World of Warcraft v2.3.3 Patch
Posted by EL1TE on 22 January 2008 - 13:11 · 9 comments & 8330 views

- Advertisement
-
-
(6 replies)
#1 Posted by sorlag on 22 Jan 2008 - 13:47
- nice nice... but fix that f*** lags in the bgs and the waittimes on arena 2on2/3on3.... open more server slots!
-
#1.1 Posted by nonick on 22 Jan 2008 - 15:11
- (sorlag said @ #1)nice nice... but fix that f*** lags in the bgs and the waittimes on arena 2on2/3on3.... open more server slots!
There is no such word as "lags".
Plural lag that is. -
#1.2 Posted by spacer on 22 Jan 2008 - 15:13
- The wait time for arena isn't Blizzard's fault. People have to queue up for a match to begin. If there are not enough people, then you're going to have to wait.
I say fix the damn disconnect issues and the system crashes that occur when using new videocards. -
#1.3 Posted by SOOPRcow on 22 Jan 2008 - 15:53
- (spacer said @ #1.2)The wait time for arena isn't Blizzard's fault. People have to queue up for a match to begin. If there are not enough people, then you're going to have to wait.
Actually they have said that there are only a limited number of server slots for each bracket. Seeing as 2v2 is the most played and has the least amount of players per team they are reaching that server limited at peek times and that is increasing the wait time. So even if there are enough people to play you're gonna wait at peek times. -
#1.4 Posted by spacer on 22 Jan 2008 - 17:37
- (SOOPRcow said @ #1.3)(spacer said @ #1.2)The wait time for arena isn't Blizzard's fault. People have to queue up for a match to begin. If there are not enough people, then you're going to have to wait.
Actually they have said that there are only a limited number of server slots for each bracket. Seeing as 2v2 is the most played and has the least amount of players per team they are reaching that server limited at peek times and that is increasing the wait time. So even if there are enough people to play you're gonna wait at peek times.
Huh, I didn't know that. It makes no sense why they would put a limit on the arenas though. -
#1.5 Posted by Leo Natan on 22 Jan 2008 - 21:45
- (nonick said @ #1.1)There is no such word as "lags".
Plural lag that is.
As a matter of fact, there is plural to lag:
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/lag#Noun
-
#1.6 Posted by nonick on 23 Jan 2008 - 08:37
- (Leo Natan said @ #1.5)(nonick said @ #1.1)There is no such word as "lags".
Plural lag that is.
As a matter of fact, there is plural to lag:
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/lag#Noun
"lag" as loss of internet connection/bad latency has no plural. "lag" as a gap, sure does.
My point stands
-
#2 Posted by lonelycooler on 22 Jan 2008 - 18:36
- because its less expensive to run less servers!
Submit to reddit
Submit to blinklist
Bookmark on del.icio.us
Add to furl
Share on Facebook
Add to Windows Live