gamers

Battlefield 2 and next Medal of Honor game delayed

LOC   on 26 January 2005 - 19:27 · 21 comments & 4591 views

Advertisement (Why?)
During an Electronic Arts conference call with EA execs Larry Probst and Warren Jenson it was revealed that the highly anticipated Battlefield 2 along with the next console Medal of Honor game have now been delayed until Q1 2006 (April-June 2005).

Here are some more tidbits from the call:

EA execs believes that there is still a lot of strength in current generation console sales, even with the industry on the verge of officially announcing new next-gen console hardware.

In the calendar year 2005, EA execs plan to make the "nessessary investments" for next generation console game development, along with a healthy handheld console line-up for the Sony PSP and the Nintendo DS, along with increased development of games for mobile phones.

On EA's recent purchase of nearly 20 percent of Ubi Soft shares, EA execs stated that they feel it is a good investment, saying, "We have nothing but respect but Ubi Soft and its management." While EA stated they are prepared to be a "long time minority shareholder" they also said, "We want to keep our options open." IF EA does decide to increase their share in Ubi Soft, EA execs stated they would like to do so with the full support and cooperation of Ubi Soft management.

Battlefield 2, the upcoming next game in the multiplayer shooter franchise, has been pushed back from a March release to a release in EA's first fiscal 2006 quarter (April-June 2005). Likewise the next console Medal of Honor title will also be released in the fiscal first quarter 2006 time period.

During the conference call Q&A, EA execs stated that despite the announcement yesterday of Take Two's semi-exclusive pro baseball video game licence, EA is pursuing the creation of some kind of baseball title although they declined to go into details.

News source: Homelanfed


at commands
Problem: The "at" family of commands did not properly drop privileges. This could allow a local user to remove files not owned by them, run programs with added privileges, or read the contents of normally unreadable files.

Affecting: Mac OS X v10.3.7, Mac OS X Server v10.3.7

ColorSync
Problem: An out-of-specification or improperly embedded ICC color profile could overwrite the program heap and allow arbitrary code execution.

Affecting: Mac OS X v10.3.7, Mac OS X Server v10.3.7, Mac OS X v10.2.8, Mac OS X Server v10.2.8

libxml2
Problem: The libxml2 library contains unsafe code that may be exploited in applications linked against it.

Affecting: Mac OS X v10.3.7, Mac OS X Server v10.3.7

Mail
Problem: A GUUID containing an identifier associated with the Ethernet networking hardware was used in the construction of an RFC-822 required Message-ID header.

Affecting: Mac OS X v10.3.7 Client, Mac OS X Server v10.3.7

PHP
Problem: Multiple vulnerabilities in PHP, including remote denial of service and execution of arbitrary code.

Affecting: Mac OS X v10.3.7, Mac OS X Server v10.3.7, Mac OS X v10.2.8, Mac OS X Server v10.2.8

Safari
Problem: When Safari's "Block Pop-Up Windows" feature is not enabled, a malicious pop-up window could appear as being from a trusted site.

Affecting: Mac OS X v10.3.7, Mac OS X Server v10.3.7, Mac OS X v10.2.8, Mac OS X Server v10.2.8

SquirrelMail
Problem: A cross-site scripting vulnerability in SquirrelMail allowed email messages to contain content that would be rendered by a user's web browser.

Affecting: Mac OS X Server 10.3.7

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 21 additional comments
(2 replies) #1 Mx² on 26 Jan 2005 - 19:56
Awwwww Noo, I want Battlefield 2.
#1.1 kev64 on 26 Jan 2005 - 20:15
So do i...
#1.2 okidoki on 26 Jan 2005 - 20:58
No, you don't.
The current state that BF2 is in is.. let's say very unpolished.
The netcode needs a major touch-up, and it needs to go through some serious optimization.
Right now, a 9800pro w/ 128mb ram only makes it look slightly nicer than BF: Vietnam.
(4 replies) #2 JakeX on 26 Jan 2005 - 20:29
I hate how EA is taking over all gaming companies.. pretty soon in the future it will be:
Blizzard
ID
and EA

thats all..
#2.1 illz55 on 26 Jan 2005 - 20:33
Wow, you are ignorant to believe Blizzard and ID will own everything else. They are not that big at all. What about Vivendi? There are many others as well... Nonetheless, I do not think that all EA Games are bad, and I am sure you can say that you enjoyed some of their games. How would they be so wealthy and huge if nobody bought their games and hated all their 'bad' games ? I just hope the developers they are buying will not make future games worse than if they would without becoming part of EA.
#2.2 okidoki on 26 Jan 2005 - 20:59
You know.. Blizzard is a part of Vivendi these days . . .
#2.3 SIG on 26 Jan 2005 - 22:03
Nah, Google will own all with Ggames!
#2.4 Radium on 28 Jan 2005 - 14:34
id Software is a tiny company and they don't publish the games themselves.
Activision usually takes care of that.
(2 replies) #3 Lingwo on 26 Jan 2005 - 20:37
Strange EA delaying games, they usually release them early and allow the public to beta test them
#3.1 Dirtie on 26 Jan 2005 - 20:49
I'd rather they took theeir time. Look at Rugby 2004
#3.2 Sir Gawain on 27 Jan 2005 - 03:40
So true. I still remember Battlefield Vietnam with the m60s.
#4 sin™ on 27 Jan 2005 - 01:07
Predictable
#5 allfive6 on 27 Jan 2005 - 02:02
damit
(1 reply) #6 skooter on 27 Jan 2005 - 03:41
Q1 2006 = April-June 2005? wtf?
#6.1 vetLOC on 27 Jan 2005 - 04:01
Yes, the Fiscal year is different than the normal calendar year we know and love. Q1 2006 is April-June of this year, don't ask why I don't know.
(2 replies) #7 SirEvan on 27 Jan 2005 - 04:57
this really sucks. I preordered BF2 thinking it would get here before we went down range to iraq... now looks like I'm gonna be in iraq for a year when this thing comes....might cancel my preorder, since it won't do me any good now.
#7.1 Decel on 27 Jan 2005 - 17:12
Eeesh Iraq. No matter what the view on the legitimicy of the war, I wish you the best of luck over there.
#7.2 JakeM741 on 28 Jan 2005 - 03:27
Good luck in Iraq
#8 Kushan on 27 Jan 2005 - 19:11
Anyone else think it's odd how EA sacks 60 of it's coders and stuff then delay a couple of their games?
#9 Gordons on 28 Jan 2005 - 16:49
Postponed huh? Damn it !!!!!!! Every damn company does this crap , im sick of it . Get better Marketing or dont give us a release date then postpone .. better yet stay quiet then release the game .. man im pissed off ! P.S. SirEvan good luck in Iraq , stay safe
#10 Amsterdam on 03 Feb 2005 - 17:41
Rediculous can they ever get a game out on time?

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)