main

Safari Builds Leak, Apple Closes Seed Program

aco   on 24 March 2003 - 12:30 · 23 comments & 6071 views

Advertisement (Why?)
A seed program for Apple's Safari Web browser has been suspended following numerous widespread leaks to the Internet. Although beta builds of Safari have been publicly released, Apple was also frequently sending developers newer releases containing added features such as tabbed browsing. The most recent leak of beta build 67 prompted Apple to notify members that it was closing the program.

"Due to Safari 67 postings to the internet, we have closed the Safari Seed project," Apple wrote in the e-mail. "We know that the majority of you are not responsible for the leaks to the internet, and we sincerely appreciate your feedback, time and effort with this project."

Many of the private beta builds released through the seed program have ended up online, showcasing progress Apple has made with its new browser. Although tabbed browsing was available in previous leaks through a debug menu, beta build 67 was the first to include a preference for the popular new feature.

View: The full story
News source: Betanews


While marketing can raise awareness, Miller said the real test will be whether AOL subscribers embrace a new broadband service the firm is rolling out on March 31.

"You've got to make a product people want to pay for, with the right content, service and functionality. If you do, great. If not, things won't work," Miller said.

Given the timing of the roll-out, Miller said first-quarter financials due out this spring would not indicate whether AOL has a viable broadband offering. However, he said the second-quarter numbers released this summer would illustrate important "trends" in the company's initial broadband efforts.

While adopting its new approach, AOL would not abandon its core subscriber base of dial-up customers. That profitable business may be mature and not growing, but it throws off hundreds of millions of dollars in cash annually and analysts expect it to remain viable for many years.

In that regard, AOL got some good news recently after Microsoft Corp. threw in the towel on its money-losing Internet dial-up business, saying it would no longer recruit new customers. The change is a boost for AOL, since it can go after the broadband market, the dial-up sector, and customers who want both types of access, without a deep-pocketed competitor to contend with in every sector.

Instead, Microsoft's MSN unit would essentially follow the path laid out by Miller at AOL by striving to persuade savvy computer users to pay for its online service, in addition to high-speed Internet connections sold by others.

The central question is whether savvy computer users who are willing to pay cable firms $40 a month for high-speed connections would keep America Online, too, with its exclusive content and communications. From March 31 to the end of the year, AOL plans to offer this add-on broadband service to existing subscribers for $9.95 a month, $5-a-month less than the previous $14.95 monthly fee that Wall Street analysts said was too high. The service will also include five hours per month of dial-up use.

Matt Davis, a broadband analyst at the Yankee Group, predicts that high-speed Internet use will double over the next few years, from less than 20 percent of households to more than 40 percent. Given the rapid change in the marketplace, Davis said America Online's new approach is critical to its viability.

Thus far, most attempts to get people to pay for content online, when so much is available for free, have failed. For AOL, the formidable challenge, Davis said, is to build a strong enough service that people want to pay for it, in addition to high-speed Internet connection fees paid to others.

"It is absolutely essential at this moment in time," Davis said. "It is a difficult move for AOL to move away from dial-up, which is squarely in its comfort zone, to move into this area where there is a lot more uncertainty. But it is definitely the direction they have to move. They probably should have done it a year ago."

AOL, which planned to kick off the broadband campaign with teaser ads featuring actress Sharon Stone during the Academy Awards, is to advertise on network and cable television over the next six weeks. Company officials said, however, that they will keep a careful watch on developments in the war with Iraq to determine whether marketing dollars need to be reallocated. Nevertheless, company officials said they are determined to launch AOL for Broadband to existing subscribers on March 31, even if some television advertising is delayed.

In the coming days, AOL also plans to unveil a unified voicemail and e-mail system, called AOL Voicemail. It would enable subscribers to have telephone messages at home routed to as many as seven different individual e-mail addresses, where individual computer users can then listen to their audio messages online.

Miller said voicemail and other upgrades to the new product, dubbed AOL 8.0 Plus, are to be added now while others would be introduced later this year. Some of the new features include a redesigned broadband welcome screen, new video partnerships with news organizations, enhanced search capabilities, new online safety and security features, and animated icons for new "Super Buddies" lists. New instant messaging features with options for personalization, known as "Instant Greetings," would be added as well.

With Microsoft backing away from the dial-up business, America Online's unchallenged leadership in that arena would provide the funding needed for broadband marketing and product enhancements. Lisa Hook, head of AOL's broadband team, smiled as she discussed Microsoft's backpedaling.

"Having narrowband to ourselves is huge for broadband. We can amortize the cost of product and programming development across 27 million households being left to us," she said.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 23 additional comments
#1 realmccoy on 24 Mar 2003 - 12:55
Did Apple plan on charging it users for the browser? If the browser is going to ce free who cares if beta are leaked.
(3 replies) #2 CoCoLUS on 24 Mar 2003 - 13:09
i guess they just recognized that introducing another browser to the market is futilely, and now they found a quick way to cancel their product without losing face. closing a product only because some freaks leak their _betas_? just laughable
#2.1 fenixDG on 24 Mar 2003 - 14:16
Read the betanews article a little better They haven't cancelled the product, only stopped the seed program (i.e. giving out beta builds to certain developers outside the company).
#2.2 Jack31081 on 24 Mar 2003 - 16:24
They're still developing it...they're just not gonna let anyone see it until the final product. And releasing Safari is not futile, it'll be the fastest browser available for Mac when it's released.
#2.3 CoCoLUS on 24 Mar 2003 - 17:36
sorry i need to read slower but the title of the newspost is a little misleading then, "Safari Builds Leak, Apple Closes Project", should be apple closes _seed_ project
(4 replies) #3 dougkinzinger on 24 Mar 2003 - 13:12
awwww....poor wittow apple can't take the wittow beta leaks that happen during testing!!
#3.1 Toxikk on 24 Mar 2003 - 13:48
they have the right to do whatever they wish with their project... leaked or not.
#3.2 dougkinzinger on 24 Mar 2003 - 15:49
[neoquote=#3.1 by Toxikk]they have the right to do whatever they wish with their project... leaked or not.[/neoquote] They're the first company to do so.
#3.3 vettimdorr on 24 Mar 2003 - 20:44
Um...No Remember Office 11 Beta 2? Microsoft pulled a leaked copy cause it wasn't ready yet. Apple just doesn't want people to test features that are not completed yet. These aren't beta releases coming out, they're alpha. A lot of features are incomplete, so they know the issue and don't want a flood of bugreports on the same problems....
#3.4 JaggedFlame on 24 Mar 2003 - 21:10
[neoquote=#3.3 by timdorr]Um...No Remember Office 11 Beta 2? Microsoft pulled a leaked copy cause it wasn't ready yet. [/neoquote] Uhh... no. They didn't cancel the program because of it. That's different from just pulling a copy.
#4 jaredbkt on 24 Mar 2003 - 14:25
In typical Neowin tradition, they named the article VERY poorly. Apple IS NOT closing the Safari project, they are only ending the beta seeding program. They got tired of leaks on the net. The full version 1.0 of Safari is expected soon.
#5 ThunderRiver on 24 Mar 2003 - 14:53
Exactly, it is just like beta program for Safari is closed doesn't mean the end product won't show up in market.
(1 reply) #6 Kombatant on 24 Mar 2003 - 16:01
Hehehehe.. i can see this move having widespread support now... [QUOTE] "Due to Longhorn postings to the internet, we have closed the Longhorn beta project," Microsoft wrote in the e-mail. "We know that the majority of you are not responsible for the leaks to the internet, and we sincerely appreciate your feedback, time and effort with this project." [/QUOTE] ROFL
#6.1 SanGreal on 24 Mar 2003 - 20:11
um, the Longhorn (alpha) project IS closed.l
#7 Valkyre on 24 Mar 2003 - 17:03
Apple is closing it's Safari project just because of leaks? What the fuck?
#8 nonick on 24 Mar 2003 - 17:30
pfffffffffft i bet that browser sucked ass, so after the leaks they show people downloading, trying and sending to trash can, so they thought, ughh, this project sux, lets close it.
#9 Afroman on 24 Mar 2003 - 17:33
THEY ARE NOT CLOSING THE BROWSER PROJECT.. JUST THE BETA RELEASE PROGRAM.. IN LAYMEN TERMS... PEOPLE WILL NOT HAVE A COPY OF IT TILL IT'S FINAL.
#10 ike on 24 Mar 2003 - 18:02
holy crap people are freaking stupid.
#11 vettimdorr on 24 Mar 2003 - 20:42
I've edited the topic title to better reflect what's going on....
#12 JaggedFlame on 24 Mar 2003 - 21:12
This kinda sucks. If I were in their shoes, I'd be less concerned about leaks of an unstable product than having more people around to fix bugs for the final version.
(1 reply) #13 ThunderRiver on 25 Mar 2003 - 00:10
Hey! aco, move your bum and change the topic alright? I can see a tons of pep "unable to read" and post comments without thinknig. Like I said in #5, it just closes that beta program that's all, and for those that do read and try to correct everyone's mind, thank you!
#13.1 configure on 25 Mar 2003 - 11:24
[quote]Hey! aco, move your bum and change the topic alright?[/quote] Why would you say that after the title HAS BEEN edited? Give aco a break.
#14 aco on 25 Mar 2003 - 08:28
Yeah FFS! Read the bloody article, I'm terribly sorry that some of you are too stupid to do that and take the title to mean something incorrect. By project I was [b]obviously[/b] referring to the "Safari Seed project" which is quoted in the body of the text. I admit it could be seen as ambiguous, but it's not like: Safari Builds Leak, Apple Cancels Safari

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)