gamers

Coppola slams EA's Godfather game

Dice   on 11 April 2005 - 13:37 · 14 comments & 3164 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Francis Ford Coppola, director of The Godfather movie trilogy, has revealed his anger at Paramount's decision allowing Electronic Arts to produce a videogame tie-in.

In an interview with US television show Sunday Morning ShootOut, Coppola said the studio did not inform him of the deal at any stage. "I knew nothing about it," he said. "They never asked me if I thought it was a good idea."

The Godfather is slated for release on PS2, Xbox, PC and PSP this autumn. It allows players to create their own mob character and work their way up through the ranks of the Corleone family, and features the likenesses of film actors Robert Duvall (Tom Hagen) and James Caan (Sonny Corleone). Marlon Brando also granted likeness rights and recorded a voiceover for the game before his death.

But Coppola, who says he has managed to get a preview of the game, believes the characters have been mishandled. "They use the characters everyone knows, and they hire those actors to be there, and only to introduce minor characters. And then for the next hour they shoot and kill each other," he said.

"I had absolutely nothing to do with the game and I disapprove. I think it's a misuse of film."

News source: gamesindustry.biz


Cont...

However, Coppola's claims that he was completely unaware of the project seem to contradict earlier statements by the game's producer, David De Martini. "We've met with [Coppola] on one occasion and we shared with him what our vision was for the game, and where we were going to go," De Martini told gamesindustry.biz in a recent interview.

"He isn't choosing to participate in the project, but he did invite us up to the Coppola winery where he has his own private library. He's got a lot of materials from the original Godfather productions - so a lot of sketch designs for the sets, for the costumes, a lot of notes that he's taken in the original screenplay as well as in the book.

"He invited us up there to take a look around, and we sent four or five people for a week. It was such a rich experience to go up there and see it and it was well worth the time," he added.



Electronic Arts was unavailable for comment at the time of writing.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 14 additional comments
(2 replies) #1 netstarman on 11 Apr 2005 - 14:17
Coppala seems WAYYYYYYY out there they were invited to go up to the house have wine and food and talk about a great game. All of a sudden his mind goes? Saying he never aproved of this game never seen it bad choice in words Coppala . The wine is good tho' i'll give it to him pretty good. but he needs to get his mind focused on this one. He's got no choice in the matter , he should embrace the video game developers and writers and try to make a good game himself. Lets see what happens.
#1.1 PermaSt0ne on 11 Apr 2005 - 15:41
just cause he invited them to his winery doesn't mean he approved the game. sure they talked, and it sounded good in theory. but if you read the article, he got mad after he got a preview of the game. he was happy with the concept, but the actual game is what he is upset about.
#1.2 toadeater on 11 Apr 2005 - 21:24
They most likely told him it would be cinematic and have all this interaction and complex characterizations, "just like the movie." This turned out to comprise 30 sec intros before each mission where some poorly-animated imitation of a Godfather character explains to you that you have to massacre everything in sight, and that it just so happens they stole a new suit from the NSA that makes you nearly invisible and allows you to see in the dark. Eventually, you wind up using your Mafia super-powers to prevent another terrorist attack on NYC. Sample dialogue:

"You messed with the wrong family this time, Bin Laden!"
#2 netstarman on 11 Apr 2005 - 14:18
Hmmm i wonder what Robert Evans ( Paramount Producer ) is up too since he bought the rights to the book by Mario Puzo.
#3 Ateoto on 11 Apr 2005 - 14:51
I'd be pissed if I was him, EA Games? Such poor poor quality these days. Well for the PC anyway.
#4 Kerm on 11 Apr 2005 - 14:53
I think it is a bad idea to make this game.
In my opinion from what i've seen through other games, and screenshots and what i've read about this game it is not going to do the film any justice.
Just selling the name again.
#5 netstarman on 11 Apr 2005 - 15:18
I can seee the bad quality coming in now from EA, Medal of Honor. better to get Call of Duty from the original guys who made MOH. Hard to think that EA is getting bad after all these years. But from my original neowin imput is that Coppala should at least try to direct a game to see how hard it is . but i do agree EA is getting bad . Maybe thats why i bought all espn games. For 19.99 you cant go wrong .
#6 Wickedkitten on 11 Apr 2005 - 16:22
Pobrecito, I wonder what Mario Puzo would think of the idea.
#7 trravez on 12 Apr 2005 - 02:52
The Academy Awards is a misuse of film.
(1 reply) #8 Briandl79 on 12 Apr 2005 - 04:55
They should have let Illusion Softworks (Take2) make it, they did such a wonderful job of making Mafia, they would have done a wonderful job on a Godfather game, I bet Coppola would have liked something by them better....
#8.1 HawkMan on 12 Apr 2005 - 17:29
riiight... did you even BOTHER to read the article...

his point was that the games was lamost exclusively shooting and being a badass.

oh wait what was MAfia all about again.. that's right, shooting tommy guns and smashing stuff with a baseball bat. oh sure there was the racing track but.. come one..

besides form what I've seen of this game so far, it's far ahead of what mafia was, and MAfia wasn't a bad game, for sure.
(1 reply) #9 Fat Tony on 12 Apr 2005 - 08:47
Oh titter, titter... never mind Frankie... considering the film is owned by Paramount any way doesn’t this mean they can do with the film what ever they want...?

Or am I wrong...?
#9.1 nic on 12 Apr 2005 - 22:24
I'm pretty sure that is the very definition of "owning."
#10 insaneshaft on 13 Apr 2005 - 05:45
It's EA, say no more.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)