main

Fight back against the RIAA!

Mr magoo   on 03 May 2003 - 10:47 · 22 comments & 1566 views

Advertisement (Why?)
To the Recording Industry Association of America, sending threatening messages to online music swappers is a potentially effective way to educate the public that trading copyrighted material is wrong. But to security geeks in the file trading community, the technique is just another volley in the electronic war with peer-to-peer opponents... and a rather trivial one at that. On Tuesday, the RIAA began using the messaging capabilities built into Kazaa and Grokster to send thousands of identical instant messages to music swappers, warning that trading copyrighted songs is against the law.

"It appears that you are offering copyrighted music to others from your computer. Distributing or downloading copyrighted music on the Internet without permission from the copyright owner is ILLEGAL," reads the canned message. "When you offer music on these systems, you are not anonymous and you can easily be identified."

It's not an entirely empty threat. A recent court decision upheld the recording industry's right to compel an ISP to identify a file-swapper. And companies catering to the music and motion picture industries have streamlined the process of scanning p2p networks for copyrighted works and noting each user's Internet IP address, by which they might later be identified. But the copyright cops aren't the only ones watching the p2p networks. Sophisticated users are looking for the tell-tales signs of spies, and noting their IP addresses as well. "There are people monitoring the networks for political reasons, like the RIAA, and there are also people monitoring the networks that are defending the networks," says Jorge Gonzalez, the founder of the p2p news site Zeropaid.com.

Those efforts have produced sizable lists of Internet IP address ranges purportedly used in anti-p2p operations by RIAA, the MPAA, and their equivalents in other countries, as well as firms like MediaDefender, MediaForce, and NetPD that specialize in catching pirates or disrupting file sharing through technical means.

Perhaps we can start messaging them back then!

View: Article @ Security Focus


As Quick Reply posted, for those of you who are wondering what sound commands was added to the last major release of Messenger Plus!, you can find out here.
    2.10.34 Version - 02/05/2003
  • Sound Commands have been re-encoded:
    • Better quality.
    • Fixes problems some people had with the sounds.
  • Sounds are not played anymore when put in a name.
  • Personalised Status window doesn't display a negative count-down on slow computers.
  • No more problem related to exiting toast popups by right clicking on them in MSN Messenger 5
  • No more empty lines with using multiple Personalised Status messages (with '#'). Also, the maximum message count is now 9.
  • Emoticon menu problem fixed, sorry about that.
  • Swedish language added.
  • Minor corrections have been done in some languages.
  • Several other little fixes.



Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 22 additional comments
#1 NESTRAPEZ on 03 May 2003 - 10:53
OK what's the ip?
(2 replies) #2 Gary_Player on 03 May 2003 - 10:53
Between a fake MAC adress, 2 firewalls, N.A.T., and a whole myriad of other security features even if they could do a damn thing I really cant see myself as being afraid of Lars Ulrich...he's skinny, and little...well admitedly so am I but I'm sure my scrawny 160lb frame could KICK THE CRAP OUT OF HIS!!!
#2.1 Jon on 03 May 2003 - 13:40
Dude if u wanna fight against Lars, James Hetfield will probably blow you to bits with a shotgun. Dont mess with heavy metal rednecks.
#2.2 YaddaMe on 04 May 2003 - 01:57
Problem #1... Metallica isn't heavy or metal anymore, and hardly pass for redneck w/ their GQ haircuts and CK underoos.
#3 vetMr magoo on 03 May 2003 - 10:58
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
#4 longwilli on 03 May 2003 - 11:12
they should be banned from the network
(1 reply) #5 madjo on 03 May 2003 - 11:23
I wonder what they'll do to foreign p2p-people... will they try to sue them too? Because they have NO jurisdiction abroad...
#5.1 RangerLG on 04 May 2003 - 14:59
Didn't they just successfully convince the Australian police to shut down that college site and fine those students some insane amounts? They will attempt to reach as far as they can.
#6 Quick Reply on 03 May 2003 - 11:40
riaa is just being plain silly
#7 csdavidson on 03 May 2003 - 12:41
well i'm in the UK, so f*** the RIAA!
(1 reply) #8 ToiletofSadness on 03 May 2003 - 16:11
After all, it is my right to steal!
#8.1 nookadum on 04 May 2003 - 10:15
Yeah, but stealing is just plain stupid.
#9 tophat on 03 May 2003 - 16:33
Okay, so... if they're on the network to gather our addresses/usernames/etc to message us... I would assume that the p2p community would be able to pick up their ip addresses/usernames/etc... Basically, how long will it be before someone starts DDoS'ing each one of these bots as they come online? It's like having that one whiny kid in class who never shut up. Sooner or later, someone always reached over and *WHAP*. (Of course, in today's society, we'd get sued for that too.)
#10 cofrog on 03 May 2003 - 17:43
hehe... welcome to the INTERNET! wonder how many people here have static, unprotected IPs...
(1 reply) #11 Fubar on 03 May 2003 - 17:53
gotta love the riaa to try summat like this..... gotta love static ip's if ya in america ......... GOTTA love not being in america
#11.1 sodapop on 04 May 2003 - 02:36
I have to use a static IP for DSL. I hate dialers, If I choose not to have a static IP I will be forced to use a dialer to dial in to connect and I won't have any of that. Besides, I'm under no direct threat. If put in the position to defend myself I am more than equipped to do so under my terms. I ain't scared of nothing but spiders and the though of being dead.
#12 StuRReaL on 03 May 2003 - 18:43
Aye not being in america rules but the RIAA have gone will to far they are well mardy and i think someone shoudl bring them down. I personally don't the see the problem, once upon a time you'd tape your CD's for your friends or put it on MD, this is just an evolution of that they sell blank tapes then tell u its illegal to copy them :o so why sell tapes/MDs/CDs DOH you have to love contradictions and it seem the RIAA love chasing their own tails
#13 nicedreams on 03 May 2003 - 18:56
Well...if they are going to sue someone, then they should sue everyone that produces blank media. They are giving you the ability to copy the files to CD/Tape/Etc so then they should sue them too. Just saying.... If they ever tried to sue me, then I'd sue all the companies that let me copy the files to CD. I guess you can't sue though, since LEGALY people can make tools to rob people or break into things, but it's ILLEGAL to use them. So (for example) I can make bombs in my own house, but I just can't use them it seems. LOL Same with Fireworks. Apply's to different states in the US. You can buy fireworks, but can get fined or go to jail for using them.
#14 xontroulis on 03 May 2003 - 20:32
Use this prog to block RIAA and similar IPs when using P2P [URL=http://xs.tech.nu/]PeerGuardian[/URL]
#15 castlerain on 03 May 2003 - 22:19
After losing, seems that the RIAA is being a bit childish in their retaliation....
#16 ShiFtedReaLity on 04 May 2003 - 01:22
note to RIAA.. as a song once said.. " Teacher leave them kids alone " riaa.. wanna be big brother.. cant have it.. thats microsoft's title
#17 Cube on 04 May 2003 - 22:25
f*ck the RIAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)