main

Next target for spam? Cell phones

Michael Stanclift   on 05 May 2003 - 14:46 · 12 comments & 1120 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Get-rich-quick schemes, explicit pornography (or the @neowin.net ever popular penis enlargement), urgent appeals for help from Nigerian colonels. Coming soon to a cell phone near you?

The bulk "spam" that now accounts for as much as three-quarters of all e-mail traffic could soon insinuate its way into movie theaters, subways, and anywhere else Americans take their cell phones, experts said at a forum on spam on Thursday.

Text-messaging services on newer cell phones could enable spammers to reach a tempting new audience, conference panelists said.

Federal law prohibits most telemarketers from dialing cell phones, but no such regulations prevent spammers from sending messages to addresses like 2025551212+cellphonecarrier.com. Because many text services carry a per-message charge, costs to consumers could mount quickly.

Wireless spam is already a problem in Japan, where text messaging has been a popular feature of cell-phone service for years, said an official with NTT DoCoMo Inc., the Japanese telecommunications giant.

News source: CNN


Silicon Substitute

This is the first time light has ever been generated from a molecule by applying electricity, said Phaedron Avouris, manager of nanometer-scale science at IBM Research's Watson Labs.

Light, already the foundation of today's high-speed communication networks, could someday be used to process data in computers and other electronic devices, as engineers run out of ways to cram more performance into silicon chips. Carbon nanotubes with semiconductor properties can be made into transistors much smaller than current silicon transistors, increasing the number of transistors that can be placed on a single chip.

Silicon, the main material used in semiconductors, does not emit light, and therefore can't be used in optoelectronic products, Avouris said. The capability of these nanotubes to generate light means the same type of material is suitable for both electronic and optoelectronic uses, he said. Optoelectronic components include solar cells, light-emitting diodes (LED), and optical-fiber communications products.

Current optical-fiber communications devices are much larger than those that could be constructed from carbon nanotubes, said David Tomanek, professor of physics at Michigan State University. Carbon nanotubes could allow the manufacture of extremely small optical fibers, allowing a greater number of fibers to be placed in a smaller device, he said.

The more fibers in a communications device, the larger the pipe for information to flow through, Tomanek said.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 12 additional comments
#1 Gahmahn on 05 May 2003 - 14:50
I hope someone stops it before it really begins. I don't want to have to shift through 30 or so msgs a day. I'll deactivate my txt msging before i do that.
(1 reply) #2 Tom Servo on 05 May 2003 - 14:58
I wonder why there's no fucking law against spam, especially when it'll cost ME money to receive wireless spam.
#2.1 Marshalus on 05 May 2003 - 15:37
There are some laws about it, in some states. I know in Kansas there is a law that you cannot receive advertisements over a medium which costs you money. This prevents people from sending faxes with ads in them. A guy I went to high school with has a dad who is an attorney who specializes in fighting people who break it. We still get them all the time at work though, which surprises me that a company as big as the one I work for (Target Corp.) wouldn't do something about it. If this does become a problem though, I'll be cancelling my TXT messaging. I like using it, but not enough to get junk mail in it.
#3 Jon on 05 May 2003 - 15:14
Well personally I'd be more worried about viruses hitting mobile phones
#4 longwilli on 05 May 2003 - 15:17
if i got charged for spam on my mobile i would personnal kick the s**t out of them!
#5 bangbang023 on 05 May 2003 - 15:35
I already got a spam text message on my cell phone and so have many of my friends. It's a spanish ad and since I don't know spanish I don't understand it at all, but thank god i get free incoming texts.
#6 CatnipOligarthy on 05 May 2003 - 15:39
this better not start happening...text messaging isnt free...im gonna be really pissed if i start getting spam
#7 Jstphish on 05 May 2003 - 16:02
I don't even use text messaging on my cell because it costs me less and it's easier to call the person and talk to them.

Last edited by 11680 on 05 May 2003 - 16:10
#8 sp00ny boy on 05 May 2003 - 17:20
i think there is only one way to get rid of spam; hunt down the people that are doing it and break all 10 of their fingers so that they can no longer use a keyboard. Ohh, and incase theyre inclined to use speech recognition, break their jaw and half their teeth then they won't do much talking.
#9 Icarus ^i^ on 05 May 2003 - 18:08
I've already gotten loads of spam messages on my cell phone... usually someone pretending to be a girl wanting to chat.. ofcourse with a extra cost every time u reply to them... someone needs to make spam (all spam) illegal now... who needs it anyway?
#10 LunaC on 05 May 2003 - 19:24
I've only had 1 spam on my cell phone, but if i get more I'll just disable text messaging until a spam filter is available... it's bad enough to have to wade thru the 200+ or so I get already per day with email... to have to pay for it directly will really make me VERY mad
#11 ANova on 06 May 2003 - 05:42
lol, this is funny. Text messaging is completely pointless anyway. Just another useless gimmick the cell phone companies use. I mean really; who needs to take pictures, watch tv, make text messages, play games and who knows what else their developing on a damn phone.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)