ces
Report a problem

Windows 7 Beta 1 to be released at CES?

Tom Warren   on 03 December 2008 - 01:03 · 39 comments & 20027 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Bob Familiar, Architect Evangelist working for Microsoft, has posted a blog entry detailing next weeks MSDN Developer Conferences. The MSDN developer conferences take place across the United States from the 9th December through to the 19th February 2009.

In the blog post Familiar states "attend an upcoming MSDN Developer Conference and you will receive a Windows 7 Beta 1 DVD". It's not clear whether this is post conference or during the conference itself. However another Microsoft employee, Keith Combs, has confirmed the DVDs will be available on the 13th January. Putting 1 and 1 together, and little birdies whispering from across the ocean, next years Consumer Electronics Show runs from the 8th January to the 11th so this would place beta 1 at the right time for a grand unveiling. Judging by the quality of 6801 Microsoft is well placed to release the beta as early as possible. Fellow Microsoft blogger Ed Bott believes Windows 7 beta 1 will feature at CES too.

The only slight hitch in Microsoft's plan? MacWorld. The conference runs from 5th January to 9th January and Steve Jobs is one of the keynote speakers. If Apple have been working overtime then they could release the highly anticipated Snow Leopard operating system and steal Microsoft's thunder.

Microsoft has always publicly stated that Beta 1 will be ready Q1 2009 so unveiling and releasing at CES fits perfectly within Q1 and is one of the best places to unveil a new operating system. In other Windows 7 related news, Chinese site it168 posted some recent photos of Windows 7 build 6956 obtained at WinHEC 2008 China which begins today.


Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 39 additional comments
#1 pasty2k2 on 03 Dec 2008 - 01:11
Noice.

Hope MS can generate a bit of positive hype this time around.

Now that they can actually deliver features, they can start talking about them!
(3 replies) #2 briangw on 03 Dec 2008 - 01:19
oh I hope this is true. I don't think I have been this excited for a Windows product in a long time.
#2.1 theyarecomingforyou on 03 Dec 2008 - 01:26
Same. I avoided Vista until the late RC stages and even then only installed it on a backup computer. That was in contrast to XP, which I used as my primary OS from the beta stages.
#2.2 Fagutish on 03 Dec 2008 - 01:34
O Rly?
In my (semi-disastrous) attempt at running both betas on my main machine back in the day, i remember xp beta 2 being much less stable than vista beta 2. NOTE: I had an ATI card, you know back when nvidia's WDDM drivers sucked megatons.
That being said Win7 on my main machine would be a no go. I heard that BF2 doesnt like it it seems.
Shame really.
#2.3 RBDurgin on 30 Dec 2008 - 23:25
Just install it on a VM

theyarecomingforyou said,
Same. I avoided Vista until the late RC stages and even then only installed it on a backup computer. That was in contrast to XP, which I used as my primary OS from the beta stages.

#3 gigapixels on 03 Dec 2008 - 01:23
Sweet
#4 shockz on 03 Dec 2008 - 01:30
Exciting. I think Windows 7 is shaping up to be a good release.
(4 replies) #5 Bri- on 03 Dec 2008 - 01:41
I think all the negative criticism about Vista will help this release. Microsoft said they have listened to customer feedback, so I hope they put it all into perspective and make Windows 7 a worthwhile release. If it's "Vista 2.0", I'll be disappointed.
#5.1 ChrisJ1968 on 03 Dec 2008 - 05:55
Bri- said,
I think all the negative criticism about Vista will help this release. Microsoft said they have listened to customer feedback, so I hope they put it all into perspective and make Windows 7 a worthwhile release. If it's "Vista 2.0", I'll be disappointed.


sometimes a fall like vista is what is needed to correct ones self.
#5.2 skynetXrules on 03 Dec 2008 - 07:23
Fail !

it is always Vista 2.0 , it is based on vista .!

vista rules
#5.3 +TCLN Ryster on 03 Dec 2008 - 11:11
Just as XP was Windows 2000 2.0. Whats your point?
#5.4 skynetXrules on 23 Dec 2008 - 18:21
TCLN Ryster said,
Just as XP was Windows 2000 2.0. Whats your point?


the point is windows doesn't came out nowhere improvement over previous release
#6 Intelman on 03 Dec 2008 - 02:36
Hm...

I wants.
#7 vetSHoTTa35 on 03 Dec 2008 - 02:37
Hmm, sweet that would definitely be nice.
#8 zalman on 03 Dec 2008 - 02:52
any info on the free tech guarantee for vista to win7?
(7 replies) #9 brink668 on 03 Dec 2008 - 03:21
why does Microsoft always release BETAs? and Apple I rarely ever seen they release a beta.

Snow Leopard is gonna probably be faster than Windows XP and look a so much better than Vista.

#9.1 rm20010 on 03 Dec 2008 - 03:25
And how is this related to Win7 beta 1?
#9.2 random_n on 03 Dec 2008 - 03:57
In contrast to Apple, Microsoft actually cares about maintaining backwards compatability, and has a massively larger hardware base upon which to test. Asking for feedback from the public at large is the most responsible thing they could do.
#9.3 random_n on 03 Dec 2008 - 03:57
(double)
#9.4 Shiranui on 03 Dec 2008 - 04:14
brink668 said,
and Apple I rarely ever seen they release a beta(sic).


Yes they do; they just choose to name them after wildcats rather than greek letters.
#9.5 pasty2k2 on 03 Dec 2008 - 04:35
Yes they do; they just choose to name them after wildcats rather than greek letters.


Hehe
#9.6 simon360 on 03 Dec 2008 - 14:39
Apple doesn't do "betas", sure. But they do constantly release early versions to developers. While they don't carry the Beta tag on them, they are more or less alphas and betas.
#9.7 Ste on 03 Dec 2008 - 21:16
simon360 said,
Apple doesn't do "betas", sure. But they do constantly release early versions to developers. While they don't carry the Beta tag on them, they are more or less alphas and betas.

at what cost?
#10 P1R4T3 on 03 Dec 2008 - 03:32
I dont what know but... there's something familiar about that architect evangelist.
(1 reply) #11 Windows7even on 03 Dec 2008 - 05:51
dont think rushing to release a beta to compete with another os is a good idea imo..i dont think even mikey would that
#11.1 +Brandon Live on 03 Dec 2008 - 06:39
Who is rushing?
#12 qdave on 03 Dec 2008 - 07:00
i almost instaled an older build today. i guess its worth a wait then for a beta
#13 xDayan on 03 Dec 2008 - 07:16
xD, Glad I saved a extra 60GB on my HDD, when I was reinstalling my OS's (Vista & xp)
#14 devHead on 03 Dec 2008 - 07:21
Hopefully this Beta 1 will be available for Technet and MSDN subscribers as well before too long.
(1 reply) #15 thealexweb on 03 Dec 2008 - 08:00
It's unlikely that Snow Leopard will steal much of Windows 7s thunder, the new leopard doesn't sport many new features that the average joe would need.
#15.1 LTD on 03 Dec 2008 - 12:22
thealexweb said,
It's unlikely that Snow Leopard will steal much of Windows 7s thunder, the new leopard doesn't sport many new features that the average joe would need.


I really don't think Snow Leopard will make a Q1 release.

Apple will have something "else" to announce, though it might not be as early as MacWorld. But it'll be pretty significant, that's for sure.

Last edited by LTD on 03 Dec 2008 - 12:42
#16 brent3000 on 03 Dec 2008 - 08:26
Windows 7 is my next upgrade... Im hoping it will be out in time for me to skip vista...

Im yet to get around to looking into the versions floating around already...
(2 replies) #17 REM2000 on 03 Dec 2008 - 08:53
I don't understand the comment regarding if Apple release Snow Leopard at the same time. Sure Microsoft is releasing a Beta of 7 not the RTM. Microsoft enthuaists will still be interested in the release as will a few people, mac people will be interested in the release of SL.

I have high hopes for both OS's, Windows 7 is shaping up to be a really good release as is Snow Leopard, it's great to see the OS world get out of the stagnation of a few years ago with hardly any releases and not much going on.
#17.1 creamhackered on 03 Dec 2008 - 09:16
Well remember when Apple announced the iPhone? This was during CES and it killed off a lot of the hype around Vista.
#17.2 afusion on 03 Dec 2008 - 15:46
creamhackered said,
Well remember when Apple announced the iPhone? This was during CES and it killed off a lot of the hype around Vista.

Well yeah because of the array of disappointing news Vista was to bring. It's like Microsoft didn't give consumers that good a reason to upgrade.
(1 reply) #18 Apogee on 03 Dec 2008 - 10:29
#18.1 Antraxek on 03 Dec 2008 - 13:19
Apogee said,


Thank you.
What bothers me is that there is Ultimate version and from this we can conclude that Win 7 will be in more versions, just like Vista.
(1 reply) #19 LTD on 03 Dec 2008 - 12:22
I really doubt the Snow Leopard will see a Q1 release. It was originally slated for release in a year's time from June 2008, then the word went around that it might be early, which people took for truth. It'll likely be "delayed" until its original scheduled release.
#19.1 Mr. Dee on 03 Dec 2008 - 15:15
I also read on AppleInsider that Snow Leopard is a work in progress. Its a massive overhaul also, they are transitioning major parts of the UI from Carbon to Cocoa specifically the Finder which needs to be tested a lot. Also, they are trying to get the 64-Bit kernel to work properly on older model Intel Core 2 Duo Macs, right now, you have to invoke a command to boot into it. Snow Leopard is not if support properly on the MacBook Air, you have to install it over CAT5, it hangs during installation requiring a restart to continue installation, it does not support the latest MacBooks Apple released. Things like Sleep and Power Management still are not working. The touted Exchange Server 2007 support is still not working. I don't expect Apple to launch Snow Leopard until at fall 2009. Also, its not a feature rich release unless Apple is hiding the truth.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)