main
Report a problem

China 'blocks 10% of websites'

configure   on 04 December 2002 - 12:38 · 35 comments & 4995 views

Advertisement (Why?)
As many as one in 10 websites may be deliberately blocked to users in China, a US study suggests.
Sites containing sexually explicit content were among those blocked, but they also included sites on sensitive topics such as Tibet, Taiwan, and dissident activity, say the authors of the report, at Harvard University's Berkman Center.

They found that while only 13.4% of well-known sexually explicit sites were blocked, 100% of the top 10 sites produced by searches using keywords such as "Tibet", "Taiwan" and "equality" were blocked.

Attempts by Chinese authorities to restrict web access have been previously documented, but this study indicates the scope of the curbs.

"People often ask us and ask others, what is it that's blocked in China?" said one the authors, Ben Edelman. "For that kind of a person, we found that producing a list of blocked sites was helpful."

The authors compared access to the internet from the US and China. They requested 204,012 distinct websites, and say they found that more than 50,000 were inaccessible from at least one point in China - but not the US - on at least one occasion.

To try to ensure that glitches in service provision were not responsible, the authors then attempted to access blocked sites again from another point in China. They found that at 18,931 sites were unavailable from two points in China on separate days. 'Read more' for categories listings of restricted sites.

News source: BBC News - China 'blocks 10% of websites'

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 35 additional comments
(3 replies) #1 Neobond on 04 Dec 2002 - 13:40
France also block many websites and force ISP's to aid in the block measures. Europe is also trying to block Free Speech on the Internet. America has implemented the Homeland Security Agency which can monitor *anything* a person within the US does on his/her computer without permission or knowledge from the person (this isn't limited to PC's) So I think China isn't really something we should be worrying about, we need to look at our own goverments before we start throwing bricks in glass houses.
#1.1 Neobond on 04 Dec 2002 - 15:16
[url=http://www.neowin.net/comments.php?id=1303]08 Nov 2001 - 02:23 GMT Yahoo not bound by French NAZI ban[/url] Granted its completely right wing but so was Frances recent Presidential candidate (Perot) The other one I can't find.. it was a report where France considered banning all Pornography from the French Internet forcing the french to host it outside France. but as I can't find the url for that you can dismiss it.
#1.2 Neobond on 04 Dec 2002 - 15:27
[quote]So if China blocks 10% of websites and puts Internet users in jail just for browsing certain politically sensitive websites, don't even compare it to France, Europe or America.[/quote] I hear ya, I'm not saying that China is better at all. I'm just saying that its funny how the BBC can focus on China policy when we are becoming more restricted with freedom and civil liberties than ever before. Is it about justification? saying that its not so bad here, just look at what they do in China! are you Chinese? those people are brought up with different values, just like Europeans can bad mouth the government in the streets, you can't in America. I just don't think 2 wrongs make a right and recently I've only been seeing "justification" in the sense that we have to look at Korea/China even Russia for civil liberties being stripped. Our fore-fathers didn't create Europe so that we can follow examples of countries that are worse so by our standards is "not so bad" that is BS and I don't buy it. I agree there has to be some regulation of the Internet but the whole purpose of the Internet was to bind cultures and a worldwide community for that its difficult to impose one law over the laws of another. The proven way to a "regulated Internet" is factions like Neowin who govern its own set of rules laid out for the best will of a community, were these guidelines drawn up from European law or American constitutional values? no they were founded on the collective intelligence and common decency of the people who participate in the site.
#1.3 Neobond on 04 Dec 2002 - 15:32
LOL yes I was, sorry
(1 reply) #2 on 01 Jan 1970 - 00:00
#2.1 Neobond on 04 Dec 2002 - 17:21
trust me you dont want to go to the site he posted, it left me mentally traumatized.
(2 replies) #3 on 01 Jan 1970 - 00:00
#3.1 Neobond on 04 Dec 2002 - 17:22
If thats true why is your comment still here and your account not banned
#3.2 Neobond on 04 Dec 2002 - 21:38
LOL!

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)