gamers

Second Life on its last life

Marcel Klum   on 21 August 2008 - 12:51 · 45 comments & 20165 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Lynden Lab’s Second Life virtual world was so popular that people were investing in virtual real estate and making significant sums of money off their investments. This was in the glory days last year and in 2006. Now the virtual world is bleeding users fast, and there doesn’t seem to be a way to hemorrhage the problem.

February 2007, Reuters reported that real estate prices in Second Life had climbed to undesirably high levels and that land speculators could suffer when more is created. Lynden Lab’s virtual world was so popular that people were looking towards virtual real estate as a smart investment. In fact, Second Life was starting to imitate the real estate climate in Sydney, with high property prices and a fear that cheaper properties being developed on the outskirts in large quantities could significantly damage to the market rather than help struggling families.

Website Alexa, which monitors website traffic, shows a significant decline in visitors to Second Life over the past year. It’s now outside of the top 1,700 websites in Australia, the United States, Great Britain and Canada (outside of the top 2,000 in some), and over the past three months alone has dropped six percent in its global reach and 18 percent in its traffic rank. Having had an almost 0.08 percent reach this time last year, it’s now dropped down to under 0.03.

News source: gadget zone
View: Second life website

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 45 additional comments
(2 replies) #1 Tom Servo on 21 Aug 2008 - 12:53
Good riddance.
#1.1 +GreyWolfSC on 22 Aug 2008 - 03:28
+1 I always thought it was awful and had too many pervs on it.
#1.2 xpgeek on 22 Aug 2008 - 16:35
Indeed.
(1 reply) #2 +Raa on 21 Aug 2008 - 13:19
Just another fad really.
#2.1 OtRaS on 21 Aug 2008 - 13:47
(Raa said @ #2)
Just another fad really.


Well said.
#3 +Sethos on 21 Aug 2008 - 13:22
Good.
#4 GEIST on 21 Aug 2008 - 13:52
I believe in aliens, but I cannot believe that people invest money in virtual real estate and whatever you can burn your money with in SL. It's incomprehensibly ridiculous.
(4 replies) #5 deck on 21 Aug 2008 - 14:04
Every game, and Second Life is in the end just a game, has a lifespan. Nothing lasts forever. I can't wait for WOW to finally die (I have nothing against it, though). I think it's incredible that people will spend vast sums of real money to finance their virtual egos.
#5.1 Xilo on 21 Aug 2008 - 17:09
(deck said @ #5)
Every game, and Second Life is in the end just a game, has a lifespan. Nothing lasts forever. I can't wait for WOW to finally die (I have nothing against it, though). I think it's incredible that people will spend vast sums of real money to finance their virtual egos.

Look at EQ. It still isn't dead...
#5.2 excalpius on 21 Aug 2008 - 20:13
Neither is Diablo, Quake 3, etc. Expect Blizzard to do one hell of a good job at keeping WoW fresh with new contents for...ever.

Hell, even I would give WoW a try if the graphics and art direction weren't so Fisher Price. It gives me an excuse to keep my life off of digital crack. If they ever update the game engine to something from the 1990s or later, I'm doomed.
#5.3 DigitalDude on 23 Aug 2008 - 01:07
It is possible in SL to make L dollars without ever spending a single dime of real cash, takes time but it IS possible, seen people do it before.
#5.4 +Sam Symons Live on 02 Sep 2008 - 03:50
(deck said @ #1)
Every game, and Second Life is in the end just a game, has a lifespan. Nothing lasts forever. I can't wait for WOW to finally die (I have nothing against it, though). I think it's incredible that people will spend vast sums of real money to finance their virtual egos.

I agree. I always sigh when my brother saves up all his money for WoW, and purely that. I save all my money for other, more useful actually useful things, and then he gets jealous. But still plays it. Ah well. Joke'll be on him when he fails the end of year exams, I suppose. Then he might learn.
#6 The Gunslinger on 21 Aug 2008 - 14:26
A fool and his money are soon parted...
#7 Xeta on 21 Aug 2008 - 14:27
Virtual real estate as a smart investment? Good bob what won't people spend their money on?!

Why do people waste real money on virtual/fake things? Laziness? Boredom? Asparagus? *sigh* I don't get it. Guess I need the mainstream media to tell me what's cool so I know what to buy.
(1 reply) #8 RPDL on 21 Aug 2008 - 14:47
Only a fad and empty promises of money-making and internet fame can push people to play a boring, laggy, memory-eating, ugly game/3D chat room with a few glitchy activities. Oh, and did I mention it has furries?

Don't get me wrong, i like the idea of a world where everyone can make stuff and contribute, but I knew the idea that real money could be exchanged for virtual money and vice versa would bring the game down.
#8.1 KaneHusky on 24 Aug 2008 - 22:45
(RPDL said @ #
Oh, and did I mention it has furries?

I'm not following... what exactly is your point in saying that?
#9 Red Dragon on 21 Aug 2008 - 14:53
Geez, those poor people will have to go back to their first lives. If they had one.
#10 vetneufuse on 21 Aug 2008 - 15:12
"real estate prices in Second Life had climbed to undesirably high levels and that land speculators could suffer when more is created" wtf? is this the Oil Speculators all over again but now VIRTUAL? give me a break......
(1 reply) #11 tablet_user on 21 Aug 2008 - 19:04
so does that mean cheap knockoffs like sonys soon to be released home will see the same fate.
#11.1 GEIST on 21 Aug 2008 - 19:38
I don't think Home will really set off to begin with.
#12 exotoxic on 21 Aug 2008 - 22:07
how can anyone think that spending money on something thats not real is a good idea??
(1 reply) #13 AnalogRival on 21 Aug 2008 - 22:34
This is why I like there.com
No crazy graphics, it's easy to pick up, and no massive attempts are commercialism
Plus it's free to start a basic account.

So I don't see it dying anytime soon.
#13.1 +Skwerl on 28 Aug 2008 - 18:28
I was a founding member of There.com, but I quickly lost interest due to its watered-down "developer" program (you could make clothes...whoopee! and sub-par graphics. I think that was 2004. I haven't gone back since, but neither have I tried Second Life.
(1 reply) #14 gollux on 22 Aug 2008 - 01:25
Second Lame Real Estate values. Yea sure. Got a bridge over here that I'll sell you.
#14.1 +GreyWolfSC on 22 Aug 2008 - 03:30
(gollux said @ #14)
Second Lame Real Estate values. Yea sure. Got a bridge over here that I'll sell you.


Sorry, not biting unless that bridge is virtual...
#15 El-Diablo on 22 Aug 2008 - 04:25
what will Dwight do with his spare time!
#16 Airlink on 22 Aug 2008 - 06:16
As P. T. Barnum once said: "There's a sucker born every minute."
(2 replies) #17 asoldier on 22 Aug 2008 - 06:41
Believe it or not, cyber estate is going to be the future...it's just a matter of being done right. I look forward to the day when people can meet in one place from different parts of the world and share their environments with eachother. Too bad it isn't today.
#17.1 MaJoR on 22 Aug 2008 - 07:08
Meh. There is a reason real estate is the way it is. No matter what happens, that land will still be there. In cyberspace, nothing is physically there. One power outage and it is gone. Look at gmail. Your emails can disappear and you can't do a thing about it. No matter how far cyber real estate goes, it will never have the "real" aspect, thus it will never become as important as real estate.
#17.2 Magallanes on 23 Aug 2008 - 13:02
(asoldier said @ #17)
Believe it or not, cyber estate is going to be the future...it's just a matter of being done right. I look forward to the day when people can meet in one place from different parts of the world and share their environments with eachother. Too bad it isn't today.


Yes it's called webhosting.
#18 Xocide on 22 Aug 2008 - 08:28
Second Life is a piece of ****.
(1 reply) #19 Mike Frett on 22 Aug 2008 - 18:16
And CNN pimps it out like it's the next best thing to sliced bread. Pathetic, I even told them.
#19.1 toadeater on 22 Aug 2008 - 20:02
(Mike Frett said @ #19)
And CNN pimps it out like it's the next best thing to sliced bread. Pathetic, I even told them.


CNN is the Democrat version of Fox News. If you got the $$$ or political clout, they'll report whatever you want them to.
(1 reply) #20 39 Thieves on 23 Aug 2008 - 00:03
Now where will all the virtual S&M perverts go for their introverted fix? Rather sad, really.
#20.1 +Skwerl on 28 Aug 2008 - 18:29
Real S&M parties!
(1 reply) #21 Rohdekill on 23 Aug 2008 - 13:48
I never purchase a game that requires a payment plan to keep playing. The game runs $20-$50 just to buy the box from the store and you want me to cough up how much a month just to play it ?? Unreal.

If I can't play it free on-line it stays on the shelf.

#21.1 MrWizard81 on 25 Aug 2008 - 17:04
(Rohdekill said @ #21)
I never purchase a game that requires a payment plan to keep playing. The game runs $20-$50 just to buy the box from the store and you want me to cough up how much a month just to play it ?? Unreal.

If I can't play it free on-line it stays on the shelf.


To Rohdekill: You do realize that Second Life is free to download and play, right? You don't have to spend a penny if you don't want to. Most RCE's are like that. Free to download and free to play. You may be limited as to what you can do for free, but the option is there. I actually play another RCE called Entropia Universe, which is a little more engaging than Second Life, but please don't bash RCE's until you've actually played one. Investment opportunities are there and I know of a number of people who play Entropia Universe as they're job. They make enough money to support themselves and their families.

To others: It may be a fad, it may disappear in 5 or 10 years, but if I have the knowledge and the ability to make money now, and know when to cash out, what does it matter? One player in Entropia Universe paid $100,000 for a virtual space station about 2.5 years ago. He made back his initial investment in less than a year and now profits from it.

Its all about risk. Stocks aren't real either. The company could fold and your stock is worthless. Same theory applies here. Yes, the game could crash, the developer could fold, but its a calculated risk. If you don't have the stomach for it, fine, but there's no reason to bash everyone else who is willing to take that risk.
#22 AfroTrance on 23 Aug 2008 - 14:24
What is second life?

"POOLS CLOSED"

?
(2 replies) #23 grewnd33 on 23 Aug 2008 - 16:03
How do you "hemorrhage the problem"? Wouldn't that mean you are making the bleeding worse and not stopping it? You could stop the hemorrhaging but not "hemorrhage the problem".
#23.1 +Skwerl on 28 Aug 2008 - 18:31
Yeah, that was a big "huh?" for me, too!
#23.2 +Sam Symons Live on 02 Sep 2008 - 03:52
Yeah, I was a bit confused about that, heh.
(2 replies) #24 Xilo on 24 Aug 2008 - 04:41
Good. There's nothing but furries, gays, and just plain incredibly perverted people on this game.
#24.1 KaneHusky on 24 Aug 2008 - 22:43
Not everyone is perverted... if you don't like it stay away from it and let the furries, gays and everyone else have fun. They aren't bothering you, nor should you bother them.

Why does everyone seem to be so glad that SL may be loosing steam? Oh, right... because you have nothing better to do than pick on lifestyles you don't agree with and most likely have no real understanding of.
#24.2 +Skwerl on 28 Aug 2008 - 18:32
I'm sure there are plenty of boring people like you there, too, Xilo!
#25 paperless on 25 Sep 2008 - 19:38
I tried this thing for like a week but...no...just plain no.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)