main

Apple Interested in Buying Universal music from Vivendi

OrangeSoul   on 12 April 2003 - 07:43 · 9 comments & 1641 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Apple Computer is in discussions to buy Universal Music, the world's biggest record company, according to media reports. The computer maker is believed to be willing to pay $5bn-6bn for Universal, which has been put up for sale by its cash-strapped parent company, Vivendi.

Vivendi wishes to raise about $7bn by selling some or all of its entertainment assets, which also include television and film studios and theme parks. Neither company would comment on the report, but analysts told BBC News Online that such a deal would make little sense for Apple. "It wouldn't change our recommendation on Apple stock," said one analyst. "But since we were already recommending clients to sell, things couldn't get much worse."

Apple's shares fell almost 7% in early trading in New York, before recovering slightly.

News source: BBC News


Online ambitions

The rationale behind the reported tie-up is Apple's considerable interest in online music.

The firm's iPod music player has been a hit, and its computers are designed with multimedia capabilities such as music and movies as a top priority.

Apple has also been testing services to make distributing music via the internet easier and less controversial.

Some technology analysts have long argued that computer makers need to sign deals with content providers, as a way of differentiating their products at a time of increasing competition and falling prices.

But going to the lengths of purchasing a record company, rather than simply signing a content deal of some sort, is seen as an unlikely step for Apple.

In the dark

The reports have sown further confusion in what was already a murky sell-off process for Universal.

Vivendi refuses to speak about the progress of talks, and is unwilling to speculate even in the most general terms about what it wants to achieve.

It is still far from clear, for example, whether the music business will be sold separately from other Universal assets.

Various companies have reportedly sniffed around, but the only offer so far has come from oilman-turned-investor Marvin Davis, who has bid $13bn for 85% of the whole entertainment business.

According to press reports last year, Vivendi turned down an offer from Mr Davis in November.

The price tags currently under discussion may well be too small for Vivendi's expectations: Universal Music alone enjoys $6bn in annual revenues.


Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 9 additional comments
#1 Wing on 12 Apr 2003 - 08:24
perhaps apple would not want to be so dependant on computer sales.
#2 kairon on 12 Apr 2003 - 11:47
Well this would help the cause for the rumored "iMusic" service Apple is planning.
#3 Jerichohol on 12 Apr 2003 - 13:59
this is a good idea, it may make the music industry change, and apple is definately a great innovator. Let us see how this works, maybe good or bad for the customer
#4 Jstphish on 12 Apr 2003 - 16:12
Hahahaha, I can see Apple selling a new digital music format in which everyone will have to buy only their hardware.
#5 cesardrgn on 12 Apr 2003 - 16:17
That i don't know. Apple with a new format.
#6 Foo Fighter on 12 Apr 2003 - 16:49
Say goodbye to to Music CDs that play in PCs. From now on, it's Mac only.
#7 steelydoubt on 12 Apr 2003 - 18:20
it would probably influence sales of macs and they may change the universal logo to the apple logo and that would be cool.
#8 veggiedude on 13 Apr 2003 - 00:41
"Say goodbye to to Music CDs that play in PCs. From now on, it's Mac only." Not true. The iPod has been crossplatform for some time now. All iPod users will be able to reap the rewards of this. javascript:addsmilie('')
#9 Sticktron on 13 Apr 2003 - 03:23
Wicked !! This would solidify Apple's future, and at the same time create a big player in the music industry (and board member of the RIAA) who has from the start advocated copying music. Remember all those ads encouraging you to copy songs to your iPods?

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)