Jul 2002 - 11:42
#2 pyrothemaniac on 29 Jul 2002 - 15:12
also if they actually released games at the same time worldwide it would cut down piracy a hell of alot.
(1 reply) #3 hunter1234 on 29 Jul 2002 - 17:19
What is wrong with "chip"ing it? i mean if i paid for anything, that is now in my possession, i should have the right to do whatever i want to it. I don't think the companies should have any saying in what i want to do with my property.

Last edited by 10348 on 29 Jul 2002 - 23:53
#3.1 Cēzero on 29 Jul 2002 - 19:12
Amen.
#4 creamhackered on 29 Jul 2002 - 19:22
I go with that
#5 betax on 30 Jul 2002 - 07:20
The sad truth is... Companys want more.. they still want ownership of the device you buy.. Copyrights were originally designed to allow someone to make profit on a technology or idea and then go into public domain. The trend is that copyrights are extended for godlike times and the product never reaches public domain thus, remains closed. The existance of public domain is to promote advancement.. :: sigh :: companies are far to money hungry. "there is no such thing as a legal backup" That makes me laugh my ass off... So someone is going to throw me in jail for making a backup copy of Final Fantasy VII to preserve the integrety of the original. I bought it... it is MINE and I can do whatever the hell I want with it. About imports.. So why the **** is it illegal to play Kenshin JAP for PSX in the US? I buy a PS2, I buy a MOD CHIP, I buy the game.. anything I do with the devices I buy should be my business and my business alone. I can see the day when you spend 5 grand on a new device, and if you do ONE WRONG THING WITH IT... you are either put in jail. Hell is there a agreement you SIGN when you buy a PS2? I think not.
#6 JeT_1o5 on 31 Jul 2002 - 07:30
[quote]What is wrong with "chip"ing it?[/quote] well when its chipped, it can play pirated games, which the companies lose money from, because the games are not bought from the stores
#7 mko on 31 Jul 2002 - 09:51
I agree that companies shouldn't control what we buy from them. I mean if it costs me $400 for a PS2 in Australia why would sony want so much when its still 'their property'? Sony has finally been kicked in the ass for charging too much. I hope this right is passed on successfully into other countries and spreads to other companies who ultimately want to control something which isn't theirs. I trade money for a console with sony right, but if I was to trade a present for something else in real life, do you think its ok I can control what my firned does with my present? No.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)