main

Creative CD MP3 Player Review

Daniel Fleshbourne   on 27 February 2002 - 15:57 · no comments & 222 views

Advertisement (Why?)
T-break have finished up a review of Creative's CD-MP3 player that lets you play MP3 files burnt of a CD

    MP3 CD players have been in the market for quite some time- the first one I ever used was the Genica but it was buggy and ate batteries like it was its last day in existence. We have come quite a long way from the Genica and today, MP3 CD players work like a dream.


News source: T-Break
View: The full Review


Raising questions

``In the wake of the Enron scandal, we have the responsibility, and the media has the responsibility, to look at questions. But also we have the responsibility not to overreact before we have the facts,'' Macht said.

CalPERS -- the California Public Employees' Retirement System -- which has been a watchdog on corporate governance issues, owns 31.8 million Cisco shares, or 0.43 percent of the company.

With the exception of Cisco vice chairman Valentine, a general partner in the venture capital firm of Sequoia Capital, one of Cisco's early backers, all the executives made their investments as ``limited partners'' in the venture funds and so had no control over the funds' investment decisions.

Cisco policy allows such investments. Board members may vote on transactions in which they have a stake unless the stake is ``material,'' which Cisco policy defines simply as ``when it would affect their decision,'' Langdon said.

According to Langdon, Chambers owned stock through two venture partnerships in five companies Cisco acquired. He received a total of 127,625 shares of Cisco stock worth approximately $5.1 million when the acquisitions closed, but had donated all the shares to charity by August 2000, Langdon said. Chambers voted on four of the five acquisitions because his stake was very small, Langdon added.

Stake in Cerent

The other four deals in which Chambers held a stake stem from his 1996 investment of $50,000 in a venture capital partnership called Sequoia Technology Partners VII, created by Valentine's venture capital company. That partnership later invested in four companies Cisco acquired: Monterey Networks, StratumOne Communications, Ardent Communications and Pipelinks. Chambers received and later donated a total of 1,382 Cisco shares worth about $68,000 in those deals.

In all, Cisco bought 12 companies that various Sequoia funds had invested in. Eight other Cisco officers who invested in Sequoia funds include chief financial officer Larry Carter, chairman John Morgridge and Mike Volpi, who oversaw Cisco's acquisition strategy at the time.

Chambers' donation of the Cisco stock reflected a personal decision rather than a corporate one. Carter also gave away all shares he received in such deals, but Langdon said he did not know whether others kept their shares. ``If you look at the relative size of the distributions received as a result of Cisco acquisitions, they are inconsequential to their overall holdings of Cisco shares,'' he said.

Carter, for instance, received shares worth less than 0.1 percent of his total holdings in Cisco; stock Volpi received represented less than 0.4 percent of his Cisco holdings.

Venture capitalists give executives and board members the opportunity to invest in partnership funds partly to cement relationships; for instance, so that executives might refer deals to the financiers in the future.

`Culture of sloppiness'

``Your lawyer, your consultant, your venture capitalists and others tend to wear many hats and get involved in many relationships that in other industries or from other points of view clearly look complicated,'' said Randy Komisar, a former Apple Computer executive and prominent Silicon Valley financier.

``In the private company arena, this valley operates on trust and integrity. That's how we move quickly, that's how we find deals. . . . I can understand how it would look different from a public company than a private company,'' he said.

And that is where advocates for shareholders say problems could arise.

``I don't mean to suggest that these very distinguished people can be bought off for the kinds of sums we're talking about here. It does create a culture of sloppiness and cutting corners that can send a wrong message to the corporate managers and the investment community.'' Minow said.


Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are no additional comments

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)