Battlefield 1942 Patch v1.4 Released
Posted by Keldyn on 12 June 2003 - 08:00 · 9 comments & 840 views
About the Author
Full name: Unknown
Forum name: Keldyn
Contact: via forum PM
Submissions: Normal · Headline
Full name: Unknown
Forum name: Keldyn
Contact: via forum PM
Submissions: Normal · Headline
Slashdot It!
Submit to reddit
Submit to blinklist
Bookmark on del.icio.us
Add to furl
Share on Facebook
Add to Windows Live
Add to Google- Advertisement
-
-
(4 replies)
#1 Posted by Timan on 12 Jun 2003 - 08:26
- can they ever do anything right? they break everything, fix **** no one wants fixed, and make mods broke! pos ea and dice...
-
#1.1 Posted by King Mustard on 12 Jun 2003 - 13:22
- Please be quiet child
-
#1.3 Posted by King Mustard on 12 Jun 2003 - 16:21
- Maybe it's your PC? :p
-
(1 reply)
#2 Posted by DOCa Cola on 12 Jun 2003 - 14:01
- great, the patch has some good improvements
-
#2.1 Posted by King Mustard on 12 Jun 2003 - 14:05
- Agreed
-
#3 Posted by Keldyn on 12 Jun 2003 - 14:59
- I dig the patch
-
#4 Posted by nookadum on 13 Jun 2003 - 05:54
- The patch is great. The physics are way better and the game performance seems to improved.
Electronic Arts has today released the next incremental update for Battlefield 1942 and a set of map editing tools for the game. The 1.4 patch includes a number of gameplay enhancements and bug fixes, plus two new weapon models for the Russian and Japanese assault rifles, a new blood effect, and other visual improvements. The map editing tools are available in open beta form, and EA is asking for feedback on them. The editing tools come in a 12MB file and require the 1.4 update. There's a 54MB sample map pack that may be helpful in learning how to use the tools. The files are available for download from the links below.
Tale of the Tape
It is unfair to compare the number of exploits of a Linux distribution like Red Hat (Nasdaq: RHAT) to Windows Server 2003 to determine whether Linux is safer than Windows, says Jan Hichert, CEO of Astaro, a Linux security solution developer. For one thing, there are more services running on a Linux distribution, Hichert told NewsFactor. But at the same time, attacks on Windows usually draw more attention, so it may seem like Windows is inherently less secure.