gamers

Thompson links GTA with US school murder plot

malebolgia   on 11 October 2004 - 14:56 · 34 comments & 12611 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Florida-based lawyer Jack Thompson has launched his latest attack on the interactive entertainment industry, telling the media that Grand Theft Auto was used by a Massachusetts teenager to prepare for a planned massacre at his high school. Sixteen year old Tobin Kerns was arrested after police discovered that he planned to kill students and teachers at his school on the anniversary of the 1999 Columbine massacre next April, and then to kill firefighters and police who responded to the emergency calls.

According to Thompson, detectives in the case told him that Grand Theft Auto was one of Kerns' "favourite games," and he has told the media that he believes the boy used the title to prepare for the planned massacre. "The technique of killing civilians and then first-responders when they get there is the primary scenario to win in all the Grand Theft Auto games," he is quoted as saying in newspaper reports over the weekend, before going on to accuse GTA titles of being "killing simulators actually used by gangs."

News source: GamesIndustry.biz


Cont...

At present the new venture is being called "Exclaim," but this is apparently only a temporary name and is likely to be replaced before the firm starts trading. Cousens is joined in the new venture by Europlay Capital Advisers, the Los Angeles based firm which is headed by industry veterans Sean Brennan and Mark Dyne and has advised on a number of major industry deals in recent years.

It's expected that along with the Cheltenham and Manchester studios - accounting for some 160 employees - "Exclaim" will also take possession of several of Acclaim's products in development, including Interview with a Made Man and Heist.


Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 34 additional comments
(1 reply) #1 AngelicRaver on 11 Oct 2004 - 15:10
Oh course, killing people and first responder something new that comes from GTA, Please. Can I hear a bull****?
#1.1 Surr3al on 12 Oct 2004 - 15:40
Not only that, where are the kid's parents? That game has a 18+ rating on it, so at the least it seems there was no parental supervision in this case.
#2 Lazy Tiger on 11 Oct 2004 - 15:12
Haha oh man thats bull****! The Lawyer is clutching at straws.
#3 cpu killer on 11 Oct 2004 - 15:15
Wow, probably the most riddiculous news I've seen all year.
"killing simulators actually used by gangs." ? Oh, come on.
#4 shihchiun on 11 Oct 2004 - 15:47
yeah, like the last 20 lawsuits were succesful...
#5 Veiva on 11 Oct 2004 - 17:33
Playing LoZ hasmade me want to find a sword and kill monsters becuase I know they will come back...
(4 replies) #6 havyn on 11 Oct 2004 - 17:33
he also forgot that THE TITLE AND MAIN POINT OF THE GAME IS GRAND THEFT AUTO was the kid planning to kill innocent drivers and steal their cars to reach his target as well????
#6.1 Ateoto on 11 Oct 2004 - 18:23
Edit: Sorry havyn, didn't mean this to be a reply to your comment. Hit the wrong button.

These articles always piss me off. I mean how many millions of copies of GTA are sold, and just because one kid goes crazy (whom obvioulsy has deeper issues if they are persuaded by video games) they blame the industry for creating "killing simulators".

Im hooked on tetris and I dont go around throwing crazy shaped bricks on people. I love Mario but I dont go around stomping on turtles, jumping in pipes, and stealing money from brick walls. Its just stupid to think that the only reason these people commit these acts is because of a video game. Look at the millions of gamers that DON'T commit crimes. And what really pisses me off is that the assholes who do this stuff then blame the games themselves, because then they can get off easier. I hate that about the human race, no one can take responsibility in this world. Everything bad is someone else's fault.
#6.2 T-Metal on 11 Oct 2004 - 19:02
Well f*cking said, Ateoto.
#6.3 Nose Nuggets on 12 Oct 2004 - 16:25
its not the human race that is like this, its the US! (yes im a us citicen so pipe down)

if you tried to pull this anywhere else in the world they would laugh at you. people are so up on passing the blame here, no one has the balls to take it.


in the words of chris rock "why cant people just be crazy"
#6.4 gohankid77 on 12 Oct 2004 - 20:23
I love Mario, but do you see me using my fist to break a floating brick? Do you see me fighting dinosaurs? Do you see me throwing fireballs or hammers, flying, or changing into a statue?

NO!
(1 reply) #7 thenay on 11 Oct 2004 - 18:13
Americans...
#7.1 T-Metal on 11 Oct 2004 - 19:02
Loser.
#8 nic on 11 Oct 2004 - 18:32
ummm.... I think someone who is sick in the head was sick in the head before they played a violent video game.

Sure, someone who is sick might get more sick ideas from a violent video games. But they will also get sick ideas from a violent movie, or what have you. Are we to ban all of it? Or just be selective?
#9 Bud on 11 Oct 2004 - 18:34
That is bull****. I wish people would stop blaming videogames as the reason some kid goes nuts and kills someone. Apparently the kids parents were negligent in their responsibility to teach the kid right from wrong.

I also agree it seems it human nature to lay the blame on something else.
(1 reply) #10 gohankid77 on 11 Oct 2004 - 18:36
Has anybody heard this story before: Game blamed for hammer murder?

The worst thing to do is ban the games. Rather than banning them, why don't they simply let it go? This stuff happens because that is simply the way that life is these days. Rather than fight it, just accept it. This thing is on an elevated scale too large for the world to handle.
#10.1 AJCrowley Esq on 11 Oct 2004 - 19:19
Yeah, just one example of many occurences of sheer retardedness. I remember when all of the Child's Play movies were banned in the UK because some little kids kidnapped a toddler and stoved is head in with rocks.

Just out of curiosity, are those movies STILL banned in the UK, or have the been made available again (seems some movies have become unbanned with DVD releases, such as A Clockwork Orange, and The Excorcist, at least I believe that to be the case).
#11 medafor on 11 Oct 2004 - 18:54
you got to be kidding me. i wonder if the lawyer even knows what version of "GTA" was his favorite. "GTA" (version 1) is soooooooo old and far from realistic.. i am sure it was a newer version of GTA. when you say "GTA" you are referring to the old/free (top view) version of Grand Theft Auto. I suppose i am ploting to kill my co workers... CUZ I LOVE THE GTA SERIES!! thats like saying watching elmer fudd blast off daffy ducks head is going to make me a killer. GTA is one of the largest selling video game franchises ever. the fact that one sick kid happens to play GTA, shouldnt give that dumb lawyer the right to point the finger at rockstar. if GTA makes killers, then there are going to be a million school shooting on columbines anniversary LOL.
(1 reply) #12 FunkyMike on 11 Oct 2004 - 19:03
God are you people really that stupid. The lawyer couldnt care less what game it was, neither is the lawyer himself stupid enough to believe it was the game which influenced the boy. Its all about an easy option, and in this case its easy enough to just blame it on a game.
#12.1 Wrath Delivery on 12 Oct 2004 - 08:01
And to expand that idea, it is really just greed on the lawyers part. He goes for the biggest target out of whom he can score the most money in order to make him go away. Quite sick actually.
(6 replies) #13 AJCrowley Esq on 11 Oct 2004 - 19:08
Firstly, killing civillians and primary responders is NOT the main objective in GTA, though it is something you can do (and rather fun).

The claim that this game is used as a training simulator is probably the most ridiculous thing that I've ever heard. Pointing at something with a mouse bears no resemblance to aiming a gun. The punches and kicks in the game are hardly physical combat training. "Killing" computer graphics will not give you the stomach to take a real life.

The common theme amongst these cases is people refusing to take responsibility. The kid doesn't take responsibility for being a psychopath/sociopath. The parents don't take responsibility for being too busy smoking crack to raise their kids to know the difference between right and wrong. The society takes no responsibility for creating a culture of violence, where people consider it their "right" to own assault weapons - weapons that have NO purpose whatsoever other than killing other human beings, where people are sent to war for a pack of lies by a president who was too much of a pussy to go to war for his country when he had the chance, where a country such as France, to which they owe their ENTIRE country (America didn't fight their own war of independance, they wouldn't have stood a chance against the British, France fought it for them) are considered to be the enemy and the scum of the Earth because they are not so stupid that they can't see through the lies used to justify the war, where the bulk of the GDP is spent on militarization, while people are refused treatment and allowed to die because they're unable to pay for medical treatment, even though the *civilized* world, and most third world countries provide medical treatment for free, because it is every human's right to live and to have good health.

I'd say those things probably have a LOT more to do with it than some game. Still, it's some free publicity for Rock Star Games, and should get the few remaining people that haven't heard of the game curious about it and make some sales, so they can continue to develop great ENTERTAINMENT products (note, video games are entertainment, the fact that the kid can easily obtain automatic weapons is of far greater concern to any rational mind than obtaining some game).

Bah, people make me sick, it's pathetic.

Edit:

Maybe things such as this - a quadrapalegic in Washington DC sent to jail for using marijuana to ease his pain, and not receiving the medical care that he needed there, and being allowed to die in a cell should be what's under investigation as the cause, clearly the kid comes from an uncaring and egocentric society.

Last edited by 8585 on 11 Oct 2004 - 19:16
#13.1 gohankid77 on 11 Oct 2004 - 19:21
QUOTE

where a country such as France, to which they owe their ENTIRE country (America didn't fight their own war of independance, they wouldn't have stood a chance against the British, France fought it for them)


That is true, but many people who would read this would think that France was actually shooting at the British during that entire time period. France supported the colonies (it wasn't a nation of United States yet) financially and about halfway between the middle and the end, the colonies started losing. France then took an active role in the American war of independence.

I am a citizen of the United States and there is one thing that really makes me angry. When the colonies needed help fighting the British, France to the colonies' aid. However, when France needed help in the same way, the colonies refused to help France! Why does that make me angry? I am a person who feels that anybody who receives help should repay their kindness/sympathy. It's as simple as that.

"I am an American."
#13.2 nic on 11 Oct 2004 - 20:32
what about WW2? American soldiers didn't help France then? Or is it a problem w/ consistency. People really need to think of these entities making the decisions as the governments of countries, not the people of the country. Not everyone in the US bashes french people. I'd say the places I've been in the US have been full of, for the most part, rational people who don't show racism. I'm sure it comes down to where you've been and what experiences you've had. I had a friend (from america) and went to germany (she got her degree in german, and is working on an international buisness degree). Where she was at she experienced a TON of recentment comming from the german people because she was an american. Not saying that all german people hate americans, but her experience was that most of them did, or at least those who did was very vocal about it.

Sorry, for driving this more OT.
#13.3 AJCrowley Esq on 11 Oct 2004 - 20:36
Yes, America helped France in WW2. However, that had nothing whatsoever to do with why America joined the war, and if it were the sole reason, I can guarantee you that they would not have gone. As with every war America has ever fought, it was not an act of kindness towards anybody else that prompted the fight, it was purely an act of self interest. Most Americans still don't seem to get this, they actually believe that they invaded Iraq to help the poor Iraqis suffering under Hussein (now the poor Iraqis suffering under Bush) - don't believe the hype, it is PURELY an act of self interest, and if there were nothing in it for the US other than the warm feeling you get from doing a good deed, you can bet your ass they would never have gone.
#13.4 gohankid77 on 11 Oct 2004 - 23:28
Which was my point exactly.
Has America repayed that debt to France? Sure they bought the Louisiana territory from Napolean, and that was simply because Americans were hungry for land even after they had more than enough to expand for decades to come!
And what about the Iraqi nation? I agree with AJ. We Americans were attacked on September 11, 2001, and we had supposed hard-evidence, but I don't think we should have gone to the extremes that we already have.
I admit that I believe many political officials are corrupt, but in these times, who isn't? Money makes the world go 'round. Money = Power = Dominion. Whoever has the most money and power has a huge advantage over someone with less money and power.

(Back on-topic): Games like the GTA series don't cause people to go to the extremes like in this case. Take the Columbine case, for example. Did video games cause that? NO! It was peer pressure. Too many people are self-conscious and afraid to speak out for what they think is right. This causes the pressure to build up and eventually explode. I am like that except that I can contain my pressure and voluntarily let it out, a rare trait. That's probably because I was bullied when I was really little and took everything thrown at me. It did, however, make me unique, which is more than I can say for most Americans.
Bottom-line: Games are tools for entertainment, not death.
#13.5 X-Spyder on 12 Oct 2004 - 15:57
You guys have seriously got caught up in a tangent...
#13.6 gohankid77 on 12 Oct 2004 - 20:24
No kidding. And my username describes me quite well. I'm a kid! Good thing this thread is hidden from the neowin homepage!
#14 TGD on 11 Oct 2004 - 19:26
I'm sure Rockstar are delighted that an article like this would come out. After all, isn't the whole point of GTA that it's so edgy and "mature"? Kinda convenient it'd come just before GTAA comes out.
#15 Colicab on 11 Oct 2004 - 21:41
Firstly this guy doesnt care about the game or the fact that its a "killing simulator" hes out to twin the case.

Secondly it seems just a wee bitty odd to me that this emerges just short of San-Andreas` release.

Either its a coincidence or this poor fool hasnt realised that by condeming a game which has already won several courtcases to this effect will only boost sales further.

If indeed this guy is for real, then all I can say is WOW its amazing what a quick 5 minutes in front of video game and some exageration can lead to.

In no way is GTA an accurate depiction of how anyone would carry out these haneous crimes. I could play GTA 24hrs a day fro a 3 weeks solid and it wouldnt be a trained assassin, chances are Id step up wuth my gun fire abput 3 times then get shot.. woops GAME OVER!

Its great cause no one has actually looked at how this kid became the way he was, I mean why got o the bother of spending cash to find out why some kids in society are becoming like this, I mean it wouldnt be the fact that hes probably been bullied since he stepped in the school doors, or that his parents abuse him oh hell no. Lets not spend money trying to prevent that, instead well blame some software house thats made a violent game.. notice the word "GAME" not accurate real life simulation, but instead well make cash back by sueing them.

Now Im off to put some babys on spikes and sacrifice my parents to the dark god "Rasmap-bull****-lawer" so that he may grant me dark powesr to thwart those that stand against me.

Dunno why really just all of a sudden have the urge... think it was that violently spcy curry I had, yeah thats a good enuff scape goat.
#16 paulhaskew on 11 Oct 2004 - 22:47
why not teach your kid, make sure you kid is doing what you teach, rather than blame it on TV/Games etc...
#17 russellc on 12 Oct 2004 - 01:48
i play gta. i'm gonna go plot a massacre now
#18 Dz_Rascal on 12 Oct 2004 - 01:53
Since when could you hold a rocket launcher and not blow yourself away? GTA is full of made up crap which is fun and interesting.

I'd say DRIV3R in free mode is a lot more realistic that GTA c'mon mr laywer man ( I bet he aint even played it ).

Chris
#19 Surr3al on 12 Oct 2004 - 15:43
I'm going to blame the lack of parental guidance on this one.
#20 X-Spyder on 12 Oct 2004 - 16:02
This is dumb. These guys really need to re-evaluate what causes problems in youths. Most likley it's mom and dad. COuld be the Jihad freakshows chopping heads off like there's no tomorrow. Simply enough, the game (and anything else violent in this kid's life) is simply a tool for him to facilitate (safely) his obviously screwed up feelings. I bet he played Dungeons & Dragons too, but I doubt he feels about the game the way the majority do. He was probably chopping off elf heads and shooting the knights who came to investigate...

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)