Hardware Review: Asus V9900 GeForce FX 5800 Ultra
Posted by Steven Parker on 25 May 2003 - 12:42 · 15 comments & 1288 views
- Advertisement
-
-
#1 Posted by leebobs on 25 May 2003 - 13:11
- This comment was removed for violating our guidelines
Yor right, sorry I worded that comment completly wrong. I can only appoligise to the neowin admins, mods and members and say that I won't do it again.
Last edited by 21925 on 25 May 2003 - 13:54
-
#2 Posted by creamhackered on 25 May 2003 - 13:41
- If only I could afford one

-
(1 reply)
#3 Posted by DJ Prem on 25 May 2003 - 14:26
- What the hell is wrong with that site all it loads it the Hardware Fusion background?
? It finally loaded who the hell is mad enought to get a NVIDIA GeForce FX 5800 whilet there is a 5900 hell lot better and stable n not to mention quieter it kicks ATI's 9800 Pro's ass big time
Last edited by 16380 on 25 May 2003 - 14:34 -
#3.1 Posted by RobertH on 26 May 2003 - 12:45
- Urrm
1. You still can't buy a 5900, it is better of course but what you mean 'stable' ? Just because the FX 5800 Ultra used noisy cooling didnt mean it suffered from instability - infact the GPU's are tested stable upto 100*c. But yes, i dont really know why anyone would choose a 5800 Ultra unless money really is burning a hole in their pockets etc.
2. The 5900 does not kick ATI's 9800 big time, its a slim lead 'depending' on the application. The AA implimentation is still inferior and it falls way behind now in 3Dmark03, now that NVIDIA's little ""optimizations"" have been discovered and stoped.
The DOOM3 benchmarks are pretty meaningless too - and as with 3dmark, if its an indication of its pixel shader performance i dont see how its a good choice for future titles. Couple that with the PRICE ratio and the 5900 is going to be about $399 (£399) and $499 (£499) for the Ultra version. Considering all this - i think the 5900 isnt going to enjoy much success.
-
(2 replies)
#4 Posted by David3k on 25 May 2003 - 14:44
- Ah-HA! ATi for Power & Quality, and nVidia for Features and Compatibility!
Glad I sorted that out.
EDIT: no replys plz. and no flaming. -
#4.1 Posted by Guspaz on 26 May 2003 - 19:15
- Oh yes Mr. Admin, we will not post any comments.
Get off your high horse, you are in no position to tell other users where they can and can't post, and what they can and can't reply to.
-
#5 Posted by FearMeAll on 25 May 2003 - 15:24
- hmm...I don't think many folks still have much interest in the 5800 ultra..the 5900 looks more appealing for sure if you want to stick with nvidia. people can buy what they want I suppose.
-
(2 replies)
#6 Posted by Sawyer12 on 25 May 2003 - 17:31
- How much is this going to set me back ? are there any other companys other than Asus that offer the a 5900 card. i havent seen any yet. even though ASUS are a good make ive never had a graphics card off them, usually only motherboards.
-
#6.1 Posted by vacs on 25 May 2003 - 21:04
- PNY : http://www.lynncomp.com/shop5/index.html?loadfile=item11711.html
Gainward: http://www.gainward.com/c-1.html?id=97
MSI : http://www.msi.com.tw/program/products/vga/vga/pro_vga_detail.php?UID=458&MODEL=MS-8929
Myself, I'm probably going to buy the Gainward or ASUS 5900 Ultra, hopefully they arrive soon...
Last edited by 11384 on 25 May 2003 - 23:12
-
(3 replies)
#7 Posted by Trek234 on 25 May 2003 - 18:38
- <<As the first GPU to apply 0.13-micron semiconductor fabrication process>>
It's nice to see Nvidia being so honest right after the 3dmark scandal... -
#7.1 Posted by RobertH on 26 May 2003 - 12:46
- That is honest, the NV30 was the first. The only ATI product that uses 0.13u is the 9600 (RV350 i believe).
-
#7.2 Posted by Guspaz on 26 May 2003 - 19:17
- First announced is not the same thing as first to market.
Pardon me, I think I'm going to go announce a 0.09-micron GPU so I can be the first to have one.
Submit to reddit
Submit to blinklist
Bookmark on del.icio.us
Add to furl
Share on Facebook
Add to Windows Live
keep your skirt on. Calm down.


Other new things are: