Assassin's Creed 2 details leaked

(9 replies) #1 Nauge on 13 Apr 2009 - 01:59

no thanks

#1.1 RPDL on 13 Apr 2009 - 02:05

care to elaborate?

#1.2 Nauge on 13 Apr 2009 - 02:09

RPDL said,

care to elaborate?

The first one left a bad taste in my mouth... not handing over any more money to this franchise

#1.3 betacortex on 13 Apr 2009 - 04:12

Agreed. The first game looked incredible and was... for about an hour, then you realize it's the same thing over and over and over and over

#1.4 Neoauld on 13 Apr 2009 - 04:44

betacortex said,

Agreed. The first game looked incredible and was... for about an hour, then you realize it's the same thing over and over and over and over

you must have srs willpower to have lasted an hour

#1.5 IbSta on 13 Apr 2009 - 06:27

Neoauld said,

you must have srs willpower to have lasted an hour

lol how about 5 whole minutes?

#1.6 RPDL on 13 Apr 2009 - 14:27

I think the first one had proof of concept, and I feel they will no doubt try to fix these mistakes.

#1.7 paradoxdream on 13 Apr 2009 - 17:41

Nauge said,

The first one left a bad taste in my mouth... not handing over any more money to this franchise

I feel the same but the story I felt was really interesting to bad it was repetitive as hell
and after an hour or so lost its game play

#1.8 carmatic on 13 Apr 2009 - 18:39

i was wondering like, if there was any such thing as a full speedrun of assassins creed... that would be quite something to watch

#1.9 spacer on 15 Apr 2009 - 14:08

I got 1000/1000 for the first one. It was fun and it the graphics are great. What more do you want?

(3 replies) #2 treborr on 13 Apr 2009 - 02:03

I heard the character now has two hidden blades? From the cover of GameInformer it shows two blades and this time and with the new amount of side missions perhaps it could be a little less repetitive than the first one.

#2.1 indiansboy94 on 13 Apr 2009 - 02:04

"New weapons to choose from including an axe, hammer, mace, spear, two different sword types, spear axe, and two smaller blades"

#2.2 treborr on 13 Apr 2009 - 02:10

I blame the time being 3am and my eyes lying to me!

#2.3 Skullpture on 15 Apr 2009 - 15:15

indiansboy94 said,

"New weapons to choose from including an axe, hammer, mace, spear, two different sword types, spear axe, and two smaller blades"

Can they get any smaller? AC2 is probably going good enough to play, can't be too sure since AC1 wasn't what it was hyped up to be.

(1 reply) #3 Baked on 13 Apr 2009 - 02:03

Looks good

Love the first one....

#3.1 evoman91 on 13 Apr 2009 - 08:40

same I really liked the first one and so did most of my friends, can't wait for this to come out

(3 replies) #4 RPDL on 13 Apr 2009 - 02:04

Will we be seeing any guns? Europe acquired firearms in the 1300s, and if the game is set in 1476, our hero is sure to face arquebus-wielding foes.

#4.1 Raa on 13 Apr 2009 - 02:10

I heard a rumor there was going to be a gun, but can't confirm it...

Either way, loving this!

#4.2 splur on 13 Apr 2009 - 06:42

You're referring to firearms, which were cannons and very uncommonly hand-cannons which were introduced into modern Europe and middle east. Muskets weren't introduced till the 15th century and only became commonly used in the 16th century. So possibly having one big boss with a pistol or musket would be practical, although he'd have to spend a minute reloading. So it'd be more comical to have him fire once and then wield his sword.

#4.3 NealtwinA on 01 Sep 2009 - 03:25

If you guys had watched the trailer, it shows him shooting out of his hidden blade sheath. The question is however, is that possible in those times. Also, wouldn't it have been better to stick with throwing knives? They are silent and accurate, while guns were noisy and hard to aim.

#5 Luis Mazza on 13 Apr 2009 - 02:42

OMG this game really bored me. So repetitive...

(1 reply) #6 Chugworth on 13 Apr 2009 - 03:12

I too found the first game to be repetitive and boring. But the game did have its good moments, and it managed to hold my interest long enough for me to finish the game.

I am interested in the second game. If they've learned from their mistakes in the first game, then it could potentially be good.

#6.1 smooth_criminal1990 on 13 Apr 2009 - 14:19

yeah same, and if they could just cut down on the cut-scenes (perhaps even make them skippable), although the ones in the last game did contribute to the storyline. Looks very interesting!

#7 bob_c_b on 13 Apr 2009 - 03:17

I enjoyed the first game, planning routes in and out for my targets, discovering little nooks and crannies of the cities, etc... This looks quite good, looking forward to this.

#8 Novaoblivion on 13 Apr 2009 - 03:25

I really liked the first game I cant wait for this one. The setting seems like it could be really fun.

#9 KeR on 13 Apr 2009 - 04:05

After having read a bunch of good reviews about the original game, I went out and bought it...wish I hadn't done it, played the game for 1hr and never touched it again.

#10 yert* on 13 Apr 2009 - 04:53

Assassin's creed is a mixed bag. I may well be they fixed some of the major mistakes, mostly the repetitiveness. It will definitely be worth a rent like the first one was. Not sure if the gameplay will warrant a purchase at least not at 59.99. Most games today still aren't innovative enough yet the prices are the same or higher.

#11 FATILA on 13 Apr 2009 - 05:07

Woo another education in next gen gameplay. I'll stick with the more basic stuff with actual plot devices and enjoyable gameplay encounters thank you.

#12 s3n4te on 13 Apr 2009 - 05:25

Yea the missions were repetitive but jumping on somebody, and sticking a knife in their neck never got old for me.

#13 splur on 13 Apr 2009 - 06:34

I actually enjoyed the the game, but it was definitely repetitive. I also enjoyed Prince of Persia... so I've got an obvious bias.

#14 Twisted Chaz on 13 Apr 2009 - 09:05

I can't wait to see what these "Sixteen unique mission types" will entail.

#15 mmck on 13 Apr 2009 - 12:18

My copy of the first game hasn't even came out of its paper cd holder yet - (it came free with my graphics card). Maybe I should get round to playing it?

It would then also be officially the first game installed on my system, oh dear, that means I haven't played AoE in a long long time.

#16 +what on 13 Apr 2009 - 13:11

Can't wait. Really liked the first one, even if the whole animus storyline was bull**** and there was nothing to do but collect flags once you completed the story. Hope they focus more on improving the gameplay than continuing the story.

#17 +S/R on 13 Apr 2009 - 13:35

I LOVED this game, I'm SO getting the 2nd one.

(1 reply) #18 jesse on 13 Apr 2009 - 14:10

what does "day and night sequence" mean? that its gonna be a one time thing? we want day/night cycles!!

#18.1 +Chrono951 on 13 Apr 2009 - 19:44

Please, please, please let there be true day/night cycles! I loved the first, but it became very suspicious when Altair kills everyone at noon.

#19 Tsusai on 13 Apr 2009 - 14:11

Full picture of the new assassin.
http://www.joystiq.com/photos/assassins-cr...2/1485933//full

(1 reply) #20 JonathanMarston on 13 Apr 2009 - 20:21

The first game was just ok - it would have been good, maybe even very good, if it wasn't so very repetitive. Hopefully they'll vary things a bit more this time around...

#20.1 Axon on 13 Apr 2009 - 20:49

JonathanMarston said,

The first game was just ok - it would have been good, maybe even very good, if it wasn't so very repetitive. Hopefully they'll vary things a bit more this time around...

They are, there are going to be 16 different mission types.

(1 reply) #21 Si_ on 13 Apr 2009 - 20:51

I think what people need to remember is the first AC was a proof-of-concept. They were trying to build something new, so inevitably it was a bit (ok very) repetitive. The same goes for other firsts like Mirrors Edge, it will take until the 2nd to make a better game as they don't have to start from square one, they can just build and improve on the foundations.

#21.1 +what on 13 Apr 2009 - 21:40

Si_ said,

I think what people need to remember is the first AC was a proof-of-concept. They were trying to build something new, so inevitably it was a bit (ok very) repetitive. The same goes for other firsts like Mirrors Edge, it will take until the 2nd to make a better game as they don't have to start from square one, they can just build and improve on the foundations.

I hope you're right. History dictates otherwise, unfortunately.

#22 skynetXrules on 13 Apr 2009 - 21:30

^ and i wont be anymore demanding then the first one ,i just hope so.

or else GTX380 here i come !

#23 Kupo-Cheer on 13 Apr 2009 - 22:57

I love how so many people both here and net-wide seem completely willing to blow this game off before seeing any solid details on it. And as if the first game were truly that terrible, either. If it was so bad, I wouldn't have been able to play through it twice (once on 360, again for the PC), enjoying it both times, despite the admittedly repetitive gameplay. But that repetition was fun enough, and the production values massive enough, to keep me entertained on both playthroughs.

Even if you somehow couldn't stand the first game, do you think Ubisoft would be so dumb as to ignore every bitching word they've heard about the game thus far? Do you think they wouldn't try to fix what could have used polish and better ideas? Honestly, how can you dismiss a game without knowing a thing about it, besides some blurbs from a magazine?

#24 +chevyordeath on 14 Apr 2009 - 18:04

I too believed the first game was very repetitive, I ended up trading it in for a different game at game stop (I had it on PS3). The graphics were great, the sound was good, the story seemed very interesting, but I remember it getting very, very repetitive.

How ever, I have decided to purchase the game again via steam for PC. I have started to play through last night, and was having fun running around. I am going to try and finish it this time around. I also believe that with the second game, the gameplay will be much improved. We will see, though.

#25 The 1337 on 15 Apr 2009 - 13:45

I can not wait for this to be released!

(4 replies) #26 spacer on 15 Apr 2009 - 15:46

I love how most people say they hated the game because it was repetitive. What single-player game isn't repetitive? You're always going to be doing the same missions/levels, using the same weapons/attacks, and fighting the same enemies. AC is no different than any other game.

#26.1 3dfxman on 15 Apr 2009 - 15:47

spacer said,

I love how most people say they hated the game because it was repetitive. What single-player game isn't repetitive? You're always going to be doing the same missions/levels, using the same weapons/attacks, and fighting the same enemies. AC is no different than any other game.

+1

#26.2 SiLENT H3RO on 15 Apr 2009 - 17:09

spacer said,

I love how most people say they hated the game because it was repetitive. What single-player game isn't repetitive? You're always going to be doing the same missions/levels, using the same weapons/attacks, and fighting the same enemies. AC is no different than any other game.

Probably because Assasins Creed is repetitive and boring.

#26.3 vvtunes on 15 Apr 2009 - 17:27

spacer said,

I love how most people say they hated the game because it was repetitive. What single-player game isn't repetitive? You're always going to be doing the same missions/levels, using the same weapons/attacks, and fighting the same enemies. AC is no different than any other game.

Probably because Assasins Creed is repetitive and boring.

#26.4 :: Lyon :: on 16 Apr 2009 - 00:33

Yup. Repetitive and boring. If it's not because of the graphics, I'd probably be ignoring all of the sub missions altogether

#27 marleyuk on 15 Apr 2009 - 18:07

I have still to complete the first one. When I got Call Of Duty 4 this got put to the back of the drawer !!

#28 Desmond DT on 04 Jul 2009 - 11:19

It didnt bother me that it was repetitive...the storyline was fantastic! And when i finished it I knew there was going to be a 2 so I give it 10/10.

Neowin.net