main

Windows Server 2003 Launch

Tom Warren   on 25 April 2003 - 22:52 · 30 comments & 2866 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Yesterday saw the launch of three new products. Mainly Windows Server 2003 but also Visual Studio .NET 2003 and SQL Server 2000 64-bit Enterprise Edition. On this day there were launch events in nearly every city in Europe and in most states in America. The main launch headed by Steve Ballmer in San Fransico kicked off shortly after the Official UK launch.

The general message of the day from Microsoft themselves was 'do more with less'. Pasted across the stage in America and the UK, Microsoft really wanted everyone to remember this phrase. Gregg, Arnaud and myself represented neowin at the official UK launch and we interviewed Ivo Salmre (manager for .Net and developer tools and technology at Microsoft) and Paul Randle (Server Solutions Marketing Manager at Microsoft) after the main launch event.

Overall the day was fun and interesting. Although the event didn't demonstrate Windows Server 2003 in much depth, it sucessfully managed to show that the .net framework and Windows Server 2003 are the way ahead for Microsoft.

Read more for a round up of all the days events.

Screenshot: The Event
Screenshot: The main hall
Screenshot: What the day was about
Screenshot: The lovely Dell Cluster
Screenshot: Dependability of Windows Server 2003
Screenshot: Visual Studio .NET 2003
Screenshot: MapPoint .NET
Screenshot: How Windows Server 2003 can help
Screenshot: HP's trained staff list
Screenshot: Hang on, aren't you launching VS .NET 2003?
Screenshot: Errors and freezing
Screenshot: Straight from horse's mouth


Most of the day was filled with partners letting everyone know how wonderful Windows Server 2003 is. Although when questioned about the '100% reliability' claim of Microsoft's Server 2003, the microphone was passed on until no-one could answer.

The two speeches that stood out on the day were that of HP and Tesco.com. Both seemed to work very closely with Microsoft and develop great services because of that. The product demonstrations themselves were entertaining but far from 'real'. First off to wow the crowds was a Dell Quad Xeon cluster of 29 blank-metal machines. Each machine had no OS installed and the aim of the demonstration was to show how Server 2003 coupled with ADS (Automated Deployment Services) could be deployed within 11 minutes whether there were 2000 machines or the 29 sitting in the room. The entire installation did indeed take just 11 minutes and although two machines failed, 27 machines were ready with Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition. An impressive demonstration but not one that most could relate to.

Moving on to the next product demonstration of the day. Sitting to the left of the stage was a e7000 series 32-way Itanium 2 system with 32gig of RAM. The aim was to process real live data that typically using a system such as Dual Xeons or Dual Athlons would take near to a month to complete. The claim was that it would take only 45mins. Although we never saw the end of the processing of a "multi-dimensional cube" of data, the data we saw processing was indeed impressive. It showed developers could use such systems and use the WSRM (Windows System Resource Manager) API to allow their programs to change the number of CPU's and balance the load through their own applications.

The third and final demonstration of the day was that of a migration of a SAP based 32-bit database system to its counter part, a 64-bit database system. At the beginning of the demonstration all was well but after the switch MMC began to become unresponsive and the server services wouldn't restart. However, the engineer got everything working (slowly) and the migration was completed sucessfully to the sound of laughter and cheers from the audience. One could only remember Bill plugging in that USB device at the Windows 98 launch.

Confusingly Microsoft used 'Visual Studio .NET' instead of 'Visual Studio .NET 2003' in its slides. A few product boxes were shown and both SQL Server 2000 64-bit Enterprise Edition and Visual Studio .NET 2003 were shown incorrectly. Nevertheless we understood what they meant.

Suprisingly there wasn't a lot of talk or demos of SQL Server 2000 64-bit Enterprise Edition itself. Visual Studio .NET 2003 got a nice airing, showing its capability to intergrate with mobile devices. The main demonstration displayed how a user could use an application designed in Visual Studio .NET 2003 for a company's web server, on a PDA. The customer could edit a record on the PDA device and it would instantly be updated to the database back bone. Microsoft used this opportunity to show off its MapPoint .NET technologies to show how a customer could request a map of a location and display it easily and efficiently on their PDA.

After the event itself we took the chance to put a few questions about Avalon, .Net framework and the future of SQL/Exchange to Ivo Salmre. He was extremely helpful and explained how he believes the .NET framework and Visual Studio .NET 2003 are perfect tools for developers to code in a better way and to be more efficient with their code. It seems Microsoft believes the .NET framework will be a key part of the company's future within the next 2-3 years. Pushing the .NET framework improves coding throughout the industry and having Windows Server 2003 fully supporting the .NET framework and using ASP.NET with IIS6 will only help with this.

As for freebies and press information we were supplied with a bag stamped with Windows Server 2003 over the top which contained a USB stick of memory (32meg). On the stick there are several press releases from important partners and box images of the various Windows Server 2003 releases.

As for the future of Windows Server 2003 we are still waiting on exact confirmation dates of ADAM, RTC, Exchange 2003 and Windows Server 2003's first Service Pack. Most of the big developments in terms of add-ons are supposedly due this summer.

I have included a few photos that we took (see above). The launch itself was fun and it was nice to meet up with certain people and put faces to those names. Here's to the Office 2003 Launch ;)

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 30 additional comments
#1 Xeon™ on 25 Apr 2003 - 22:59
Nice Cream!
#2 Spidoinkel on 25 Apr 2003 - 23:01
Looks fun, sad i missed it.
(1 reply) #3 Arnaudt on 25 Apr 2003 - 23:01
I knew we were right to let creamy do the write up Nice stuff! It was fun ... can't wait till the next one
#3.1 Xeon™ on 25 Apr 2003 - 23:02
lookie lookie, long time no see on MSN.. any who.. i went aswell
#4 vetRadish™ on 25 Apr 2003 - 23:07
Nice article Cream .... Radish.
(1 reply) #5 giantsnyy2002 on 25 Apr 2003 - 23:34
[QUOTE][URL=http://www.neowin.net/staff/creamhackered/articles/server2003/launch/uhoh.jpg] Screenshot: Errors and freezing, note it is Windows 2000[/URL] [/QUOTE] if you look carefully, its Windows XP with classic mode enabled nice article tho
#5.1 creamhackered on 25 Apr 2003 - 23:41
Actually It was Server 2003, I used the wrong caption. Corrected now
#6 andrewfq on 25 Apr 2003 - 23:52
You should have included a picture of you all looking smartly dressed with the goody bags for others to put faces to names.
(2 replies) #7 Avenger on 25 Apr 2003 - 23:57
I'm confused about something. If this was the release for Windows Server 2003 and VS .Net 2003.......then what is this event on May 8th, "Microsoft Windows Server 2003 and Visual Studio .NET 2003 Launch Event. Start Date: 05/08/2003 Start Time: 03:00 PM"? I'm signed up for this one, am I missing anything?

Last edited by 7725 on 26 Apr 2003 - 00:03
#7.1 creamhackered on 26 Apr 2003 - 00:00
Well this was the official launch date of the two products you mentioned. 8th of may for you is just a launch event. Perhaps like the one over here on the 1st of may in the UK.
#7.2 Avenger on 26 Apr 2003 - 00:10
Confusing. The Official Launch date and then a Launch Event later on. Weird. I hope the "Launch Event" I'm going to is as good as yours sounded. Why do I feel cheated somehow. lol?
(3 replies) #8 Mav Phoenix on 26 Apr 2003 - 00:08
Bah I couldn't care less. I'm sick of average people who aren't even people who are doing anything that warrants a workstation in the first place trying to jimmy rig the damn thing to run as one when it isn't.
#8.1 creamhackered on 26 Apr 2003 - 00:18
Righty
#8.2 =NickJ= on 26 Apr 2003 - 08:40
Yo know sum of us do actually use the server as a server, creamhackered and myself just for starters
#8.3 Mav Phoenix on 26 Apr 2003 - 21:20
[neoquote=#8.2 by =NickJ=]Yo know sum of us do actually use the server as a server, creamhackered and myself just for starters[/neoquote] Then I guess I wasn't talking to you was I?
#9 Something on 26 Apr 2003 - 00:58
ooo, i live near Glocester, suprised they didn't hold it at Cheltenham Racecourse
(1 reply) #10 Elektro on 26 Apr 2003 - 01:04
Where is bill gates during all this? He really is dead isnt he!?!?!?!?!?!!!!!!!11111111
#10.1 Darkness2k on 27 Apr 2003 - 10:47
Yeah, I thought he was at these Launches.... Maybe the servers don't interest him
#11 Quick Reply on 26 Apr 2003 - 01:35
does that little icon next to the title mean this is sticky?
(1 reply) #12 kowcop on 26 Apr 2003 - 02:13
a dell cluster in a compaq rack? the shame
#12.1 Pilsbury on 26 Apr 2003 - 16:11
The Dells are in the Dell rack on the right. The Compaq rack will have been holding the Compaq IA64 servers...
(1 reply) #13 DWZ on 26 Apr 2003 - 02:14
pitty they ran out of seats at the Melbourne event
#13.1 Quick Reply on 26 Apr 2003 - 03:17
i wouldn't have gone anyway
(6 replies) #14 zivan56 on 26 Apr 2003 - 02:48
[QUOTE] Errors and freezing[/QUOTE] Reminds me of Windows 98 launch. Its where plug and pray got its name
#14.1 JaggedFlame on 26 Apr 2003 - 03:08
It was actually caused by a CD read error, I think.
#14.2 creamhackered on 26 Apr 2003 - 08:39
It was when Bill Gates first plugged a USB device into a laptop running Windows 98, nothing to do with a CD read error
#14.3 Napalm on 26 Apr 2003 - 11:28
Yep, it was a scanner.
#14.4 JaggedFlame on 26 Apr 2003 - 13:25
My bad.
#14.5 neaos on 26 Apr 2003 - 17:06
It wasn't the launch of Windows 98. There where showing it off at a show and Bill said, " that's why it's still in beta, huh?"
#14.6 creamhackered on 26 Apr 2003 - 19:04
Indeed you're right and he said "This must be why we're not shipping Windows 98 yet?"

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)