main

RIAA Site Under Attack. Yes. Again.

youm0nt   on 08 February 2003 - 08:35 · 32 comments & 1574 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Seems our favorite friends, the RIAA has once again been the target of irate hacker groups. -Keldyn

For one reason or another, your business or organization has raised the ire of some very tech-savvy individuals, and you can't seem to keep your Web site up and running. What do you do? That may just be what the Recording Industry Association of America is asking itself, given that its site RIAA.org came under attack yet again on Friday, knocking it offline. The recent downing is just the latest in a string of assaults on the music industry group's site, apparently stemming from the RIAA's crackdown on illegal peer-to-peer file swapping.

News source: PC World


Screenshot: IE6 with hardening pack
Screenshot: WMP9
Screenshot: DirectX Properties
Screenshot: Terminal Services
Screenshot: Help and Support
Screenshot: Configure your server

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 32 additional comments
#1 m4ch1n3g0d on 08 Feb 2003 - 08:52
Ah ha!!! suckers!!
#2 w33d on 08 Feb 2003 - 08:55
lmao
#3 Andrey on 08 Feb 2003 - 09:05
LOL, instead of spending money on worthless law suites, why RIAA can't just spend money to secure their own server? Don't they realize that their battle with Napster, Morpheus, Kazaa, etc... isn't getting them anywhere? I would hope such a big organization such as RIAA would employ some smart people, but apparently this is not the case.
#4 CarbonKnight on 08 Feb 2003 - 09:14
I wonder if RIAA.org holds the record for most attempted hacks, if a such a record was kept. Well, either RIAA.org or CNN.com.
(1 reply) #5 idbuythatforadollar on 08 Feb 2003 - 09:21
haha.. how embarrising would it be to be the webmaster? surley applying all the latest security patches would be enouf?
#5.1 jizness on 08 Feb 2003 - 09:32
Most of the attacks have been DDoS, while some of the more clever have actually borken into the website. A DDoS attack is by no means considered "hacking", merely disrupting it. Patches dont mean anything. You forget most exploits go without ever being reported or published. Moreover most admins dont patch there servers properly to begin with, nor do they stay up to date, ie., The SQL Slammer Worm
#6 mule on 08 Feb 2003 - 09:48
LOL. We love you RIAA...
(1 reply) #7 CheeseCow on 08 Feb 2003 - 10:10
I think all this hacking is just going to give them the feeling that they are fireing at the right target. If they really were the serious caring guys they try to tell us that they are, they should wonder why nobody likes them. Their attitude reminds me of the dictator Saddam Hussein, who tells his people that he is the nicest guy on earth, and can't see why everbody dislikes him. He's after all just being nice...
#7.1 Mr. Black on 08 Feb 2003 - 16:10
[neoquote=#7.0 by CheeseCow]I think all this hacking is just going to give them the feeling that they are fireing at the right target. If they really were the serious caring guys they try to tell us that they are, they should wonder why nobody likes them. Their attitude reminds me of the dictator Saddam Hussein, who tells his people that he is the nicest guy on earth, and can't see why everbody dislikes him. He's after all just being nice... [/neoquote] I couldn't have said it better myself!
#8 aem4162 on 08 Feb 2003 - 10:25
hehehehehehehehe
#9 guru on 08 Feb 2003 - 12:14
what goes around comes around
#10 SMG on 08 Feb 2003 - 12:38
Maybe we should have a little section on the right of the main page counting the times it has been hacked, instead of reporting it so many times
#11 DrOmango on 08 Feb 2003 - 13:44
and the award for most hacked site goes to *drum rolls* RIAA.org
#12 kairon on 08 Feb 2003 - 13:52
Yeah, I figured.
#13 MitchShrader on 08 Feb 2003 - 15:07
those scoundrels! gadzooks! they oughta be thrashed and tarred and feathered! um...*Which* scoundrels i guess is debatable...But anyway, tarring and feathering is too GOOD for em, they oughta have to listen to commercial A.M. Radio. Muhahahahhaa, vicious ain't i..
#14 mdsalih on 08 Feb 2003 - 15:22
typical MdSalih
#15 Shad0wcat on 08 Feb 2003 - 15:25
They damn well deserve it, I hope they enjoy their uber1337 non-existent websites, assholes
#16 TheFamousGeoff on 08 Feb 2003 - 16:32
Hmmm... it's great, except; is anyone else worried that this'll just lead to further assumptions that all file-swappers are hackers and criminals out to destroy the hard-working poverty stricken recording industry? The papers already seem to swallow that view....
#17 GaMMa on 08 Feb 2003 - 17:10
Haha, nobody likes the RIAA.
#18 Cara on 08 Feb 2003 - 17:18
This is almost not even news anymore...it happens so often. [i]:: LOL ::[/i]
#19 cesardrgn on 08 Feb 2003 - 17:20
They never learn... It happend before, it happend now... UUNET, Digex, TST..."No matter how they secure themselves, there is always a time when they let their guard down."
#20 el_casho on 08 Feb 2003 - 17:27
i wish someone would change the page title to "Really Idiotic *ssholes of America" it'd be great!
(1 reply) #21 el_casho on 08 Feb 2003 - 17:29
a friend of mine also told me hilary rosen was lesbian! (thats just what he said )
#21.1 nacs on 08 Feb 2003 - 17:37
Hey she quit so lay off her.
#22 Gweedo on 08 Feb 2003 - 17:32
How many times is that now?
#23 Dashel on 08 Feb 2003 - 18:37
She is a lesbian. Read the latest Wired. As much as I enjoy the RIAA site getting hacked I still wonder at what point this ceases to be a form of resistance to the big money of the record industries and not some kind of (hate to use it but...) terrorist attack. If someone repeatedly did this to my site just because they don't agree with my beliefs I would be pissed too. But then again, when fighting goliath you must use stones.
#24 xpablo on 08 Feb 2003 - 19:51
Damn, Those Hackers ! I wonder what website gets more daily traffic RIAA.org or Neowin.net ??? my guess is neowin.
#25 vetmalebolgia on 08 Feb 2003 - 22:03
What a way to start your morning with such great news.
(1 reply) #26 KKND on 08 Feb 2003 - 23:05
lol...its funny reading everyone's reply. Some people have "quite" the imagination. Sure it can/will get hacked. But it just proves to their point/view that fileshares do NO good. What good comes from filesharing.....ohh boo hoo.....as one person would say in arrogant voice, "I only download a few songs from the artist....and then if I like it enough I'll run out to the store, this very minute, and buy their cd....". Or my favorite reply, "I'm [u]ONLY[/u] sampling their music. You know....previewing it..... .....Hmm, now what will I ever do with my 60gig hard-drive...And only 10gig are filled....such a waste of space." or...."Its [u]not[/u] like its hurting anyone if I download the WHOLE CD......just look at the economy." I also got pleny more "qoutes", if you want to hear them. Their "quite" entertaining. LOL Also - another thing. I'll bet more than 75% of the people on this board, if they were given the opportunity to steal something, such as a candy bar in the open of a gas station - you would take it. NOW, lets apply that to this same situation of p2p. So, if an entire artists songs were available to download via p2p, wouldn't you be tempted to take/download it?...err...steal it (sorry, had to use correct grammar and spelling) ??? Well, I'm not going to start a flame war and call everyone ignorant ( )....because that would not settle very good with everyone. All-in-all I wish inernet users would take better responsibility/control of themselves. KKND
#26.1 riotkittie on 09 Feb 2003 - 01:15
I think it's asinine to say no good comes from filesharing. At the very least:[list] [*]people are given an opportunity to discover artists & genres that may not have been easily available to them otherwise.[/*] [*]people actually have the opportunity to sample a product & make informed decisions before they purchase their CDs. This is good for the consumer, the artist, the recording companies and retailers, as well.[/*] [*]people no longer have to shell out cash for the same piece of DEFECTIVE media over and over and over. In the last 8 years, I have replaced a handful of the _same_ CDs at least three times. (and no, they weren't scratched or otherwise damaged by me). [/*] [*]not only can people can access content they may have on formats like 8 track of vinyl that was never released on CD, making it a lot easier to enjoy their music, but they can also access work that's no longer in print[/*] [*]lesser known/unsigned bands have the opportunity to get their music out there and develop a fan base[/*] [*]artists who are no longer being actively marketed by their record companies because they're not "what the people want" ::insert eye roll here:: have an opportunity to touch base with their fans, and gather new ones, as well.[/*] [/list] I think it's also asinine to assume you know what 75% of the people here would do, and pathetic that you called us thieves. You don't work for the RIAA by any chance, do you? I'm not defending those who download and don't buy, just trying to point out that a lot of people DO purchase their CDs. Sales aren't hurting, if anything, they've increased over the last few years. The RIAA may not be selling what they'd _estimated_ they'd sale, but there are a number of reasons for that (and I believe sharing's down towards the bottom of that list). In 1997, I had 100 CDs. In 2002, I had nearly 1200. Now I'm hovering around 700, thanks to the rejects who broke into my ex's car : I could go on and on and on, but this is already long enough. Guess I'll wander off and throw my FTP up instead
#27 Dashel on 08 Feb 2003 - 23:20
I hear where you are coming from KKND but at some level its kinda hard to 'vote' with my dollar if the RIAA is just going to blame it on piracy anyway. I haven't bought any music from RIAA associated companies in 2 years because I am sick of their business pracitices. It's like the RIAA feels they are entitled to continued profitability and if they aren't then who is the scapegoat? The very small percentage of people who 'steal' the music from P2P? I guarantee they loose more to retail theft than from file sharing. So what, should we mandate body cavity searches (the real life equivalent to DRM) to catch these thieves as well?
#28 vetmalebolgia on 09 Feb 2003 - 01:31
Wow their site is back online, but for how long? Chop Chop hackers

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)