main

Microsoft: Longhorn to arrive in 2005

Tom Warren   on 07 May 2003 - 19:48 · 36 comments & 651 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Longhorn, the next major version of Windows for desktop PCs, will debut in 2005 and will usher in a new level of graphics for PCs, Microsoft executives said Wednesday.

While Microsoft plans to release "a couple of beta," or test, versions of Longhorn in 2004, the final version of the operating system won't come out commercially until 2005, said Will Poole, senior vice president of the Windows Client division at Microsoft. He made the comments during a speech delivered at the Windows Hardware Engineering Conference (WinHEC) here. Previously, analysts and sources had speculated that Longhorn would come out in late 2004 or early 2005.

"The weight of the company is behind Longhorn," Poole said. "This is a huge bet for the company. It will really change the landscape of what people see."

With Longhorn, Microsoft hopes to improve the visual quality of the computing experience. Company representatives at a WinHEC demonstration of a pre-beta version of Longhorn said that the goal is to be able to run the OS on screens with a resolution of 120 dots per inch or higher.

That's far more refined than screens today. Current 17-inch SXGA displays have a resolution of about 95 dots per square inch, said Bob O'Donnell, an analyst at market research firm IDC.

News source: news.com


The action is predicated on the country's Product Liability Act, which enables consumers to sue for damage resulting from products. There is some question, however, as to whether software qualifies as a product under the terms of the law.

Such lawsuits—especially those that name software vendors as defendants—are relatively rare, thanks to the terms of the user license agreements that accompany virtually every commercial application sold today. License agreements typically require that users agree to use the software as-is and surrender any rights to hold the manufacturer liable for defects or damage caused by the application.

In some cases, large corporate customers have service level agreements that give them the ability to hold their ISPs liable for network outages that affect the companies' ability to do business. But individual consumers don't enjoy such protections and are essentially left to their own devices when it comes to problems such as Slammer.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 36 additional comments
(2 replies) #1 DarkLordSouron on 07 May 2003 - 19:50
i knew that
#1.1 creamhackered on 07 May 2003 - 19:51
You rock
#1.2 DigitalResource on 07 May 2003 - 23:39
he he
(2 replies) #2 blzd|sicmade on 07 May 2003 - 19:55
me too
#2.1 eSouL on 08 May 2003 - 03:51
You roll
#2.2 Krome on 08 May 2003 - 03:54
LOL
#3 Foo Fighter on 07 May 2003 - 20:10
I knew Longhorn wouldn't make it to market by next year. Sad really, I was looking forward to it.
#4 Endeavor on 07 May 2003 - 20:13
I just Longhorn isn't screwed up by limiting users on what you can do with your computer. I know the OS will be awesome but what I am afraid of is the software MS wants to put in their next os's to help stop piracy. No one should steal anything but.. I don't MS tell me what I can or can't do with my computer.
(3 replies) #5 leebobs on 07 May 2003 - 20:49
XP will hit SP4 before Longhorn releases!!! Wow.... Imagine it thats about another 500 as yet undiscovered bugs (Excluding SP2'2 252)... Speed and security increases, support for more future hardware. In 2005 XP will look dated but man it will be stable, secure, well used, industry leading and will have achieved a folklaw status.... Much like Half-life!!
#5.1 SidVicious on 07 May 2003 - 21:18
[neoquote=#5.0 by leebobs]XP will hit SP4 before Longhorn releases!!! Wow.... Imagine it thats about another 500 as yet undiscovered bugs (Excluding SP2'2 252)... Speed and security increases, support for more future hardware. In 2005 XP will look dated but man it will be stable, secure, well used, industry leading and will have achieved a folklaw status.... Much like Half-life!![/neoquote]
#5.2 oggiethefroggie on 07 May 2003 - 22:39
[neoquote=#5.0 by leebobs]XP will hit SP4 before Longhorn releases!!! Wow.... Imagine it thats about another 500 as yet undiscovered bugs (Excluding SP2'2 252)... Speed and security increases, support for more future hardware. In 2005 XP will look dated but man it will be stable, secure, well used, industry leading and will have achieved a folklaw status.... Much like Half-life!![/neoquote] and the original worms dos version, which im amazed to find runs w/o a problem on xp.
#5.3 j.reed on 07 May 2003 - 23:16
[neoquote=#5.0 by leebobs]XP will hit SP4 before Longhorn releases!!! Wow.... Imagine it thats about another 500 as yet undiscovered bugs (Excluding SP2'2 252)... Speed and security increases, support for more future hardware. In 2005 XP will look dated but man it will be stable, secure, well used, industry leading and will have achieved a folklaw status.... Much like Half-life!![/neoquote] And just think, even after longhorn is realeased, potentially more fixes will be out. If Longhorn has DRM, I'll be with my XP for quite some time.
(1 reply) #6 Eth3l on 07 May 2003 - 21:44
2005 - dude that sucks. wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy too long
#6.1 Solarix on 07 May 2003 - 23:47
phuck that im not waiting til 2005 for another OS ill stick to windows chicago
(1 reply) #7 NeoMayhem on 07 May 2003 - 21:50
What the hell does the OS have to do with the DPI you can use a screen at? If I had a 120dpi screen, I could use it on DOS or win3.1 if I wanted
#7.1 Joshie on 08 May 2003 - 00:21
[neoquote=#7.0 by NeoMayhem]What the hell does the OS have to do with the DPI you can use a screen at? If I had a 120dpi screen, I could use it on DOS or win3.1 if I wanted [/neoquote] It's about taking advantage of it. I could just as easily spit at ClearType and say I can read text just fine on an LCD without it.
#8 longwilli on 07 May 2003 - 21:56
didn't it say that in a timeline that was origanaly posted at bink and also posted here few months back?
#9 fdiaz2day on 07 May 2003 - 22:40
Actually, PC World got this story before CNET.
(6 replies) #10 Huezo on 07 May 2003 - 22:45
Longhorn + Palladium = I'd go buy a Mac
#10.1 Rudy on 07 May 2003 - 23:13
[neoquote=#10.0 by Huezo]Longhorn + Palladium = I'd go buy a Mac[/neoquote] enjoy ur mac while i'll enjoy my pc
#10.2 Huezo on 07 May 2003 - 23:22
I will enjoy my unlocked Mac while you enjoy your locked PC
#10.3 Joshie on 08 May 2003 - 00:21
Awww, how cute, another person who has no idea what Palladium actually was.
#10.4 Huezo on 08 May 2003 - 00:26
w00t!
#10.5 mbg on 08 May 2003 - 00:27
who knows, by then maybe OS X will be available for x86
#10.6 Chipi on 08 May 2003 - 11:36
yeah
#11 DigitalResource on 07 May 2003 - 23:41
2005? Damn, maybe I'm dead by than
#12 btallack on 08 May 2003 - 01:02
At least it gives them plenty of time to improve the default skin.
#13 Samoa on 08 May 2003 - 01:12
When R they going to post some real news??? We already knew that. I'm in no rush. Windows XP pro is nice. real nice. me sa happy now.
(1 reply) #14 Xero on 08 May 2003 - 01:35
first its 2003 then 2004 now 2005 this pisses me off so much argh I WANT IT NOW!! , but it will be worth it
#14.1 vacs on 08 May 2003 - 02:19
Longhorn was since ever expected to be released in 2005. I really don't know where you got 2004 or even 2003 from... Same thing for DX10...
#15 V_F on 08 May 2003 - 02:42
well, looks like ill have plenty Milestone ports by then
#16 kljs on 08 May 2003 - 03:14
by that time, maybe a linux insurgent might happen........ M$ might just be desperate, and release it way earlier.....or not... who knows.
(1 reply) #17 kioria on 08 May 2003 - 06:02
what version is windows longhorn? or i should rather say: what is the version of windows longhorn?
#17.1 Jason on 08 May 2003 - 06:28
NT6
#18 altezza on 08 May 2003 - 06:09
I thought next year for Longhorn release
#19 KayMan2K on 08 May 2003 - 07:30
Longhorn is Windows NT 6.0 (WinXP, as we all know, is Windowa NT 5.1)

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)