hardware

Nvidia Readies New “Ultimate” Technology for Gamers

Slimy   on 29 September 2007 - 15:33 · 33 comments & 16529 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Nvidia Corporation not only plans to refresh its lineup of performance graphics accelerators this year, but also intends to introduce its 3-way SLI multi-GPU technology, which is apparently Nvidia’s new “ultimate gaming platform”. Initially Nvidia plans to enable triple SLI support for the top-of-the-range GeForce 8800 GTX and Ultra graphics cards, but eventually it may support 3-way configurations of other GPUs as well. Systems with three graphics cores will be powered by Nvidia nForce 680i as well as nForce 780i platforms with the former supporting PCI Express 1.1/1.0a, whereas the latter featuring PCI Express 2.0 along with a special “BR04” switch for more efficient multi-GPU operation.

The exact feature set of 3-way SLI platforms as well as performance boosts over single- or dual-GPU configurations will mostly depend on driver support. Back in 2006, when Nvidia unveiled its 4-way SLI technology, actual systems featuring four GPUs could not offer leading performance in all games due to poor drivers. Currently quad SLI technology is not supported for Windows Vista and customers who paid over $1000 for graphics cards alone have to take advantage of only two GPUs instead of four.

News source: Xbit Laboratories

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 33 additional comments
(1 reply) #1 EduardValencia on 29 Sep 2007 - 17:09
3 - way SLi is just insane,nothing demands that raw power!,well ate least in gaming world,excluding animated 3D design and all that stuff
#1.1 Leo Natan on 29 Sep 2007 - 17:29
Don't say nothing. Some monitors with insane resolutions (or multiple monitors in arrays) require much more power to render a scene.
#2 thenay on 29 Sep 2007 - 17:49
I like the idea of 3-way I honestly rarely know people who have 2, now 3, oh my! lol
(1 reply) #3 miguel_montes on 29 Sep 2007 - 18:07
Nothing in technology is "ultimate"...
#3.1 +Raa on 30 Sep 2007 - 03:01
Except for Vista...

.... But that's an ultimate farce?
(1 reply) #4 Azmodan on 29 Sep 2007 - 18:07
It's not a piece of gaming... it's just luxurious, expensive stuff. In 5 years, what we know as a 3-SLi 8800GTX will be garbage compared to a single video card with an average cost.
#4.1 Beastage on 02 Oct 2007 - 13:07
Quote - (Azmodan said @ #4)
It's not a piece of gaming... it's just luxurious, expensive stuff. In 5 years, what we know as a 3-SLi 8800GTX will be garbage compared to a single video card with an average cost.


Make that 2 years time
#5 Croquant on 29 Sep 2007 - 18:32
The real question is, will the 780i-based motherboards have three PCIx 32x slots? Currently the best you can get is two x16 (electrical)/ x16 (physical) slots with an additional single x8 (electrical)/ x16 (physical). What I'd really like to see are EATX 780i-based boards that have three PCIe 2.0 32x slots and a pair of DP Xeon sockets. That would rock.
(2 replies) #6 Sazz181 on 29 Sep 2007 - 18:50
Wow, imagine 3 of those, with Ageia PhysX, with 8GB DDR3 RAM, with a Solid State Drive, plus Intel Quad Core OC

And then imagine how many weeks most of us would have to go without food to buy it

I guess if I went out and bought that tommorow, it would be a low-end PC within 5 years.
#6.1 Tantawi on 29 Sep 2007 - 18:51
5 yeas? you're optimistic
#6.2 Jugalator on 01 Oct 2007 - 10:06
5 years ago, Windows XP was all the rage and Pentium 4's were just getting warmed up as a platform.
The GeForce FX was just set to replace the GeForce 4, 80 GB drives were normal, and 512 MB on board memory.

5 years later, we're 3 revisions further in NVIDIA's series, new drives are often at least 4x the size, and we commonly have 4x as much RAM.

Extrapolating that into the future would mean 8 GB RAM computers in 2012, several generations ahead in graphics, nearly 2 TB drives, and something like at least quad core CPU's being the mainstream, eight core for the high end.

I don't think he's that optimistic to be honest.
#7 OblivionStalker on 29 Sep 2007 - 19:03
Yes, yes. In 10 years, not direct-to-drive downloads and games paging files, but direct-to-brain. Lol.
(1 reply) #8 +Digix on 29 Sep 2007 - 19:29
seems like nvidias answer to crossfires technology, good to have competition i guess.
#8.1 SIE on 30 Sep 2007 - 12:24
You mean crossfire is ATI's answer to nVidia's SLI because they had it first when they bought 3DFX?
#9 JohnBfromMemphis on 29 Sep 2007 - 20:34
AMD/ATI calls their 3 card setup Tri-Fire .. the video is on youtube. It's a demo given by Henri Richard before she left the company. She opens the case to show the monster Phenom cooler and 3 2900XT's all snug and tight >.<
(1 reply) #10 +Kushan on 29 Sep 2007 - 20:53
Now come on Nvidia, how about you get 2-way SLi working properly before you jump to 3?
#10.1 Unwonted on 30 Sep 2007 - 04:18
I was thinking the same thing!
#11 chaosblade on 29 Sep 2007 - 23:51
For really, really, filthy rich Gamers, perhaps.
(1 reply) #12 Dakkaroth on 30 Sep 2007 - 05:18
Just what everyone needs: a computer that dims the lights when turned on.
#12.1 Sazz181 on 30 Sep 2007 - 14:06
At last, a use for those 1000 and 2000Watt PSU's we all have
#13 Budious on 30 Sep 2007 - 07:12
Just what I'm never going to use. I just want a single (1) 9800GTX ... so hurry up and release them.
#14 obsolete_power on 30 Sep 2007 - 13:59
NVIDIA, YOU STUPID IDIOTS! SLi does not work!!! Every time I enable SLi, the games actually perform much worse and it is bad enough that I notice it!
#15 Sazz181 on 30 Sep 2007 - 14:05
I'm looking forward to that...

.. and the price cuts that follow.
#16 DJ Prem on 30 Sep 2007 - 15:31
How about getting drivers sorted first?
#17 ZEROarmy on 01 Oct 2007 - 03:47
This just dumb and wasteful. AMD and Intel put so much work into lowering power consumption in their processors, then nvidia comes out with this triple and quad stuff that just completely destroys any savings.
#18 toadeater on 01 Oct 2007 - 06:44


Last edited by toadeater on 01 Oct 2007 - 07:03
(1 reply) #19 Jugalator on 01 Oct 2007 - 09:56
2x SLI doesn't even work well... You'd think you'd get an uber system with SLI'd high end Geforce 8's and DX10 on Vista, but actually you don't, because you'll run into all sorts of driver trouble before. If it's not about SLI itself, it's about DX10, and if it's not about DX10, it's about some weird Vista issue.
#19.1 spacer on 01 Oct 2007 - 15:37
Over you could just not use Vista for gaming...as any serious gamer is already aware.
(2 replies) #20 Denver_80203 on 01 Oct 2007 - 19:13
Personally I would just prefer to see more games take advantage of two monitors rather than all that power dedicated to a single screen.

Examples include:
WOW with all the tool bars dedicated to one screen and game play to the other
C&C or the like with defensive base on one screen and offensive attacks on the other

etc and so on.
#20.1 ZombieFly on 05 Oct 2007 - 20:06
direct x10 supports multimonitor, expect future vista games to start using it very soon.
#20.2 Croquant on 06 Oct 2007 - 04:17
Quote - (ZombieFly said @ #20.1)
direct x10 supports multimonitor, expect future vista games to start using it very soon.

So does DX 9. Just not in SLI (and no, DX10 SLI does not support more than one monitor either.)
#21 ambiance on 04 Oct 2007 - 20:59
I have never been able to afford SLI, but I will say that pc gamers are the biggest suckers in the world.
#22 Mistwaver on 23 Oct 2007 - 20:50
They need to fix SLI before moving to a more advanced technology of SLI. Twice the price tag for a 15-20% performance boost, when a single card gets enough performance the naked eye can't detect a difference anyways? I don't think so.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)