main

AMD Releases Athlon XP 3000+

OrangeSoul   on 10 February 2003 - 10:47 · 19 comments & 1162 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Less than a week after unveiling its fastest processor, Advanced Micro Devices Monday took the wraps off an even faster chip for desktop PCs.The Sunnyvale, Calif.-based semiconductor maker introduced its AMD Athlon XP processor 3000+, which is immediately availability from NEC's Packard Bell consumer line starting in Europe. Some two-dozen U.S. computer manufacturers are expected to follow suit in the next few weeks including Hewlett-Packard.

Priced at $588 in 1,000-unit quantities, the new chip is based on AMD's 32-bit "Barton" architecture and features either 384KB or 640KB of total on-chip cache memory, QuantiSpeed architecture and support for AMD's 3DNow! -- a preset list of multimedia instructions. The new Athlon is compatible with AMD's Socket A infrastructure, and supports the advanced 266 or 333 front-side bus. Like other Athlons before it, the processors were manufactured using AMD's 0.13 micron copper process technology in Fab 30 in Dresden, Germany.

AMD boasts up to 17 percent better performance than a 3.06GHz Pentium 4 from rival Intel.

News source: Internet News


Vatis says he doubts there would be any impact on US sites if the military were to launch a cyberattack. "Even if the world became aware that we were offensively engaged in cyberwar, it wouldn't make US corporations more likely to become attacked. We're going to be attacked no matter what we do. Information warfare is going to be a part of every military conflict from this point forward," he said.

And while the US military may have some powerful weapons of mass disruption, Vatis says, the country needs to do a better job of focusing on its vulnerabilities. "We are a target-rich environment," he said. "So many nation-states are developing information-warfare capabilities. That's what makes the defensive side of this so critical."

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 19 additional comments
#1 Darkness2k on 10 Feb 2003 - 11:49
mmmm 640k onboard cache... Didn't someone say 640kb of memory was all anyone needed? Would this run at around 2.5ghz then? or 2.75? But how long before it comes out? We are still stuck at 2700 in England.
#2 Orog on 10 Feb 2003 - 11:50
woohooo go AMD!!
(4 replies) #3 hardgiant on 10 Feb 2003 - 13:05
YES.....AMD finally has a CPU running at 3 Ghz !!!!!!!!!
#3.1 DJ^TuRKiYe on 10 Feb 2003 - 13:09
the clock speed isn't 3ghz edit: 2.17GHz

Last edited by 3830 on 10 Feb 2003 - 13:19
#3.2 nonick on 10 Feb 2003 - 18:13
[neoquote=#3.1 by DJ^TuRKiYe]the clock speed isn't 3ghz edit: 2.17GHz [/neoquote] but performes better than 3ghz cpu heh... shame on intel!!
#3.3 Jason on 10 Feb 2003 - 18:26
AMD's new rating is compared to a 1.4 Athlon
#3.4 Cody on 10 Feb 2003 - 22:11
[neoquote=#3.3 by Jason]AMD's new rating is compared to a 1.4 Athlon[/neoquote] thats what they say but we al know what they mean...
#4 leebobs on 10 Feb 2003 - 13:10
Hmmmmmmmmmmmm...... Barton
(1 reply) #5 pocket cd-r on 10 Feb 2003 - 13:47
i really want to know if its suppost to beat the hyperthread chip or the normal one. someone buy one and post benchmarks!!!
#5.1 dr3w2k3 on 10 Feb 2003 - 16:18
[neoquote=#5.0 by pocket cd-r]i really want to know if its suppost to beat the hyperthread chip or the normal one. someone buy one and post benchmarks!!![/neoquote] http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,3973,873603,00.asp
#6 CoLdFuSi0n on 10 Feb 2003 - 13:50
oh baby i want
(2 replies) #7 Acid on 10 Feb 2003 - 14:01
It's not 3ghz, it 'performs' like intel's 3ghz
#7.1 TC17 on 10 Feb 2003 - 17:42
The article I read said it was faster than the Intel chips.
#7.2 TC17 on 10 Feb 2003 - 17:44
=
#8 daveS on 10 Feb 2003 - 18:08
yeah runs at 2.17ghz and runs a 512kb L2 cache, which is for a nice 10 - 20 % increase in processing power over the standard XP Chips ... wouldnt mind one .. but just got a 2400+ which is running nice at 2.2ghz
#9 Mav Phoenix on 10 Feb 2003 - 22:05
[quote] NEC's Packard Bell consumer line starting in Europe[/quote] WTF I thought Packard Bells were finished!
#10 Impulfusion on 10 Feb 2003 - 23:06
YEAH BABY! Go AMD!
#11 Boogiman on 11 Feb 2003 - 12:57
have, have, have. i really want one. I have a 2100XP and it is just not somting for me
#12 splendore on 11 Feb 2003 - 15:05
Ya AMD has taken on an IR naming strategy for the Athlon Xp. a 2100+ runs at 1.7 ghz just because its 2,100 doesn't mean it runs at 2.1 Ghz.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)