Neowin.net

Looks like AMD have been hard at work, here is a round-up of some of the stories I found over at the The Inquirer

AMD has announced its 1.3GHz Duron chip which costs $118 if you buy 1,000 of them at a time. The Socket A chip is intended to compete against Celerons from Intel - the chip giant is already moving its family of Pentium III based "value" chips to .13 micron copper interconnect cores.
News source: The Inquirer
View: AMDzone - Review of 1.3GHz Duron chip

The Inquirer is also reporting that Slashdot is saying that there is a "Major Linux 2.4/Athlon/AGP" bug. From the reports it seems that the bug (many Athlon and Duron CPUs experience memory corruption when extended paging is used in conjunction with AGP) was found in September 2000, and a Win2k fix was produced (a registry fix), but apparently AMD didn't realize that Linux 2.4 also uses extended paging when the kernel is compiled with a Pentium-Classic or higher Processor family kernel configuration setting. Alan Cox (the ultimate kernel hacker...) is producing a fix, and there is a work around (passing the mem=nopentium option to your kernel, using GRUB or LILO, at boot-time).
News source: The Inquirer
News source: Slashdot - Major Linux/Athlon CPU bug discovered
View: Microsoft Windows 2000 AGP fix (Knowledge base article)

And finally, The Inquirer has managed to get a look at the new AMD roadmap for 2002. From the figures, it looks like the Athlon XP is gearing up for a 2600+ in Q3 2002, costing in the range of $1500, and Athlon XP systems in the $800 range having 2000+ chips. Also released are some pricing and information on the AMD dealer pricing for 28th of January.
News source: The Inquirer - AMD roadmap in Graphics
News source: The Inquirer - Mysteries of AMD pricing continue

However AOL is highly anxious - as shown in leaked strategy memos last year - at losing its Net franchise. Microsoft has shown every indication that intends to drain the oxygen from future web transactions, and in order to so, wants to squeeze AOL off the PC desktop. AOL has already touted Linux in web appliances and appreciates that a box giving access to AOL content and instant messaging doesn't need to be a Wintel PC.

The trouble is, buying RedHat is the most convoluted and most expensive way of buying such an alternative to Wintel. For example, see Robin Miller's review the $799 OEone Linux PC/appliance. OEone is a modest outfit, but proves that you don't need to own any assets except a little imagination and a few good programmers: the OEone UI is based on Mozilla's XUL toolkit, an asset AOL has helped nurture.

Expensive mergers (and Red Hat would indeed be one, with its $1.6 billion market cap) tend to appeal to the big swinging dicks in corporate planning, and look no further for the likely suspect for this rumour. As the Post's Alec Klein, who wrote the merger story, wrote here in December, ex-AOLer Bob Pittman was passed over for the CEO post in December. This might be his way of showing the AOLers can still punch their weight.

Only of one of those three areas is likely to be attractive to AOL. The other two, if it needs them, can be acquired though partnership, rather than spending cash. AOL is if anything, withdrawing from enterprise business software, with its ownership of the iPlanet venture (the server half of the Netscape acquisition) elapsing in March. Most of the employees were transferred to Sun last year.

Whatever. If this expensive nuptial takes place, it certainly adds a little rebel chic to the AOL-TW Death Star.

But let's not forget boys and girls, that Linux would be serving but one purpose: providing a pipe to AOL-TW's content, TV shows and its news plugs about that content. A survey of US network TV news last year indicated that a third of morning broadcast 'news' stories were promotional features, and 20 per cent of all stories were plugs for the owners' other products (now sourced below). They were, as we saw with the Time front-page splash for the new iMac, thinly-disguised advertorial.

In other words, it may be a Linux computer, but a Linux computer that's solely serving a gigantic information and entertainment congolmerate. And that will be enough to make folk nostalgic for Clippy the Paper Clip.

Remember that for all its vices, Microsoft has next to no media content, and once you're away from your computer, The Beast has very little power to make to your daily cultural intake any more dismal and bland; while that's the entire raison d'etre of the AOL-Time Warner "synergies". We're baffled that anyone should find that absorbing a successful Linux enterprise company to achieve such ends is anything to celebrate. Maybe they should be spending less time with their computers?

View: Robin Miller's review
View: Washington Post's story