Urban Terror v3.1
Posted by Marcel Klum on 10 October 2003 - 15:59 · 10 comments & 780 views
- Advertisement
-
-
(3 replies)
#1 Posted by mlauzon on 10 Oct 2003 - 16:04
- Because I cannot figure out how to play CS -- to many buttons to remember -- this is my game of choice!
-
#1.1 Posted by mlauzon on 10 Oct 2003 - 16:11
QUOTE (#1.0) Because I cannot figure out how to play CS -- to many buttons to remember -- this is my game of choice!
You know, I think this is the first time that I've gotten the number 1 reply to a topic on NeoWin!!!
-
#1.2 Posted by fluxcapacitor on 10 Oct 2003 - 16:21
- Wow, what an accomplishment. Get outside some mang, might be a little healthy for ya...
-
#2 Posted by Xeon™ on 10 Oct 2003 - 19:13
- Urban Terror is an awsome game, you really should get in to it

-
(1 reply)
#3 Posted by m4ch1n3g0d on 10 Oct 2003 - 19:55
- WOW, i love urban terror. Havent played in a while. /Me runs to go play urban terror!
-
(1 reply)
#4 Posted by nicedreams on 11 Oct 2003 - 01:17
- THIS GAME RULEZ!
Find me anywhere. Usually PoopClan or FSK405 Servers...
b/zd|nicedreams
-
#5 Posted by ripgut on 11 Oct 2003 - 21:29
- u can find me on poop, fsk405 as b/zd|sicmade
Submit to reddit
Submit to blinklist
Bookmark on del.icio.us
Add to furl
Share on Facebook
Add to Windows Live
In the increasingly bitter wars between those advocating stronger anti-piracy protections and those who favor less stringent copyright enforcement, the decision against legal action represents one of a precious few instances of companies looking past their bottom line.
"I think it's a sensible decision given the situation, given that what [Halderman] was doing was perfectly legitimate," said computer science professor Edward Felten. "[Jacobs is] to be commended for not wanting to interfere with research."
Felten and some of his colleagues had been in a similar situation in 2001 when the Recording Industry Association of America — the same group that sued Dan Peng '05 last semester for running a campus file-sharing website — strongly urged the research group not to publish their work on another copy-protection technology.
The RIAA said publishing the work would violate the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.