gamers
Report a problem

New Tomb Raider movie in the pipeline

Marcel Klum   on 18 December 2006 - 21:09 · 16 comments & 8383 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Eidos exec Ian Livingstone OBE has claimed that the forthcoming next-gen iteration of Tomb Raider "is like watching television", and revealed that another big screen outing for Lara Croft is also in the works.

The Britsoft firm's product acquisitions director was speaking in an exclusive interview with GamesIndustry.biz sister site Eurogamer TV, following his recent talk on 10 years of Tomb Raider.

On what to expect from the next-gen version, he commented: "I've seen some of the in-game models and it's just like watching television; if you felt you were in love with Lara Croft previously, you ain't seen nothing yet. You'll be drooling when you see the new Lara as she appears in the next iteration."

During the presentation, hosted by the Game On exhibition at London's Science Museum, Livingstone revealed that the Tomb Raider franchise has netted revenues in excess of USD1 billion, with lifetime sales of over 30 million units.

Lara Croft's two movie outings have also accounted for hefty revenues of US$ 430 million - and Livingstone confirmed that work on a third big screen outing, again starring Angelina Jolie, is also underway.

News source: Gamesindustry.biz

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 16 additional comments
(2 replies) #1 zeta_immersion on 18 Dec 2006 - 21:29
i wonder if any of these long "trilogy " games (or more like 6-ology .... the caracter is getting old ... they should think about that and implement it ... old lara or .. lets see ... some other old characters
#1.1 +Ryster092 on 19 Dec 2006 - 00:04
You mean a "Hexology" don't you?
#1.2 joeydoo on 19 Dec 2006 - 01:00
I thought people knew about the third movie.
They delayed it, along with Sin City 2, because Jolie was preggers.
#2 Jugalator on 18 Dec 2006 - 22:04
#3 Audhumla on 18 Dec 2006 - 22:22
The last one wasn't bad. This should be interesting.
#4 sundayx on 18 Dec 2006 - 22:59
ANGELINA JOLLLIIIEEEEE
#5 Un-Dead Soldier on 18 Dec 2006 - 23:23
Bigger boobs perhaps?
#6 Nose Nuggets on 18 Dec 2006 - 23:43
the last one was not bad at all. some puzzles actually took more then 10 minutes to figure out and complete.

regardless, any angalina jolie movie is worth at LEAST a rental.
(1 reply) #7 +stifler6478 on 19 Dec 2006 - 02:48
I loved the movies. This is excellent news.

-Spenser
#7.1 patseguin on 21 Dec 2006 - 14:15
Quote - stifler6478 said @ #7
I loved the movies. This is excellent news.

-Spenser


Same here. Not quite sure why so many people trashed the movies.
(1 reply) #8 Kushan on 19 Dec 2006 - 05:09
Oh god no, we don't need this at all. Tomb Raider should be left to rest, it went downhill since the 3rd game and it hasn't made up for it since.
#8.1 SomeAzn on 20 Dec 2006 - 23:36
While I haven't played it, the last one was pretty highly regarded.
(1 reply) #9 Magallanes on 21 Dec 2006 - 16:44
"...More boring that Tomb Raider 2".

:-P

Anyways i still disagreed with the choice of angelina jolie, there are many models exact that the real tombraider and even with more bust.. also angelina jolie is not a good actress at all.

#9.1 ir0nw0lf on 21 Dec 2006 - 17:59
Sadly, many people [aka guys] didn't go to see the movie for her "acting ability"... They didn't nickname the movie Boob Raider for nothing ya know.
#10 yert* on 21 Dec 2006 - 20:45
I thought the first Tomb Raider was actually pretty fun and overall entertaining. The second one wasn't that great, but hey, Angelina Jolie is hottttttttt. Long live big boobs and Tomb Raider.
#11 +Xerxes on 05 Jan 2007 - 08:57
I'm confused, by next iteration do they mean Tomb Raider: 10th Anniversary? or a game after that? cause the 10th Anniversary one is essentially Tomb Raider 1 running on the Tomb Raider Legend engine (while it is quite good, it's not "like watching TV" )

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)