main

NVIDIA Win2K/XP 42.81 Driver

Daniel Fleshbourne   on 01 February 2003 - 11:41 · 22 comments & 294 views

Advertisement (Why?)
NVIDIA 4.2.8.1 BETA DETONATOR DRIVER FOR Windows 2000/XP
  • driver dated 01/22/2003 (22nd of January 2003)
  • full Multilanguage generic release
  • supports all NVIDIA desktop/workstation cards to date
  • preliminary support for NV31, NV31GL and NV34, NV34GL chipsets
  • fully DirectX 9 compatible driver
  • installs NVIDIA MediaCenter by default (can be disabled)
  • should offer increased performance over recent 42.xx drivers
  • BETA driver - unsupported by NVIDIA - install only at your own risk!
This driver is currently unavailable for Win9x/ME. However, I was told a while ago by NVIDIA that new drivers should be posted "soon" on official NVIDIA website, and that would of course include drivers for Win9x/ME operating system.

Download: NVIDIA Win2K/XP 42.81 Driver | Mirror
News source: Warp2Search

This is a BETA Driver!, please use caution when installing it on your system


Another analyst firm came up with similar estimates that measured the cost of cleanup rather than of lost productivity. Technology market researcher Computer Economics estimates that the worm cost between $750 million and $1 billion to clean up, said Mark McManus, vice president of technology and research for the Carlsbad, Calif., firm.

"The labor costs, although significant, weren't as bad as Code Red," McManus said. Analysts at Computer Economics had estimated that the LoveLetter virus cost almost a billion dollars in cleanup and more than $7.7 billion in lost productivity.

Many security experts argue, however, that while SQL Slammer is easier to clean up, the worm was worse overall than Code Red--which attacked more servers but didn't affect infrastructure, such as financial systems.

"This worm did something that we have not seen before," said Peter Allor, director of operations for the Information Technology Information Sharing and Analysis Center (IT-ISAC). "In this case, the customer was affected," he said. "People weren't getting dial tones, airplanes couldn't fly, ATMs weren't giving cash."

Data on computer viruses has always been lean. Putting a dollar figure on the losses incurred by malicious code is difficult at best, said Michael Gartenberg, research director for Internet industry watcher Jupiter Research.

"It is a billion soft dollars, and that is an important part of an equation," he said, stressing that the losses weren't actually coming out of companies' wallets. "Measuring productivity and translating it into dollars is a hard thing."

In the past, analysts have tried to bill a variety of events to lost productivity. Last May, outplacement service Challenger Gray and Christmas estimated that the first day of "Star Wars: Episode II--Attack of the Clones" would cost firms $319 million in lost productivity from workers calling in sick and taking days off. In addition, Internet monitoring software maker Websense estimated in May 2000 that a Webcast by underwear retailer Victoria Secret would cost businesses $120 million in lost productivity.

Mi2g's Matai said there is a big difference between those numbers and the losses incurred by malicious code.

"I don't think we are looking at productivity loss like that at all," he said. "We are looking at how many servers went down, what was the utilization of those servers and what kind of traffic didn't get through," he said. "The administrators could do nothing until they sorted all that mess out. So it is a different measure of productivity loss."

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 22 additional comments
(1 reply) #1 teka on 01 Feb 2003 - 12:01
Ok... Downloading this one too!
#1.1 SecretAgentMan on 01 Feb 2003 - 12:07
[neoquote=#1.0 by teka]Ok... Downloading this one too! [/neoquote] You you can never have enough videocard drivers.
#2 nomis_nehc on 01 Feb 2003 - 12:08
fully dx9? anyways, any word on performance anyone?
#3 warr on 01 Feb 2003 - 12:10
"should offer increased performance over recent 42.xx drivers " what is called "should"!!!
#4 GamblerFEXonlin on 01 Feb 2003 - 12:34
I chose ati because of the endless tv-out problems I have had with both my gf2 and gf3 (this one from hercules with conexant chip). I've gone through an impressive amount of both tvtool versions and different drivers. finally I've bought a tv-out card for $125, and half of the bill I'm sending to hercules, the other half to elsa (if theres still someone left). here in norway theres very strict laws to protect the consumer, if theres anything "missing" (the legal word in norwegian is "mangler" ) with a ware I can demand a full refund or compensation. and since I bought this card in norway, hercules have to bend over *snicker*
#5 kaffra on 01 Feb 2003 - 13:16
might give this a try too
#6 destrox on 01 Feb 2003 - 13:20
great, full Dx9 support, cant wait to try it.
(1 reply) #7 kirupa on 01 Feb 2003 - 13:28
Guru 3d has the newer 42.86 dets on their site for XP/2000: http://www.guru3d.com/files/detonator/ Just worth mentioning in case anybody here did not know =) Cheers! Kirupa
#7.1 Ji@nBing on 01 Feb 2003 - 14:33
[neoquote=#7.0 by kirupa]Guru 3d has the newer 42.86 dets on their site for XP/2000: http://www.guru3d.com/files/detonator/ Just worth mentioning in case anybody here did not know =) Cheers! Kirupa[/neoquote] thanks dude. nice find. these are much better than the 42.70's i had installed. about 200 more points in 3d mark! (i know that's not much but it's a lot more of an increase than any other detonators i have used in a long time)
(1 reply) #8 Tikimotel on 01 Feb 2003 - 13:50
42.86, is english only weighs in at ~8MB and has got an installer. (Do a clean install!) NVRT 2.1 works with these
#8.1 SHoTTa35 on 01 Feb 2003 - 20:07
those suck it seems....
(1 reply) #9 Drimacus on 01 Feb 2003 - 15:19
wtf is nVidia Media Center ?
#9.1 kuruptnation on 01 Feb 2003 - 17:00
[neoquote=#9.0 by Drimacus]wtf is nVidia Media Center ?[/neoquote] Its a icon in your system tray that you have direct link to controlling aliasing, anistropic filtering and other settings. You can turn it off though in the properties.
(1 reply) #10 LilBlueDawg on 01 Feb 2003 - 20:49
ok im a lil confused here about how to install new drivers. wut do i do? uninstall the old ones and reboot, then install the new ones? whenever i reboot after uninstallin the old ones, XP just installs the defaults back. is that how u guys do it?
#10.1 SHoTTa35 on 01 Feb 2003 - 21:08
XP installs the 28.58 since that's the drivers that's installed with SP1. I usually install over those but i'm gonna try installing from Safe Mode where it wouldn't install any drivers (i don't think) Testing.....
#11 xStainDx on 01 Feb 2003 - 20:54
42.86 Mobile Installation Succesful!
(1 reply) #12 tdebug on 02 Feb 2003 - 11:35
http://davidhanefelt.dk/warp2search/Win2kxp42.81.zip Error 389 13:36:19 2.2.2003 Error #80070005(Access is denied.) in CRgHttpSession::RequestFile() hmm...
#12.1 Tikimotel on 02 Feb 2003 - 18:13
Try at guru3d.com, they have more than just 42.86...
#13 [AMD]-SimGuy on 02 Feb 2003 - 18:29
42.81 works great on WinXP. No graphical abnormalities. 250+ point jump in 3DMark2001 SE score. Beta or not, these drivers work great
#14 cesardrgn on 02 Feb 2003 - 20:02
yeah baby. this lil kid does the job.
#15 cesardrgn on 02 Feb 2003 - 20:03
you need to uninstall the old drivers, then reboot. after all that just install the new drivers LilBlueDawg.
#16 kanan on 03 Feb 2003 - 07:17
I installed these and it seems that 42.81 is a rehash of 29.45 if uyou check the driver version affter installation. 42.86 seems to be legit, and is working fine withe my 3 leadtek cards (250LE Ti4200, Geforcee 3 Titanium 200, and Geforce 3 128mg TDH.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)