main

Apple becomes largest online music store in the world...

me101   on 05 May 2003 - 16:39 · 68 comments & 8457 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Steve Jobs announced today that "In less than one week we’ve broken every record and become the largest online music company in the world."

With this announcement, Apple says that its revolutionary iTunes Music Store sold over one million songs during its first week. Over half of the songs were purchased as albums, dispelling concerns that selling music on a per-track basis will destroy album sales.

In addition, over half of the 200,000 songs offered on the iTunes Music Store were purchased at least once, demonstrating the breadth of musical tastes served by Apple's groundbreaking online store.

"Apple has created the first complete solution for the digital music age - ou can purchase your favorite music online at the iTunes Music Store, mix your favorite tracks into playlists with iTunes, and take your entire music collection with you everywhere with the super-slim new iPods”, said Steve Jobs.

Other parties are equally pleased at the success of the new Apple iTtunes Music Store. “Hitting one million songs in less than a week was totally unexpected,” said Roger Ames, Warner Music Group’s chairman and CEO. “Apple has shown music fans, artists and the music industry as a whole that there really is a successful and easy way of legally distributing music over the Internet.”

And Doug Morris, Universal Music Group’s CEO comment regarding their new venture with Apple... "Our internal measure of success was having the iTunes Music Store sell one million songs in the first month. To do this in one week is an over-the-top success - Apple definitely got it right with the iTunes Music Store.”

News source: MacCentral
View: Apple Press Release - iTunes Music Store Sells Over One Million Songs in First Week


Version 3.20 beta 5

1. WinRAR "Rename" command allows to modify the name case without
changing the name. Previous versions reported "File already exist"
error when entering the same name with only the case changed.

2. Bugs fixed:

a) WinRAR displayed incorrect file sizes when browsing contents
of UUE files combined from several parts;

b) WinRAR did not restore file modification time when extracting
files in the command line mode if "High precision modification
time" option was disabled in the default compression profile.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 68 additional comments
#1 bboyroe on 05 May 2003 - 16:48
nice 1 apple
(1 reply) #2 Mr. Black on 05 May 2003 - 16:52
This just tells you that the RIAA is fuked in the head. If Apple did this with this much success by charging $.99 per song, they could have done it long ago themselves. What morons...
#2.1 aristotle-dude on 07 May 2003 - 06:13
[neoquote=#2.0 by Mr. Black]This just tells you that the RIAA is fuked in the head. If Apple did this with this much success by charging $.99 per song, they could have done it long ago themselves. What morons...[/neoquote] Dude, it's not just a matter of selling the songs. It's the interface and ease of use. The RIAA does not know how to write the software interface.
(1 reply) #3 wtmcgee on 05 May 2003 - 16:55
when iTunes comes to PC in the fall, windows users will see how awesome this store is. i'm still not sold on buying complete albums from here - but as far as singles go, or a couple of songs from an album i wouldn't exactly buy, this is a great service.
#3.1 Jugalator on 07 May 2003 - 11:24
[neoquote=#3.0 by wtmcgee]when iTunes comes to PC in the fall, windows users will see how awesome this store is.[/neoquote] ... and Apple will notice how awesome their revenue will become I can only congratule them for proving what RIAA refuse to believe -- that people actually wish to buy non-pirated music as long as it isn't ridiculously expensive.
#4 cold on 05 May 2003 - 16:55
well done apple
(1 reply) #5 Marshalus on 05 May 2003 - 16:57
* Marshalus patiently waits for the Windows version.
#5.1 btallack on 05 May 2003 - 16:59
Agreed.
(2 replies) #6 CoLdFuSi0n on 05 May 2003 - 17:04
man i think that its absolutly pathic $.99 for a song
#6.1 bararum on 05 May 2003 - 17:19
what?
#6.2 Jugalator on 07 May 2003 - 11:26
pathic Path"ic, a. [Gr. ?.] Passive; suffering.
#7 vetBroChaos on 05 May 2003 - 17:05
i like that if an artist thinks they can put out a crap cd with only one good song, you can still legally support them by just purchasing the one good song.
(4 replies) #8 David3k on 05 May 2003 - 17:07
DAMN YOU, APPLE! I WILL KILL YOU! I SWEAR IT!
#8.1 vetBroChaos on 05 May 2003 - 17:14
[neoquote=#8.0 by David3k]DAMN YOU, APPLE! I WILL KILL YOU! I SWEAR IT![/neoquote] you ok, pal?
#8.2 nonick on 05 May 2003 - 17:15
[neoquote=#8.0 by David3k]DAMN YOU, APPLE! I WILL KILL YOU! I SWEAR IT![/neoquote] ...
#8.3 Fotix on 05 May 2003 - 20:34
That was good for a laugh! LOL.
#8.4 ibetheone on 05 May 2003 - 23:08
[neoquote=#8.0 by David3k]DAMN YOU, APPLE! I WILL KILL YOU! I SWEAR IT![/neoquote] Alright buddy its time to lay off the crack
#9 Foo Fighter on 05 May 2003 - 17:16
Way to go Apple! Show the other players how to do it right. Congratulations. Now, if my new 10gig iPod would arrive.....
#10 JaggedFlame on 05 May 2003 - 17:22
Nice!
#11 Celtboy on 05 May 2003 - 17:31
Yeh. I just bought the new 3 Doors Down cd at work on an iBook. Dl'd on a T1 in about 7 minutes and then burned to a cd....plays and rips fine on my pc...so....anyway.. I like it. Apple did it right.
(2 replies) #12 timbo3 on 05 May 2003 - 17:38
Are there even that many macs out there? Just wait till Windows users can get in on this. 1 million will look like crap. RIAA surrenders
#12.1 the evn show on 05 May 2003 - 18:12
[neoquote=#12.0 by timbo3]Are there even that many macs out there?[/neoquote] Does there need to be? Are you assuming that every owner of a Macintosh lives in america, is over 18, has a credit card, and wanted to buy music from Apple's store last week. Oh, and to answer your question: According to Apple's last quarterly income statement they sold half a 650,000 macs + 125,000 ipods in the last three months alone, so YES there are one million mac computers out there.
#12.2 jaredbkt on 05 May 2003 - 19:00
Actually, there are over 40 million Mac users.
#13 thornz0 on 05 May 2003 - 18:12
not bad considering its ,ac only. I may support the service when the windows version arrives.
(1 reply) #14 kemical on 05 May 2003 - 18:18
apples are pretty
#14.1 GamblerFEXonlin on 06 May 2003 - 06:37
i think the plastic feel cheap, but they are very silent and that is better then extremely noisy good loking PC. It could even have an S with a cape on it and I would still choose a silent one. Cant listen to music with such a racket...
(7 replies) #15 Aragorn on 05 May 2003 - 19:12
Take that Microsoft!!! Go Apple!
#15.1 hotrod on 05 May 2003 - 19:41
Ummmm........ since when was this a Mac VS. MS topic¿¿ It amazes me how rediculous some kiddies act... The last i checked i believe this was Apple trying to show the music industry that something like this can be done..... it's sure as hell not a matter of Apple trying to outdo MS on something so please grow up ay¿
#15.2 Marshalus on 05 May 2003 - 19:45
I wonder how long it'll take for Microsoft to realize whats going on and start mTunes featuring WMA.
#15.3 mr_skrilla on 05 May 2003 - 20:42
[neoquote=#15.1 by hotrod]Ummmm........ since when was this a Mac VS. MS topic¿¿ It amazes me how rediculous some kiddies act... The last i checked i believe this was Apple trying to show the music industry that something like this can be done..... it's sure as hell not a matter of Apple trying to outdo MS on something so please grow up ay¿ [/neoquote] Good point. Just because apple has this service it means nothing about apple beating microsoft or anything like that. IT's not like just because apple has a music selling service everyone is going to sell their pc's w/ windows and go and buy a damn mac.
#15.4 Krankerz on 05 May 2003 - 22:59
[neoquote=#15.1 by hotrod]Ummmm........ since when was this a Mac VS. MS topic¿¿ It amazes me how rediculous some kiddies act... The last i checked i believe this was Apple trying to show the music industry that something like this can be done..... it's sure as hell not a matter of Apple trying to outdo MS on something so please grow up ay¿ [/neoquote] I think it very much so has something to do with competing with MS. If you have ever done anything with your PC BESIDES looking at porn on Kazaa, then you'd notice that little "Premium Services" button in WMP 9 Series featuring Microsoft's pressPlay service. So there!
#15.5 Octol on 05 May 2003 - 23:18
[neoquote=#15.2 by Marshalus]I wonder how long it'll take for Microsoft to realize whats going on and start mTunes featuring WMA.[/neoquote] If Bill Gates is smart, he'll leave this one alone. In the past, the idea of Apple going under was one of his worst nightmares. If he keeps out of this, he is virtually guaranteed a viable competitor for the foreseeable future.
#15.6 mr_skrilla on 06 May 2003 - 01:54
[neoquote=#15.4 by Krankerz]I think it very much so has something to do with competing with MS. If you have ever done anything with your PC BESIDES looking at porn on Kazaa, then you'd notice that little "Premium Services" button in WMP 9 Series featuring Microsoft's pressPlay service. So there! [/neoquote] Microsoft primary concern with WMP9 is NOT selling music. Do they maybe sell some thru WMP9? yes. But if they were actually trying to make a lot of money selling music through WMP9 I think that it would be a lot different than it is now.
#15.7 GamblerFEXonlin on 06 May 2003 - 06:48
[neoquote=#15.2 by Marshalus]I wonder how long it'll take for Microsoft to realize whats going on and start mTunes featuring WMA.[/neoquote] please, no MS propritary standard. The +3dB trick in their WMA codec doesnt make it any better (mildly put!). MS wants to own j00 ass, when do you think linux will support windows media codecs? how about automatic downloading of a codec that gets a "upgrade" every 3rd month? .AVI is a joke, hundreds of different lousy codecs, good old mpg2 i can play at any windows machine out-of-the-box, divX is dying because of spyware and bloat (can i pls just get the divX hack and it can work with all old divX files video+audio pls and no crappy "playa" omg. Xvid looks promising, but codec packs like Nimo is a nightmare for your system and should be illegal heh.
(1 reply) #16 Jerichohol on 05 May 2003 - 19:12
good job, apple, nice innovation, now with the planned purchase of universal could we see a new generation of digital media?
#16.1 wtmcgee on 05 May 2003 - 19:57
that's just a rumor. doubt it will come to fruition.
(2 replies) #17 antsy on 05 May 2003 - 19:16
And its only avalible to macs? Are [B]MP3 Pro and high bit rates avalible?[/B] I would like some [B]5.1 surround music to download[/B]
#17.1 GamblerFEXonlin on 06 May 2003 - 06:58
[neoquote=#17.0 by antsy] And its only avalible to macs? Are [B]MP3 Pro and high bit rates avalible?[/B] I would like some [B]5.1 surround music to download[/B][/neoquote] A friend of mine converted all his mp3s to mp3 pro, but he found the audio quality to be extremely poor. too bad, all his mp3s was messed up. I adviced him to talk to mp3pro developer but i didnt hear how it went. mp3 pro sounds commercial and appeals only to teens with the "pro," their homepage is cheesy too. So i cant say im too eager to test it out.. But 5.1 surround music and mixes I would [b]love[/b]! Then we get to the format, MPEG4 AAC that apple uses can have up to 48 full range channels, i just wonder about compatibility and quality. AC3 5.1 seems best for spdif passthrough to a receiver (hifi receivers are excellent at decoding DD), but please dont use WMA.
#17.2 Jugalator on 07 May 2003 - 11:29
[neoquote=#17.1 by GamblerFEXonlin]A friend of mine converted all his mp3s to mp3 pro, but he found the audio quality to be extremely poor. too bad, all his mp3s was messed up.[/neoquote] haha, what a moron your friend is Of course mp3 pro will sound worse than mp3 in THAT case... See: 1. Original Audio from CD. 2. Compressed with LOSSY compression to mp3. 3. Compressed AGAIN with LOSSY compression to mp3pro. It's like doing this: 1. Buy a new car. 2. Crash it into a wall. (state #1) 3. Crash it into a wall... again. (state #2) I guess your friend expected the car to be in a better shape in state #2?
(3 replies) #18 CoCoLUS on 05 May 2003 - 20:14
wow, now if we would replace apple with microsoft in the newspost, there would only be flaming and posts about microsoft taking over the world... *sigh*
#18.1 kairon on 05 May 2003 - 20:59
[neoquote=#18.0 by CoCoLUS]wow, now if we would replace apple with microsoft in the newspost, there would only be flaming and posts about microsoft taking over the world... *sigh*[/neoquote] Big difference, buddy. If Microsoft were in it then yes it would be considered taking over the world because they have so much money and products in every area of the computer market, but Apple, does not. Case closed.
#18.2 insurgent on 05 May 2003 - 21:47
Just be happy with the innovation of the Microsoft crapper, and hush.
#18.3 GamblerFEXonlin on 06 May 2003 - 07:02
[neoquote=#18.0 by CoCoLUS]wow, now if we would replace apple with microsoft in the newspost, there would only be flaming and posts about microsoft taking over the world... *sigh*[/neoquote] Of course. M$ would use their properitary and inferiour WMA codec, and force us to use WMP for music playing. omg is wmp slow and bloat compared to winamp 2.81.
(1 reply) #19 timbo3 on 05 May 2003 - 21:06
Does anyone know what kind of file it is and how the licensing works? with WMAs formating often is crappy because of that. I guess it has to be an mp3 for the iPod, right?
#19.1 giantsnyy2002 on 05 May 2003 - 21:15
[neoquote=#19.0 by timbo3]Does anyone know what kind of file it is and how the licensing works? with WMAs formating often is crappy because of that. I guess it has to be an mp3 for the iPod, right?[/neoquote] yea, either MP3 or AAC. Great step for apple... i hope it continues for them, and even more so when they port iTunes to PC
(4 replies) #20 rocks1985 on 05 May 2003 - 21:18
Apple, I would say it's a great service. I would say a lot of your products are good. One problem. Everything you produce is over-priced. Yes, I would love the service if (1) the music selection was more than that of kazaa and (2) if single songs costed a dime, or 10 cents. Also, some songs should be free, if the artist gives the okay. Who else thinks that 10 cents is a lot more reasonable than a dollar?
#20.1 giantsnyy2002 on 05 May 2003 - 21:36
[neoquote=#20.0 by rocks1985]Apple, I would say it's a great service. I would say a lot of your products are good. One problem. Everything you produce is over-priced. Yes, I would love the service if (1) the music selection was more than that of kazaa and (2) if single songs costed a dime, or 10 cents. Also, some songs should be free, if the artist gives the okay. Who else thinks that 10 cents is a lot more reasonable than a dollar? [/neoquote] a dollar is very reasonable... 10 cents would just be too cheap, it would virtually make no money for the artists...
#20.2 insurgent on 05 May 2003 - 21:55
You would find it more reasonable if the songs "costed" a dime? Some people will complain about anything. If they "costed" a quarter, people would complain and say they should be fifteen cents. If they "costed" a dime, then someone would complain that they should "costed" a penny. People spend more than $.99 on a soda or some candy.
#20.3 Krankerz on 05 May 2003 - 23:02
[neoquote=#20.0 by rocks1985](2) if single songs costed a dime, or 10 cents.[/neoquote] 10 cents or a dime? It's the same thing buddy. We're not in the 2nd grade anymore...well...ahem...
#20.4 tntomek on 05 May 2003 - 23:04
[neoquote=#20.1 by giantsnyy2002]a dollar is very reasonable... 10 cents would just be too cheap, it would virtually make no money for the artists...[/neoquote] I disgree. For 10c they would increase volume over 10 fold. I wouldnt bother downloading pirated stuff if a song was that cheap. But $1 is too high IMHO. When artists wake up and realize that they can slowly start cutting out the middleman the price will surely reach 25c or even lower. This is just the beginning of a revolution in the music industry. The next year or 2 is going to be very interesting. I predict in 5 years time movies/games will also be cheaper as the business model must change. Piracy cannot be stoped by the current methods. The only way to stop piracy is by providing cheap service/product that is simply not worth getting illegaly. You can count me in the *new* business model, but until then you can kizzz my azz if you think I'm gonna pay CAN $65 for a video game and $20 for a dvd. For all you anti piracy people out there, you have a good argument but this IS a REVOLUTION which will end in benefiting the consumer...but if everyone thought like you these huge companies would just keep charging us even more then they are now...nothing would ever change...think about it...piracy hurts no one but the deep pockets of large corporations. The ONLY way money will go to the artist is through these online means and not by purchasing $15 albums of whic the artist gets a $1.
(1 reply) #21 redrope on 05 May 2003 - 22:01
I do, of course. Everyone will say so since its cheaper, but the artists wouldnt make anything. Neither would Apple. I think that 99 cents is a fine price. I do agree that maybe they should offer some songs free if the artists give the OK. This would easily seperate the artists that care about giving away music or not. Fine by me.
#21.1 giantsnyy2002 on 05 May 2003 - 22:14
[neoquote=#21.0 by redrope]I do agree that maybe they should offer some songs free if the artists give the OK. This would easily seperate the artists that care about giving away music or not. Fine by me.[/neoquote] sure... the artists give the ok... but the labels wont... im guessing thered be lawsuits against apple by every RIAA member if one song out of the whole store was free...
(1 reply) #22 Mgz on 05 May 2003 - 22:12
It would be nice if Apple allow us to choose the bitrate, people on broadband may choose as highest as possible bitrate while dial-up user can satisfy with 128kbps ACC and 5.1 surround sound intent to movie only, it crap wehn listenning music (at least with me )
#22.1 GamblerFEXonlin on 06 May 2003 - 07:07
on a home theater sustem its very fun!
(1 reply) #23 Dross on 05 May 2003 - 22:32
Are the songs really 128kbs? Ew.. If I wanted to listen to popular shit I'd turn on the radio. Yeah I wanna pay to hear only the popular crap that's shoved in my ears all damn day. Na.. I'll stick to what I like and pay for it if I listen to it more than once.
#23.1 insurgent on 05 May 2003 - 23:05
It's 128kbs ACC, which is equal to or better than 196kbs mp3. And it is just like a music store. They have popular crap, as well as obscure stuff.
#24 jedimasterk on 05 May 2003 - 22:56
I hope they do a Linux version as well as Quicktime 6.2
#25 aaron901 on 05 May 2003 - 23:18
way to go Apple! its really an astounding figure considering its Mac exclusive now. i bet if Apple ports iTunes to Windows and everything is tightly integrated like on the Mac, 1 billion sales isn't far away.
(1 reply) #26 dj1s on 06 May 2003 - 03:12
wonder how much of that 99 cents goes to the artists....anyone know?
#26.1 GamblerFEXonlin on 06 May 2003 - 07:11
[neoquote=#26.0 by dj1s]wonder how much of that 99 cents goes to the artists....anyone know?[/neoquote] a good question, why is this information never in any press releases, i though this market demand would be fulfilled already, and this here apples new service shouldnt be bad.
(2 replies) #27 iomayho on 06 May 2003 - 04:02
you do have to take into account that people who use macs are those that are willing to spend some money...^^ windows user aren't that rich...^^
#27.1 GamblerFEXonlin on 06 May 2003 - 07:12
generalizing are we? i thought mac users was so poor after their mac purchase..
#27.2 sengork on 06 May 2003 - 12:41
[neoquote=#27.1 by GamblerFEXonlin]generalizing are we? i thought mac users was so poor after their mac purchase..[/neoquote] lol good one
(4 replies) #28 Silver Dragon on 06 May 2003 - 05:31
To clear a couple of things up... It's 128Kbps AAC, *not* MP3. The AAC codes is far better, and should sound just as good as the original CD at that quality. We did some tests between the two, and could barly make out a difference between 128AAC and an AIFF. When we did 160Kbps AAC and AIFF we simply could not tell the difference. The lincensing works as follows: You are allowed to burn the files to CD as many times as you like. The only restriction is that you must modify your playlist at least once every 10 burns. So if you burn 10 copies of a CD then change the order every 10 times. They do this to try and prevent you from downloading songs and buring 50 copies for all your friends. You can play this on unlimited iPods, old and new. The Firmware update will allow you to use AAC on all old iPods, and the new iPods already have cooler firmware on them. You can play the songs on up to 3 Macs, but no more. Are there easy ways to get around all of these? Oh yeah. Apple is not trying to shove DRM down everyones throat, rather, just trying to keep "the honest people honest". For the record, there are over 25 million Macintosh users out there. Apple has amazing power and influence in the marketplace, and when they speak people listen. Keep in mind that Apple released Mac OS X and within 2 years it became the largest *nix variant out there. More popular than all other flavors of Unix and Linux combined. You may not like them, but you have to admire what they have going. Hope that helps to clear some things up.
#28.1 sttroopers on 06 May 2003 - 06:20
Now just imagine how popular OS X would be if people didnt have to own a mac to use it.
#28.2 GamblerFEXonlin on 06 May 2003 - 07:20
[neoquote=#28.0 by Silver Dragon]You can play this on unlimited iPods, old and new. The Firmware update will allow you to use AAC on all old iPods, and the new iPods already have cooler firmware on them. You can play the songs on up to 3 Macs, but no more. Are there easy ways to get around all of these? Oh yeah. Apple is not trying to shove DRM down everyones throat, rather, just trying to keep "the honest people honest".[/neoquote] I dont see your logic, the honest people would be a problem? And play the songs on 3 macs but no more is DRM in its best example. "Oh yeah" to get around this? can you go in a little more detail, like do you have to hardware mod your ipod or the 3 macs you have, or break a 2048bit encryption key, or re-process the file digitally that take about 10 minutes for each file, or go analogue?
#28.3 dp123 on 06 May 2003 - 17:06
Gambler, a bit cynical? The logic is: if it is extremely easy, like Kazaa, to pirate--even honest people will do it. This will be exactly what RIAA predicts. However, if you make it easy and controlled for the honest people--they will see this STORE as if it was like a Kazaa or Napster and gladly indulge in buying digital music. Or in other words, do you think pirates will change their ways at any price or level of control. '"Oh yeah" to get around this?' How 'bout simply transfer the files to a PC. Or rip the tracks with Toast. These are the two easiest methods--only Apple Macs, iPods, and iTunes recognize the blocks on the AAC files so a simple transfer or rip via other hardware or software can strip out the restrictions. Is that easy enough for you?
#28.4 aristotle-dude on 07 May 2003 - 17:47
[neoquote=#28.1 by sttroopers]Now just imagine how popular OS X would be if people didnt have to own a mac to use it. [/neoquote] Yeah it would get pirated by warez doodz like they do with XP. It would be the death of apple. Remember BeOS anyone? Remember NeXT? Both had versions for X86 aswell as PPC. Wait until the IBM 970 PPC. The 1.4 Ghz blows the doors of the 3 Ghz P4 in some tests let alone the 1.8 or 2.0 Ghz models which are even faster.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)